throbber
10/13/2017
`
`Partnership Between Drug Giant And Native American Tribe May Affect Patent Challenges : NPR
`
`ON AIR NOW
`NPR 24 Hour Program Stream
`
`&
`
`< Partnership Between Drug Giant And Native American Tribe May
`Affect Patent Challenges
`
`September 19, 2017 · 4:59 PM ET
`
`Listen · 3:37
`
`Queue
`
`Download
`
`ARI SHAPIRO, HOST:
`
`Now a story of strange bedfellows. One is drug giant Allergan, maker of Botox and
`other hugely popular medicines. The other is a small Native American tribe in upstate
`New York. As David Sommerstein of North Country Public Radio and our Planet
`Money team reports, the partnership could make it harder to challenge drug patents.
`
`DAVID SOMMERSTEIN, BYLINE: Allergan's drug for dry eyes, Restasis is a
`blockbuster - 1 and a half billion dollars in sales last year. So the company wants to
`protect its patent for the drug as long as it can, until it expires in 2024. Now, it used to
`be a lot easier to protect patents. A generic drug maker would say, hey, Allergan, your
`Restasis drug isn't new and novel enough to deserve patent protection; we should be
`able to make it, too, and sell it cheaper. But Allergan could tie up the whole thing in
`expensive lawsuits for years. It often worked out in the patent holder's favor. But in
`2011, Congress wanted a change. Bob Stoll was a commissioner for the U.S. Patent and
`Trademark Office who helped streamline the process.
`
`BOB STOLL: An effective and less-costly manner than spending millions of dollars
`going to court.
`
`SOMMERSTEIN: Now instead of a lawsuit, there was a simpler process - a review
`board. And you know what? It worked. The board had its own problems - patent trolls,
`multiple challenges. But the pendulum swung from the patent holder to the patent
`challenger.
`
`MICHAEL SHORE: It's pretty well known as the patent death squad. It's a kangaroo
`court in my opinion.
`
`SOMMERSTEIN: Michael Shore is a patent lawyer in Dallas. He represents big
`companies like Allergan and also public universities. This new review board made his
`job harder. But in January he found a workaround. He was representing the
`University of Florida, and he successfully argued his client's patent couldn't be
`challenged at the review board because it's a state university, part of the government
`of Florida, a sovereign entity. So Michael Shore, sitting at his desk, savoring his
`victory, had a thought. How can I do this for all my clients? He needed more sovereign
`entities.
`
`SHORE: Actually I think I did a Google search on sovereigns, and Indian tribes came
`up.
`
`http://www.npr.org/templates/transcript/transcript.php?storyId=552181878
`
`1/2
`
`MYLAN - EXHIBIT 1144
`Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al. v. Allergan, Inc.
`IPR2016-01127, -01128, -01129, -01130, -01131, -01132
`
`

`

`Partnership Between Drug Giant And Native American Tribe May Affect Patent Challenges : NPR
`10/13/2017
`SOMMERSTEIN: So Shore started calling Indian tribes, and eventually he ended up
`on the phone with Dale White, general counsel for the 13,000-member Saint Regis
`Mohawk Tribe. And they came up with a plan. The Mohawks called Allergan and said,
`hey, give us your Restasis patent, $14 million and some royalties. We'll lease the
`patent back to you so you can make the drug, and we'll protect the patent at the review
`board.
`
`I mean this must be really crazy to just have this plop out of the sky in your lap really.
`
`SHORE: (Laughter) Yeah, it's - we're all kind of shaking our heads a little bit.
`
`SOMMERSTEIN: The Mohawks have a modest casino. But like most Native tribes,
`there's a lot of poverty on the reservation.
`
`SHORE: So having the ability or opportunity that might come along with this business
`venture is life-changing for the tribe.
`
`SOMMERSTEIN: When the deal was announced, there was a lot of blowback. Critics
`called it sleazy, a hornet's nest. David Mitchell is founder of a new not-for-profit called
`Patients For Affordable Drugs. He says he has nothing against the Mohawks. But he
`says the deal keeps generics out of the market, and that means higher prices for people
`who need medicines.
`
`DAVID MITCHELL: Allergan is gaming that system, thwarting the will of Congress,
`finding a way to abrogate the law and thereby hurting patients. And it's flat out wrong.
`
`SOMMERSTEIN: If this sovereignty protection stands up, Indian tribes could end up
`with lots of patents and a substantial revenue stream, and the pendulum would swing
`back in favor of the patent holder. For NPR News, I'm David Sommerstein.
`
`Copyright © 2017 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for
`further information.
`
`NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary
`transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the
`future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.
`
`© 2017 npr
`
`http://www.npr.org/templates/transcript/transcript.php?storyId=552181878
`
`2/2
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket