throbber

`
`CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND RESEARCH
`
`Approval Package for:
`
`APPLICA TION NUMBER.-
`
`21-023
`
`Trade Name:
`
`Restasis
`
`Generic Name:
`
`Cyclosporine ophthalmic emulsion, 0.05%
`
`Sponsor:
`
`Allergan, Inc.
`
`Approval Date:
`
`October 10, 2003
`
`Indications:
`
`Provides for the use of R_estasis (cyclosporine
`ophthalmic emulsion) Opthalmic Emulsion, 0.05%
`for the following indication:
`to increase tear
`production in patients whose tear production is
`presumed to be suppressed due to ocular
`inflammation associated with keratoconjunctivitis
`sicca. Increased tear production was not seen in
`patients currently taking topical anti—inflamrnatory
`drugs or using punctal plugs.
`
`1
`
`ALL 2033
`MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS v. ALLERGAN
`|PR2016-01128
`
`1
`
`ALL 2033
`MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS V. ALLERGAN
`IPR2016-01128
`
`

`

`
`
`CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND
`
`RESEARCH
`
`APPLICA TION NUMBER:
`
`21-023
`
`CONTENTS
`
`
`A Rs /
`
`ded in this ND Review.
`
`
`
`A roval Letter
`
`A rovable Letter(s)
`
`Final Printed Labelin
`
`Medical Review(s)
`
`Chemistry Review(s)
`EA/FONSI
`
`Pharmacolo Review(s)
`
`Statistical Review(s)
`
`Microbiolo Review(s)
`Clinical Pharm_ac0logy/ Biogharmaceutics Review(s)
`Administrative D0cument(s)
`
`
`
`Correspondence
`
`2
`
`

`

`CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND
`
`RESEARCH
`
`APPLICA TION NUMBER:
`
`21-023
`
`APPROVAL LETTER! S!
`
`3
`
`

`

`_€
`
`DEPARTMENT OFHEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
`
`PubficHeathSewice
`
`Food and Drug Administration
`Rockville, MD 20857
`
`NDA 21-O23
`
`Allergan, Inc.
`Attention: Elizabeth Bancroft
`
`Senior Director, Regulatory Affairs
`2525 Dupont Drive
`P.O. Box 19534
`
`Irvine, California 92623-9534
`
`Dear Ms. Bancroft:
`
`Please refer to your new drug application (NDA) dated February 24, 1999, received February 25, 1999,
`submitted under section 505(b) ofthe Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act for Restasis
`Lcyclosporine ophthalmic emulsion) Ophthalmic Emulsion, 0.05%.
`/_.
`_
`'
`We acknowledge receipt of your submissions dated September 7, 2001, and April 23, May 22,
`June 17, July 11, September 6, October 28, November 15, and December 4, 6, 16 and 20, 2002.
`
`We also refer to our approvable letters of August 3, 1999, and March 25, and October l9, 2000.
`The September 6, 2002, submission constituted a complete response to our October 19, 2000, action
`letter.
`
`This new drug application provides for the use of Restasis {cyclosporine ophthalmic emulsion)
`Ophthalmic Emulsion, 0.05% for the following indication: to increase tear production in patients
`whose tear production is presumed to be suppressed due to ocular inflammation associated with
`keratoconjunetivitis sicca. Increased tear production was not seen in patients currently taking topical
`anti—inflammatory drugs or using punctal plugs.
`
`It is approved, effective on the date of this
`We completed our review of this application, as amended.
`letter, for use as recommended in the enclosed labeling text.
`
`The final printed labeling (FPL) must be identical to the enclosed labeling text for the package insert,
`immediate container and carton labels. Marketing the product with FPL that is not identical to the
`approved labeling text may render the product misbranded and an unapproved new drug.
`
`Please submit an electronic version of the FPL according to the guidance for industry titled Providing
`Regulatory Submissions in Electronic Format - NDA. Alternatively, you may submit 20 paper copies
`of the FPL as soon as it is available but no more than 30 days after it is printed. Individually mount ten
`of the copies on heavy-weight paper or similar material. For administrative purposes, designate this
`submission "FPL for approved NDA 21-023." Approval of this submission by FDA is not required
`before the labeling is used.
`
`4
`
`

`

`NDA 21-023
`
`Page 2
`
`In addition, submit three copies of the introductory promotional materials that you propose to use for
`this product. Submit all proposed materials in draft or mock-up form, not final print. Send one copy to
`this Division and two copies of both the promotional materials and the package insert directly to:
`
`Division of Drug Marketing, Advertising, and Communications, HFD-42
`Food and Drug Administration
`5600 Fishers Lane
`
`Rockville, MD 20857
`
`Please submit one market package of the drug product when it is available.
`
`We have not completed validation of the regulatory methods. However, we expect your continued
`cooperation to resolve any problems that may be identified.
`
`We remind you that you must comply with reporting requirements for an approved NBA (21 CFR
`3 £4.80 and 314.81).
`
`It‘_\‘ou have any questions, call Lori M. Gorski, Project Manager, at (301) 827-2090.
`
`Sincerely,
`
`{See appended eIec:Ir(mic' .\'igrmtin'c gmgc,‘
`
`Wiley A. Chambers, MD.
`Deputy Director
`Division ofAnti-Inflammatory, Analgesic
`and Ophthalmic Drug Products, HFD-550
`Office of Drug Evaluation V
`Center for Drug Evaluation and Research
`
`Enclosure
`
`5
`
`

`

`CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND
`
`RESEARCH
`
`APPLICA TION NUMBER:
`
`21-023
`
`APPROVABLE LETTERQ SQ
`
`6
`
`

`

`
`DEPARTIVLENT OF HEALTH & HUIVIAN SERVICES
`Public Health Service
`
`NBA 21-023
`
`OCT I 9 2000
`
`Food and Drug Administration
`Rockville MD 20857
`
`Allergan, Inc.
`Attention: Elizabeth Bancroft
`
`Director, Regulatory Affairs
`2525 Dupont Drive
`P.0. Box 19534
`
`Irvine, California 92623-9534
`
`Dear Ms. Bancroft:
`
`Please refer to your new drug application (NDA) dated February 24, 1999, received
`February 25, 1999, submitted under section 505(b) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic
`Act for Restasis (cyclosporine ophthalmic emulsion) Ophthalmic Emulsion, 0.05%.
`
`We acknowledge receipt of your submissions dated-April 24, August 9, 22, 23, and 31,
`September 7, and October:..2 and 3, 2000.
`tWe also refer to our approvable letters of
`August 3, 1999, and March 25, 2000. Your submission of August 9, 2000, constituted a
`complete response to our March 25, 2000, action letter.
`
`We have completed the review of this application, as amended, and it is approvable. Before
`this application may be approved, however, it will be necessary for you to address the lack of
`substantial evidence of efficacy. Substantial evidence should consist of adequate and well-
`controlled investigations, as defined in 21 CFR 314.126, that the drug product will have the
`effect it purports or is represented to have under the conditions of use prescribed,
`recommended or suggested in the proposed labeling. Specifically, the submitted studies are
`not replicative and are insufficient to establish efficacy —--..........__..._......-—...______
`'
`.4: : 4.
`a
`
`Under 21 CFR 314.50(d)(5)(vi)(b), we request that you update your NDA by submitting all
`safety information you now have regarding your new drug.
`
`We will continue to work with you on the proposed labeling for this product.
`
`In addition, please submit three copies of the introductory promotional materials that you
`propose to use for this product. All proposed materials should be submitted in draft or mock-
`up form, not final print. Please submit one copy to this Division and two copies ofboth the
`promotional materials and the package insert directly to:
`
`7
`
`

`

`Page 2
`NDA 21-023
`
`Division of Drug Marketing, Advertising, and Communications, HFD-40
`Food and Drug Administration
`5600 Fishers Lane
`
`Rockville, Maryland 20857
`
`Within 10 days after the date of this letter, you are required to amend the application, notify us
`of your intent to file an amendment, or follow one of your other options under 21 CFR
`314.} 10. In the absence of any such action FDA may proceed to withdraw the application.
`
`Under 21 CFR 314.102(d) of the new drug regulations, you may request an informal meeting
`or telephone conference with this Division to discuss what further steps need to be taken before
`the application may be approved.
`
`The drug product may not be legally marketed until you have been notified in writing that the
`application is approved.
`
`If you have any questions, call Lori M. Gorski, Project Manager, at (301) 827-2020.
`
`Sincerely,
`
`(ff
`Wi1e)7A. Chambers, MD.
`Deputy Director
`Division of Anti—lnflammatory, Analgesic and
`Ophthalmic Drug Products, HFD—550
`Office of Drug Evaluation V
`Center for Drug Evaluation and Research
`
`8
`
`

`

`
`
`NDA 21-023
`
`Page 3
`
`cc:
`
`NDA 21-Q23
`HFD-550/Div. Files
`[nitialed by:
`HFD-‘S50/CSO/Gorsk
`HFD-550/MO/Boyd‘
`I-[FD-550/Chem/'I‘so
`I-[FD~S50/Phar/Mukheriee
`HFD-725/Stat/Lu
`HFD-880/PK/Tandon
`
`Z; I
`
`5.6’!
`. L; (
`‘
`I/_§(
`
`(5 I
`
`HFD-805/Micro/Riley
`I-IFD-550/DepDir/Cham m
`HFD-550/ADD/Bull
`‘
`HFD-5S0/SCSONacoc'11.
`I-[FD-550/ChemTL/Ng
`HFD-725/Stat TL/Lin
`HFD-880/PK TL/Bashaw
`HFD-805/Micro TL/Cooney
`HFD-002/ORM
`
`}
`£5:
`
`55-.‘
`;’
`
`HFD-105/ADRA
`
`HFD-95/DDMS
`
`HFD-830/DNDC Division Director
`DISTRICT OFFICE
`
`Drafted by: /October 12. 2000. revised 10/16/00
`Inif 1 db :
`7
`fin? ’
`25/
`filenamez
`
`APPROVABLE (AE)
`
`9
`
`

`

`
`
`DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
`
`Public Health Service
`
`
`NDA21-O23
`
`MAR 2 5 2000
`
`Food and Drug Administration
`Rockville MD 20857
`
`Allergan, Inc.
`Attention: Elizabeth Bancroft
`
`Director, Regulatory Affairs
`2525 Dupont Drive
`P.0. Box 19534
`
`Irvine, California 92623-9534
`
`Dear Ms. Bancrofi:
`
`Please refer to your new drug application (NDA) dated February 24, 1999, received
`February 25, 1999, submitted under section 505(b) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic
`Act for Restasis (eyclosporine ophthalmic emulsion) Ophthalmic Emulsion, 0.05%.
`
`We acknowledge receipt of your submissions dated August 4 (two), September 3 and 20, and
`December 8, 1999. Your submission of December 8, 1999, constituted a complete response to
`our August 3, 1999, action letter.
`
`We have completed the review of this application, as amended, and it is approvable. Before
`this application may be approved, however, it will be necessary for you to address the
`following:
`
`1. There is a lack of substantial evidence consisting of adequate and well-controlled
`investigations, as defined in 21 CFR 314.126, that the drug product will have the effect it
`purports or is represented to have under the conditions of use prescribed, recommended or
`suggested in the proposed labeling. Specifically, the submitted studies are not replicative
`and are insufficient to establish efficacy
`
`
` __.. ___._,,__;u—-H|“""‘!'“"=" "" ' ' "'5 "”‘***I=0hu=aetrsnnafiu.s-ys;g‘,,;,_$._"_“_“‘_.'§i‘-mi”
`
`2. Under 21 CFR 3 14.50(d)(5)(vi)(b), .we request thatyou update your NDA by-submitting all--
`safety information you now have regarding your new drug.
`
`We will continue to work with you on the proposed labeling for this product.
`
`In addition, please submit three copies of the introductory promotional materials that you
`propose to use for this product. All proposed materials should be submitted in draft or mock-
`up form, not final print. Please submit one copy to this Division and two copies of both the
`promotional materials and the package insert directly to:
`
`10
`
`10
`
`

`

`NDA 21 -023
`
`Page 2
`
`Division of Drug Marketing, Advertising, and Communications, HFD-40
`Food and Drug Administration
`5600 Fishers Lane
`
`Rockville, Maryland 2085?
`
`Within 10 days after the date ofthis letter, you are required to amend the application, notify us
`of your intent to file an amendment, or follow one of your other options under 21 CFR
`314.110. In the absence of any such action FDA may proceed to withdraw the application.
`Any amendment should respond to all the deficiencies listed. We will not process a partial
`reply as a major amendment nor will the review clock be reactivated until all deficiencies have
`been addressed.
`
`Under 21 CFR 31 4.l02(d) of the new drug regulations, you may request an informal meeting
`or telephone conference with this Division to discuss what fiirther steps need to be taken before
`the application may be approved.
`
`The drug product may not be legally marketed until you have been notified in writing that the
`application is approved.
`
`If you have any questions, call Lori M. Gorski, Project Manager, at (301) 827-2090.
`
`Sincerely,
`
`#4
`Wiley A. Chambers, MD.
`Deputy Director
`Division of Anti-Inflammatory, Analgesic
`Ophthalmic Drug Products, I-IFD—550
`Office of Drug Evaluation V
`Center for Drug Evaluation and Research
`
`11
`
`11
`
`

`

`Page 3
`NDA 21-023
`
`cc:
`
`NDA 21-O23
`HIFD—550/Div. Files
`HFD-550/CSO/Gorsk‘
`
`HFD-SSOIMO/Boyd,
`HZFD~550/Chem/Fensélau
`
`L5,:
`
`'
`
`0.51‘
`
`;
`
`I-IFD-550/Phar/Mukhelfiee
`HFD-725/Stat/Lu
`’
`HFD-880/PK/Tandon {5}
`I-II-‘D-805/Micro/Ri1e_v -
`‘
`Ifi'~'D—550/DepDir/Chambers‘
`HFD-550/DD/Midthun . £5
`HFD-550/SCSONaccari
`13!
`
`HFD-550/ChemTL/Ng
`HFD-725/Stat TL/Lin
`
`12
`
`/52
`
`M £
`
`5!
`
`- 4
`
`HFD-880fPK TL/Bashaw
`
`I-[FD-805/Micro TL/Cooncy
`I-[FD-O02/ORM
`
`HFD-105/ADRA
`HIFD-95/DDMS
`
`-
`
`HZFD-83 0/DNDC Division Director
`
`DISTRICT OFFICE
`
`[ff
`
`Drafted by: /March 15, 2000
`Initialed by: __
`
`APPROVABLE (AB)
`
`12
`
`

`

`( DEPARTMENTOFHEALTH &HUMANSERVICES
`
`Public Health Service
`
`Food and Drug Administration
`Rocicville MD 20857
`
`NDA21-023
`
`AUG
`
`-3 ’999
`
`Allergan, Inc.
`Attention: Elizabeth Bancroft
`
`Director, Regulatory Affairs
`2525 Dupont Drive
`P.O. Box 19534
`
`Irvine, California 92623-9534
`
`"Dear Ms. Bancroft:
`
`Please refer to your new drug application (NDA) dated February 24, 1999, received
`February 25, 1999, submitted under section 505(b) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic
`Act for Restasis (cyclosporine ophthalmic emulsion) Ophthalmic Emulsion, 0.05%.
`
`We acknowledge receipt of your submissions dated February 24, March 2, 3, 18, and 30,
`April 7, 20, 22, and 23, May 5, 10 (three), and 28, June 17, and July 8, 12, 13, 16 and 26, 1999.
`
`We have completed the review of this application, as amended, and it is approvable. Before this
`application may be approved, however, it will be necessary for you to address the following:
`
`1. There is a lack of substantial evidence consisting of adequate and well-controlled
`investigations, as defined in 21 CFR 314.126, that the drug product will have the effect it
`purports or is represented to have under the conditions of use prescribed, recommended
`or suggested in the proposed labeling. Specifically, the submitted studies are not
`replicative and are insufficient to establish efficacy in the re"-“""“*—-—--—v
`r‘-""-——-—.__.._.....—---"-.
`
`2. The methods to be used in, and the facilities and controls used for, the manufacture,
`processing, packing or holding of the drug substance or the drug product are inadequate
`to preserve its identity, strength, quality, purity, stability and bioavailablity. Specifically, -
`the following issues will need to be addressed:
`
`
`- appears high for a sterile product. Please
`for
`a. The limit of -
`provide justification for using this limit.
`
`
`
`__,....__—g-- . test data was not included. Please provide the data for the
`b. The
`
`containerlclosure
`.. {ESL
`
`13
`
`13
`
`

`

`NDA 21-023
`
`Page 2
`
`‘c. With regard to the performance qualification of the '_' machine and the verification
`
`ofthe
`_
`_
`please provide the data from the original qualification
`performed using _‘—-—--'——---
`
`d.
`
`‘
`
`
`Jvere not included in the
`_
`.
`‘
`.e~.....a....nn--_c:-....¢
`s validation. Therefore, the effect of the‘
`
`_
`has not been established. Please provide information to
`demonstrate that a
`‘~--~--—----—-—--''*''''''‘''''''‘'‘'''''''''''‘''‘''''‘'‘''-'' _ will be
`sufficient to '
`
`during the --
`
`on the
`
`e. The study perfonned to validate a
`
`*-""*---"j""""": for the drug product does not
`
`.
`
`support --v--*“:""‘“"“""‘
`
`We will continue to work with you on the proposed labeling for this product.
`
`Within 10 days after the date of this letter, you are required to arnend the application, notify us of
`your intent to file an amendment, or follow one of the other options under 21 CFR 314.110. In
`the absence of any such action FDA may proceed to withdraw the application. Any amendment
`should respond to all the deficiencies listed. We will not process a partial reply as a major
`amendment nor will the review clock be reactivated until all deficiencies have been addressed.
`
`Under 21 CFR 314.50(d)(5)(vi)(b), we request that you update your NDA by submitting all
`safety information you now have regarding your new drug.
`
`In addition, please submit three copies of the introductory promotional materials that you
`propose to use for this product. All proposed materials should be submitted in draft or mock-up
`form, not final print. Please submit one copy to this Division and two copies of both the
`promotional materials and the package insert directly to:
`
`Division of Drug Marketing, Advertising, and Communications, I-IFD-40
`Food and Drug Administration
`5600 Fishers Lane
`
`Rockville, Maryland 20857
`
`Under 21 CFR 3l4.l02(d) of the new drug regulations, you may request an informal meeting or
`telephone conference with this Division to discuss what further steps need to be taken before the
`application may be approved.
`
`The drug product may not be legally marketed until you have been notified in writing that the
`application is approved.
`
`14
`
`14
`
`

`

`
`
`NDA 21-023
`
`Page 3
`
`If you have any questions, contact Lori M. Gorski, Project Manager, at (301) 827-2090.
`
`Sincerely,
`
`Wileyéflhaanbers, M.D.
`
`J
`
`Deputy Director
`Division of Anti-Inflammatory, Analgesic and
`Ophthalmic Drug Products, HFD-550
`Office of Drug Evaluation V
`Center for Drug Evaluation and Research
`
`15
`
`

`

`
`
`NDA 21-023
`
`Page 4
`
`cc:
`
`£5}
`
`NDA 21-023
`HFD-550/Div. Files
`HFD-550/CSO/Gorski
`HFD-550/MO/Boyd
`HFD-550/Chem/Bhnanwu -
`HFD-550/Phar/Mukheriee
`HFD-725/Stat/Lu
`1!!
`PIFD—880/PK/'I‘anaon
`HFD-805/Micro/Riley
`HFD-550/DepDir/Chambers
`HZFD-5 5 0/ChemTL/Ng
`HFD-550/Pharm TL/Weir
`HFD-550lC1in Rev/Holmes
`
`HFD-725/Stat TL/Lin
`
`1-;I
`
`_
`
`‘.
`
`Lg
`
`15 S
`
`HFD-880/PK TL/Bashaw
`
`HFD-805/Micro TL/Cooncy
`HFD-002/ORM
`
`I-IFD-105/ADRA
`
`J,
`
`.
`
`4
`HFD-95/DDMS
`HFD-830/DNDC Division Director
`
`DISTRICT OFFICE
`
`Drafted by: /July 28, 1999
`
`filename: 21023A.E.WPD
`
`APPROVABLE (AB)
`
`16
`
`16
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket