throbber
Br. J. Cancer (1990), 62, 591-594
`
`Br. J. Cancer (1990), 62, 591
`
`594
`
`19" Macmillan Press Ltd., 1990
`
`© Macmillan Press Ltd., 1990
`
`SHORT COMMUNICATION
`
`The polyoxyethylene castor oil Cremophor EL modifies multidrug
`resistance
`
`G.J. Schuurhuis, H.J. Broxterman, H.M. Pinedo, Th. H.M. van Heijningen, C.K. van Kalken,
`J.B. Vermorken, E.C. Spoelstra & J. Lankelma
`
`Department of Medical Oncology, Free University Hospital, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
`
`In vitro the presence of P-glycoprotein is associated with the
`possibility to reverse multidrug resistance (MDR) with com-
`pounds with different structural features (Bradley et al.,
`1988). Although many such compounds have been described,
`only a few can be expected to be active
`clinically
`at
`achievable concentrations: quinidine (Tsuruo et al., 1984),
`amiodarone (Chauffert et al., 1987), bepridil (Schuurhuis et
`al., 1987) and cyclosporin A (Slater et al., 1986; Twentyman,
`1988) are examples. During our investigations on the in vitro
`effects of resistance modifiers on daunorubicin and vincristine
`freshly
`accumulation
`in
`obtained human tumour cells
`(Schuurhuis et al., 1989b) we found that Cremophor EL,
`which is a polyethoxylated castor oil used as a solubiliser,
`e.g. of vitamins and of the immunosuppressant drug cyclo-
`sporin A, had effects on drug accumulation similar to other
`resistance modifiers used. In order to study whether this
`effect of Cremophor EL was related to MDR, we inves-
`tigated
`effects of Cremophor EL on anthracycline
`the
`accumulation and anthracycline and vincristine cytotoxicity
`in MDR and sensitive model cell lines and we compared the
`using
`cyclosporin A and
`results
`obtained
`with
`those
`verapamil. Both human squamous lung cancer cells (SW-
`1573, Keizer et al.,
`1989; Broxterman et al., 1989) and
`human myeloma cells (8226, Dalton et al., 1986, 1989b) were
`used. The latter ones are of special interest because of the
`increased in vivo sensitivity of myeloma to a regimen contain-
`ing vincristine, doxorubicin and dexamethasone (the VAD
`regimen) when verapamil is used as a modifier (Dalton et al.,
`1989a). Both types of MDR cells overexpress P-glycoprotein
`(Dalton et al., 1989b; Kuiper et al., 1990).
`Cells were cultured in Dulbecco's modified minimal essen-
`tial medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum
`(Gibco, Paisley, Scotland). The human multiple myeloma
`8226Dox4 and 8226Dox40 cells were cultured in the presence
`of 40 and 400 nM doxorubicin (Adriablastina, Farmitalia,
`Milan, Italy) respectively. SW-1573/2R160 cells were derived
`from SW-1573/2R50 cells (Keizer et al., 1989; Broxterman et
`al., 1989) by continuous exposure to 160 nM doxorubicin.
`Experiments were performed on cells cultured for 1-2 weeks
`without doxorubicin. Cells were allowed to adhere (SW-1573
`cells) or equilibrate in suspension (8226 cells) in six-well
`tissue culture plates (Costar, Cambridge, MA, USA). Then
`they were incubated under 5% CO2 with doxorubicin or
`vincristine sulfate (Sigma Chemical Co., St Louis, MO, USA)
`with or without resistance modifiers for at least three cell
`doubling times. Cell doubling times were 22 h (SW-1573),
`45h (SW-1573/2R160), 36h (8226S), 42h (8226Dox4) and
`44 h (8226Dox40). Thereafter the cells were counted as des-
`cribed by Schuurhuis et al. (1987) using a Sigmex microcell
`counter model CC-I 10. With high concentrations of Cremo-
`
`Correspondence: G.J. Schuurhuis.
`Received 8 January 1990; and in revised form 17 April 1990.
`
`phor EL (>132 jg ml') or when fresh human plasma was
`used, the cells were co-incubated with doxorubicin and Crem-
`ophor EL for 2 h, post-incubated for 2 h with Cremophor
`EL only and further incubated in fresh medium as described
`above. Resistance modifiers used were verapamil.HCI (Sig-
`ma), cyclosporin A (Sandoz AG, Basel, Switzerland), cyclo-
`sporin A in Cremophor EL (Sandimmune, Sandoz, AG) and
`Cremophor EL (Sandoz AG). Cyclosporin A in Cremophor
`EL was used because in this form (Sandimmune) cyclosporin
`A is administered clinically. The choice of the concentration
`of the modifiers used in the cytotoxicity experiments in this
`study is based on other in vitro studies: 1-2I1M cyclosporin
`A and 4 tLM verapamil usually are effective in modulating
`MDR (Durie & Dalton, 1988; further reviewed in Twen-
`tyman, 1988 and Kaye, 1988). The choice of Cremophor EL
`concentrations is based on the amounts present in the cyclo-
`sporin A solutions which are administered in the clinic (as
`Sandimmune), e.g. a final dilution of 2 gM cyclosporin A
`contains 33 fig ml-' Cremophor EL.
`Cellular accumulation and efflux experiments were per-
`formed essentially as described earlier (Schuurhuis et al.,
`1987). Some 0.1-0.3 x 106 cells were incubated for 2 h at
`37C in 550 jil Dulbecco's medium, pH 7.4, lacking NaHCO3
`but containing 20 mM HEPES and 10% fetal bovine serum,
`to which '4C-doxorubicin (Amersham Laboratories, Amer-
`sham, UK) or '4C-daunorubicin (Amersham) was added with
`or without resistance modifiers. The final concentration of
`doxorubicin and daunorubicin was made 0.5 liM by adding
`unlabelled doxorubicin and daunorubicin (Specia,
`Paris,
`France). After two washes with ice-cold phosphate-buffered
`saline, the cells were transferred to liquid scintillation fluid.
`No corrections were made for direct binding of anthracyc-
`lines to the cells since binding was the same whether or not
`modifiers were present and was too low to affect the con-
`clusions (5-20% at maximum). For efflux experiments sen-
`cells were incubated with 0.5 lSM doxorubicin or
`sitive
`daunorubicin. Resistant cells were incubated with 2.5 JAM
`(SW-i 573/2R 160)
`daunorubcin
`doxorubicin
`1 JiM
`or
`(8226Dox4); this resulted in about the same intracellular drug
`amounts as in the sensitive cells in these experiments after 2 h
`After washing with ice-cold
`Dulbecco's
`of incubation.
`medium, the cells were resuspended in fresh ice-cold medium
`and incubated for 1 h at 37°C. After washing the cell-
`associated radioactivity was determined.
`In Table I it is shown that Cremophor EL (132figml-')
`partly reversed doxorubicin resistance in SW-1573/2R160
`cells (the dose modifying factor, DMF, was 6.3; resistance
`index = 77) while only a small effect was observed on the
`parent cell line. With concentrations higher than 132 fig ml-I
`higher dose modifying factors were found (> 10). At a con-
`Cremophor EL had a small
`centration
`of 33 lg ml-'
`although
`significant
`SW-1573/2R160
`cells
`effect
`in
`(DMF = 1.9, see Table I). Two JAM pure cyclosporin A had a
`DMF of 8.3 ± 1.5 (mean ± s.d.
`three
`experiments,
`in
`P<0.01), while 2 JM cyclosporin A (Sandimmune), which
`
`MYLAN - EXHIBIT 1132
`Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al. v. Allergan, Inc.
`IPR2016-01127, -01128, -01129, -01130, -01131, & -01132
`
`

`

`592
`
`G.J. SCHUURHUIS et al.
`
`Table I
`
`Effect of resistance modifiers on doxorubicin cytotoxicity in human squamous lung cancer and
`myeloma MDR and sensitive cells
`DMP
`
`Vp
`(4 pM)
`1.4±0.2
`5.4 ± O..5
`
`IC50 (nM)
`Vp
`CEL
`CEL
`Cycl. Al
`Cell line
`(control)
`(33 zg mt-') (132 jg ml-')
`(16 AM)
`1.6±0.4c
`22±_3c
`1.8±0.6
`SW-1573
`1.5±0.1
`1700±300[77]d
`6.3 ±0.1
`1.9±0.1'
`SW-1573/2R160
`16.8 ± 6.If
`11.0 ± 1.4'
`1.1 ± 0.1
`8226S
`1.4± 0
`12
`2
`1.2
`0.1
`1.1
`0.3
`7.1 ± 1.2'
`4.6 ± 0.2g
`95 ± 12 [7.9]
`5.4 ± 1.79
`8226Dox4
`0.8g
`4.9
`3.4 + 0.3
`2.6 ± 1.3f
`13.3 ± 2.8'
`5.6 ± 2.2
`8226Dox40
`540 + 110 [45]
`-
`8.4 + 2.7
`Vp, verapamil; Cycl. A, cyclosporin A; CEL, Cremophor EL; ICG, doxorubicin concentration resulting in
`50% growth inhibition. aDMF, dose modifying factor = IGC
`without resistance modifier/IC50 with
`resistance modifier. bCycl. A (Sandimmune): 2 laM for SW-1573 cells, 1 gM for 8226 cells (2 jAM cycl. A is
`dissolved in 33 ,lg ml-' CEL and 1 jAM cycl.A in 16.5 fig ml-' CEL). cValues are means ± s.d. from 2-5
`independent experiments. dValues within brackets: IC50 MDR cell line/IC50 parent cell line. eSignificantly
`different from I (P < 0.05, Student's t test). fSignificantly different from 1 (P < 0.02). gSignificantly different
`from I (P<0.01).
`
`contains 33 ytg ml-' Cremophor EL, had a DMF of 16.8
`(Table I). These results show that both compounds as such
`are able to sensitize SW-1573/2R160 cells to doxorubicin and
`that the effects are additive when cyclosporin A is given as
`Sandimmune.
`Also in the human myeloma cell line 8226Dox40 with a
`moderately high doxorubicin resistance index (45, see Table
`I) Cremophor EL (33 fLg ml-') had only a small effect (DMF
`of 2.6, see Table I). Like in SW-1573/2R160 cells, with higher
`concentrations of Cremophor EL the effects on doxorubicin
`cytotoxicity became more pronounced (Table I). On the
`other hand, in 8226Dox4 cells with a low doxorubicin resis-
`tance index (7.9, see Table I) 33 glg ml-' Cremophor EL
`largely reversed doxorubicin resistance (Table I and Figure
`1). One jAM cyclosporin A in Cremophor EL (16.5 yg ml-')
`16 pM) had no greater effect than
`or verapamil (4 or
`Cremophor EL (33 yg ml-') alone (Table I). Figure 1 shows
`the dose - response relationship for Cremophor EL on dox-
`orubicin cytotoxicity: even at concentrations of 4.1 and
`8.2 lAg ml-' (which correspond to dilutions of 1:256,000 and
`1:128,000
`respectively),
`signifcant
`effects were observed.
`These data show that in cells with low levels of MDR
`reversal of resistance with cyclosporin A may have been
`achieved at least partly due to the carrier (Cremophor EL)
`effects alone. This may have important implications for the
`design and interpretation of clinical trials with cyclosporin A
`as reversing agent.
`Interestingly,
`results
`that
`indicate
`cells
`with
`our
`intermediate to high levels of resistance, like 8226Dox40 and
`SW-1573/2R160 cells, may not be good models to predict the
`possible clinical usefulness of resistance modifiers in P-
`glycoprotein-containing tumours. This may be due to the fact
`that drug efflux from cells with low amounts of P-
`glycoprotein can be blocked more efficiently.
`
`Drug accumulation experiments confirmed the findings
`reported above. Cremophor EL significantly stimulated dox-
`orubicin and daunorubicin accumulation in 8226Dox40 and
`SW-1573/2R160 cells, respectively, but not in the sensitive
`cells (Table II). In SW-1573/2R160 cells daunorubicin was
`of doxorubicin,
`used
`instead
`since drug accumulation
`differences between sensitive and resistant cells and impor-
`tantly, effects of modifiers on drug accumulation in resistant
`cells, were much more pronounced for daunorubicin than for
`doxorubicin in these cells. Cremophor EL (132 jg ml-')
`stimulates anthracycline accumulation at least partly by in-
`
`.100.
`
`~40
`
`U 20
`
`0
`
`0.01 -.05 0.1
`Dxorublcpn (FiM)
`Figure 1
`Effect of Cremophor EL on doxorubicin cytotoxicity in
`8226Dox4 and 8226S cells. Myeloma cells were incubated with
`doxorubicin in the presence of increasing concentrations of
`Cremophor EL (CEL) as described in the text. Symbols represent
`means ± s.e. from 2-3 independent experiments, except CEL
`(16.5 fig ml-') (one experiment). 8226Dox4: 0-0, control;
`O 0, CEL (4.1 figml-'); A-A, CEL (8.2 jAgml-'); V-V,
`CEL (16.5Sjgml-'; 0-0, CEL (33figml-'); O-*, CEL
`(132 jg ml-'); x -x, Cycl. A (Sandimmune, 2 1AM). 8226S: 0---
`*, control; *---*, CEL (33jLgml-'); x---x, Cycl. A (2jAM).
`
`Table II
`
`Effect of resistance modifiers on anthracycline accumulation and retention in human squamous lung cancer and
`myeloma MDR and sensitive cells
`
`anthracyclinea
`AEFb
`Cycl.A
`accumulation
`Vp
`Cel
`(8 jLM)
`(132 og mlh')
`(16 jAM)
`(pmol per 106 cells)
`Cell line
`346±52'
`1.18±0.11'
`1.05±0.12
`0.99+0.08'
`SW-1573
`0.39h
`0.45h
`4.39 ± 0.88h
`56 ± 8 [6.2]f
`SW-1573/2R160
`3.09
`2.05
`0.94±0.19
`0.99±0.11
`1.05±0.18
`8226S
`147 17
`0.19h
`0.16'
`0.11h
`1.30
`20 [1.4]
`1.34
`1.24
`107
`8226Dox4
`1.27± 0.17h
`0.18'
`1.30
`1 [1.8]
`1.54
`0.26h
`8226Dox40
`84
`-
`Abbreviations as in Table I. aDrug accumulation (2 h at 37°C) was carried out with 0.5 gM daunorubicin for SW-1573 cells
`and with 0.5 jAM doxorubicin for 8226 cells. "AEF, accumulation enhancement factor = drug accumulation with modifier/drug
`accumulation without modifier. CAnthracycline retention was measured after 1 h of drug efflux; shown are means ( ± s.d.) of
`initial amounts. dREF, retention enhancement factor = drug retention with CEL (1321g ml- ')/drug retention without CEL.
`'Values are means ± s.d. from 2-6 independent experiments each performed in triplicate. fValues between brackets: drug
`accumulation in sensitive cells/drug accumulation in resistant cells. gSignificantly different from 1 (P < 0.05, Student's t test).
`hSignficantly different from 1 (P<0.01).
`
`REP
`1.12±0.17
`1.37 ± 0.09'
`0.98±0.04
`0.05'
`1.08
`
`Anthr.
`retentionc
`12e
`63
`34 ± 8
`72±5
`9
`67
`
`

`

`CREMOPHOR EL MODIFIES MULTIDRUG RESISTANCE
`
`593
`
`creasing its retention in the MDR cells (Table II), as seems to
`be the case for cyclosporin A (Nooter et al., 1989). No
`significant effects of Cremophor EL on anthracycline reten-
`tion were seen in the parent cells. The effects of the modifiers
`on drug cytotoxicity in MDR cells seems to be due for an
`important part to a change in intracellular drug distribution
`instead of to stimulation of drug accumulation as will be
`discussed later. In addition, stimulation of anthracycline
`accumulation by modifiers occurs in a dose-dependent way
`and therefore low concentrations of modifiers stimulate
`anthracycline accumulation only slightly. In order to show
`clearly that the resistance modifiers used stimulate drug
`accumulation in our MDR cells we have chosen higher con-
`centrations of modifiers for accumulation and retention
`experiments than for cytotoxicity experiments.
`We have also determined the effect of Cremophor EL on
`vincristine cytotoxicity in 8226Dox4 cells since vincristine is
`included in clinical protocols for myeloma patients. Figure 2
`shows that Cremophor EL is active in reversing vincristine
`resistance with dose modifying factors of 2.2, 3.2, 8.4 and
`28.7 for the concentrations of 8.2, 16.5, 33 and 132ligmlh',
`respectively. Since the resistance index was 15, this means a
`more than complete reversal of resistance at 132figml-'.
`Interestingly, the sensitive cells were affected too, although to
`limited
`extent (DMF: 2.2,
`Figure
`2). Two gM
`a
`see
`verapamil, a concentration which is ony achievable clinically
`with serious side-effects (Benson et al., 1985; Ozols et al.,
`1987) was less effective than Cremophor EL at a concentra-
`tion of 33 yg ml-' (see Figure 2).
`One major determinant of the efficacy of a drug in the
`clinic can be its ability to bind to proteins (Koch-Weser &
`Sellers, 1976). We have shown previously that an increase in
`the protein concentration signifcantly decreased the potency
`of resistance modifiers such as verapamil, bepridil, diltiazem
`and Ro 11-2933/001 to stimulate anthracycline accumula-
`tion in MDR cells (Broxterman et al., 1987). Table III shows
`that Cremophor EL at concentrations of 33 and 132 fig ml-
`largely retains its ability to reverse doxorubicin resistance in
`8226Dox4 cells at a high protein concentration (compare
`Tables I and III). At this protein concentration the dose
`modifying factors of verapamil, even at a concentration of
`16I1M, are somewhat lower than for Cremophor EL (Table
`III). In addition, when 8226Dox4 cells were incubated in
`fresh human plasma
`for
`2 h
`with
`doxorubicin
`and
`Cremophor EL (132 pg ml-'),
`followed by a 2 h post-
`incubation in plasma with Cremophor EL only, the effect
`was about the same as in control experiments using 10%
`fetal bovine serum in the same incubation protocol (DMF of
`2.5-3.5). These results indicate that proteins probably do not
`strongly interfere with the capacity of Cremophor EL to
`modulate MDR.
`Despite the many studies addressing the mechanism of
`action of resistance modifiers, the answers offered are not yet
`satisfactory. Resistance modifiers seem to act at least partly
`by binding to P-glycoprotein (Safa et al., 1986; Cornwell et
`al., 1986; Foxwell et al., 1989) and competing for drug efflux
`via P-glycoprotein (Bradley et al., 1988), thereby increasing
`drug accumulation in the cell. As an alterntive some resis-
`tance modifiers may act via their detergent effect on mem-
`
`=
`
`=
`
`1001-
`
`80
`
`60
`
`40
`
`20
`
`0
`
`0
`
`0.01
`
`-7-m.
`
`0.1
`Vincristine (IJ.M)
`
`1.0
`
`Figure 2
`Effect of Cremophor EL on vincristine cytotoxicity in
`8226Dox4 and 8226S cells. Cells were incubated with vincristine
`in the presence or absence of Cremophor EL (CEL) or verapamil.
`Each point represents mean ± s.e. of 2-4 independent experi-
`ments. 8226Dox4: 0-O, control; 0-0, CEL (8.2 jgml-');
`A-A, CEL (16.59lgml-'); V-V, CEL (33pgml-'); O-O,
`CEL (1329Agml1');
`U--U, verapamil (0.5I1M); A---A, verap-
`amil (I 9AM); V---V, verapamil (2 9aM). 8226S: *---@, control;
`*---*, CEL (1329fg ml ').
`
`branes as reported for Tween 80 (Carlsen et al., 1976). We
`have shown previously that the action of resistance modifiers
`may be due largely to their effects on the intracellular drug
`localisation instead of on drug accumulation: in cells with
`high levels of MDR doxorubicin is present mainly in the
`cytoplasm in the absence of resistance modifiers. However, in
`the presence of resistance modifiers doxorubicin is mainly in
`the nucleus, as is the situation in drug-sensitive cells (Willing-
`ham et al., 1986; Schuurhuis et al., 1989a; Broxterman et al.,
`1990). Cremophor EL also was able to produce a similar
`change in drug localisation (from mainly cytoplasmic to
`mainly nuclear) in SW-1573/2R160 cells as determined with
`fluorescence microscopy (results not shown). These observa-
`tions offer an explanation for the finding that modifiers such
`as cyclosporin A are able to reverse drug resistance to a large
`extent without strongly affecting drug accumulation (Slater et
`al., 1986; Schuurhuis et al., 1989a; this study).
`Since protein kinase C (PKC) activity has been associated
`with MDR and its reversal (Aquino et al., 1988; Fine et al.,
`1988; O'Brien et al., 1989; Ferguson & Cheng, 1987), it is of
`interest that Cremophor EL, like other resistance modifiers
`such
`verapamil,
`tamoxifen,
`cyclosporin A and
`as
`phenothiazines (Mori et al.,
`1980; O'Brian et al.,
`1985;
`Walker et al., 1989; Schatzman et al., 1981), strongly inhibits
`PKC activity at concentrations comparable to those used in
`this study (Zhao et al., 1989).
`In conclusion, our findings demonstrate that Cremophor
`EL is a potent modifier of MDR in human myeloma cells at
`protein concentrations which closely mimic the in vivo situa-
`tion. Clinical studies in myeloma with Cremophor EL as a
`resistance modifier thus seem warranted. Further, Cremophor
`
`Table III
`
`Reversal of doxorubicin resistance in 8226 MDR cells in protein-richa
`medium
`
`CEL
`(33 lAg ml-')
`
`DMFO
`IC50 (nM)
`CEL
`Vp
`Vp
`(132 ,Ag ml' )
`Cell line
`(control)
`16 gM
`4 "AM
`8226S
`26.3
`5.9c
`-
`1.0
`0.1
`0.3
`1.2
`250 + 71 [9.5]d
`6.2 + 1.f
`5.5 ± 0.7e
`3.5 ± 0.7'
`8226Dox4
`2.0 + 0.7
`Abbreviations as in Table I. aThe growth medium contained 4% bovine serum albumin
`(Sigma) in addition to 10% fetal calf serum. bDMF, dose modifying factor: IC50 minus
`resistance modifier/IC", plus resistance modifier. cValues are means ± s.d. from 2-3
`IC,o 8226Dox4 cells/ICM, 8226S cells.
`dValues between brackets:
`experiments.
`'Significantly different from I (P<0.05, Student's t test). 'Signficantly different from I
`(P<0.02).
`
`

`

`594
`
`G.J. SCHUURHUIS et al.
`
`EL may turn out to be useful in the treatment of other
`P-glycoprotein-containing tumours in addition to myeloma
`since we have found that in vitro the compound was active
`on other P-glycoprotein-containing human MDR cancer cells
`like squamous lung cancer cells (this paper) and ovarian
`cancer cells (submitted) as well as intrinsically resistant P-
`glycoprotein-containing human colon cancer cells (submit-
`ted).
`
`References
`
`AQUINO, A., HARTMAN, K.D., KNODE, M.C. & 4 others (1988). Role
`of protein kinase C in phosphorylation of vinculin in adriamycin-
`resistant HL-60 leukemia cells. Cancer Res., 48, 3324.
`BENSON, A.B. III, TRUMP, D.L., KOELLER, J.M. & 5 others (1985).
`Phase I study of vinblastine and verapamil given by concurrent
`IV infusion. Cancer Treat. Rep., 69, 795.
`BRADLEY, G., JURANKA, P.F. & LING, V. (1988). Mechanism of
`multidrug resistance. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 948, 87.
`BROXTERMAN, H.J., KUIPER, C.M., SCHUURHUIS, G.J., VAN DER,
`HOEVEN, J.J.M., PINEDO, H.M. & LANKELMA, J.
`(1987).
`Daunomycin accumulation in resistant tumor cells as a screening
`model for resistance modifying drugs: role of protein binding.
`Cancer Lett., 35, 87.
`BROXTERMAN, H.J., PINEDO, H.M., KUIPER, C.M. & 7 others (1989).
`Immunohistochemical detection of P-glycoprotein
`in human
`tumor cells with a low degree of drug resistance. Int. J. Cancer,
`43, 340.
`BROXTERMAN, H.J., SCHUURHUIS, G.J., LANKELMA, J., BAAK,
`J.P.A. & PINEDO, H.M. (1990). Towards functional screening for
`multidrug resistant cells in human malignancies. In Proceedings
`Pezcollar Foundation Symposia. Drug resistance: Mechanisms and
`Reversal. Trento, Italy, 19-21 June 1989.
`CARLSEN, S.A., TILL, J.E. & LING, V. (1976). Modulation of mem-
`brane drug permeability in Chinese hamster ovary cells. Biochim.
`Biophys. Acta, 455, 900.
`CHAUFFERT, B., REY, D., COUDERT, B., DUMAS, M. & MARTIN, F.
`(1987). Amiodarone is more efficient than verapamil in reversing
`resistance to anthracyclines in tumour cells. Br. J. Cancer, 56,
`119.
`CORNWELL, M.M., SAFA, A.R., FELSTED, R.L., GOTTESMAN, M.M.
`& PASTAN, 1. (1986). Membrane vesicles from multidrug-resistant
`human cancer cells contain a specific 150- to 170-kDa protein
`detected by photoaffinity labeling. Proc. Nati Acad. Sci. USA, 83,
`3847.
`DALTON, W.S., DURIE, B.G.M., ALBERTS, D.S., GERLACH, J.H. &
`CRESS, A.E. (1986). Characterisation of a new drug resistant
`myeloma cell line which expresses p-glycoprotein. Cancer Res.,
`46, 5125.
`DALTON, W.S., GROGAN, T.M., MELTZER, P.S. & 5 others (1989a).
`Drug resistance in multiple myeloma and non-Hodgkin's lym-
`phoma: detection of P-glycoprotein and potential circumvention
`by addition of verapamil to chemotherapy. J. Clin. Oncol., 7, 415.
`DALTON, W.S., GROGAN, T.M., RYBSKI, J.A. & 6 others (1989b).
`Immunohistochemical detection and quantitation of P-glyco-
`protein in multiple drug-resistant human myeloma cells: associa-
`tion with level of drug resistance and drug accumulation. Blood,
`73, 747.
`DURIE, B.G.M. & DALTON, W.S. (1988). Reversal of drug-resistance
`in multiple myeloma with verapamil. Br. J. Haematol., 68, 203.
`FERGUSON, P.J. & CHENG, Y.-C. (1987). Transient protection of
`cultured human cells
`against
`antitumor
`by
`12-0-
`agents
`tetradecanoyl-13-acetate. Cancer Res., 47, 433.
`FINE, R.L., PATEL, J. & CHABNER, B.A. (1988). Phorbol esters induce
`multidrug resistance in human breast cancer cells. Proc. Natl
`Acad. Sci. USA, 85, 582.
`FOXWELL, B.M.J., MACKIE, A., LING, V. & RYFFEL, B. (1989).
`Identification of the multidrug resistance-related P-glycoprotein
`as a cyclosporine binding protein. Molec. Pharmacol., 36, 543.
`(1988). The multidrug resistance phenotype. Br. J.
`KAYE, S.B.
`Cancer, 58, 691.
`KEIZER, H.G., SCHUURHUIS, G.J., BROXTERMAN, H.J. & 5 others
`(1989). Correlation of multidrug resistance with decreased drug
`accumulation, altered subcellular drug distribution, and increased
`P-glycoprotein expression in cultured SW- 1573 human lung
`tumor cells. Cancer Res., 49, 2988.
`KOCH-WESER, J. & SELLERS, E.M. (1976). Binding of drugs to serum
`albumin. N. Engl. J. Med., 294, 311.
`
`This work was supported by grants from the Netherlands Cancer
`Foundation (IKA VU 88-22) and from the Bristol-Myers Squibb
`Company. We thank Dr W.S. Dalton (Tucson, Arizona) for supply-
`ing the 8226 myeloma cells and Dr H. Joenje (Amsterdam, The
`Netherlands) for his gift of the SW-1573 and the SW-1573/2R50
`cells, from which the SW-1573/2R160 cells used in this study were
`derived.
`
`KUIPER, C.M., BROXTERMAN, H.J., BAAS, F. & 5 others (1990).
`Drug transport variants without P-glycoprotein overexpression
`from a human squamous lung cancer cell line after selection with
`doxorubicin. J. Cell. Pharmacol., (in the press).
`MORI, F., TAKAI, Y., MINAKUCHI, R., YU, B. & NISHIZUHA, Y.
`(1980). Inhibitory action of chlorpromazine, dibucaine and other
`phospholipid-interacting
`drugs
`calcium-activated
`phos-
`on
`pholipid-dependent protein kinase. J. Biol. Chem., 255, 8378.
`NOOTER, K., OOSTRUM, R., JONKER, R., VAN DEKKEN, H., STOK-
`DIJK, W. & VAN DEN ENGH, G. (1989). Effect of cyclosporin A on
`daunorubicin accumulation in multidrug-resistant p388 leukemia
`cells measured by real-time flow cytometry. Cancer Chemother.
`Pharmacol., 23, 296.
`O'BRIAN, C.A., FAN, D., WARD, N.E., SEID, C. & FIDLER, I. (1989).
`Level of protein kinase C activity correlates directly with resis-
`tance to adriamycin in murine fibrosarcoma cells. FEBS Lett.,
`246, 78.
`O'BRIAN, C.A., LISKAMP, R.M., SOLOMON, D.H. & WEINSTEIN, I.B.
`(1985). Inhibition of protein kinase C by tamoxifen. Cancer Res.,
`45, 2462.
`OZOLS, R.F., CUNNION, R.E., KLECKER, R.W. & 4 others (1987).
`Verapamil and adriamycin in the treatment of drug-resistant
`ovarian cancer patients. J. Clin. Oncol., 5, 641.
`SAFA, A.R., GLOVER, C.J., MEYERS, M.B., BIEDLER, J.L. & FEL-
`STED, R.L. (1986). Vinblastine photoaffinity labeling of high
`molecular weight surface membrane glycoprotein specific for
`multi-drug resistant cells. J. Biol. Chem., 261, 6137.
`SCHATZMAN, R.C., WISE, B.C. & KUO, J.F. (1981). Phospholipid
`sensitive calcium-dependent protein kinase: inhibition by anti-
`psychotic drugs. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 98, 669.
`SCHUURHUIS, G.J., BROXTERMAN, H.J., VAN DER HOEVEN, J.J.M.,
`PINEDO, H.M. & LANKELMA, J. (1987). Potentiation of dox-
`orubicin cytotoxicity by the calcium antagonist bepridil
`in
`anthracycline-resistant and -sensitive cell
`lines. A comparison
`with verapamil. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol., 20, 285.
`SCHUURHUIS, G.J., BROXTERMAN, H.J., CERVANTES, A. & 5 others
`(1989a). Quantitative determination of factors contributing to
`doxorubicin resistance in multidrug resistant cells. J. Natl Cancer
`Inst., 81, 1887.
`SCHUURHUIS, G.J., PINEDO, H.M., CERVANTES, A. & 4 others
`(1989b). Mechanism of anthracycline resistance and its reversal in
`cells with high and low levels of multidrug resistance. Proc. Am.
`Assoc. Cancer Res., 30, 519 (abstract).
`SLATER, L.M., SWEET, P., STUPECKY, M. & GUPTA, S. (1986). Cyc-
`losporin A reverses vincristine and daunorubicin resistance in
`acute lymphatic leukemia in vitro. J. Clin. Invest., 77, 1405.
`TSURUO, T., IIDA, H., KITATANI, Y., YOKOTA, K., TSUKAGOSHI, S.
`& SAKURAI, Y. (1984). Effects of quinidine and related com-
`pounds on cytotoxicity and cellular accumulation of vincristine
`and adriamycin in drug-resistant tumour cells. Cancer Res., 44,
`4303.
`TWENTYMAN, P.R. (1988). A possible role for cyclosporins in cancer
`chemotherapy. Anticancer Res., 8, 985.
`WALKER, R.J., LAZZARO, V.A., DUGGIN, C.G., HARVATH, J.S. &
`TILLER, D.J. (1989). Cyclosporin A inhibits protein kinase C
`activity: a contributing mechanism in the development of nephro-
`toxicity. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 160, 409.
`WILLINGHAM, M.C., CORNWELL, M.M., CARDARELLI, C.O., GOT-
`TESMAN, M.M. & PASTAN, I. (1986). Single cell analysis of
`daunomycin uptake and efflux
`in multidrug-resistant and -
`sensitive KB cells: effects of verapamil and other drugs. Cancer
`Res., 46, 5941.
`ZHAO, F.-K., CHUANG, L.F., ISRAEL, M. & CHUANG, R.Y. (1989).
`Cremophor EL, a widely used parenteral vehicle, is a potent
`inhibitor of protein kinase C. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.,
`159, 1359.
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket