throbber
Page 1 of 2
`
`New Patents Could Sustain Allergan Restasis Franchise Until
`2024
`Jan.14.14 | About: Allergan plc (AGN)
`In its most recent quarterly results, Allergan (NYSE:AGN) stated that its Restasis product
`had $239.3M in net sales for the three months ended September 30, 2013, and $662.4M
`in net sales for the nine months ended September 30, 2013. Allergan gave guidance that
`it expected Restasis to have net sales for the full year of 2013 of $900-920M. This is
`roughly 15% of Allergan's total expected annual product sales. Thus, Restasis appears to
`be a very important product to Allergan.
`
`Restasis is a drug that was approved by the FDA in December 2002. Its active ingredient
`is cyclosporine (0.05% strength) and it is an ophthalmic emulsion. Allergan stated in its
`most recent 10-Q that "The U.S. Patent covering Restasis will expire in May 2014."
`Indeed, the FDA's Orange Book listing of patents for Restasis currently contains only one
`patent, U.S. Pat. 5,474,979 ("the '979 patent"), which expires on May 17, 2014. Fear of
`generic competition for Restasis sent Allergan's shares down more than 10% last summer
`when the FDA issued guidance for how generic forms of Restasis could be developed.
`
`This morning, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office issued a new patent to Allergan for
`"Methods of Providing Therapeutic Effects Using Cyclosporin Components." This is the
`second patent the Patent Office issued in as many weeks from the same family of
`applications that date back to September 2003. There will be a third patent from the family
`issued next week and at least two more issued in the near future. Specifically, on
`December 31, 2013, the PTO issued U.S. Pat. No. 8,618,064 ("the '064 patent"), and
`today the PTO issued U.S. Pat. No. 8,629,111 ("the '111 patent"). Any patents issued from
`this family, including the '064 and '111 patents, will have a term that extends to at least
`2024, a decade longer than the only current Orange Book patent for Restasis that expires
`in a few months.
`
`While the '064 patent claims, "A method of treating or preventing corneal graft rejection ...
`," which may not effectively protect Restasis from generic competition, the brand new '111
`patent issued this morning broadly claims, "A topical ophthalmic emulsion for treating an
`eye of a human comprising cyclosporin A in an amount of about 0.05% by weight ... ."
`
`https://seekingalpha.com/article/1945551-new-patents-could-sustain-allergan-restasis-franchise-until-2024
`
`MYLAN - EXHIBIT 1083
`Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al. v. Allergan, Inc.
`IPR2016-01127, -01128, -01129, -01130, -01131, & -01132
`
`

`

`Page 2 of 2
`
`Thus, it seems to be a broad patent that Allergan can list in the Orange Book and assert
`against any potential generic challenger to Restasis. Indeed, Allergan filed an 8-K with the
`SEC this morning stating, "The Company has submitted the '111 Patent for listing in the
`United States Food and Drug Administration (the "FDA") publication Approved Drug
`Products With Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations, commonly known as the Orange
`Book. The '111 Patent will expire in August 2024."
`
`https://seekingalpha.com/article/1945551-new-patents-could-sustain-allergan-restasis-franchise-until-2024
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket