throbber
Downloaded from
`Downloaded from
`
`http://www.jimmunol.org/
`http://www.jimmunol.org/
`
` by guest on June 26, 2017
` by guest on June 26, 2017
`
`This information is current as
`of June 26, 2017.
`
`Desiccating Stress Induces T Cell-Mediated
`Sjögren's Syndrome-Like Lacrimal
`Keratoconjunctivitis
`Jerry Y. Niederkorn, Michael E. Stern, Stephen C.
`Pflugfelder, Cintia S. De Paiva, Rosa M. Corrales, Jianping
`Gao and Karyn Siemasko
`
`2006; 176:3950-3957; ;
`J Immunol 
`doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.176.7.3950
`http://www.jimmunol.org/content/176/7/3950
`
`References
`
`cites 20 articlesThis article
`
`, 9 of which you can access for free at:
`http://www.jimmunol.org/content/176/7/3950.full#ref-list-1
`
`Subscription
`
`
`
`The Journal of ImmunologyInformation about subscribing to
`http://jimmunol.org/subscription
`
` is online at:
`
`Permissions
`
`Submit copyright permission requests at:
`http://www.aai.org/About/Publications/JI/copyright.html
`
`Email Alerts
`
`Receive free email-alerts when new articles cite this article. Sign up at:
`http://jimmunol.org/alerts
`
` is published twice each month by
`The Journal of Immunology
`The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.,
`1451 Rockville Pike, Suite 650, Rockville, MD 20852
`Copyright © 2006 by The American Association of
`Immunologists All rights reserved.
`Print ISSN: 0022-1767 Online ISSN: 1550-6606.
`
`MYLAN - EXHIBIT 1046
`Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al. v. Allergan, Inc.
`IPR2016-01127, -01128, -01129, -01130, -01131, & -01132
`
`

`

`Downloaded from
`
`http://www.jimmunol.org/
`
` by guest on June 26, 2017
`
`The Journal of Immunology
`
`Desiccating Stress Induces T Cell-Mediated Sjo¨gren’s
`Syndrome-Like Lacrimal Keratoconjunctivitis1
`
`Jerry Y. Niederkorn,2,3* Michael E. Stern,2† Stephen C. Pflugfelder,2‡ Cintia S. De Paiva,‡
`Rosa M. Corrales,‡ Jianping Gao,† and Karyn Siemasko†
`
`Chronic dry eye syndrome affects over 10 million people in the United States; it is associated with inflammation of the lacrimal
`gland (LG) and in some cases involves T cell infiltration of the conjunctiva. We demonstrate that environmental desiccating stress
`(DS) elicits T cell-mediated inflammation of the cornea, conjunctiva, and LG, but not other organs in mice. The lacrimal kera-
`toconjunctivitis (LKC) was mediated by CD4ⴙ T cells, which, when adoptively transferred to T cell-deficient nude mice, produced
`inflammation in the LG, cornea, and conjunctiva, but not in any other organ. Adoptively transferred CD4ⴙ T cells produced LKC
`even though recipients were not exposed to DS. LKC was exacerbated in euthymic mice depleted of CD4ⴙCD25ⴙforkhead/winged
`helix transcription factorⴙ regulatory T cells. The results suggest that DS exposes shared epitopes in the cornea, conjunctiva, and
`induce pathogenic CD4ⴙ T cells that produce LKC, which under normal circumstances is restrained by
`LG that
`CD4ⴙCD25ⴙforkhead/winged helix transcription factorⴙ regulatory T cells. The Journal of Immunology, 2006, 176: 3950 –3957.
`
`D ry eye is a common ocular disease and is one of the
`
`leading causes of patients seeking ophthalmic care. Dry
`eye or lacrimal keratoconjunctivitis (LKC)4 has a tre-
`mendous impact on quality of life and can cause debilitating eye
`pain and loss of vision. In animal models and humans, chronic dry
`eye disease is often associated with T cell infiltration of the con-
`junctiva (1–3). T cell infiltration has also been observed in dry eye
`patients with or without a systemic autoimmune disease, such as
`Sjogren’s syndrome (SS) (3). It has been proposed that in some
`forms of dry eye disease, autoreactive T cells alter the function of
`the ocular surface epithelium and also cause reduced tear secretion
`(4). The presence of CD4⫹ T cells in the epithelium and stroma of
`the conjunctiva and the salutary effect of the T cell-immunosup-
`pressive drug, cyclosporine, in some patients support the proposi-
`tion that dry eye is an immune-mediated disease (2, 5). However,
`others have argued that inflammation of the cornea and conjunc-
`tiva is the result, not the cause, of dry eye disease.
`It is now recognized that the ocular surface and lacrimal glands
`function as an integrated unit, termed the lacrimal functional unit
`(LFU), which is linked by their sensory and autonomic nerves (4).
`Inflammation in any component of the LFU has the capability to
`compromise the function of other components through soluble me-
`
`*Department of Ophthalmology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center,
`Dallas, TX 75390; †Department of Biological Sciences, Allergan, Irvine, CA 92623;
`and ‡Department of Ophthalmology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030
`
`Received for publication December 8, 2005. Accepted for publication January
`19, 2006.
`
`The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page
`charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance
`with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
`1 This work was supported by Grant EY11915 and unrestricted grants from Research
`to Prevent Blindness (New York, NY) and Allergan.
`2 J.Y.N., M.E.S., and S.C.P. contributed equally to this study.
`3 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Jerry Y. Niederkorn, Depart-
`ment of Ophthalmology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323
`Harry Hines Boulevard, Dallas, TX 75390. E-mail address:
`jerry.niederkorn@
`utsouthwestern.edu
`4 Abbreviations used in this paper: LKC, lacrimal keratoconjunctivitis; CLN, cervical
`lymph node; DS, desiccating stress; FoxP3, forkhead/winged helix transcription fac-
`tor; GC, goblet cell; LFU, lacrimal functional unit; LG, lacrimal gland; NS, non-
`stressed; OGD, Oregon Green dextran; SS, Sjogren’s syndrome.
`
`diators, generation of autoreactive T cells to shared Ags, and inhibi-
`tion of neural transmission (4). SS causes profound dysfunction of the
`LFU, which includes decreased tear secretion, loss of conjunctival
`goblet cells (GC) transformation of the ocular surface epithelium to a
`keratinized surface. Immunopathological changes, including immune-
`mediated inflammation and increased production of inflammatory cy-
`tokines and chemokines, have been detected in the dysfunctional lac-
`rimal glands and ocular surface tissues in SS (6–8).
`It has been proposed that a wide range of factors that alter the
`integrity of tissues create danger signals that activate APCs and
`promote the generation of immune responses to self Ags (9). The
`danger hypothesis has been implicated in the pathogenesis of SS
`(10) and is consistent with the observation that desiccating stress
`(DS) to the ocular surface induces the expression of proinflamma-
`tory cytokines (11). With this in mind, we tested the hypothesis
`that environmental DS to the ocular surface would break self-tol-
`erance and induce the development of T cell-mediated inflamma-
`tion directed against epitopes expressed on the ocular surface and
`the lacrimal gland (LG).
`
`Materials and Methods
`Mice
`
`(BALB/cByJ-
`nude BALB/c
`Female BALB/c, T cell-deficient
`HfH11⬍␯⬎), and C57BL/6 mice, 6 – 8 wk old, were purchased from The
`Jackson Laboratory or Charles River Laboratories. All animal experiments
`were approved by the institutional animal care and use committees at Al-
`lergan and Baylor College of Medicine. All studies adhered to the Asso-
`ciation for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology statement for the Use of
`Animals in Ophthalmic and Vision Research.
`
`Induction of DS in mice
`
`DS was induced by s.c. injection of scopolamine hydrobromide (0.5 mg/0.2
`ml; Sigma-Aldrich) four times a day (0800, 1200, 1400, and 1700 h),
`alternating between the left and right flanks of 4- to 6-wk-old mice, as
`previously described (12). Up to five mice were placed in a cage with a
`perforated plastic screen on one side to allow airflow from a fan (Cafrano)
`placed 6 in. in front of it for 16 h/day. Room humidity was maintained at
`30 –35% and temperature at 80°F. DS was induced for either 5 or 12 con-
`secutive days. This model of dry eye disease has been used previously with
`no discernible ill effects from the scopolamine treatment or low humidity
`(11, 12). Changes in corneal permeability were assessed by measuring
`corneal staining by Oregon Green dextran (OGD; 70,000 m.w.; Molecular
`Probes) as previously described (13). Aqueous tear production was assessed
`
`Copyright © 2006 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.
`
`0022-1767/06/$02.00
`
`

`

`Downloaded from
`
`http://www.jimmunol.org/
`
` by guest on June 26, 2017
`
`The Journal of Immunology
`
`3951
`
`using cotton thread (Quick Thread; FCI Ophthalmics) as previously described
`(14). Control mice were maintained in a nonstressed (NS) environment con-
`taining 50–75% relative humidity without exposure to forced air. Tear pro-
`duction was measured with phenol red-impregnated cotton threads (Zone-
`Quick; Oasis) placed into the tear meniscus of the lateral canthus for 30 s.
`
`Measurement of GC density
`
`Surgically excised eyes were fixed in 10% formalin and embedded in paraffin.
`Sections (6 ␮m) were stained with periodic acid-Schiff reagent. Sections from
`three eyes in each group (in two different sets of experiments) were examined
`and photographed with a Nikon Eclipse E400 microscope equipped with a
`Nikon DXM 1200 digital camera. GC density was measured in the superior
`and inferior bulbar and tarsal conjunctiva and expressed as number per 100 ␮m
`using Metavue 6.24r software (Molecular Devices).
`
`In vivo analysis of adoptively transferred CFSE-labeled
`lymphocytes
`Spleen cells (1 ⫻ 107/ml) were collected from BALB/c mice subjected to
`DS and were labeled with 10 ␮M CFSE (Molecular Probes) for 15 min at
`room temperature. Cells were washed three times in RPMI 1640 and were
`injected i.p. into BALB/c mice (1 ⫻ 107 spleen cells/0.1 ml/mouse).
`
`Immunohistochemistry
`
`OCT-embedded globes with attached lids were sectioned at 10-␮m thick-
`ness and stained for the expression of mouse CD4 (rat anti-mouse CD4; rat
`IgG2a, k; clone H129.19; BD Pharmingen) using Vectastain Elite ABC
`reagents (Vector Laboratories).
`
`Adoptive cell transfer and anti-Thy 1.2 Ab treatment
`
`Spleens and cervical lymph nodes (CLN) were collected from mice sub-
`jected to DS and NS, and one donor-equivalent of either spleen or CLN
`cells was transferred i.p. to syngeneic nude mice. One donor-equivalent is
`defined as the number of cells remaining after the respective in vitro ma-
`nipulation (e.g., anti-Thy 1.2 Ab treatment or CD4⫹ T cell enrichment) of
`a single spleen or CLN from a single donor. The remaining cells represent
`the total lymphocyte population for that spleen cell category for a single
`donor. One splenic equivalent of T cells was equal to ⬃5 ⫻ 107 cells.
`Spleen cells were depleted of T cells by in vitro treatment with anti-Thy 1.2
`Ab (BD Pharmingen) in the presence of complement. Control aliquots of
`spleen cells were treated with complement alone. Cells were washed with
`RPMI 1640 medium before being adoptively transferred in 0.1 ml of RPMI
`1640 medium.
`CD4⫹ and CD25⫹ T cell enrichment
`BALB/c CLN cell suspensions were enriched for CD4⫹ T cells by positive
`selection using rat anti-mouse CD4-conjugated magnetic microbeads
`(MACS system; Miltenyi Biotec) as described previously (15). The CD4-
`enriched cell suspensions contained ⬎87% CD4⫹ T cells as determined by
`flow cytometry. CD4⫹CD25⫹ T cells were enriched using a mouse
`CD4⫹CD25⫹ regulatory T cell magnetic isolation kit (Miltenyi Biotec)
`according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
`Permeabilized CD4⫹CD25⫹ cells were tested for the expression of cy-
`toplasmic forkhead/winged helix transcription factor (Foxp3) protein.
`Briefly, CD4⫹CD25⫹ cells were washed three times in HBSS, resuspended
`in Cytofix/Cytoperm solution (BD Pharmingen), and incubated for 30 min
`at room temperature. Cells were washed three times in Perm/Wash buffer
`and resuspended with an FITC-labeled rat anti-mouse Foxp3 Ab (eBio-
`sciences) at a concentration of 1 ␮g/ml for 30 min on ice. Cells were
`washed in Perm/Wash buffer three times, incubated with PE-labeled sec-
`ondary Ab for 20 –30 min at 4°C, washed three additional times in Perm/
`Wash buffer, fixed in 1% paraformaldehyde, and assessed for fluorescence
`in a FACScan flow cytometer (BD Biosciences). The results were analyzed
`using CellQuest version 3.1f software (BD Biosciences). CD4⫹CD25⫹
`cells were found to be 89% Foxp3⫹ (data not shown).
`In vivo depletion of CD25⫹ cells
`In vivo depletion of CD25⫹ regulatory T cells was achieved as described
`previously (16). Briefly, anti-CD25 Ab (hybridoma PC61; American Type
`Culture Collection) was administered i.p. to normal BALB/c mice 7 days
`before and on the day DS was initiated.
`
`Statistics
`
`Values for cell counts in tissue specimens and tear production were eval-
`uated by either Student’s t test or ANOVA.
`
`Results
`DS induces immune-mediated inflammation of the ocular surface
`and lacrimal gland
`
`C57BL/6 mice exposed to DS displayed altered corneal epithelial
`barrier function, which was reflected in an 85% increase in the
`uptake of the OGD label that was used to measure the integrity of
`the corneal epithelial barrier (Fig. 1). Histopathological analysis
`revealed reduced numbers of conjunctival GC, decreased tear pro-
`duction, and CD4⫹ T cell infiltration of the conjunctival basal
`
`FIGURE 1.
`Increased corneal permeability induced by DS. C57BL/6
`mice were subjected to 5 days of DS or NS conditions. Mouse corneas were
`viewed and photographed under cobalt blue light 10 min after application
`of 1 ␮l of the fluorescent molecule OGD to the ocular surface. A, Ocular
`surface of mouse subjected to 5 days of DS. B, Ocular surface of untreated,
`NS mouse. C, Quantification of OGD uptake by corneas of NS normal
`mice and mice subjected to 5 days of DS. There were five animals in each
`group in three independent experiments.
`
`

`

`Downloaded from
`
`http://www.jimmunol.org/
`
` by guest on June 26, 2017
`
`3952
`
`DS INDUCES T CELL-MEDIATED KERATOCONJUNCTIVITIS
`
`epithelium (Fig. 2, A–E). The greater severity of keratoconjuncti-
`vitis in C57BL/6 mice than BALB/c mice is consistent with the
`observation that BALB/c mice have a larger
`repertoire of
`CD4⫹CD25⫹ regulatory T cells compared with C57BL/6 mice
`(17). The role of CD4⫹CD25⫹ regulatory T cells was tested by
`treating BALB/c mice with anti-CD25 Ab to deplete natural reg-
`ulatory T cells before subjecting the mice to DS. Anti-CD25-
`treated BALB/c mice developed significant keratoconjunctivitis
`and displayed a steep reduction in the density of conjunctival GC
`compared with the isotype control mice and mice subjected to DS
`without Ab treatment (Fig. 2F).
`
`DS-induced lacrimal keratoconjunctivitis can be adoptively
`transferred with CD4⫹ T cells
`Adoptive transfer experiments were performed to determine the
`role of T cells in the ocular inflammation elicited by DS. Draining
`
`CLN cells were collected from BALB/c mice after a 5-day expo-
`sure to DS and were adoptively transferred to athymic (nude)
`BALB/c mice that were maintained under NS conditions (50 –75%
`relative humidity). Even though the adoptive cell transfer recipi-
`ents were NS, they had reduced tear production and developed
`LKC after receiving CLN cells from donors treated with DS (Fig.
`3). Inflammation was immune mediated, because the nude mouse
`recipients of CLN cells from NS donors maintained normal tear
`production and did not develop inflammation of the conjunctiva
`(Fig. 3, B and C). Importantly, inflammation in recipients of CLN
`cells from DS donors was restricted to the lacrimal functional unit
`(cornea, conjunctiva, and LG), and no significant inflammatory
`cell infiltrates were found in the salivary gland, oral mucosa, thy-
`roid, heart, lung, colon, spleen, adrenal gland, or vagina (data not
`shown). Histopathological analysis revealed significant LG inflam-
`mation and loss of conjunctival GC, which coincided with a steep
`
`FIGURE 2. DS induces LKC. C57BL/6 mice (A–E) and BALB/c mice (A, B, and F) were maintained in either NS conditions (50 –75% relative humidity)
`or DS (30 –35% relative humidity) for either 5 days (A–E) or 12 days (A and C). Five days of DS consistently produced LKC in C57BL/6 mice. A, Reduced
`numbers of conjunctival GC; B, diminished tear production; C, CD4⫹ cell density in conjunctivae of NS mice. D, Mice treated with DS; CD4⫹ T cells
`(brown stain) in basal conjunctival epithelium. E, CD4⫹ T cell density in conjunctivae of DS and NS mice. F, Reduced conjunctival GC density in BALB/c
`mice treated with anti-CD25 before exposure to 5 days of DS. There were three animals in each group in two independent experiments (i.e., n ⫽ 6
`mice/group).
`
`

`

`Downloaded from
`
`http://www.jimmunol.org/
`
` by guest on June 26, 2017
`
`The Journal of Immunology
`
`3953
`
`reduction in tear production (Fig. 3A) and the appearance of
`ocular surface inflammation (Fig. 3, B and C). Immunohisto-
`chemical staining demonstrated a significant infiltrate of CD4⫹
`T cells in the LG in the adoptive cell transfer recipients (Fig. 4).
`Inflammation was T cell dependent, because in vitro treatment
`of CLN cell suspensions with anti-Thy 1.2 Ab plus complement
`before adoptive transfer prevented the development of LKC
`(Fig. 5A). Moreover, histopathological examination of the eyes
`and LGs of recipients of CLN cell suspensions depleted of T
`cells demonstrated significantly reduced mononuclear cellular
`infiltrates in the conjunctivae and the sparing of 80% of the
`normal tear production (Fig. 5, B and C). To determine whether
`the CD4⫹ T cells in the conjunctivae and LGs contributed to
`LKC, adoptive transfer experiments were performed in which
`either CD4⫹ T cell-enriched or CD4⫹ T cell-depleted CLN cell
`suspensions were collected from mice subjected to DS and
`transferred to syngeneic BALB/c nude mice. Recipients of
`CD4⫹ T cell-enriched CLN cells developed intense LG inflam-
`mation (Fig. 5D), with significant increases in the number of
`both conjunctival mononuclear cells and neutrophils (data not
`shown). Moreover, CD4⫹ T cells were detected in the LG of the
`adoptive transfer recipients (Fig. 5G). Additional evidence of
`CD4⫹ T cell involvement was demonstrated in experiments in
`which CD4⫹ T cells were collected from mice subjected to DS,
`labeled with CFSE, and adoptively transferred to nude mice that
`were maintained in an NS environment. Accumulations of
`CFSE-labeled CD4⫹ T cells were found in the conjunctival
`epithelium of the nude mice that received adoptive cell transfers
`(Fig. 5H), but were absent
`in nonocular organs (data not
`shown). By contrast, adoptive transfer of CFSE-labeled CD4⫹
`T cells from normal donors did not preferentially localize in the
`corneas or conjunctivae of nude mouse recipients (Fig. 6), sug-
`gesting that mice subjected to DS develop CD4⫹ T cells that
`preferentially localize in the eye and LGs, where they produce
`inflammatory disease, GC loss, and LG dysfunction.
`
`Role of CD4⫹CD25⫹ T cells in mitigating LKC
`The inflammation produced in the adoptive cell transfer recip-
`ients was consistently more severe in nude mice than euthymic
`mice, suggesting the possible mitigating effects of one or more
`regulatory T cell populations in the euthymic host. To examine
`the role of natural regulatory T cells in LKC, euthymic BALB/c
`mice were treated with anti-CD25 mAb to deplete putative nat-
`ural regulatory T cells before receiving adoptively transferred T
`cells from BALB/c donors treated with DS. Euthymic BALB/c
`
`FIGURE 3. Adoptive T cell transfer of LKC. Euthymic BALB/c mice
`(normal) were subjected to either DS or NS conditions for 5 days, and one
`donor-equivalent of CLN cells was adoptively transferred to each athymic
`(nude) BALB/c nude mouse recipient. Nude mice were maintained under NS
`conditions after adoptive cell transfer and were assessed for tear production
`and conjunctival cellular infiltrates 7 days later. A, Reduced tear production. B
`and C, Mononuclear (B) and neutrophil (C) cell infiltrates in conjunctivae of
`adoptive transfer recipients are shown. There were five animals in each group.
`
`FIGURE 4. CD4⫹ T cell infiltrate in lacrimal glands in recipients of
`adoptively transferred CD4⫹ T cells from mice subjected to DS. A, CD4⫹
`T cells (brown) in LG in a recipient of CLN cells from a DS donor. B,
`Immunohistochemistry of the same specimen as that in A, but tested with
`an isotype control Ab. There were five animals in each group.
`
`

`

`Downloaded from
`
`http://www.jimmunol.org/
`
` by guest on June 26, 2017
`
`3954
`
`DS INDUCES T CELL-MEDIATED KERATOCONJUNCTIVITIS
`
`FIGURE 5. DS-induced LKC is mediated by T cells. BALB/c mice were placed in DS for 5 days, and CLN and spleen cells were collected. CLN cells
`were treated with anti-Thy 1.2 Ab and complement to deplete T cells. One donor-equivalent of unfractionated or CD4⫹ T cell-enriched CLN or spleen cells
`was injected i.p. into each BALB/c nude mouse. Nude mice were kept under NS conditions. Tissues were collected for histology 48 h later. A, Histopa-
`thology of conjunctiva, cornea, and LG after adoptive CLN cell transfer. Note the absence of GC in conjunctivae in recipients of untreated or complement-
`treated CLN cells. Normal GC (short arrows) in hosts receiving T cell-depleted CLN cells. Corneal inflammation (long arrow) is absent in recipients of
`anti-Thy 1.2-treated CLN cells. B, Mononuclear cells infiltrate the conjunctivae of CLN cell recipients. C, Reduced tear production in CLN cell recipients.
`D, Intense LG inflammation (arrow) in recipients of CD4⫹ T spleen cells from DS donors. E, Normal LG. F, Isotype control Ab (background) staining
`of LG from a recipient of CD4⫹ spleen cells from DS donors. G, Anti-CD4 immunostaining (brown) of LG from same mouse as that in F. H, Accumulation
`of CD4⫹ T cells in the conjunctiva after adoptive transfer of CFSE-labeled, CD4⫹ T cell-enriched spleen cells. There were five animals in each group.
`
`mice treated with anti-CD25 Ab before receiving adoptively
`transferred CD4⫹ CLN from DS donors developed severe LKC
`and a 38% reduction in tear production (Fig. 7). To confirm that
`the CD4⫹CD25⫹ T cells exerted a mitigating effect on the de-
`velopment of dry eye disease, nude mice were reconstituted
`with one spleen cell equivalent of either CD4⫹CD25⫹ (⬃89%
`Foxp3⫹) T cells or CD4⫹CD25⫺ (⬍1% Foxp3⫹) T cells from
`euthymic, BALB/c donors that had been maintained in an NS
`environment. On the same day, the nude mice also received
`pathogenic, LKC-inducing CD4⫹ T cells from BALB/c donor
`mice that had been maintained for 5 days in a DS environment.
`Nude mice reconstituted with CD4⫹CD25⫹Foxp3⫹ putative
`regulatory T cells resisted the development of LKC and main-
`tained 90% tear production compared with a 28% reduction in
`tears in nude mice not receiving CD4⫹CD25⫹ T cells (Fig. 8A).
`Moreover, CD4⫹CD25⫹ Foxp3⫹ reconstituted mice resisted in-
`flammation and expressed a 60% reduction in the number of
`
`FIGURE 6. Absence of conjunctival and corneal
`inflammation in
`BALB/c nude mice that received CFSE-labeled CD4⫹ spleen cells from
`NS BALB/c donor mice. There were five animals in each group.
`
`

`

`Downloaded from
`
`http://www.jimmunol.org/
`
` by guest on June 26, 2017
`
`The Journal of Immunology
`
`3955
`
`FIGURE 7. Depletion of natural T regulatory cells by systemic treatment with anti-CD25 mAb exacerbates DS-induced LKC. Pathogenic CD4⫹
`T cells were isolated from the CLN of BALB/c mice that were subjected to 5 days of DS and adoptively transferred to euthymic BALB/c mice (1 ⫻
`107 CD4⫹ cells/mouse) that were treated with either anti-CD25 Ab or an isotype control Ab (500 ␮g given i.p. 7 days before and on the day of the
`adoptive transfer of CD4⫹ CLN cells). A, Keratoconjunctivitis in anti-CD25-treated BALB/c mice. Arrows indicate inflammatory cell infiltrates in
`conjunctiva and cornea. B, Reduced tear production in anti-CD25-treated BALB/c mice that received CD4⫹ CLN from DS donors. There were five
`animals in each group.
`
`mononuclear cells and a 97% reduction in the number of neu-
`trophils that infiltrated the conjunctivae (Fig. 8, B and C). His-
`topathological analysis confirmed the mitigating effects of
`adoptively transferred CD4⫹CD25⫹Foxp3⫹ cells. Conjunctival
`GC were virtually eliminated in recipients of CD4⫹ T cells
`from DS donors, but were spared in nude mice that were re-
`constituted with CD4⫹CD25⫹Foxp3⫹ cells from NS donors
`(Fig. 8, D–F). Likewise, corneal and LG inflammation was ex-
`tinguished in CD4⫹CD25⫹Foxp3⫹ cell
`recipients (Fig. 8,
`G–L).
`
`Discussion
`The causes of dry eye diseases, including SS, are multifactorial
`and involve immunogenetic, hormonal, and environmental factors
`(18, 19). In this study we demonstrated the isolated effect of a
`single environmental factor, DS, on the development of immune-
`mediated dry eye disease. Animals subjected to DS developed oc-
`ular surface lesions that mimicked those found in dry eye patients.
`The preponderance of CD4⫹ T cells in LG inflammation bore a
`striking resemblance to the lesions found in SS patients and in
`animal models of SS (19 –21). More important, the results indicate
`that tear insufficiency alters the function of the corneal epithelium
`and elicits inflammation of the ocular surface. The DS-induced
`inflammation elicited the generation of autoreactive CD4⫹ T cells
`that infiltrated all three components of the lacrimal functional unit
`(i.e., cornea, conjunctiva, and LG). Once generated, pathogenic
`CD4⫹ T cells produced ocular surface and LG inflammation, even
`in animals housed in an NS environment.
`The milder ocular surface inflammation induced by DS in eu-
`thymic BALB/c mice compared with C57BL/6 mice is consistent
`with the hypothesis that DS-induced LKC is mediated by CD4⫹ T
`cells, but is mitigated by CD4⫹CD25⫹ natural regulatory T cells,
`because BALB/c mice have a better developed repertoire of
`CD4⫹CD25⫹ regulatory T cells than C57BL/6 mice (17). More-
`over, elimination of CD25⫹ T cells in euthymic mice increased the
`severity of LKC, whereas reconstitution of athymic mice with
`CD4⫹CD25⫹ regulatory T cells mitigated LKC.
`A phenomenon similar to what we have reported also occurs in
`some patients who are exposed to ocular surface dryness from any
`
`number of mechanisms. It is not unusual for patients who take
`medications with anticholinergic side effects, such as antidepres-
`sants, to develop a permanent dry eye despite cessation of the
`offending medication. These patients frequently respond to immu-
`nomodulatory therapies such as topical corticosteroids and cyclo-
`sporine. This phenomenon is also observed when there is incom-
`plete lid closure after blepharoplasty surgery where there is
`exposure and desiccation of a portion of the ocular surface. Pa-
`tients with well-documented normal tear production before this
`surgery may develop a marked depression in tear production that
`persists after the exposure is treated. However, these patients fre-
`quently respond to immunomodulatory therapies. We believe that
`persistent DS results in the up-regulation of ocular surface Ags that
`initiate an autoimmune LKC. This is influenced by a variety of
`host susceptibility factors, including age, gender, and systemic im-
`mune dysregulation (e.g., rheumatoid arthritis or graft-vs-host
`disease).
`The present findings also suggest that mild inflammation pro-
`duced by transient DS is brought under control by CD4⫹25⫹
`Foxp3⫹ regulatory T cells. However, in systemic autoimmune dis-
`eases, such as SS, ocular surface inflammation occurs in conjunc-
`tion with inflammation in multiple organ systems and might be
`more resistant to immune regulation by CD4⫹CD25⫹Foxp3⫹ reg-
`ulatory T cells. In SS, it is widely believed that inflammation of the
`LG compromises tear production, which culminates in desiccation
`of the ocular surface. The desiccated ocular surface, in turn, pro-
`vokes inflammation and might elicit the generation of a danger
`signal, which breaks tolerance to self epitopes expressed on cells
`on the ocular surface. Our results indicate that desiccation of the
`ocular surface induces an immune response not only to the corneal
`and conjunctival epithelium, but also to elements in the LG, sug-
`gesting that there are shared epitopes among the components of the
`LFU. Identifying these epitopes will be important for devising
`therapeutic strategies that may be useful in the management of
`⬎10 million dry eye patients.
`
`Disclosures
`The authors have no financial conflict of interest.
`
`

`

`Downloaded from
`
`http://www.jimmunol.org/
`
` by guest on June 26, 2017
`
`3956
`
`DS INDUCES T CELL-MEDIATED KERATOCONJUNCTIVITIS
`
`FIGURE 8. CD4⫹CD25⫹Foxp3⫹ T cells mitigate LKC. BALB/c nude mice were not reconstituted (none) or were reconstituted with CD4⫹
`CD25⫹Foxp3⫹ T cells (putative suppressor cells) from euthymic BALB/c mice maintained in NS conditions. Pathogenic CD4⫹ T cells were isolated from
`euthymic BALB/c mice subjected to DS and were adoptively transferred to nude mice on the same day as the reconstitution with CD4⫹CD25⫹Foxp3⫹ T
`cells. A, Reduced tear production. B, Mononuclear cell infiltrates into the conjunctivae. C, Neutrophil infiltration into conjunctivae. Histopathology of
`conjunctiva (D–F), cornea (G–I), and LG (J–L) is shown. Groups consisted of untreated controls (D, G, and J), recipients of pathogenic CD4⫹ T cells from
`DS donors (E, H, and K), and recipients of pathogenic CD4⫹ T cells from DS donors and CD4⫹CD25⫹ T cells from NS donors. Note the loss of
`conjunctival GC (arrows; E) and intense LG inflammation (K) in a nude mouse that received CD4⫹ T cells from a DS mouse, but was not reconstituted
`with normal CD4⫹CD25⫹Foxp3⫹ T cells. There were two animals in E, H, and K; all other panels had five animals in each group.
`
`References
`1. Gao, J., T. A. Schwalb, J. V. Addeo, C. R. Ghosn, and M. E. Stern. 1998. The role
`of apoptosis in the pathogenesis of canine keratoconjunctivitis sicca: the effect of
`topical cyclosporin A therapy. Cornea 17: 654 – 663.
`2. Kunert, K. S., A. S. Tisdale, M. E. Stern, J. A. Smith, and I. K. Gipson. 2000.
`Analysis of topical cyclosporine treatment of patients with dry eye syndrome:
`effect on conjunctival lymphocytes. Arch. Ophthalmol. 118: 1489 –1496.
`3. Stern, M. E., J. Gao, T. A. Schwalb, M. Ngo, D. D. Tieu, C. C. Chan, B. L. Reis,
`S. M. Whitcup, D. Thompson, and J. A. Smith. 2002. Conjunctival T-cell sub-
`populations in Sjogren’s and non-Sjogren’s patients with dry eye. Invest. Oph-
`thalmol. Vis. Sci. 43: 2609 –2614.
`4. Stern, M. E., R. W. Beuerman, R. I. Fox, J. Gao, A. K. Mircheff, and
`S. C. Pflugfelder. 1998. The pathology of dry eye: the interaction between the
`ocular surface and lacrimal glands. Cornea 17: 584 –589.
`
`5. Sall, K., O. D. Stevenson, T. K. Mundorf, and B. L. Reis. 2000. Two multicenter,
`randomized studies of the efficacy and safety of cyclosporine ophthalmic emul-
`sion in moderate to severe dry eye disease: CsA Phase 3 Study Group. Ophthal-
`mology 107: 631– 639.
`6. Jones, D. T., D. Monroy, Z. Ji, S. S. Atherton, and S. C. Pflugfelder. 1994.
`Sjogren’s syndrome: cytokine and Epstein-Barr viral gene expression within the
`conjunctival epithelium. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 35: 3493–3504.
`7. Jones, D. T., D. Monroy, Z. Ji, and S. C. Pflugfelder. 1998. Alterations of ocular
`surface gene expression in Sjogren’s syndrome. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 438:
`533–536.
`8. Pflugfelder, S. C., D. Jones, Z. Ji, A. Afonso, and D. Monroy. 1999. Altered
`cytokine balance in the tear fluid and conjunctiva of patients with Sjogren’s
`syndrome keratoconjunctivitis sicca. Curr. Eye Res. 19: 201–211.
`
`

`

`Downloaded from
`
`http://www.jimmunol.org/
`
` by guest on June 26, 2017
`
`The Journal of Immunology
`
`3957
`
`9. Matzinger, P. 2002. The danger model: a renewed sense of self. Science 296:
`301–305.
`10. Bredberg, A., G. Henriksson, A. Larsson, R. Manthorpe, and A. Sallmyr. 2005.
`Sjogren’s syndrome and the danger model. Rheumatology 44: 965–970.
`11. Luo, L., D. Q. Li, A. Doshi, W. Farley, R. M. Corrales, and S. C. Pflugfelder.
`2004. Experimental dry eye stimulates production of inflammatory cytokines and
`MMP-9 and activates MAPK signaling pathways on the ocular surface. Invest.
`Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 45: 4293– 4301.
`12. Yeh, S., X. J. Song, W. Farley, D. Q. Li, M. E. Stern, and S. C. Pflugfelder. 2003.
`Apoptosis of ocular surface cells in experimentally induced dry eye. Invest. Oph-
`thalmol. Vis. Sci. 44: 124 –129.
`13. De Paiva, C., and S. C. Pflugfelder. 2004. Diagnostic Approaches to Dry Eye and
`Lacrimal Keratoconjunctivitis. Marcel Dekker, New York.
`14. Dursun, D., M. Wang, D. Monroy, D. Q. Li, B. L. Lokeshwar, M. E. Stern, and
`S. C. Pflugfelder. 2002. A mouse model of keratoconjunctivitis sicca. Invest.
`Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 43: 632– 638.
`15. Skelsey, M. E., E. Mayhew, and J. Y. Niederkorn. 2003. CD25⫹, interleukin-
`10-producing CD4⫹ T cells are required for suppressor cell production and im-
`mune privilege in the anterior chamber of the eye. Immunology 110: 18 –29.
`
`16. Shimizu, J., S. Yamazaki, and S. Sakaguchi. 1999. Induction of tumor immunity
`by removing CD25⫹CD4⫹ T cells: a common basis between tumor immunity
`a

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket