throbber
Hill, Kyle
`
`From:
`Sent:
`To:
`Cc:
`
`Subject:
`
`Trials <Trials@USPTO.GOV>
`Friday, July 21, 2017 11:34 AM
`Parmelee, Steve; Trials
`Rosato, Michael; Mills, Jad; Devine, Wendy; Phillips, Anna;
`GSpeier@carlsoncaspers.com; 'MSchuman@carlsoncaspers.com';
`mdzwonczyk@sughrue.com; 'tribar@sughrue.com'; 'Azy S. Kokabi
`(akokabi@sughrue.com)' (akokabi@sughrue.com); 'whelan@fr.com'; Michael Kane;
`Jonathan Singer; Susan Morrison
`RE: Conf. Call Request for IPR2016-01127, -01128, -01129, -01130, -01131, and
`-01132
`
`Counsel,
`
`The panel has reviewed Patent Owner’s sur-replies filed in these proceedings, and has determined that additional briefing
`or motion practice is not warranted at this point. Petitioner may address both the substance and the alleged impropriety
`of the sur-replies during oral argument.
`
`Regards,
`
`Andrew Kellogg,
`Supervisory Paralegal
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`USPTO
`andrew.kellogg@uspto.gov
`Direct: 571-272-5366
`
`
`
`
`From: Parmelee, Steve [mailto:sparmelee@wsgr.com]
`Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2017 8:49 PM
`To: Trials <Trials@USPTO.GOV>
`Cc: Rosato, Michael <mrosato@wsgr.com>; Parmelee, Steve <sparmelee@wsgr.com>; Mills, Jad <jmills@wsgr.com>;
`Devine, Wendy <wdevine@wsgr.com>; Phillips, Anna <anphillips@wsgr.com>; GSpeier@carlsoncaspers.com;
`'MSchuman@carlsoncaspers.com' <mschuman@carlsoncaspers.com>; mdzwonczyk@sughrue.com;
`'tribar@sughrue.com' <tribar@sughrue.com>; 'Azy S. Kokabi (akokabi@sughrue.com)' (akokabi@sughrue.com)
`<akokabi@sughrue.com>; 'whelan@fr.com' <Whelan@fr.com>; Michael Kane <kane@fr.com>; Jonathan Singer
`<singer@fr.com>; Susan Morrison <morrison@fr.com>
`Subject: Conf. Call Request for IPR2016-01127, -01128, -01129, -01130, -01131, and -01132
`
`Your Honors,
`
` I
`
` write on behalf of Petitioner Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. to request a conference call to discuss Patent Owner’s
`inclusion of new arguments and new evidence in its sur-replies that were filed on July 14, 2017. Because we believe
`they are not responsive to any purported “new issues” in Petitioners’ Replies, we seek the Board’s guidance regarding
`appropriate remedies. Petitioner believes that some combination of (1) an order finding the new exhibits are entitled to
`no weight; (2) authorization to file a motion to strike; and/or (3) authorization to file substantive briefing to address the
`new exhibits and arguments, are justified. Patent Owner has indicated it opposes Petitioner’s request.
`
`Counsel for Petitioner and Patent Owner are available Thursday July 20, after 1pm Eastern; or Friday July 21, after 11am
`Eastern.
`
`1
`
`MYLAN - EXHIBIT 1136
`Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al. v. Allergan, Inc.
`IPR2016-01127, -01128, -01129, -01130, -01131, & -01132
`
`

`

`
`Respectfully,
`
`Steven W. Parmelee
`Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati
`701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 5100
`Seattle, WA 98104
`
`206-883-2542 Direct
`sparmelee@wsgr.com | www.wsgr.com
`
`
`
`
`This email and any attachments thereto may contain private, confidential, and privileged material for the sole
`use of the intended recipient. Any review, copying, or distribution of this email (or any attachments thereto) by
`others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender immediately and
`permanently delete the original and any copies of this email and any attachments thereto.
`
`2
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket