`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_____________________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`_____________________________
`
`
`MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC., TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA,
`INC. and AKORN INC.,1
`Petitioners,
`
`v.
`
`ALLERGAN, INC.
`Patent Owner.
`
`_____________________________
`
`Case IPR2016-01127 (US 8,685,930 B2)
`Case IPR2016-01128 (US 8,629,111 B2)
`Case IPR2016-01129 (US 8,642,556 B2)
`Case IPR2016-01130 (US 8,633,162 B2)
`Case IPR2016-01131 (US 8,648,048 B2)
`Case IPR2016-01132 (US 9,248,191 B2)
`_____________________________
`
`DECLARATION OF ANNA G. PHILLIPS IN SUPPORT OF
`
`PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR PRO HAC VICE ADMISSION
`
`
`1 Cases IPR2017-00576 and IPR2017-00594, IPR2017-00578 and IPR2017-
`00596, IPR2017-00579 and IPR2017-00598, IPR2017-00583 and IPR2017-00599,
`IPR2017-00585 and IPR2017-00600, and IPR2017-00586 and IPR2017-00601,
`have respectively been joined with the captioned proceedings. The word-for-word
`identical paper is filed in each proceeding identified in the caption pursuant to the
`Board’s Scheduling Order (Paper 10).
`
`
`
`0001
`
`MYLAN - EXHIBIT 1133
`Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al. v. Allergan, Inc.
`IPR2016-01127, -01128, -01129, -01130, -01131, & -01132
`
`

`

`
`
`I, ANNA G. PHILLIPS, hereby declare the following:
`
`1.
`
`I am a member in good standing of the state bars of Texas and California, as
`
`well as numerous United States District Courts and the United States Court of Appeals for
`
`the Federal Circuit.
`
`2.
`
`I have not been suspended or disbarred from practice before any court or
`
`administrative body.
`
`3.
`
`I have never had an application for admission to practice before any court or
`
`administrative body denied.
`
`4.
`
`No sanction or contempt citation has been imposed against me by any court or
`
`administrative body.
`
`5.
`
`I have read and will comply with the Office of Patent Trial Practice Guide and
`
`the Board’s rules of Practice for Trials set forth in part 42 of the Code of Federal
`
`Regulations.
`
`6.
`
`I will be subject to the USPTO Rules of Professional Conduct set forth in 37
`
`C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et seq. and disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a).
`
`7.
`
`I am a patent litigation attorney with experience representing clients in a
`
`number of United States District Courts. I have experience in all stages of litigation, from
`
`preliminary injunction through trial and appeal, and across a wide range of technologies,
`
`including pharmaceutical drugs, formulations, and dosages. My biography is attached hereto
`
`as Exhibit A.
`
`
`
`1
`
`0002
`
`

`

`
`
`8.
`
`In a related matter involving the Patents-at-Issue,2 I am representing Petitioner
`
`Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. in consolidated litigation currently pending in the Eastern
`
`District of Texas. See Allergan, Inc. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al., No. 2:15- cv-
`
`01455 (Lead Case). As a result, I have reviewed the Patents-at-Issue, their relevant file
`
`histories, and the prior art (including the prior art at issue in this Inter Partes Review
`
`proceeding). In addition, I have gained significant familiarity with claim construction issues
`
`pertaining to the Patents-at-Issue.
`
`9.
`
`I have performed a detailed review of the Patents-at-Issue, the parties’
`
`submissions in the present Inter Partes Review proceeding, and the Board’s Decision
`
`instituting Inter Partes Review of the Patents-at-Issue. Additionally, I have served an
`
`essential role in this Inter Partes Review proceeding, including working with the present
`
`Lead Counsel to prepare the Petitioner’s Reply. Based on the foregoing, I have a detailed
`
`understanding of the Patents-at-Issue and the substantive and technical issues involved in this
`
`proceeding.
`
`10.
`
`I am currently applying for leave to appear pro hac vice before the PTAB in
`
`the following related IPR proceedings: (1) IPR2016-01127; (2) IPR2016-01128; (3)
`
`IPR2016-01129; (4) IPR2016-01130; (5) IPR2016-01131; and (6) IPR2016-01132. I have
`
`not applied to appear pro hac vice in any other Inter Partes Review proceedings.
`
`
`2 The “Patents-at-Issue” are U.S. Patent Nos. 8,685,930 B2; 8,629,111 B2;
`
`8,642,556 B2; 8,633,162 B2; 8,648,048 B2; 9,248,191 B2.
`
`-2-
`
`0003
`
`

`

`
`
`11.
`
`I hereby declare that all statements made herein of my own knowledge are true
`
`and that all statements made on information and belief are believed to be true; and further
`
`that these statements were made with the knowledge that willful false statements and the like
`
`so made are punishable by fine or imprisonment, or both, under Section 1001 of Title 18 of
`
`the United States Code.
`
`
`
`Date: July 7, 2017
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/ Anna G. Phillips /
`
`
`
`
`
`Anna G. Phillips
`
`-3-
`
`0004
`
`

`

`EXHIBIT A
`EXHIBIT A
`
`
`
`
`
`0005
`
`0005
`
`

`

`Anna G. Phillips - Attorney Biography - Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati
`
`Page 1 of 1
`
`Contact Information
`
`900 South Capital of
`Texas Highway
`Las Cimas IV, Fifth Floor
`Austin, TX 78746
`Phone | 512-338-5447
`Fax | 512-338-5499
`
`anphillips@wsgr.com
`
`Areas of Expertise
`
`Patent Litigation
`
`ANNA G. PHILLIPS
`
`Associate
`Litigation
`
`EXPERIENCE:
`
`Anna Phillips is an associate in the Austin office of Wilson Sonsini Goodrich &
`Rosati, where her practice focuses on patent litigation, including Hatch-Waxman
`litigation. She has successfully represented clients in district courts across the
`country and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. Anna has had
`success in obtaining favorable outcomes for her clients, including, for example,
`preliminary injunctions prohibiting further commercial sale of potentially infringing
`products. Her strong technical background provides the flexibility and expertise to
`work with a variety of technologies.
`
`Prior to joining the firm, Anna served as a law clerk to the Honorable John D.
`Love of the Eastern District of Texas for three years.
`
`EDUCATION:
`
`(cid:1) J.D., University of San Diego School of Law, 2010
`Cum Laude; Lead Articles Editor, San Diego International Law Journal;
`Editor, Journal of Contemporary Legal Issues
`
`(cid:1) B.S., Architectural Engineering, and B.A., Plan II Honors, The University of
`Texas at Austin, 2007
`
`ASSOCIATIONS AND MEMBERSHIPS:
`
`(cid:1) Member, The Austin Intellectual Property American Inn of Court
`
`SELECT PUBLICATIONS:
`
`(cid:1) "Copyright or Trademark? Can One Boy Wizard Prevent Film Title
`Duplication?" 11 San Diego International Law Journal 319, 2009
`
`ADMISSIONS:
`
`(cid:1) State Bar of California
`
`(cid:1) State Bar of Texas
`
`(cid:1) U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
`
`(cid:1) U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
`
`(cid:1) U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas
`
`(cid:1) U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas
`
`(cid:1) U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas
`
`(cid:1) U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
`
`https://www.wsgr.com/WSGR/DBIndex.aspx?SectionName=attorneys/BIOS/11671.htm
`
`7/7/2017
`
`0006
`
`