throbber

`
`MANSOOR AMIJI - 02/22/2017MANSOOR AMIJI - 02/22/2017
`

`
`·1· ·UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`·2· · · · · · · · · ____________
`
`·3· · BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`·4· · · · · · · · · ____________
`
`·5· · · · · MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC.,
`
`·6· · · · · · · · · ·Petitioner
`
`·7· · · · · · · · · · · ·v.
`
`·8· · · · · · · · ALLERGAN, INC.,
`
`·9· · · · · · · · · Patent Owner
`
`10· · · · · · · · · ____________
`
`11· · · · · · · ·Case IPR2016-01127
`
`12· · · · · · · · Patent 8,685,930
`
`13· · · · · · · ·Case IPR2016-01128
`
`14· · · · · · · · Patent 8,629,111
`
`15· · · · · · · ·Case IPR2016-01129
`
`16· · · · · · · · Patent 8,642,556
`
`17· · · · · · · ·Case IPR2016-01130
`
`18· · · · · · · · Patent 8,633,162
`
`19· · · · · · · ·Case IPR2016-01131
`
`20· · · · · · · · Patent 8,648,048
`
`21· · · · · · · ·Case IPR2016-01132
`
`22· · · · · · · · Patent 9,248,191
`· · · · · · · · · · ____________
`23
`
`24· · · ·DEPOSITION OF MANSOOR AMIJI, Ph.D.
`
`25· · ·Wednesday, February 22, 2017 9:10 a.m.
`
`
`DTI Court Reporting Solutions - Woodland HillsDTI Court Reporting Solutions - Woodland Hills
`
`1-800-826-02771-800-826-0277
`
`www.deposition.comwww.deposition.comYVer1f
`
`1
`
`ALL 2023
`MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS V. ALLERGAN
`IPR2016-01128
`
`

`

`·1· · · · · · · · Fish & Richardson P.C.
`
`·1· · · · · · · · · · · I N D E X
`
`
`MANSOOR AMIJI - 02/22/2017MANSOOR AMIJI - 02/22/2017
`Page 2
`
`Pages 2..5
`Page 4
`
`·2· · · ·One Marina Park Drive, Boston, MA 02210
`
`·2· ·WITNESS· · · · DIRECT· · CROSS· · REDIRECT
`
`·3
`
`·4· ·Reported by:
`
`·3· ·MANSOOR AMIJI, Ph.D.
`
`·4· ·By Ms. Coletti· ·5
`
`·5· ·Janet Sambataro, RMR, CRR, CLR
`
`·6· ·JOB NO. LA-115711
`
`·5
`
`·6
`
`·7
`
`·8
`
`·7· · · · · · · PREVIOUSLY MARKED EXHIBITS
`
`·8· ·Number· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · Page
`
`·9· · · · · · · · · · · ·February 22, 2017
`
`·9· ·Exhibit 1001· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·44
`
`10· · · · · · · · · · · ·9:10 a.m.
`
`10· ·Exhibit 1002 in IPR 2016-01129· · · · · · ·16
`
`11
`
`12
`
`11· ·Exhibit 1002 in IPR 2016-01128· · · · · · ·16
`
`12· ·Exhibit 1002 in IPR 2016-01129· · · · · · ·16
`
`13· · · · Deposition of MANSOOR AMIJI, PH.D., held
`
`13· ·Exhibit 1002 in IPR 2016-01130· · · · · · ·17
`
`14· ·at the offices of Fish & Richardson P.C., One
`
`14· ·Exhibit 1002 in IPR 2016-01131· · · · · · ·17
`
`15· ·Marina Park Drive, Boston, Massachusetts,
`
`15· ·Exhibit 1002 in IPR 2016-01132· · · · · · ·17
`
`16· ·pursuant to Agreement before Janet Sambataro, a
`
`16· ·Exhibit 1003· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·18
`
`17· ·Registered Merit Reporter, Certified Realtime
`
`17· ·Exhibit 1004· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·44
`
`18· ·Reporter, Certified LiveNote Reporter, and a
`
`18· ·Exhibit 1006· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·46
`
`19· ·Notary Public within and for the Commonwealth of
`
`19· ·Exhibit 1007· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·47
`
`20· ·Massachusetts.
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`·1· ·APPEARANCES:
`
`·2· ·FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
`
`·3· ·(By Susan Morrison Coletti, Esquire)
`
`Page 3
`
`·4· ·222 Delaware Avenue
`
`·5· ·Wilmington, Delaware 19899
`
`·6· ·302.652.5070
`
`·7· ·coletti@fr.com
`
`·8· ·Counsel for the Petitioner
`
`·9· ·- and -
`
`10· ·FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
`
`11· ·(By Tasha M. Francis, Ph.D., Esquire)
`
`12· ·3200 RBC Plaza
`
`13· ·60 South Sixth Street
`
`14· ·Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402
`
`15· ·612.335.5070
`
`16· ·Counsel for the Petitioner
`
`17
`
`18· ·WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
`
`19· ·(By Jad Mills, Esquire)
`
`20· ·701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 5100
`
`21· ·Seattle, Washington 98104
`
`22· ·206.883.2554
`
`23· ·jmills@wsgr.com
`
`24· ·Counsel for the Respondent
`
`25
`
`20· ·Exhibit 1008· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·47
`
`21· ·Exhibit 1009· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·162
`
`22· ·Exhibit 1015· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·106
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`Page 5
`
`·1· · · · · · · · P R O C E E D I N G S
`·2· · · · · · · · MANSOOR AMIJI, Ph.D.,
`·3· ·having been duly sworn, after presenting
`·4· ·identification in the form of a driver's license,
`·5· ·deposes and says as follows:
`·6· · · · · · · · · DIRECT EXAMINATION
`·7· ·BY MS. COLETTI:
`·8· · · · Q.· ·Good morning, Dr. Amiji.
`·9· · · · A.· ·Good morning.
`10· · · · Q.· ·Can you please state and spell your
`11· ·name for the record.
`12· · · · A.· ·Mansoor, spelled M-A-N-S-O-O-R, middle
`13· ·initial M., as in Mary, last name A-M-I-J-I.
`14· · · · Q.· ·And can you please state your business
`15· ·address.
`16· · · · A.· ·Northeastern University, 360 Huntington
`17· ·Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts 02115.
`18· · · · Q.· ·Now, before I get started into the
`19· ·substance of today's deposition, I'll go over a
`20· ·few ground rules.
`21· · · · I believe you've been deposed before.· Is
`22· ·that right?
`23· · · · A.· ·Yes.
`24· · · · Q.· ·So you probably know some of these, but
`25· ·I'll go over them anyway.
`
`
`DTI Court Reporting Solutions - Woodland HillsDTI Court Reporting Solutions - Woodland Hills
`
`1-800-826-02771-800-826-0277
`
`www.deposition.comwww.deposition.comYVer1f
`
`2
`
`

`

`Pages 6..9
`Page 8
`
`
`MANSOOR AMIJI - 02/22/2017MANSOOR AMIJI - 02/22/2017
`Page 6
`·1· · · · You understand you're under oath.· The court
`·2· ·reporter just swore you in.· Right?
`·3· · · · A.· ·Yes.
`·4· · · · Q.· ·And you understand that any testimony
`·5· ·that you give today can be used in the IPR
`·6· ·proceeding that we're here today talking about.
`·7· ·You understand that.· Right?
`·8· · · · A.· ·Yes.
`·9· · · · Q.· ·And you understand that the testimony
`10· ·that you give today is the same as if you were
`11· ·giving it in court.
`12· · · · Do you understand that as well?
`13· · · · A.· ·Yes.
`14· · · · Q.· ·And so you understand that it's
`15· ·important to testify completely and truthfully
`16· ·and accurately.· Right?
`17· · · · A.· ·Yes.
`18· · · · Q.· ·Because our court reporter here is
`19· ·recording our conversation, it's important that
`20· ·you verbalize your answers, so "yes" or "no" as
`21· ·opposed to nodding or shaking your head.· Do you
`22· ·understand that?
`23· · · · A.· ·Yes.
`24· · · · Q.· ·And it's important that we don't speak
`25· ·over each other.· So I will try to let you finish
`
`·1· · · · A.· ·Sure.
`·2· · · · Q.· ·Now, I think you said already you have
`·3· ·been deposed before.· Is that correct?
`·4· · · · A.· ·Yes.
`·5· · · · Q.· ·About how many times?
`·6· · · · A.· ·Five or six times.
`·7· · · · Q.· ·And always as an expert witness or in
`·8· ·other capacities as well?
`·9· · · · A.· ·In some of the cases, I've -- in other
`10· ·capacities as well.
`11· · · · Q.· ·And let's talk about the expert witness
`12· ·work first.· What sorts of cases were they?· Were
`13· ·they all patent infringements?· Were there other
`14· ·kinds of cases in which you testified as an
`15· ·expert?
`16· · · · A.· ·Some were patent infringement.· There
`17· ·are also other types of cases.
`18· · · · Q.· ·What were the other types?
`19· · · · A.· ·Contract disputes.
`20· · · · Q.· ·Okay.· What else?
`21· · · · A.· ·There was also one case that involved a
`22· ·university that was -- the plaintiffs were
`23· ·St. John's University, and they were suing and I
`24· ·was asked to serve as an expert to look at the
`25· ·technical aspect of the case.
`
`Page 7
`·1· ·an answer before I ask my next question, and I'd
`·2· ·ask that you allow me to finish my question
`·3· ·before you give your answer.· Is that okay?
`·4· · · · A.· ·Yes.
`·5· · · · Q.· ·Your attorney may object from time to
`·6· ·time, but unless for some reason he instructs you
`·7· ·not to answer the question, do you understand
`·8· ·you're obligated to answer my question as best
`·9· ·you can?
`10· · · · A.· ·Yes.
`11· · · · Q.· ·If one of my questions is confusing or
`12· ·if you need some clarification, please let me
`13· ·know and I'll try to rephrase it.· Okay?
`14· · · · A.· ·Yes.
`15· · · · Q.· ·So then is it fair to assume that if
`16· ·you answer my question, that you've understood
`17· ·it?
`18· · · · A.· ·Yes.
`19· · · · Q.· ·Dr. Amiji, is there any reason, medical
`20· ·or otherwise, that you can't give complete,
`21· ·truthful and accurate testimony today?
`22· · · · A.· ·No.
`23· · · · Q.· ·And if that ever changes during the
`24· ·course of the day, if you start to feel ill, just
`25· ·let me know.· Is that okay?
`
`Page 9
`·1· · · · Q.· ·What was the dispute about in that
`·2· ·case?· Do you recall?
`·3· · · · A.· ·It involved patents, but not
`·4· ·necessarily from infringement side.· It was just
`·5· ·the patents and who were the owners, the rightful
`·6· ·owners of the patents.
`·7· · · · Q.· ·I see.· And what about cases where you
`·8· ·were not serving as an expert witness?· What
`·9· ·sorts of cases were those?· I think you said you
`10· ·were deposed in cases where you were not an
`11· ·expert witness.· Is that right?
`12· · · · A.· ·No.· I'm not sure I said that.
`13· · · · Q.· ·Maybe I misunderstood you, then.· So in
`14· ·all these five or six depositions that you gave,
`15· ·you were always an expert witness.· Is that
`16· ·right?
`17· · · · A.· ·Yes.· I was asked to serve as an expert
`18· ·looking at the technical matters.
`19· · · · Q.· ·Okay.· When was the last time you were
`20· ·deposed?
`21· · · · A.· ·November of last year.
`22· · · · Q.· ·And what did that relate to, generally?
`23· ·Was that a patent infringement case?
`24· · · · A.· ·Yes.
`25· · · · Q.· ·What was the technology, generally?
`
`
`DTI Court Reporting Solutions - Woodland HillsDTI Court Reporting Solutions - Woodland Hills
`
`1-800-826-02771-800-826-0277
`
`www.deposition.comwww.deposition.comYVer1f
`
`3
`
`

`

`
`MANSOOR AMIJI - 02/22/2017MANSOOR AMIJI - 02/22/2017
`Page 10
`·1· · · · A.· ·It was a drug formulation patent.
`·2· · · · Q.· ·Was it a Hatch-Waxman case or ANDA
`·3· ·case?
`·4· · · · A.· ·Yes.
`·5· · · · Q.· ·Have you ever been deposed in an IPR
`·6· ·proceeding before?
`·7· · · · A.· ·No, I haven't.
`·8· · · · Q.· ·Have you ever served as an expert
`·9· ·witness in an IPR proceeding, before this one?
`10· · · · A.· ·Yeah.· I don't believe I have served on
`11· ·an IPR proceeding before.
`12· · · · Q.· ·In all of the cases where you were --
`13· ·excuse me, in all of the patent cases where you
`14· ·served as an expert witness, were they all
`15· ·Hatch-Waxman cases?
`16· · · · A.· ·No.· As I said before, I have served on
`17· ·cases like the St. John's case I mentioned, which
`18· ·also involved patents, but it wasn't a
`19· ·Hatch-Waxman case.
`20· · · · Q.· ·But that wasn't a patent infringement
`21· ·case?· Is that right?
`22· · · · A.· ·No.· It wasn't a patent infringement.
`23· · · · Q.· ·So limiting it just to the patent
`24· ·infringement cases that you have served as an
`25· ·expert on, were all of those Hatch-Waxman cases?
`
`Pages 10..13
`Page 12
`·1· · · · Q.· ·So a good chunk of the business day.
`·2· ·Is that fair?
`·3· · · · A.· ·Yeah.
`·4· · · · Q.· ·And which lawyers were present?· The
`·5· ·lawyers that are here?
`·6· · · · A.· ·Yes.· All three of them.
`·7· · · · Q.· ·All three of them.· Was anyone else
`·8· ·present?
`·9· · · · A.· ·Mr. Parmelee was on the call yesterday,
`10· ·just for a few -- maybe an hour or so.
`11· · · · Q.· ·Was anyone else present in the room
`12· ·with you and the lawyers yesterday or the day
`13· ·before when you were preparing for the
`14· ·deposition?
`15· · · · A.· ·No.
`16· · · · Q.· ·And did you speak to anyone else, other
`17· ·than lawyers, in preparation for your deposition?
`18· · · · A.· ·No.
`19· · · · Q.· ·You said you read the patents, the
`20· ·prosecution histories.· What other documents did
`21· ·you read besides those?
`22· · · · A.· ·The declarations, my declarations. I
`23· ·also reviewed some of the exhibits that are
`24· ·attached to the declarations.
`25· · · · Q.· ·Was there anything outside the
`
`Page 11
`
`·1· · · · A.· ·Yes.
`·2· · · · Q.· ·And have you ever been an expert
`·3· ·witness in a case related to ophthalmic drugs
`·4· ·before?
`·5· · · · A.· ·No, I have not.
`·6· · · · Q.· ·Did you do anything to prepare for
`·7· ·today's deposition?
`·8· · · · A.· ·Yes.
`·9· · · · Q.· ·What did you do?
`10· · · · A.· ·I read my declarations.· I read
`11· ·patents.· I read the prosecution history.· I read
`12· ·a lot of documents.
`13· · · · Q.· ·Did you meet with anyone to prepare for
`14· ·today's deposition?
`15· · · · A.· ·Yes.
`16· · · · Q.· ·Who did you meet with?
`17· · · · A.· ·With attorneys.
`18· · · · Q.· ·When did you do that?
`19· · · · A.· ·The day before yesterday and yesterday.
`20· · · · Q.· ·For about how long?
`21· · · · A.· ·Just a few hours both days.
`22· · · · Q.· ·A few hours each day?
`23· · · · A.· ·Yes.
`24· · · · Q.· ·About how many?
`25· · · · A.· ·Maybe five or six hours.
`
`Page 13
`·1· ·declarations, the attachments, and the patents
`·2· ·that you reviewed?· So anything that you didn't
`·3· ·cite in your declarations?
`·4· · · · A.· ·No.
`·5· · · · Q.· ·Okay.· And did you review those on your
`·6· ·own or did you review them with the lawyers or
`·7· ·both?
`·8· · · · A.· ·Some of it I reviewed on my own.
`·9· ·Sometimes we would have some discussions, and
`10· ·we'd do it together.
`11· · · · Q.· ·And when did you start preparing for
`12· ·the deposition?
`13· · · · A.· ·Maybe about two weeks ago.
`14· · · · Q.· ·Did you read all of your declarations
`15· ·again or did you focus on any one in particular?
`16· · · · A.· ·No.· I read all, and specifically
`17· ·looking at all.· I also looked at the IPR
`18· ·decision that came from the patent board.
`19· · · · Q.· ·The institution decision?
`20· · · · A.· ·Correct.
`21· · · · Q.· ·Is that what you mean?
`22· · · · A.· ·Yes.
`23· · · · Q.· ·Do you understand, Dr. Amiji, that
`24· ·there is a concurrent litigation going on between
`25· ·Allergan and Mylan or Restasis in District Court?
`
`
`DTI Court Reporting Solutions - Woodland HillsDTI Court Reporting Solutions - Woodland Hills
`
`1-800-826-02771-800-826-0277
`
`www.deposition.comwww.deposition.comYVer1f
`
`4
`
`

`

`Pages 14..17
`Page 16
`
`
`MANSOOR AMIJI - 02/22/2017MANSOOR AMIJI - 02/22/2017
`Page 14
`·1· · · · A.· ·I was informed of that a long time ago,
`·2· ·but I haven't really had any interactions on
`·3· ·that.
`·4· · · · Q.· ·Do you know anything about that
`·5· ·litigation?
`·6· · · · A.· ·No, I don't.
`·7· · · · Q.· ·Have you reviewed any documents or
`·8· ·court orders from that proceeding?
`·9· · · · A.· ·No.
`10· · · · Q.· ·Has anyone talked to you about any
`11· ·documents or court orders from that proceeding?
`12· · · · · · ·MR. MILLS:· I'm just going to register
`13· ·an objection on the basis of privilege and
`14· ·attorney work product.· And to the extent that
`15· ·the question inquires into any conversations with
`16· ·counsel, then I would instruct you to not answer
`17· ·with regards to conversations with counsel.
`18· · · · · · ·MS. COLETTI:· Dr. Amiji is an expert
`19· ·witness.· There is no privilege between lawyers
`20· ·and an expert witness.· So I think that's an
`21· ·improper instruction.
`22· ·BY MS. COLETTI:
`23· · · · Q.· ·So did anyone tell you anything about
`24· ·the Court orders or the proceedings in the
`25· ·District Court?
`
`·1· ·Mylan's ANDA has been approved or not?
`·2· · · · A.· ·No, I don't.
`·3· · · · Q.· ·And you don't have any knowledge
`·4· ·regarding any problems Mylan may or may not be
`·5· ·having with its ANDA.· Is that right?
`·6· · · · A.· ·That's right.
`·7· · · · Q.· ·And have you been asked to serve as an
`·8· ·expert witness in the District Court litigation?
`·9· · · · A.· ·No, I have not.
`10· · · · Q.· ·Okay.· I'm going to hand you,
`11· ·Dr. Amiji, and I'm going to read them one by one,
`12· ·but these are all your declarations but so our
`13· ·record is clear.
`14· · · · So first I have what has been marked as
`15· ·Exhibit 1002 in IPR 2016-01127, and it's your
`16· ·declaration related to the '930 patent.
`17· · · · Then I'm going to hand you what's been
`18· ·marked as Exhibit 1002 in IPR 2016-01128.· It's
`19· ·your declaration related to the '111 patent.
`20· · · · · · ·MR. MILLS:· Do you have copies of any
`21· ·of these documents?
`22· · · · · · ·MS. COLETTI:· I do.· I'll hand you a
`23· ·whole pile in just a moment.
`24· · · · Q.· ·Next I have what's been marked as
`25· ·Exhibit 1002 in IPR 2016-01129.· It's your
`
`Page 15
`
`·1· · · · A.· ·No.
`·2· · · · · · ·MR. MILLS:· Same instruction.
`·3· · · · Q.· ·And have you asked for any documents
`·4· ·from that proceeding?· You said you didn't review
`·5· ·anything.
`·6· · · · Have you asked for anything but not gotten
`·7· ·it?
`·8· · · · A.· ·No.
`·9· · · · Q.· ·Do you know anything about Mylan's ANDA
`10· ·or Mylan's generic product?
`11· · · · A.· ·No.
`12· · · · Q.· ·Do you know anything about any of the
`13· ·other -- let me step back a minute.
`14· · · · Do you know anything about whether there are
`15· ·other generic companies attempting to make
`16· ·generic versions of Restasis?
`17· · · · A.· ·No, I don't.
`18· · · · Q.· ·Have you been contacted by lawyers for
`19· ·any of the other generic companies regarding
`20· ·Restasis?
`21· · · · A.· ·No, I have not.
`22· · · · Q.· ·And do you know the status of Mylan's
`23· ·ANDA with FDA?
`24· · · · A.· ·No, I don't.
`25· · · · Q.· ·So fair to say you don't know whether
`
`Page 17
`
`·1· ·declaration related to the '556 patent.
`·2· · · · Then I've got what has been marked as
`·3· ·Exhibit 1002 in IPR 2016-01130.· It's your
`·4· ·declaration related to the '162 patent.
`·5· · · · Next is Exhibit 1002 in IPR 2016-01131.
`·6· ·It's your declaration related to the '048 patent.
`·7· ·And then finally, Exhibit 1002 in IPR 2016-01132.
`·8· ·It's your declaration related to the '191 patent.
`·9· · · · And, Dr. Amiji, you have your six
`10· ·declarations in front of you?· Are all of those
`11· ·in front of you?
`12· · · · A.· ·Yes.
`13· · · · Q.· ·For purposes of today's questioning,
`14· ·I'm going to focus mostly on the second document
`15· ·we marked.· It's the one for the '111 patent.· So
`16· ·if you'd like to reference any of the others, you
`17· ·have all of them.· But that's the one I'm going
`18· ·to spend most of my time questioning on.
`19· · · · And I see, Dr. Amiji, you have a binder of
`20· ·documents in front of you.· What's in your binder
`21· ·that you brought with you today?
`22· · · · A.· ·So that's the same, the declarations
`23· ·and then the corresponding patents.
`24· · · · Q.· ·Okay.· And is there anything in your
`25· ·binder that's marked up or in any way is
`
`
`DTI Court Reporting Solutions - Woodland HillsDTI Court Reporting Solutions - Woodland Hills
`
`1-800-826-02771-800-826-0277
`
`www.deposition.comwww.deposition.comYVer1f
`
`5
`
`

`

`
`MANSOOR AMIJI - 02/22/2017MANSOOR AMIJI - 02/22/2017
`Page 18
`
`·1· ·highlighted or underlined?
`·2· · · · A.· ·No, it's not.
`·3· · · · Q.· ·It's just clean copies of the same
`·4· ·documents I just handed you?
`·5· · · · A.· ·Yes.
`·6· · · · Q.· ·All right.· So let me also hand you
`·7· ·what was marked as Exhibit 1003 -- and I believe,
`·8· ·Counsel, you already have this one -- to each of
`·9· ·your declarations.· It's your CV.
`10· · · · And I want to start out by discussing your
`11· ·education and experience a little bit.· And you
`12· ·have your CV there in front of you.· So can you
`13· ·start by telling me about your education
`14· ·beginning after high school.
`15· · · · A.· ·So I did my bachelor's degree in
`16· ·pharmacy at Northeastern University, and I
`17· ·graduated in 1988.· And then went on to do my
`18· ·Ph.D. at Purdue University in West Lafayette,
`19· ·Indiana.· And I graduated from there in '92.
`20· · · · And then I worked for a company in Madison,
`21· ·Wisconsin, called Columbia Research Labs until
`22· ·December of '92.
`23· · · · And in January of 1993, I came back to
`24· ·Northeastern University as an assistant
`25· ·professor.· And I've been at Northeastern now for
`
`Pages 18..21
`Page 20
`
`·1· · · · A.· ·For oral, mucosal delivery and
`·2· ·transdermal delivery.
`·3· · · · Q.· ·Were you working on a particular drug
`·4· ·or were you developing a drug delivery platform
`·5· ·or system?
`·6· · · · A.· ·Both.
`·7· · · · Q.· ·What was the particular drug you were
`·8· ·working on?
`·9· · · · A.· ·There were several products.· One that
`10· ·is still commercially available called Replens.
`11· · · · Q.· ·What is does Replens do?
`12· · · · A.· ·It's a moisturizer for post menopausal
`13· ·women, a vaginal moisturizer.
`14· · · · Q.· ·And other than that product, Replens,
`15· ·what other products were you working on?
`16· · · · A.· ·So oral products using hydrogel
`17· ·technology.· There was also work that we're doing
`18· ·related to use of chewing gum-based delivery
`19· ·systems.
`20· · · · Q.· ·All right.· And when you went back to
`21· ·Northeastern in January of 1993, you set up your
`22· ·own lab?
`23· · · · A.· ·Yes.
`24· · · · Q.· ·Is that fair to say?
`25· · · · A.· ·Yes.
`
`Page 19
`·1· ·24 years, and climbed from assistant professor to
`·2· ·my current position, which is university
`·3· ·distinguished professor.
`·4· · · · Q.· ·How long were you at -- I'm going to
`·5· ·work backwards.· How long were you at, I think
`·6· ·you said, Columbia Research Labs in Madison?
`·7· ·Just a few months?· Is that right?
`·8· · · · A.· ·That's correct.· From July '92 to
`·9· ·December '92.
`10· · · · Q.· ·And what was your work there, just
`11· ·generally?
`12· · · · A.· ·I was a senior research --
`13· · · · · · ·(Discussion off the record.)
`14· · · · Q.· ·Sorry about that.· You were saying --
`15· ·you were telling me about your work at Columbia
`16· ·Research Labs.· I think you started to say you
`17· ·were a senior research...
`18· · · · A.· ·Scientist at Columbia.· I started there
`19· ·right after I finished my Ph.D., and I was -- it
`20· ·was a small startup company that was started by a
`21· ·professor at the University of Wisconsin,
`22· ·Madison, a pharmacy professor named Joe Robinson.
`23· · · · Q.· ·And what sorts of work were you doing?
`24· · · · A.· ·I was developing drug formulations.
`25· · · · Q.· ·For what kind of application?
`
`Page 21
`·1· · · · Q.· ·Okay.· And you have -- I think you said
`·2· ·your bachelor's was in pharmacy.
`·3· · · · A.· ·Yes.
`·4· · · · Q.· ·And what was your Ph.D. in?
`·5· · · · A.· ·In pharmaceutical sciences.
`·6· · · · Q.· ·And what was your thesis?
`·7· · · · A.· ·So I was interested in looking at how
`·8· ·materials interact with biological fluid,
`·9· ·especially with blood, and the properties of
`10· ·materials and how they interact with blood
`11· ·components.
`12· · · · Q.· ·You did not go to medical school.· Is
`13· ·that fair?
`14· · · · A.· ·No.· I did not go to medical school.
`15· · · · Q.· ·So you're not a physician.· Is that
`16· ·right?
`17· · · · A.· ·Yes.· I'm not a physician.
`18· · · · Q.· ·And you're also not an ophthalmologist.
`19· ·Fair?
`20· · · · A.· ·No.· I'm not an ophthalmologist.
`21· · · · Q.· ·So is it fair to say you've never
`22· ·treated any ocular disease in patients?
`23· · · · · · ·MR. MILLS:· Objection.· Form.
`24· · · · A.· ·I have not treated any patients with
`25· ·ocular diseases.· I've done work, as shown in my
`
`
`DTI Court Reporting Solutions - Woodland HillsDTI Court Reporting Solutions - Woodland Hills
`
`1-800-826-02771-800-826-0277
`
`www.deposition.comwww.deposition.comYVer1f
`
`6
`
`

`

`Pages 22..25
`Page 24
`
`
`MANSOOR AMIJI - 02/22/2017MANSOOR AMIJI - 02/22/2017
`Page 22
`·1· ·CV, on drug formulations for treating ocular
`·2· ·disorders.
`·3· · · · Q.· ·But you've never treated a patient with
`·4· ·dry eye.· Is that fair?
`·5· · · · A.· ·No.· I have not.
`·6· · · · Q.· ·Is it also fair to say you've never
`·7· ·done a clinical trial on an ocular drug?
`·8· · · · A.· ·No, I have not.
`·9· · · · Q.· ·And have you ever evaluated the results
`10· ·of a clinical trial on an ocular drug?
`11· · · · A.· ·Not specifically on ocular drug, but I
`12· ·have evaluated clinical trial results.
`13· · · · Q.· ·And I looked at your CV.· Is it fair to
`14· ·say you don't have any publications that are
`15· ·specifically on ocular or ophthalmic drugs?
`16· · · · A.· ·I may not have specific publications,
`17· ·but I have worked on ocular formulations and
`18· ·certainly have also consulted with companies on
`19· ·ocular formulations.
`20· · · · Q.· ·Your CV, I think I counted, it's 88
`21· ·pages.· Is that right?
`22· · · · A.· ·Yes.
`23· · · · Q.· ·Would it surprise you to know that the
`24· ·word "eye" does not appear anywhere in your
`25· ·88-page CV?
`
`·1· ·there or not.
`·2· · · · Q.· ·I think you said you have worked on
`·3· ·ocular delivery systems.
`·4· · · · A.· ·Yes.
`·5· · · · Q.· ·Can you tell me about that?
`·6· · · · A.· ·Yes.· I worked on materials, polymeric
`·7· ·systems that are administered in the eye.· I'm
`·8· ·especially interested in materials that respond
`·9· ·to different stimuli and how they can create a
`10· ·locally acting therapeutic.
`11· · · · I also worked with lipid-based delivery
`12· ·systems.· I worked with cyclosporin.
`13· · · · Q.· ·Is it fair to say that you've never
`14· ·worked on a cyclosporin formulation for the eye,
`15· ·though.· Is that right?
`16· · · · A.· ·I've worked with emulsion-based
`17· ·delivery system for cyclosporin.
`18· · · · Q.· ·But not for the eye?
`19· · · · A.· ·No.· Not for the eye.
`20· · · · Q.· ·And you said you've worked on polymeric
`21· ·delivery systems.
`22· · · · A.· ·Yes.
`23· · · · Q.· ·How do those relate to an ophthalmic or
`24· ·ocular delivery system?
`25· · · · A.· ·They increase residence time in the
`
`Page 23
`·1· · · · A.· ·Well, the fact that, you know, there's
`·2· ·sometimes formulations that are developed that
`·3· ·use the word "mucosal delivery" or "ophthalmic
`·4· ·delivery," it's not necessarily, you know, has to
`·5· ·have the word "eye" on it.
`·6· · · · Q.· ·Okay.· So would it surprise you to know
`·7· ·that the word "eye" is not on your CV?
`·8· · · · A.· ·No, it doesn't surprise me.
`·9· · · · Q.· ·And the word "ocular" is not on your
`10· ·CV.
`11· · · · A.· ·Again, I've worked on ocular delivery
`12· ·systems.· I have also worked on a number of
`13· ·different polymeric delivery systems for the eye.
`14· · · · Q.· ·But none of your publications on your
`15· ·88-page CV have the word "ocular" in them.· Is
`16· ·that fair to say?
`17· · · · A.· ·Again, I haven't looked through it, and
`18· ·I haven't done a word search on my CV to tell you
`19· ·whether there is a word "ocular" or not.
`20· · · · Q.· ·And the same would go for the word
`21· ·"ophthalmic."· None of your publications have the
`22· ·word "ophthalmic" in the title such that that
`23· ·word appears on your CV.
`24· · · · A.· ·Again, I haven't done a word search of
`25· ·my CV to find whether the specific words are
`
`Page 25
`
`·1· ·eye.
`·2· · · · Q.· ·And so have you worked on a specific
`·3· ·formulation, a specific polymeric delivery system
`·4· ·for use in the eye?
`·5· · · · A.· ·Sometimes they're specific.· Sometimes
`·6· ·it's a platform technology that we want to test
`·7· ·to see that it will have a residence time in the
`·8· ·eye as well.
`·9· · · · Q.· ·So have you worked on any specific
`10· ·formulation that's been administered to the eye
`11· ·of a person?
`12· · · · A.· ·You mean human person?
`13· · · · Q.· ·Yes.
`14· · · · A.· ·No.
`15· · · · Q.· ·Have you worked on any specific
`16· ·delivery system that's been administered to the
`17· ·eye of some other mammal?
`18· · · · A.· ·Yes.
`19· · · · Q.· ·What?
`20· · · · A.· ·Usually we do our studies for eye, we
`21· ·use rabbit models.
`22· · · · Q.· ·And are those systems with drugs in
`23· ·them, or are you just testing the delivery
`24· ·system?
`25· · · · A.· ·In some cases, they'll have drugs.· In
`
`
`DTI Court Reporting Solutions - Woodland HillsDTI Court Reporting Solutions - Woodland Hills
`
`1-800-826-02771-800-826-0277
`
`www.deposition.comwww.deposition.comYVer1f
`
`7
`
`

`

`
`MANSOOR AMIJI - 02/22/2017MANSOOR AMIJI - 02/22/2017
`Page 26
`·1· ·some cases, they are delivery system.· In some
`·2· ·cases, we also use for imaging applications.
`·3· · · · Q.· ·But none of those deliveries -- ocular
`·4· ·delivery systems have ever been used in a human
`·5· ·being, as far as you're aware?
`·6· · · · A.· ·Are you asking the ones that are
`·7· ·developed in my lab?
`·8· · · · Q.· ·Yes.
`·9· · · · A.· ·Have they been used in humans or in
`10· ·some of my consulting work, whether they have
`11· ·been used in humans?
`12· · · · Q.· ·Yeah.· Let me ask a cleaner question.
`13· · · · Have any of the delivery systems that you
`14· ·have worked on in your lab been used in the eye
`15· ·of a human being?
`16· · · · A.· ·No.
`17· · · · Q.· ·And you list in your CV a number of
`18· ·awards.· Is that right?
`19· · · · A.· ·Yes.
`20· · · · Q.· ·Is it fair to say that none of those
`21· ·relate to ocular drugs?
`22· · · · A.· ·I'm not sure what you mean by awards
`23· ·related to ocular drugs.
`24· · · · Q.· ·Well, have any of the awards you've
`25· ·received been related to your work on an ocular
`
`Pages 26..29
`Page 28
`·1· · · · Q.· ·Is it fair to say you are not an expert
`·2· ·on dry eye disease?
`·3· · · · · · ·MR. MILLS:· Objection.· Form.
`·4· · · · A.· ·I'm not sure I understand that
`·5· ·question.· What do you mean by expert in dry eye
`·6· ·disease?· A medical expert?
`·7· · · · Q.· ·Yes.· You're not a medical expert on
`·8· ·dry eye disease.
`·9· · · · A.· ·No. I don't treat patients.
`10· · · · Q.· ·Have you ever studied the underlying
`11· ·causes of dry eye disease in your lab or
`12· ·elsewhere in your research?
`13· · · · A.· ·I study inflammatory diseases.· I have
`14· ·certainly a number of publications and grants in
`15· ·inflammatory diseases.
`16· · · · Q.· ·But never dry eye disease,
`17· ·specifically?
`18· · · · A.· ·No. I haven't specifically looked at
`19· ·dry eye disease.
`20· · · · Q.· ·Have you ever formally studied the
`21· ·treatments for dry eye outside the context of
`22· ·this case?
`23· · · · A.· ·Again, I've had a lot of experience in
`24· ·looking at inflammatory diseases, the general
`25· ·categories of inflammatory diseases.
`
`Page 27
`
`·1· ·or ophthalmic drug?
`·2· · · · A.· ·My awards are related to my
`·3· ·contributions in pharmaceutical science, my
`·4· ·contributions in advancing controlled drug
`·5· ·delivery systems.· I'm a fellow of both the
`·6· ·American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists
`·7· ·as well as the Controlled Release Society.· And
`·8· ·all the awards that I received are based on my
`·9· ·contributions in the pharmaceutical sciences.
`10· · · · Q.· ·Right.· So I see about halfway down on
`11· ·Page 87 of your CV, there's a list.· There's a
`12· ·list of your awards on Page 87.· Is that right?
`13· · · · A.· ·Yes.
`14· · · · Q.· ·And there are specific awards, for
`15· ·example, for outstanding research in oral drug
`16· ·delivery.· Do you see that?
`17· · · · A.· ·Yes.
`18· · · · Q.· ·There are no awards specific to
`19· ·research in ophthalmic or ocular drug delivery
`20· ·listed on your CV.· Is that right?
`21· · · · A.· ·Well, they're not, you know, specific
`22· ·ones for ophthalmic.· The fact that I have awards
`23· ·on pharmaceutical sciences, I received a number
`24· ·of awards in the field of pharmaceutical science
`25· ·in drug formulation and drug delivery.
`
`Page 29
`·1· · · · Q.· ·Do you understand that dry eye disease
`·2· ·is an inflammatory disease?
`·3· · · · A.· ·In cases, a dry eye disease, as
`·4· ·defined, is a broad class, and there the subset
`·5· ·is KCS, which is an inflammatory disease.
`·6· · · · Q.· ·So have you ever studied the treatments
`·7· ·specifically for dry eye disease outside the
`·8· ·context of this case?
`·9· · · · A.· ·Studied in a manner like read articles
`10· ·about it or did research on it?
`11· · · · Q.· ·Done research on the treatments for dry
`12· ·eye disease, outside the context of this case.
`13· · · · A.· ·No.· I have not done research, but I
`14· ·certainly have read articles.
`15· · · · Q.· ·Outside the context of this case?
`16· · · · A.· ·Yes.
`17· · · · Q.· ·What treatments were available to treat
`18· ·dry eye patients in 2002, early 2003, to the best
`19· ·of your knowledge?
`20· · · · A.· ·There were a number of different types
`21· ·of therapeutics that are available, as well as
`22· ·artificial tears were available.
`23· · · · Q.· ·What were the therapeutics that were
`24· ·available?
`25· · · · A.· ·Again, I don't know exactly.· I haven't
`
`
`DTI Court Reporting Solutions - Woodland HillsDTI Court Reporting Solutions - Woodland Hills
`
`1-800-826-02771-800-826-0277
`
`www.deposition.comwww.deposition.comYVer1f
`
`8
`
`

`

`Pages 30..33
`Page 32
`
`
`MANSOOR AMIJI - 02/22/2017MANSOOR AMIJI - 02/22/2017
`Page 30
`·1· ·looked into the specific kinds of compounds that
`·2· ·are available.· But I know that there are
`·3· ·prescription drugs that were prescribed, maybe
`·4· ·off-label use, in treatment of dry eye.· But I
`·5· ·know artificial tears were available.
`·6· · · · Q.· ·So you know artificial tears were
`·7· ·available.· Do you know any of the specific
`·8· ·prescription drugs that were available before
`·9· ·Restasis came on the market in 2003?
`10· · · · A.· ·Again, if you have something you want
`11· ·to show me, I can look through that.· Sitting
`12· ·here, I don't know exact drugs and drug names.
`13· · · · Q.· ·Do you know which tests are used to
`14· ·measure dry eye disease in patients?
`15· · · · A.· ·Yes.· I have -- the Schirmer test is
`16· ·one of them that looks at the amount of tear
`17· ·production and then staining, corneal staining is
`18·

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket