throbber
THE BUCKINGHAM RESEARCH GROUP
`Research Notes for February 5, 2003
`
`Important disclosure information (relative to NASD Rule 2711) about The Buckingham Research Group’s rating system, risks, and
`potential conflicts of interest appear at the end of this material (or contact your investment representative).
`
`Allergan (AGN-$59.89)
`STRONG BUY FY Ends Dec. Target: $80
`FY03 EPS From/To: $2.30E/NC vs. $1.88A LY
`FY04 EPS From/To: $2.80E/NC
`Next Q EPS (Mar-03) From/To: $0.53E/NC vs. $0.43A LY
`*Estimates and Actuals Reflect Pharma-Only for 2002, 2003 & 2004.
`David G. Buck (212) 922-2136 / dbuck@buckresearch.com
`
`AGN Shares Could Weaken on News of Botox-Related Lawsuit but Shares Remain Strong-Buy
`
`(Div./Yield: $0.36/0.6%)
`(Consensus: $2.31E)
`(Consensus: $2.86E)
`(Consensus: $0.53E)
`
` (cid:120)
`
` Strong Buy-rated Allergan (AGN) announced that it has been sued along with an outside
`physician by a California couple alleging that use of Botox to treat migraines (an off-label use)
`caused a “chronic medical condition.” We have not seen the lawsuit; however, Allergan defended
`the safety profile for its Type A botulinum toxin product and vowed to defend itself and avoid
`settling what it termed a “frivolous” lawsuit. Botox remains an important driver of Allergan’s
`growth. We expect the European Union to approve Vistabel (European name for Botox Cosmetic)
`shortly. We believe that some negative publicity including litigation was inevitable for a drug that
`grew 42% in 2002 to nearly $440 million. Allergan’s insurance will cover litigation costs. Botox
`(34% of sales) should grow by 29% for 2003 based on geographic expansion and growth of both
`cosmetic use (40% of sales) and therapeutic use (70% of sales).
`(cid:120) The April launch of Restasis for therapeutic dry and the second quarter filing of Diquafasol
`(dry eye) by Inspire Pharmaceuticals (to be marketed by Allergan) are upcoming catalysts. For
`2003, we expect Restasis revenues of $27 million (about 2% contribution to sales) while Allergan’s
`combined dry eye franchise should generate nearly $50 million in 2004 revenues (2.5% of sales).
`We also expect Phase II data on oral Tazorac for acne in May followed by Phase III data for oral
`Tazorac in psoriasis in July. The acne and psoriasis markets represent conservatively $500 million in
`market potential for Tazorac which had 2002 revenues of $85 million as a topical cream.
`(cid:120) Growth outlook and price target remains intact. Our target remains $80 per share, based
`upon a 35x multiple of our 2003 EPS estimate of $2.30. At current prices, Allergan trades at just
`over 1x its growth rate, a discount to a historical PEG ratio of 2x for branded pharmaceutical
`companies. We see Allergan remaining a 22-25% growth company despite the likelihood that the
`Company will repurchase the Bardeen R&D vehicle, thereby eliminating R&D reimbursement
`revenues to Allergan and improving quality of earnings.
`
`
`
`1
`
`ALL 2048
`MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS V. ALLERGAN
`IPR2016-01128
`
`

`

`THE BUCKINGHAM RESEARCH GROUP
`Research Notes for February 5, 2003
`
`
`Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO-$13.20)
`(Div./Yield: Nil/Nil)
`ACCUMULATE FY Ends July Target: $19 (From $18)
`(Consensus: $0.54E)
`FY03 EPS From/To: $0.57E/$0.60E vs. $0.39A LY
`(Consensus: $0.60E)
`FY04 EPS From/To: $0.70E/$0.74E
`(Consensus: $0.13E)
`Next Q EPS (Apr-03) From/To: $0.14E/$0.15E vs. $0.15A LQ
`(Consensus: $19.2B)
`FY03 Revenue (US$ B) From/To: $19.5E/$19.1E vs. 18.9A LY
`(Consensus: $20.9B)
`FY04 Revenue (US$ B) From/To: $21.8E/$21.1E
`(Consensus: $4.76B)
`Next Q Revenue (Apr-03) From/To: $4.84E/$4.72E vs. $4.71A LQ
`Calendar EPS: 2001A=$0.18; 2002A=$0.54; and 2003E=$0.64. The Buckingham Research Group makes a market in the securities of
`Cisco Systems (CSCO).
`Gina Sockolow (212) 922-1815 / gsockolow@buckresearch.com
`
`EPS Ahead of Consensus; Raise EPS and Maintain Accumulate
`
` (cid:120)
`
` Accumulate-rated Cisco Systems (CSCO) reported above-consensus fiscal 2Q03 EPS of $0.15 on
`sequentially flat sales of $4.71 billion, due to a higher gross margin and lower operating expenses.
`(cid:120) CSCO’s fiscal 3Q03 outlook was cautious, citing weakness in January, and management repeated the
`January 2003 quarter guidance of 0% to –3% for sales, lower gross margin and flat operating costs.
`(cid:120) We are raising our 12-month stock price target for CSCO to $19 per share (from $18), based on a
`P/E multiple of 30x, reflecting projected 30% annual EPS growth, and our revised estimate for
`calendar 2003 EPS of $0.64 (from $0.62).
`(cid:120) We are maintaining our Accumulate rating and raising our above-consensus EPS estimates from
`$0.14 to $0.15 for fiscal 3Q03; from $0.57 to $0.60 for the July 2003 fiscal year (FY2003) and from
`$0.70 to $0.74 for FY2004 to reflect a lower sales base offset by higher gross margin expectations.
`(cid:120) We estimate revenue at $19.1 billion in FY2003, up 1%, and $21.1 billion, up 10%, in FY2004 from
`$18.9 billion in FY2002 to take into account a $500 million run rate in Andiamo sales combined
`with pull-along sales of other switches and routers by the end of FY2004.
`(cid:120) See our full note for more details.
`
`
`
` •
`
`Crompton Corp. (CK-$5.97)
`(Div./Yield: $0.20/3.4%)
`ACCUMULATE FY Ends Dec. Target: $7 (From $8)
`(Consensus: $0.58E)
`FY03 EPS From/To: $0.60E/$0.45E vs. $0.48A LY
`(Consensus: $0.85E)
`FY04 EPS From/To: $0.60E/NC
`(Consensus: $0.10E)
`Next Q EPS (Mar-03) From/To: $0.10E/$0.05E vs. $0.06A LY
`EPS at last peak (1999) = $1.55 (pro forma). Analyst, associate or a member of household have a financial interest in any class of
`common equity securities, warrants or options of the subject company.
`John E. Roberts (212) 210-0064 / jroberts@buckresearch.com
`
`CK Reports 4Q02 In Line; Reducing Estimates & Target
`
` Accumulate-rated Crompton Corp. (CK) reported 4Q02 EPS of $0.09 versus a loss of $0.10 per
`share last year, in line with expectations. We are, however, reducing our EPS estimates for 1Q03
`from $0.10 to $0.05 and for the full-year 2003 from $0.60 to $0.45. We are also introducing a 2004
`EPS estimate of $0.60 at this time.
`• We maintain our Accumulate rating on CK. Our revised stock price target of $7 per share represents
`a 15.5x P/E multiple on our reduced estimate of $0.45 for 2003, which is in line with other peer
`
`2
`
`

`

`THE BUCKINGHAM RESEARCH GROUP
`Research Notes for February 5, 2003
`
`company stocks with economic- and petroleum-sensitive earnings. We note that CK’s EPS reached
`$1.55 as recently as 1999.
`• Ethylene-propylene diene-monomer rubber (EPDM, 11% of sales) is especially petroleum-sensitive.
`Polymer additives (32% of sales) are feeling inventory cycles of plastics in which they are used.
`Plastic processing equipment (7% of sales) is suffering from low customer capital spending.
`• Volume grew 5% in 4Q02 versus 4Q01. Polymer additives grew 7%, polymers grew 6%,
`organosilicones grew 7%, crop protection grew 11%. Equipment sales volume declined 10%.
`• Refined products remain in divestment discussions, and we believe this business will eventually be
`sold for near $100 million ($0.87 per share). We believe the company also continues to evaluate
`much larger divestments.
`
` (cid:120)
`
` Yesterday, after the close, Neutral-rated I-Many, Inc. (IMNY) reported fourth quarter and year-end
`2002 results inline with the pre-announced range. Revenue of $11.7 million was 1.2% above our
`estimate of $11.5 million, 12.2% below our prior estimate of $13.3 million and within the pre-
`announced range of $11.3-$12.5 million. December quarter EPS of $(0.09) was a penny better than
`our estimate, $0.03 per share worse than our original estimate and within the pre-announced range of
`$(0.08)-$(0.11) per share.
`(cid:120) Guidance for 1Q03 calls for revenue of $11-$13 million and a loss of ($0.09)-($0.04) per share. No
`guidance was given for the full 2003 year (FY03). When IMNY pre-released its 4Q02 results several
`weeks ago, we suspended our estimates, pending the release of final results. After reviewing our
`model, we have decided to be very conservative in our estimates, and we have lowered our revenue
`estimates for 1Q03 and FY03 from $12.2 million and $54.6 million, respectively, to $11.9 million and
`$51.2 million, respectively. We are also lowering our 1Q03 EPS estimate from ($0.04) to ($0.07), and
`our FY03 estimate to ($0.17) from our prior (under review) estimate of $(0.08).
`(cid:120) Although we believe there is limited downside to the stock from current levels, there is also little to get
`excited about in the near-term, as we believe I-many will continue to face a challenging environment.
`We are maintaining our Neutral rating.
`
`
`
`
`
`I-Many, Inc. (IMNY-$1.25)
`NEUTRAL FY Ends Dec. Target: $1
`FY02 EPS From/To: $(0.18)E/($0.18)A vs. $(0.12)A LY
`FY03 EPS From/To: $(0.08)E/($0.17)E
`Last Q EPS (Dec02) From/To: $(0.10)E/($0.09)A vs. $0.01A LY
`Next Q EPS (Mar03) From/To: $(0.04)E/($0.07)E vs. $0.01A LY
`FY02 Rev. ($ mil.) From/To: $54.5E/$54.7A vs. $56.1A LY
`FY03 Rev. ($ mil.) From/To: $54.6E/$51.2E
`Last Q Rev. (Dec02) From/To: $11.5E/$11.7A vs. $13.8A LY
`Next Q Rev. (Mar03) From/To: $12.2E/$11.9E vs. $15.0A LY
`Ken Kiarash (212) 210-0063 / kkiarash@buckresearch.com
`
`IMNY 4Q02 Results Inline With Pre-Announced Range – Maintain Neutral
`
`(Div./Yield: Nil/Nil)
`(Consensus: $(0.17)E)
`(Consensus: $(0.12)E)
`(Consensus: $(0.09)E)
`(Consensus: $(0.06)E)
`(Consensus: $55.9M)
`(Consensus: $54.7M)
`(Consensus: $13.0M)
`(Consensus: $13.3M)
`
`3
`
`

`

`THE BUCKINGHAM RESEARCH GROUP
`Research Notes for February 5, 2003
`
`Jones Apparel Group (JNY - $29.50)
`ACCUMULATE FY Ends Dec. Target: $40
`FY02 EPS From/To: $2.80E/$2.81A v.s. $2.31A LY
`FY03 EPS From/To: $3.05E/NC
`Next Q EPS (Mar-03) From/To: $0.84E/NC vs. $0.77A LY
`Reported Q EPS (Dec-02) From/To: $0.49E/$0.50A vs. $0.25A LY
`Lee Backus (212) 922-5529/ lbackus@buckresearch.com
`
`Remain With Accumulate Based On Valuation Although License Dispute Could Weigh On The Stock
`Near Term; JNY Reported On Plan 4Q02 EPS Of $0.50, Confirmed FY03 EPS Of $3.05
`
`(Div./Yield: Nil/Nil)
`(Consensus: $2.80)
`(Consensus: $3.07)
`(Consensus: $0.86)
`(Consensus: $0.50)
`
` •
`
` We continue to rate the shares of Jones Apparel Group (JNY) at Accumulate, although we
`acknowledge that the dispute between Ralph Lauren and JNY could weigh on the stock until there is
`some settlement. With the stock at this level however, we believe that any resolution of the dispute
`will be a positive for the stock. Even if JNY loses the Lauren line after December 31, 2003 (a
`scenario that we believe is unlikely), the stock is currently selling at a multiple of about 10X the
`resulting EPS estimate for 2004. We believe that the dispute will probably be resolved with JNY
`paying a higher royalty fee for the Lauren line after December 31, 2003. Our 2003 EPS estimate of
`$3.05 would remain intact under any circumstances. If for some reason the issue is not settled so
`that JNY retains the Lauren line after the end of this year, our 2004 EPS estimate of $3.30 would
`probably have to be reduced but we would expect that there are certainly other businesses that could
`fill at least part of the void (the worst case scenario would be a 2004 EPS reduction of $0.50). A
`higher royalty rate starting next year (the more likely scenario) we estimate would impact next year
`by no more than $0.10 per share.
`• JNY is a diversified company, Lauren represents approximately 13% of sales and an estimated 17%
`of operating profits. JNY has been very successful in growing earnings through accretive
`acquisitions. We expect that JNY will continue to use their very high cash flow ($449 million or
`$3.18 per share in 2003) to make additional acquisitions.
`
`
`
`MEDTRONIC, INC. (MDT-$43.10)
`STRONG BUY FY Ends April Target: $60
`FY03 EPS From/To: $1.40E/NC vs. $1.21A LY
`FY04 EPS From/To: $1.68E/NC
`Next Q EPS (Jan-03) From/To: $0.36E/NC vs. $0.30A LY
`Robert M. Goldman, CFA (212) 922-5506 / rgoldman@buckresearch.com
`
`Strong Buy Reiterated Despite Reimbursement Concerns
`
`(Div./Yield: $0.25/0.58%)
`(Consensus: $1.41E)
`(Consensus: $1.64E)
`(Consensus: $0.35E)
`
` •
`
` On Monday, February 3, the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) posted information
`to be discussed on Wednesday, February 12, at a meeting of the Medicare Coverage Advisory
`Committee (MCAC).
`• On that day, the MCAC will discuss the possibility of granting a national Medicare reimbursement
`code for the prophylactic use of implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) for heart attack
`survivors (the MADIT II population). There will be a public review period following the Feb. 12,
`2003, meeting prior to any MCAC decision being implemented.
`• The CMS analysis posted February 3 takes issue with the exclusion criteria in the MADIT II trial,
`the Guidant-sponsored trial that concluded “in patients with a prior myocardial infarction and
`
`4
`
`

`

`THE BUCKINGHAM RESEARCH GROUP
`Research Notes for February 5, 2003
`
`advanced left ventricular dysfunction, prophylactic implantation of a defibrillator improves survival
`and should be considered as a recommended therapy.”
`• Neutral-rated Guidant Corp. (GDT-$32.65) will respond to the CMS analysis, and the issue will
`be discussed at the MCAC meeting on February 12, 2003.
`• To us, no argument that the CMS reasoning is flawed will offset the reality, it seems to us, that CMS
`is heading in a direction to not fully reimburse for MADIT II patients. Moreover, the CMS concern
`may discourage device implantation in MADIT II patients and lead to less state-by-state coverage.
`Investors would be well suited, in our judgment, to somewhat moderate their projected sales growth
`rate assumptions for all ICDs suppliers.
`• We cover both Guidant and Medtronic. We view GDT as much more leveraged to the MADIT II
`argument as compared to MDT. We reiterate our STRONG BUY rating on MDT, based on the
`following.
`o We project FY2004 aggregate sales growth for MDT of 15%.
`o Embedded in our projection is our estimate (unchanged) of FY2004 ICD sales growth of 18% (to
`$1.4 billion).
`o Were ICD sales growth in FY2004 to only equal 7% (about the market growth rate prior to the
`report of MADIT II trial results), our Medtronic ICD sales projection for FY2004 becomes about
`$1.3 billion and our aggregate sales growth projection about 13.5%. More likely, ICD sales
`growth for MDT in FY2004 will be somewhere between 7% and 18%, depending on what the
`MCAC says on February 12, 2003.
`o We are attracted to MDT shares, in large part, based on the company’s well-diversified growth
`portfolio, as indicated in table below.
`
`
`
` •
`
`Monsanto Co. (MON-$17.65)
`(Div./Yield: $0.48/2.7%)
`NEUTRAL FY Ends Dec. Target: $17 (From $19)
`(Consensus: $1.43E)
`FY03 EPS From/To: $1.45E/$1.20E vs. $1.10A LY
`(Consensus: $1.75E)
`FY04 EPS From/To: $1.50E/NC
`(Consensus: $0.32E)
`Next Q EPS (Mar-03) From/To: $0.30E/$0.15E vs. $0.33A LY
`Analyst, associate or a member of household have a financial interest in any class of common equity securities, warrants or
`options of the subject company.
`John E. Roberts (212) 210-0064 / jroberts@buckresearch.com
`
`Reducing Estimates for MON; Neutral Rating Maintained
`
` Neutral-rated Monsanto Co. (MON) reported 4Q02 EPS of $0.31 versus $0.09 last year, essentially
`in-line with expectations. However, we are reducing our EPS estimates for 1Q03 from $0.30 to
`$0.15, and for the full year 2003 from $1.45 to $1.20. We also are introducing a 2004 EPS estimate
`of $1.50 at this time.
`• We have revised our stock price target to $17 per share (from $19), based on a 14x P/E multiple on
`our lowered estimate for 2003 EPS of $1.20 and in line with many other stocks in our Specialty
`Chemicals coverage universe. We believe that MON’s book value near $19 per share, and near 10%
`free cash flow yield, should support the stock near current prices.
`• Sales declined 14% from 4Q01 for Roundup products, and declined 7% for other non-seed products
`(other herbicides, milk growth hormone, etc.). The Roundup decline reflects increased generic
`competition in the U.S., and reduced sales in Latin America due to credit risk management.
`• Seed & Genomics revenues rose 16% from 4Q01. This helped overall North American and Latin
`American sales (including Roundup) to be up 1-2%. Sales in the smaller Europe-Africa area rose
`
`5
`
`

`

`THE BUCKINGHAM RESEARCH GROUP
`Research Notes for February 5, 2003
`
`12%, and in Asia-Pacific declined 21%. Weather conditions in Asia (drought in Australia, etc.) have
`caused recent Asian results to be weak for a number of Ag. Products producers.
`• The press release did not comment on U.S. approval for root-worm protected corn. We believe
`investors are expecting a modest amount of U.S. planting in 2003, with a significant ramp up in
`2004.
`
`
`
`99 CENTS ONLY STORES (NDN-$24.00)
`NETURAL FY Ends Dec. Target: $22
`FY02 EPS From/To: $0.83E/$0.83A vs. $0.69A LY
`FY03 EPS From/To: $0.99E/$0.98E
`FY04 EPS From/To: $1.20E/New
`Reported Q EPS (Dec-02) From/To: $0.28E/$0.28A vs. $0.23A LY
`Next Q EPS (Mar-03) From/To: $0.20E/$0.19E vs. $0.18A LY
`John Zolidis (212) 922-0149 / jzolidis@buckresearch.com
`
`Remain With A Neutral Following 4Q02 Results; Cutting 2003 EPS Estimate One Cent to $0.98
`
`(Div./Yield: Nil/Nil)
`(Consensus: $0.84E)
`(Consensus: $1.00E)
`(Consensus: $1.20E)
`(Consensus: $0.28E)
`(Consensus: $0.20E)
`
` •
`
` Neutral-rated 99 Cents Only Stores (NDN) reported 4Q02 EPS of $0.28, in-line with our estimate
`and the street consensus. However, bottom-line results were aided by a lower than expected tax rate.
`• NDN provided revised guidance for 2003 and maintained its 25% and 20% square footage and EPS
`growth projections, respectively. However, a majority of new store openings will occur in the
`second half, and costs related to the company’s new Texas distribution center will pressure results
`over the course of the year. We are lowering our 2003 EPS estimate by one cent to $0.98 (in-line
`with the low end of guidance) but are concerned that these figures may prove to be a bit of a stretch.
`• We remain with an Neutral rating on NDN and maintain our stock price target of $22 per share,
`which is based on a 22x P/E multiple (or a PEG ratio of 1.1x) and our 2003 EPS estimate of $0.98.
`Even with yesterday’s 11% decline, NDN shares continue to trade at a premium to growth and at P/E
`multiples higher than those almost every other retailer. While we agree that NDN has an extremely
`productive store model, and a huge opportunity for long-term growth, we believe the shares are
`overvalued given near-term risks associated with growth into new markets and operational
`challenges attached to opening and integrating a second distribution center into the company’s
`systems.
`
`
`
`Royal Caribbean Corp. (RCL-$15.20)
`STRONG BUY FY Ends Dec. Target: $30
`FY03 EPS From/To: $2.00E/NC vs. $1.79A LY
`Next Q (Mar-03) EPS From/To: $0.35E/$0.33E vs. $0.27A LY
`Helane Becker (212) 922-5523/ hbecker@buckresearch.com
`
`RCL: Maintain Strong Buy: Reducing Q1 Estimate Due to Additional Cancellation
` Royal Caribbean Corp. (RCL) common shares continue to be rated Strong Buy. We continue to
`believe these shares can sell at 15x estimated 2003 EPS of $2.00 or at a stock price target of $30 per
`share.
`• RCL reported yesterday that it would cancel a third cruise due to a propulsion problem on the
`Infinity. We had previously reduced our Q1 EPS estimate by $0.05 to $0.35 on the cancellation of
`two cruises on this ship and now will reduce the estimate by an additional $0.02 to $0.33 per share.
`
`(Div./Yield: $0.52/3.4%)
`(Consensus: $1.88E)
`(Consensus: $0.27E)
`
` •
`
`6
`
`

`

`THE BUCKINGHAM RESEARCH GROUP
`Research Notes for February 5, 2003
`• The Infinity is an 18-month old ship, and thus still under warranty, and RCL will probably get relief
`from the manufacturer. However, this process could take months or years.
`• For the first quarter, management is somewhat cautious on the outlook, saying yields would be up by
`2%-4%. We were estimating an increase of 3%-4% in our 1Q03 EPS estimate of $0.33 vs. $0.27 a
`year ago. For the full-year 2003, management indicated it remained comfortable with the current
`consensus estimate of $2.01 per share, in line with our estimate of $2.00.
`
`Watson Pharmaceuticals (WPI-$30.02)
`STRONG BUY FY Ends Dec. Target: $37
`FY03 EPS From/To: $1.85E/NC vs. $1.63A LY
`FY04 EPS From/To: $2.13E/NC
`Next Q EPS (Mar-03) From/To: $0.44E/NC vs. $0.34A LY
`EPS Estimates for 2002, 2003 & 2004 Exclude Goodwill Amortization Per New Accounting Rules
`David G. Buck (212) 922-2136 / dbuck@buckresearch.com
`
`Company Ends 2002 on Positive Note; Expect Accelerating Earnings Growth
`
`(Div./Yield: Nil/Nil)
`(Consensus: $1.80E)
`(Consensus: $2.05E)
`(Consensus: $0.42E)
`
`
`
` (cid:120)
`
` Watson Pharmaceuticals reported 4Q EPS that topped expectations by $0.01, but were at the
`high-end of the pre-announcement range. Throughout 2002, Watson met or exceeded
`expectations. We expect an acceleration of growth in 2003 with expected EPS of $1.85 (+14%), the
`high end of Watson’s $1.75-$1.85 per share range. We remain with EPS estimates of $1.85 for 2003
`and $2.13 for 2004 with just minor tweaks (our full model is part of our full Company Comment).
`Our 1Q 2003 EPS estimate of $0.44, remains $0.01 above Watson’s guidance range. We expect a
`return to 15-20% EPS growth for Watson and our price target of $37 represents a 20x multiple of
`2003 earnings. As a reminder, Watson’s earnings power is understated due to non-cash amortization
`charges. We estimate free cash flow per share of $1.81 for 2003 and $2.05 for 2004. At current
`prices, Watson shares trade at under 17x free cash flow for a yield of 6%. We would continue to
`purchase WPI shares.
`(cid:120) The expected approval of Oxytrol (overactive bladder) and drug launches are the key catalysts
`for Watson. We expect an approvable letter by the end of this month for the Oxytrol overactive
`bladder drug, with an approval expected during 2Q 2003. The Company will launch this drug
`initially with its own urology sales force followed by the addition of up to 380 reps by 3Q 2003. We
`expect this drug to post 2003 revenues of $45 million with peak sales of $250-$300 million. Watson
`should receive FDA approval or re-launch as many as 12 generic drugs in 2003, leading to generic
`revenue growth of 17% for 2003. Women’s Health posted 2002 revenues of $343 million (+41%,
`28% of company sales). Growth opportunities remain despite generic competition from
`Accumulate-rated Barr. Watson is launching three oral contraceptives under license from Ortho and
`the division should benefit from growth in PapSure (cervical cancer screening) and Alora (HRT)
`which have no generic risk.
`(cid:120) Pipeline drugs include nail fungus patch. Watson indicated that it has filed patent applications for
`its nail fungus (onychomycosis) patch, which we believe to be fluconazole and Watson should file an
`NDA for this drug by first half 2004. One mild negative was the delay in the fentanyl lozenge
`cancer pain drug. The FDA is requiring a carcinogenicity study that could delay the program
`by two years, potentially a positive for Cephalon, marketer of Actiq. Somerset’s (Watson/Mylan
`joint venture) Emsam antidepressant should be filed with the FDA during 2003.
`
`
`
`7
`
`

`

`THE BUCKINGHAM RESEARCH GROUP
`Research Notes for February 5, 2003
`
`webMethods, Inc. (WEBM-$10.66)
`ACCUMULATE FY Ends March Target: $14
`FY03 EPS From/To: ($0.04)E/NC vs. $(0.31)A LY
`FY04 EPS From/To: $0.19E/NC
`Next Q EPS (Mar03) From/To: $0.02E/NC vs. $(0.00)A LY
`FY03 Rev. ($ mil.) From/To: $202.1E/NC vs. $196.0A LY
`FY04 Rev. ($ mil.) From/To: $229.8E/NC
`Next Q Rev. (Mar03) From/To: $54.4E/NC vs. $50.7A LY
`Calendar year EPS: 2002A = ($0.06), 2003E = $0.15 and. 2004E = $0.30.
`Ken Kiarash (212) 210-0063 / kkiarash@buckresearch.com
`
`Investor Meetings Reaffirms Our Confidence in WEBM’s Leading Position
`
`(Div./Yield: Nil/Nil)
`(Consensus: ($0.03)E)
`(Consensus: $0.12E)
`(Consensus: $0.03E)
`(Consensus: $202.7M)
`(Consensus: $223.2M)
`(Consensus: $53.9M)
`
` (cid:120)
`
`
`
` Yesterday in New York, we hosted a series of investor meetings with management of
`webMethods. Key takeaways include:
`o webMethods 6, which was released in December quarter, has been received very well by end
`users, accounting for some of the recent success and continuing momentum in the current
`quarter. GA (general availability) of webMethods 6 will be at the end of current quarter. The
`management also indicated better-than-expected uptake of webMethods Business Manager and
`WorkFlow, which are sold as add on modules.
`o Operating margins should continue to improve due to leverage in WEBM’s business and
`financial model. WEBM’s management has not provided any specific guidance for revenue or
`margins beyond the current quarter, but our feeling is that the existing estimates are very
`conservative. We believe operating margins can settle in the 20%-plus range in the next 2-3
`years, after climbing to 10-20% range by the end of FY04 (our above-street consensus estimate
`assumes an operating margin of 7% in 4QFY04).
`o Public sector should continue to surprise on the upside. WEBM’s largest deal in the last quarter
`was with the state of Georgia. We expect similar deals to continue, at federal, state, and local
`levels, especially considering that integration remains a top priority for all enterprises,
`particularly in the public sector. Also, any additional trickle coming from the major increase in
`FY04 IT budget (up 15% to $60 billion) should disproportionately benefit smaller vendors such
`as webMethods.
`o Given that the March quarter is WEBM’s fourth fiscal quarter, we feel comfortable with our view
`that the company can meet, and even beat, current estimates. We have modeled for a modest 1%
`sequential increase in revenue in the March quarter. However, given that a meaningful number of
`WEBM’s quota-carrying sales people will start to hit their ‘accelerators’ in this quarter, we
`believe WEBM’s can once again exceed current estimates, both on top-line and bottom-line.
`(cid:120) We would continue to add to our positions in WEBM, as this leading integration software
`vendors continues to gain market share (see our report of February 3) against the weaker
`players and the space is rapidly consolidating around the three leading vendors, WEBM,
`TIBCO, and IBM.
`(cid:120) We are maintaining our Accumulate rating and price target of $14, based on a combination of DCF,
`PEG and comparables analysis (at $14 per share, WEBM shares would be trading at 2.3x EV/CY03
`revenue of $224 million).
`
`8
`
`

`

`THE BUCKINGHAM RESEARCH GROUP
`Research Notes for February 5, 2003
`
`INDUSTRY COMMENTS
`
`
`
`
`
`AIRLINE INDUSTRY
`The Buckingham Research Group makes a market in the securities of Northwest Airlines (NWAC).
`Helane Becker (212) 922-5523 /hbecker@buckresearch.com
`
`Airline Industry: January Traffic To Date Slightly Better Than Expected
`
` •
`
` January traffic reports indicate that airlines’ load factors may be running a percentage point or two
`ahead of our expectations. We think some of this may be due to New Year holiday return traffic.
`• Also, unit revenues appear to be positive for the second month in a row. This is the first time this
`has happened in two years. The President week holidays later this month and the start of spring
`break in March could aid this possible pick-up off the bottom.
`In the next two weeks, we should know whether Swap-rated UAL Corp. (UAL-$0.91) will have to
`convert from a Chapter 11 to Chapter 7 bankruptcy filing. We think this is likely due to the
`company’s pension liabilities. We estimate that UAL’s underfunded pension liability is $4.0 billion.
`• United Airlines’ conversion to Chapter 7 would obviously aid American Airlines and Northwest
`Airlines. American itself has issues, and has approached its employees for $1.5 billion in wage
`concessions. Without those concessions, we believe that American would probably have to file for
`Chapter 11 itself by the summer. A Chapter 7 petition by United would buy American at least
`another year.
`• We continue to focus on AMR Corp. (AMR-$2.87), Northwest Airlines (NWAC-$6.15) and
`Continental Airlines (CAL-$5.75), all rated Accumulate, as all should benefit from either USAir’s
`or UAL’s Chapter 11 filings.
`
`•
`
`
`
`ELECTRIC UTILITIES INDUSTRY
`Jeffrey J. Hoffman (212) 922-5527 / jhoffman@buckresearch.com
`
`Recent Developments That Can Impact EIX and CPN
`
` •
`
` We reiterate our Strong Buy ratings on the shares of Edison International (EIX-$12.20) and
`Calpine (CPN-$3.33). We are maintaining our 2002 and 2003 EPS estimates for EIX of $2.03 and
`$1.60, respectively, and our stock price target of $20 per share, which is based on a 12x P/E multiple
`to our 2003 EPS estimate. We also are maintaining our 2002 and 2003 EPS estimates for CPN of
`$0.77 and $0.90, respectively, and our stock price target of $11 per share.
`• On a positive note, yesterday power prices and spark spreads in the Midwest and Northeast
`rebounded dramatically in front of colder weather expectations. Power delivery in the Mid Atlantic
`increased 36% to $55 per MWH, power delivery in western New York State increased 45% to $65
`per MWH, New York City increased 7.5% to $75 per MWH and power delivery in the New England
`Power Pool increased 11% to $62.13. Power prices had moderated with the recent warmer weather.
`The cold weather of January and the current price developments are positive for EIX’s Edison
`Mission Energy (EME) subsidiary, which is selling power into the Midwest spot market, and for
`CPN, which sells into all of the regional spot markets, and should positively impact 1Q03 earnings.
`
`9
`
`

`

`THE BUCKINGHAM RESEARCH GROUP
`Research Notes for February 5, 2003
`• On a negative note, yesterday Williams Companies (WMB–$3.25; Not Rated) announced it had
`sold a 170 MW power plant to Hoosier Energy for $67 million. This is mildly negative news. The
`sales price is approximately $394 million per KW, which is below the cost of construction. We
`estimate the current cost of construction for new gas plants at $500-$600 per KW. The low sales
`price reinforces to market view of a glut of power plant capacity. The market value of existing
`power plant capacity is one important factor considered by debt investors for refinancing current
`debt maturities. Since power plants are assets with 40-50 year operating lives and since it is
`generally recognized that the current national glut of capacity will be gone by 2005, we expect
`power plant asset values will recover to cost of construction valuations over the next two to three
`years. These developments impact both EIX and CPN in their refinancing negotiations.
`
`
`
`HEALTHCARE SERVICES & HOSPITAL MANAGEMENT INDUSTRY
`Jeffrey J. Hoffman (212) 922-5527 / jhoffman@buckresearch.com
`
`Hospital Stocks: Earnings Catalysts Remain Intact
`
` •
`
` We continue to rate the shares of HCA Inc. (HCA-$40.55), Health Management Associates
`(HMA-$17.80), LifePoint Hospitals (LPNT-$24.05), Triad Hospitals (TRI-$26.61) and Universal
`Health Services (UHS-$44.76) as Strong Buys. We continue to rate the shares of Tenet Healthcare
`(THC-$17.90) as Accumulate.
`• Earnings reports from this sector to date indicate that pricing and admissions trends continue to be
`robust. We expect to see this continue as LPNT and TRI report on February 18 and 25 respectively.
`• We feel yesterday HCA earnings report had two very important points. One is that commercial
`pricing continues very strong. With 80% of HCA’s managed care contracts renegotiated for this year,
`pricing increases averaged 7.5%. That compares to general expectations of increases of 5-6%. For
`2004, 25% of HCA’s contracts have been renegotiated with similar average increases of 7.5%. HCA
`has typically been an industry leader and a standard setter regarding pricing negotiations
`• Regarding admissions, HCA’s robust capital expenditures growth has been in response to its existing
`markets admissions growth. HCA spent $1.8 billion in 2002 vs. $1.42 billion in 2001. It will spend
`$2 billion this year and likely will spend more than $2 billion in 2004. These increases are for
`internal expansion and are in addition to its pending $1.3 billion acquisition of Health Midwest.
`• We believe these two developments are ind

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket