throbber
Topical Nonpreserved Methylprednisolone
`Therapy for Keratoconjunctivitis Sicca in
`Sjo¨gren Syndrome
`
`Peter Marsh, MD, Stephen C. Pflugfelder, MD
`
`Objective: To review the efficacy and side effects of topical nonpreserved corticosteroid therapy for
`treatment of severe keratoconjunctivitis associated with Sjo¨ gren syndrome.
`Design: Retrospective, noncomparative case series.
`Participants: Twenty-one patients with Sjo¨ gren syndrome–associated keratoconjunctivitis sicca and annoy-
`ing ocular irritation.
`Intervention: Treatment with topical nonpreserved methylprednisolone sodium succinate.
`Main Outcome Measures: Symptom severity, frequency of instillation of artificial tears, corneal fluorescein
`staining scores, resolution of filamentary keratitis, steroid-related side effects.
`Results: Before starting methylprednisolone therapy, all patients were experiencing moderate-to-severe eye
`irritation despite prior punctal occlusion in most cases and frequent use of nonpreserved artificial tears by all.
`After 2 weeks of topical application, three to four times per day, moderate (43%) or complete (57%) relief of
`irritation symptoms was experienced by all patients and no complications were observed. An average decrease
`in corneal fluorescein scores of 2.6 6 0.5 points (on a 12-point scale) was observed, and filamentary keratitis
`resolved in all ten eyes with this condition. Therapy was stopped after 2 weeks in eight patients, and six of these
`patients reported that their symptoms remained at a tolerable level for weeks to months. Lower dose steroid
`therapy was continued in the remaining patients, whose symptoms worsened after attempted weaning. Com-
`plications of corticosteroid therapy in patients receiving prolonged therapy included increased intraocular
`pressure in one patient at 3 months, worsening of pre-existing posterior subcapsular cataracts in one patient at
`6 months, and formation of posterior subcapsular cataracts in another patient at 6 months.
`Conclusions: These findings indicate that topical nonpreserved methylprednisolone is an effective treatment
`option for patients suffering from severe keratoconjunctivitis sicca who continue to experience bothersome eye
`irritation despite maximum aqueous enhancement therapies. They also suggest that inflammation is a key
`pathogenic factor in this condition. Careful monitoring is essential in dry eye patients treated with corticosteroids
`for more than 2 weeks because steroid-related complications (increased intraocular pressure and cataract
`formation) were observed after several months of therapy in this series. Because of the chronic nature of this
`disease and the likelihood of patients developing steroid-related complications with their long-term use, topical
`nonpreserved methylprednisolone therapy appears to be most appropriate for short-term “pulse” treatment of
`exacerbations of keratoconjunctivitis sicca. Ophthalmology 1999;106:811– 816
`
`Ocular irritation is often associated with deficiencies of one
`or more of the constituents of the tear film.1 Among the
`different types of dry eye, aqueous tear deficiency resulting
`from lacrimal gland secretory dysfunction is associated with
`the greatest ocular discomfort and leads to ocular surface
`disease, termed keratoconjunctivitis sicca.1,2
`
`Originally received: May 5, 1998.
`Manuscript no. 98235.
`Revision accepted: November 25, 1998.
`From the Ocular Surface and Tear Center, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute,
`Department of Ophthalmology, University of Miami School of Medicine,
`Miami, Florida.
`A coauthor (SCP) and the University of Miami School of Medicine have
`jointly filed a patent for nonpreserved steroid therapy for dry eye.
`Reprint requests to Stephen C. Pflugfelder, MD, Bascom Palmer Eye
`Institute, 900 NW 17th Street, Miami, FL 33136.
`
`Aqueous enhancement therapies, including artificial tears
`and punctal occlusion, are currently the mainstay of therapy
`for patients with irritation due to aqueous tear deficiency.3
`These treatments may decrease irritation symptoms and
`improve ocular surface disease in many patients, particu-
`larly those with mild disease. In contrast, patients with
`severe keratoconjunctivitis sicca, as typically seen in
`Sjo¨gren syndrome, often complain of annoying irritation,
`photophobia, and intolerance to sustained visual effort de-
`spite maximum use of aqueous-enhancing therapies. These
`patients may also experience acute exacerbations of this
`condition, such as filamentary keratitis, that produce dis-
`abling symptoms.
`The mechanism by which aqueous tear deficiency leads
`to ocular surface disease has been proposed to be secondary
`to increased tear osmolarity, desiccation of surface epithe-
`lium, and to a poorly lubricated ocular surface.4 There is
`
`811
`
`MYLAN - EXHIBIT 1052
`Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al. v. Allergan, Inc.
`IPR2016-01127, -01128, -01129, -01130, -01131, & -01132
`
`

`

`Ophthalmology Volume 106, Number 4, April 1999
`
`increasing evidence that inflammation may be an important
`factor in the pathogenesis of keratoconjunctivitis sicca.
`Squamous metaplasia, a pathogenic condition of reduced
`mucus production by the conjunctival epithelium, is more
`severe in the systemic autoimmune disease Sjo¨gren syn-
`drome than other forms of aqueous tear deficiency.2 Inflam-
`matory cell infiltration, consisting predominantly of T lym-
`phocytes, has been reported to occur in the conjunctiva of
`patients with Sjo¨gren syndrome.5–7 Further, abnormally in-
`creased expression of inflammatory cytokines such as inter-
`leukin-6 (IL-6) and upregulation of the cell surface immune
`adhesion molecules, human leukocyte antigen-DR (HLA-
`DR) and intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1), in the
`conjunctival epithelium have been reported to occur in
`Sjo¨gren syndrome.2,8,9
`Based on these immunopathologic findings, we began
`treating patients with Sjo¨gren syndrome and keratoconjunc-
`tivitis sicca who were experiencing severe and disabling
`symptoms that were unresponsive to aqueous enhancement
`therapy with a topical nonpreserved corticosteroid solution.
`Here we report the results of a retrospective review of the
`safety and efficacy of this therapy in 21 such patients with
`Sjo¨gren syndrome. The results indicate that topically ap-
`plied corticosteroids are a very effective therapy for the
`symptoms and ocular surface disease seen in these patients.
`Side effects were rare, but when present were those typi-
`cally associated with topical steroid therapy (ocular hyper-
`tension and cataracts).
`
`Patients and Methods
`
`After approval by the University of Miami Institutional Review
`Board, the medical records of all patients treated by one physician
`(SCP) with topical corticosteroid solution for aqueous tear defi-
`ciency associated with Sjo¨gren syndrome were reviewed. All pa-
`tients had the diagnosis of either primary or secondary Sjo¨gren
`syndrome. Criteria used for the diagnosis of primary Sjo¨gren
`syndrome were those used previously2 and included all of the
`following: 5-minute Schirmer test without anesthesia less than or
`equal to 5-mm strip wetting, interpalpebral conjunctival and cor-
`neal rose bengal and/or fluorescein staining, presence of one or
`more serum autoantibodies (rheumatoid factor $ 1:160, antinu-
`clear antibody $ 1:160, Sjo¨gren syndrome antibody A [SS-A] or
`Sjo¨gren syndrome antibody B [SS-B]), xerostomia, and absence of
`a connective tissue disease. Those diagnosed as having secondary
`Sjo¨gren syndrome met the above criteria for aqueous tear defi-
`ciency, ocular surface changes, and xerostomia but had been
`diagnosed as having either rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus
`erythematosus, or juvenile rheumatoid arthritis by a rheumatolo-
`gist.
`Records were reviewed to determine the nature and severity of
`symptoms patients experienced both before and after treatment.
`Change in symptoms was graded as no change, 11 (irritation
`symptoms decreased, but still present), 21 (irritation symptoms
`barely noticeable or absent most of the time), and 31 (complete
`resolution of irritation symptoms). The type and frequency of
`topical medications used before methylprednisolone treatment
`were noted, as well as any change in the frequency of “as needed”
`medications (e.g., artificial tears) during or after treatment with
`topical corticosteroid. In cases in which this information was not
`clearly presented in the chart, patients were contacted by tele-
`
`812
`
`phone, and their history and symptomatic response were reviewed.
`Patients were also asked how long their irritation symptoms re-
`mained tolerable after stopping corticosteroid therapy.
`Corneal fluorescein staining was graded from 0 (none) to 12
`(most severe) by one physician (SCP) for each eye before and
`throughout the use of methylprednisolone according to a previ-
`ously reported scoring system that has been routinely used for all
`patients evaluated by the investigator since 1992.1
`Patients were initially treated with the corticosteroid methyl-
`prednisolone. A topical solution of this steroid was prepared by the
`pharmacy of the Bascom Palmer Eye Institute by diluting intrave-
`nous methylprednisolone sodium succinate in nonpreserved sterile
`normal saline solution to final concentrations of 0.1% to 1%.
`Patients were dispensed bottles containing 5 ml of the steroid
`solution and were instructed to keep it refrigerated and to discard
`it after 3 weeks.
`Initial therapy consisted of 1% methylprednisolone three to
`four times a day for 2 weeks. Patients were re-evaluated at that
`time, and based on their symptoms, the methylprednisolone solu-
`tion was either stopped or was continued at a lower frequency
`(usually one drop per day) or dose (0.1%– 0.5%). Two patients
`were changed from methylprednisolone to 1% hydroxymethylpro-
`gesterone (HMS; Allergan, Irvine, CA) and one was switched to
`0.1% fluorometholone (FML; Allergan, Irvine, CA) to reduce
`corticosteroid-related side effects. Any change in symptoms or
`ocular surface disease after this change of medication was noted.
`
`Results
`
`Between December 1994 and June 1996, 21 patients were placed
`on topical nonpreserved methylprednisolone for treatment of the
`irritation symptoms or filamentary keratitis associated with pri-
`mary or secondary Sjo¨gren syndrome keratoconjunctivitis sicca.
`Diagnosis, demographic data, prior therapy, change in symptoms
`and corneal fluorescein staining score after 2 weeks of therapy,
`duration of therapy, and complications are presented in Table 1.
`Nineteen of the 21 patients were women. Ages ranged from 31
`to 79 years (mean, 59 years). Primary Sjo¨gren syndrome was
`diagnosed in 17 of the 21 patients. Of the four patients diagnosed
`with secondary Sjo¨gren syndrome, two had rheumatoid arthritis,
`one had systemic lupus erythematosus, and one had juvenile rheu-
`matoid arthritis.
`All patients were using nonpreserved topical lubricants (tears
`or ointments) before starting methylprednisolone. One patient was
`using topical vitamin A ointment, and one patient was using oral
`cyclosporin A. Two patients (cases 1 and 9 in Table 1) had been
`previously treated with preservative-containing corticosteroid
`preparations with some, but not complete relief of symptoms.
`All patients reported improvement in irritation symptoms after
`2 weeks of methylprednisolone therapy. Moderate improvement in
`symptoms was noted in 43% of patients (9 of 21), and 57% (12 of
`21) of the patients experienced complete relief of their ocular
`irritation. One patient experienced mild discomfort after instilling
`the medication. Therapy was stopped after 2 weeks in eight pa-
`tients who had complete relief of their symptoms. Six of these
`patients reported that their symptoms remained at a tolerable level
`with use of artificial tears for periods ranging from 2 weeks to 6
`months.
`The change in corneal fluorescein staining scores after 2 weeks
`of therapy is presented in Table 1. A mean decrease in corneal
`fluorescein scores of 2.6 6 0.5 points (on a 12-point scale) was
`observed. Fluorescein staining scores decreased by at least 3 points
`in 30 (71%) of the 42 eyes, 7 eyes (17%) had a decrease in staining
`of 2 points, and 5 eyes (12%) had a decrease of 1 point. In addition
`
`

`

`Marsh and Pflugfelder z Steroid Therapy for Dry Eye
`
`Table 1. Clinical Features of Steroid-treated Sjo¨gren Syndrome Patients
`
`Patient
`No.
`
`Age
`(yrs)/
`Gender
`
`Cause of ATD
`
`Prior Therapy*
`
`73 /F
`48 /F
`50 /F
`66 /F
`
`Bion, Inflamase Forte
`Primary SS
`Hypotears PF
`Primary SS
`Secondary SS (RA) Bion
`Primary SS
`Hypotears PF
`
`Therapeutic Response
`after 2 Weeks
`Ocular Surface
`Disease‡
`
`Symptoms†
`31
`31
`21
`31
`
`Right Eye
`31
`31(*)
`11
`31
`
`Left Eye
`31
`31(*)
`31
`31(*)
`
`21
`
`21
`
`21
`
`21
`31
`31
`21
`
`31
`31
`
`31
`31
`31
`21
`31
`21
`21
`31
`
`21
`
`21
`
`11
`
`31
`31
`31(*)
`31
`
`31
`11
`
`31
`31
`31
`31
`31
`31(*)
`11
`31(*)
`
`21
`
`21
`
`31(*)
`
`21
`31
`31(*)
`31
`
`21
`31
`
`31
`31
`31
`31
`21
`31(*)
`11
`31(*)
`
`Treatment
`Duration§
`
`Complications|
`
`2 wks
`6 wks
`6 mos
`2 wks
`
`2 mos,
`3 wks
`3 wks
`
`Increased IOP at 3 mos
`History of ocular HTN, switched
`to FML to minimize rise in
`IOP
`
`7 mos Worsening of pre-existing PSC
`OU at 6 mos
`
`4 wks
`52 wks
`2 wks
`5 mos
`
`2 wks
`5 wks
`
`2 wks
`3 wks
`2 wks
`6 wks
`2 wks
`5 wks
`9 wks
`2 wks
`
`Early PSC at 6 mos, HMS started
`
`Switched to HMS but stopped
`due to burning
`
`Burning and discharge with MP
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`9
`10
`11
`
`12
`13
`
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`
`45 /M Primary SS
`
`53 /M Primary SS
`
`67 /F
`
`69 /F
`36 /F
`65 /F
`53 /F
`
`62 /F
`68 /F
`
`79 /F
`70 /F
`31 /F
`67 /F
`62 /F
`49 /F
`55 /F
`64 /F
`
`Celluvisc, oral CSA, oral
`Bromhexine
`Secondary SS (RA) Hypotears PF, 10%
`acetylcysteine drops,
`Refresh plus
`Refresh plus, Refresh PM
`ointment
`Hypotears PF
`Primary SS
`Secondary SS (JRA) Pred Forte, Aquasite
`Primary SS
`Bion, Refresh plus
`Primary SS
`0.01% transretinoic acid
`ointment, Refresh plus
`Refresh plus
`Refresh plus, Bion
`
`Primary SS
`Primary SS
`
`Refresh plus, Bion
`Primary SS
`Bion
`Primary SS
`HMS, Bion, Refresh
`Primary SS
`Bion
`Primary SS
`Secondary SS (SLE) Refresh Plus
`Primary SS
`Refresh plus, Bion
`Primary SS
`Bion
`Primary SS
`Refresh Plus
`
`SS 5 Sjo¨gren syndrome; PSC 5 posterior subcapsular cataract; IOP 5 intraocular pressure; HTN 5 hypertension; ATD 5 aqueous tear deficiency.
`* BION Tears (hydroxylpropylmethylcellulose, dextran 70; Alcon Laboratories, Ft. Worth, TX), Inflamase Forte (1% prednisolone phosphate, CIBA
`Vision Corp, Duluth, GA), Hypotears PF (polyvinyl alcohol, PEG-400, dextrose, CIBA Vision Corp), Celluvisc (1% carboxymethylcellulose, Allergan,
`Inc, Irvine, CA), CSA 5 2% cyclosporin emulsion, Refresh Plus (0.5% carboxymethylcellulose, Allergan), Refresh PM (mineral oil, petrolatum and
`lanolin alcohol, Allergan, Inc), Pred Forte (1% prednisolone acetate, Allergan, Inc), FML (0.1% fluorometholone, Allergan), Aquasite (polycarbophil,
`PEG-400, dextran 70, CIBA Vision), HMS (1% hydroxymethylprogesterone, Allergan, Inc, Irvine, CA), MP 5 methylprednisolone.
`† 11 5 slight improvement; 21 5 moderate improvement; 31 5 complete relief.
`‡ 0 5 no change; decrease in corneal fluorescein staining score by one point 5 11; 2 points 5 21; 3 points or resolution of filamentary keratitis 5 31;
`(*) 5 resolution of filamentary keratitis.
`§ Duration of treatment at the time of the last follow-up examination.
`\ Complications at the time of the last follow-up examination.
`
`to a decrease in the intensity of fluorescein staining, a change in the
`pattern of staining from diffuse punctate staining to localized
`blotches, as demonstrated in Figure 1, was often observed. Fila-
`mentary keratitis resolved in all ten eyes with this condition (Fig
`2). All patients reported a decrease in the use of topical lubricants
`while on methylprednisolone, in many cases from 10 to 15 times
`per day to once or twice per day.
`Treatment duration ranged from 2 weeks to 1 year (mean, 9.1
`weeks). In those patients still using the medication, the dose of
`methylprednisolone at the time of last evaluation ranged from
`0.5% once a day to 1% twice a day. No complications were
`observed after 2 weeks of therapy. Complications that were likely
`to be related to more prolonged treatment included elevated in-
`traocular pressure and cataracts. Intraocular pressure increased
`from the high teens to 23 mmHg in the right eye and to 24 mmHg
`in the left eye of one patient (case 3, Table 1) after 3 months of
`
`therapy. Once the dose of methylprednisolone was tapered to 0.5%
`twice daily, the intraocular pressure returned to the high teens.
`Pre-existing posterior subcapsular cataracts in one patient (case 7,
`Table 1) worsened after 6 months of therapy. Another patient (case
`9, Table 1) developed minimal posterior subcapsular cataracts in
`both eyes that were noted after 6 months of therapy. The patient
`was using 0.5% methylprednisolone once or twice a day at the time
`the cataracts were noted. The patient stated that she could not
`function off of the steroid, and the methylprednisolone was
`changed to hydroxymethylprogesterone (HMS) once a day. A
`follow-up examination 6 months after switching to hydroxymeth-
`ylprogesterone revealed a distance visual acuity was 20/20 in each
`eye and no change in the cataracts.
`Three patients were changed from methylprednisolone to less
`potent topical corticosteroids. One patient (case 4, Table 1) was
`switched to fluorometholone 0.1% once or twice daily because of
`
`813
`
`

`

`Ophthalmology Volume 106, Number 4, April 1999
`
`Figure 1. Patient 10. A decrease in area of fluorescein staining and change
`in staining pattern from a diffuse punctate exposure zone to blotches was
`observed (Table 1) after 2 weeks of nonpreserved methylprednisolone
`therapy. This was representative of the therapeutic response in most
`patients.
`
`a history of steroid-responsive elevated intraocular pressure. One
`patient (case 9, Table 1) was switched to HMS 1% twice daily at
`first evidence of cataract formation. This dose controlled the pa-
`tient’s ocular irritation over 6 months of follow-up. Another pa-
`tient (case 13, Table 1) was changed from methylprednisolone to
`HMS 1% to reduce the likelihood of steroid-induced complica-
`tions, although she had no evidence of complications at that time.
`This patient had marked improvement in symptoms and ocular
`surface disease after 5 weeks of methylprednisolone treatment.
`After 1 month of using HMS 1% 1 to 2 times a day, she com-
`plained that the drop felt “thick” and clouded her vision. This
`medication was discontinued and the patient’s ocular surface dis-
`ease and symptoms were stable when they were re-evaluated 5
`months later. No cases of infectious keratitis, corneal epithelial
`defects, or sterile corneal thinning were observed throughout the
`follow-up period.
`
`Discussion
`
`This retrospective review of our preliminary experience
`with the use of nonpreserved topical methylprednisolone
`
`Figure 2. Patient 11. Two weeks of methylprednisolone reduced cornea
`punctate epitheliopathy, adherent mucus, and filaments in both eyes
`(Table 1).
`
`814
`
`

`

`Marsh and Pflugfelder z Steroid Therapy for Dry Eye
`
`indicates that topically applied corticosteroid produces rapid
`and dramatic improvement in ocular irritation symptoms
`and the keratoconjunctivitis sicca that develops in aqueous
`tear deficiency occurring in Sjo¨gren syndrome. This therapy
`was used in a group of patients that had constant annoying
`and occasionally disabling irritation symptoms despite max-
`imal aqueous enhancement therapy. It was offered to pa-
`tients to improve the quality of their lives and to allow them
`to perform their daily activities in a more normal fashion.
`All patients reported improvement in irritation symptoms
`within several days of starting steroid therapy, and improve-
`ment in keratoconjunctivitis sicca was clearly evident by the
`2-week follow-up visit. One shortcoming of this study is
`that symptomatic response to therapy was based on a ret-
`rospective review of records rather than completion of a
`formal symptom survey. In most cases in this series, the
`effect of the steroid therapy on irritation symptoms and
`daily function was clearly documented at the 2-week fol-
`low-up visit, and a numeric value in the four-point symptom
`grading scheme that was used could be assigned without
`difficulty. After the 2-week “pulse” of topical methylpred-
`nisolone, the steroid was either stopped or patients were
`switched to a lower concentration of this medication and
`were instructed to taper their dosing frequency. In some
`cases, the medication was stopped after several additional
`weeks while other patients required prolonged low-dose
`therapy to control their irritation symptoms, under close
`monitoring for steroid-related complications.
`It is interesting that irritation symptoms remained at a
`tolerable level in many patients for weeks to months after
`the steroid was stopped. This suggests that steroids may
`decrease or eliminate the factors that cause irritation in
`keratoconjunctivitis sicca and that they are efficacious for
`treatment of acute exacerbations of this condition. No com-
`plications were observed at the 2-week follow-up examina-
`tion that was performed in all patients. Steroid-related com-
`plications were observed in three patients
`receiving
`prolonged topical steroid therapy. These included ocular
`hypertension in one patient after 3 months and posterior
`subcapsular cataracts in two patients after 6 months of
`treatment.
`Keratoconjunctivitis sicca and Sjo¨gren syndrome are es-
`tablished risk factors for microbial keratitis and sterile cor-
`neal ulceration.4 Neither of these corneal complications was
`observed in this series. Because of their immunosuppressive
`effects, corticosteroids could potentially increase the risk
`for developing microbial keratitis or worsen this condition if
`it should develop during therapy. Corticosteroids also sup-
`press corneal wound healing, and they could inhibit healing
`of sterile corneal ulcers.10 Therefore, they should not be
`used in patients with keratoconjunctivitis who have corneal
`epithelial defects, stromal thinning, or stromal infiltrates.
`Because of the chronic nature of Sjo¨gren syndrome ker-
`atoconjunctivitis and the likelihood of patients developing
`steroid-related complications with their long-term use, it
`appears that topical nonpreserved methylprednisolone is
`most appropriate for short-term pulse therapy of acute dis-
`ease exacerbations. Longer term corticosteroid therapy
`should be reserved only for patients with aqueous tear
`deficiency who have disabling irritation symptoms or ocular
`
`surface disease (such as filamentary keratitis) that decreases
`their visual acuity and their ability to function. These pa-
`tients need to be informed of the risks of therapy and to be
`evaluated at frequent intervals to look for signs of steroid-
`related complications.
`The unparalleled anti-inflammatory efficacy of cortico-
`steroids has prompted the investigation of regimens for
`treatment of systemic inflammatory diseases that minimize
`systemic side effects.11–13 Strategies intended to minimize
`complications of systemic steroid therapy have included the
`use of lower doses for rheumatoid arthritis and enteric-
`coated “site-specific” preparations that facilitate delivery of
`the medication to the diseased intestinal mucosa, and min-
`imize systemic absorption, in Crohn disease.11–13 The im-
`proved quality of life and reduced end-organ damage re-
`ported in these clinical trials were thought to outweigh the
`minimal corticosteroid-related side effects that were ob-
`served.11–13
`Other steroid moieties with less potential to cause ocular
`toxicity than methylprednisolone sodium succinate may
`also prove to be useful for therapy of keratoconjunctivitis
`sicca. Methylprednisolone was used in our dry eye patients
`because it could be prepared as a nonpreserved aqueous
`preparation to avoid the well-documented toxicity associ-
`ated with benzalkonium chloride, the preservative in all
`commercially available ophthalmic steroids.14,15 Further-
`more, methylprednisolone has proven efficacy for pulse
`intravenous therapy of systemic and ocular inflammatory
`diseases.16 Several of our patients continued to experience
`improvement in their irritation symptoms after they were
`switched to fluorometholone or hydroxymethylprogester-
`one, two topical corticosteroids that have a lower reported
`propensity to raise intraocular pressure than prednisolo-
`ne.17,18 Because of their lower potential for complications,
`these less toxic steroids appear to be viable options if they
`are formulated without preservatives. Another agent that
`could be considered is loteprednol etabonate, a corticoste-
`roid that is reported to have greater specificity for ocular
`surface epithelial cells, reduced intraocular activity, and a
`lower propensity to raise intraocular pressure.19
`The findings in our study suggest that ocular surface
`inflammation plays an important pathogenic role in the
`ocular irritation and ocular surface disease that develop in
`aqueous tear deficiency. This is further supported by the
`improvement in irritation symptoms and ocular surface dis-
`ease that have been observed from topical therapy with the
`immunosuppressive agent cyclosporin A.20 Indeed, immu-
`nopathologic studies show evidence of immune activation
`of the conjunctival epithelium in Sjo¨gren syndrome. Com-
`pared with normal eyes, a significantly greater percentage of
`conjunctival epithelial cells from patients with Sjo¨gren syn-
`drome express the immune adhesion molecules, HLA class
`II and ICAM-1 antigens.8,9 Furthermore, significantly ele-
`vated concentrations of messenger RNAs (mRNAs) encod-
`ing the inflammatory cytokines tumor necrosis factor-a,
`interleukin-1a, and IL-6 have been found in the conjuncti-
`val epithelium of patients with Sjo¨gren syndrome compared
`to normal control subjects.8,21 Corticosteroids decrease both
`production and release of these inflammatory cytokines,22,23
`and inhibition of their production and release has been
`
`815
`
`

`

`Ophthalmology Volume 106, Number 4, April 1999
`
`postulated as one of the mechanisms by which corticoste-
`roids suppress the inflammatory response.24 Future studies
`may determine whether the clinical improvement in kera-
`toconjunctivitis sicca observed with topical corticosteroid
`therapy is correlated with a decrease in cytokine production
`by cells on the ocular surface.
`In summary, this preliminary clinical series indicates that
`topical corticosteroid therapy is efficacious for the treatment
`of severe aqueous tear deficiency that is refractory to lubri-
`cant therapy without preservatives and punctal occlusion.
`Future clinical trials appear to be warranted to determine the
`optimum corticosteroid agent and the concentration and
`dosing frequency of steroid that will minimize steroid-
`related ocular complications.
`
`References
`
`1. Pflugfelder SC, Tseng SCG, Sanabria O, et al. Evaluation of
`subjective assessments and objective diagnostic tests for di-
`agnosing tear-film disorders known to cause ocular irritation.
`Cornea 1998;17:38 –56.
`2. Pflugfelder SC, Tseng SCG, Yoshino K, et al. Correlation of
`goblet cell density and mucosal epithelial membrane mucin
`expression with rose bengal staining in patients with ocular
`irritation. Ophthalmology 1997;104:223–35.
`3. American Academy of Ophthalmology. Blepharitis and the
`Dry Eye in the Adult. Preferred Practice Pattern. San Fran-
`cisco, CA: American Academy of Ophthalmology, 1991.
`4. Murillo–Lopez F, Pflugfelder SC. Dry Eye. In: Krachmer JH,
`Mannis MJ, Holland EJ, eds. Cornea. St. Louis: Mosby, 1997;
`V. 1, Chap. 56.
`5. Raphael M, Bellefqih S, Piette J Ch, et al. Conjunctival biopsy
`in Sjo¨gren’s syndrome: correlations between histological and
`immunohistochemical features. Histopathology 1988;13:191–
`202.
`6. Power WJ, Mullaney P, Farrell M, Collum LM. Effect of
`topical cyclosporin A on conjunctival T cells in patients with
`secondary Sjo¨gren’s syndrome. Cornea 1993;12:507–11.
`7. Pflugfelder SC, Huang AJW, Feuer W, et al. Conjunctival
`cytologic features of primary Sjogren’s syndrome. Ophthal-
`mology 1990;97:985–91.
`8. Jones DT, Monroy D, Ji Z, et al. Sjo¨gren’s syndrome: cytokine
`and Epstein–Barr viral gene expression within the conjuncti-
`val epithelium. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1994;35:3493–504.
`9. Baudouin C, Brignole F, Becquet F, et al. Flow cytometry in
`impression cytology specimens. A new method for evaluation
`of conjunctival
`inflammation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci
`1997;38:1458 – 64.
`
`10. McCarey BE, Napalkov JA, Pippen PA, et al. Corneal wound
`healing strength with topical antiinflammatory drugs. Cornea
`1995;14:290 – 4.
`11. Breedveld FC. New perspectives on treating rheumatoid ar-
`thritis [editorial]. N Engl J Med 1995;333:183– 4.
`12. Kirwan JR. The effect of glucocorticoids on joint destruction
`in rheumatoid arthritis. The Arthritis and Rheumatism Council
`Low-Dose Glucocorticoid Study Group. N Engl J Med 1995;
`333:142– 6.
`13. Greenburg GR, Feagan BG, Martin F, et al. Oral budes-
`onide for active Crohn’s disease. N Engl J Med 1994;331:
`836 – 41.
`14. Ichijima H, Petroll WM, Jester JV, Cavanagh HD. Confocal
`microscopic studies of living rabbit cornea treated with ben-
`zalkonium chloride. Cornea 1992;11:221–5.
`15. Ubels JL, McCartney MD, Lantz WK, et al. Effects of
`preservative-free artificial tear solutions on corneal epithe-
`lial structure and function. Arch Ophthalmol 1995;113:
`371– 8.
`16. McCluskey P, Wakefield D. Intravenous pulse methylpred-
`nisolone in scleritis. Arch Ophthalmol 1987;105:793–7.
`17. Cantrill HL, Palmberg P, Zink HA, et al. Comparison of in
`vitro potency of corticosteroids with ability to raise intraocular
`pressure. Am J Ophthalmol 1975;79:1012–7.
`18. Mindel JS, Tavitian HO, Smith H, Jr, Walker EC. Compara-
`tive ocular pressure elevation by medrysone, fluorometholone,
`and dexamethasone phosphate. Arch Ophthalmol 1980;98:
`1577– 8.
`19. Friedlaender MH, Howes J. A double-masked, placebo-con-
`trolled evaluation of the efficacy and safety of loteprednol
`etabonate in the treatment of giant papillary conjunctivitis.
`Am J Ophthalmol 1997;123:455– 64.
`20. Gunduz K, Ozdemir O. Topical cyclosporin treatment of ker-
`atoconjunctivitis sicca in secondary Sjo¨gren’s syndrome. Acta
`Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1994;72:438 – 42.
`21. Jones DT, Monroy D, Ji Z, Pflugfelder SC. Alterations of
`ocular surface gene expression in Sjogren’s syndrome. Adv
`Exp Med Biol 1998;438:533– 6.
`22. Lee SW, Tsou AP, Chan H, et al. Glucocorticoids selectively
`inhibit the transcription of interleukin 1B gene and decrease
`the stability of interleukin 1bmRNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S
`A 1988;85:1204 – 8.
`23. Zanker B, Walz G, Wieder KJ, Strom TB. Evidence that
`glucocorticosteroids block expression of the human inter-
`leukin-6 gene by accessory cells. Transplantation 1990;49:
`183–5.
`24. Chrousos GP. The hypothalmic–pituitary–adrenal axis and
`immune-mediated inflammation. N Engl J Med 1995;332:
`1351– 62. (HMS; Allergan, Irvine, CA)
`
`816
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket