throbber
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC.,
`
`Petitioner,
`
`V.
`
`ASTRAZENECA AB,
`Patent Owner.
`
`Case IPR2016-01122
`
`Patent No. RE44,186
`
`NOTICE OF JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING JOINDER
`
`

`
`I.
`
`Introduction
`
`Following Patent Owner AstraZeneca AB’s (“Astrazeneca”) filing of its
`
`opposition (Paper 10) to Petitioner Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.’s (“Teva”)
`
`motion to join (Paper 3) the instituted IPR2015-01340, Mylan Pharms. Inc, v.
`
`AstraZeneca AB (the “proceeding”), the parties met and conferred as to the level of
`
`cooperation between Teva and Mylan that will be maintained if Teva’s motion for
`
`joinder was granted. Teva notified AstraZeneca that it has reached an agreement
`
`with Mylan and, by this notice, stipulates that if joinder is granted, that it will
`
`cooperate with Mylan and any other joined party to provide a single voice in the
`
`joined proceeding, whether at hearings, at depositions, in filings, or otherwise.
`
`II.
`
`TeVa’s Stipulation
`
`Teva agrees to share the use of Mylan’s experts with Mylan, the “Lead
`
`Petitioner,” and all joined petitioners in this IPR proceeding. As long as Mylan is a
`
`party to the proceeding, Teva will:
`
`0
`
`0
`
`0
`
`coordinate any communications with Mylan’s experts through Mylan;
`
`not produce their own testifying witness; and
`
`not file substantive papers (except for those associated with Board
`
`approved motions that do not affect Mylan or Mylan’s position).
`
`Teva will confer and cooperate with Mylan and all joined petitioners on the
`
`consolidated filings but, as long as Mylan is a party to the review, Mylan will make
`
`

`
`Case No. IPR20l6-01122
`
`Patent No. RE44,l 86
`
`all final decisions and will retain responsibility for oral argument (including
`
`telephone hearings and appeals). Teva will not seek or receive separate time and
`
`will not separately argue during oral argument, including telephone hearings and
`
`appeals, except when addressing Board—approved motions that do not affect Mylan
`
`or Mylan’s position.
`
`Teva will coordinate the discovery and testimony relating to witnesses with
`
`Mylan and all joined petitioners but, as long as Mylan is a party to the review,
`
`Mylan will make all final decisions. In particular, as long as Mylan is a party to the
`
`review, Teva will not separately file or serve objections or discovery requests, will
`
`not receive separate cross examination or redirect time, will not separately cross
`
`examine or redirect any witness, and it stipulates that cross examinations will occur
`
`within the timeframe normally allotted to one party without a need for extension in
`
`light of the joinder.
`
`Whether Mylan remains a party or not, Teva will not actively seek to change
`
`the opinion of Mylan’s current expert (Dr. Rotella) or present attorney arguments
`
`that are inconsistent with Dr. Rotella’s opinions or the positions taken by Mylan in
`
`the copending litigation.
`
`If Mylan is no longer a party to the proceeding, Teva shall meet and confer
`
`with the remaining joined parties, if any, to select a new Lead Petitioner. Any such
`
`

`
`Case No. IPR20l6—0l 122
`
`Patent No. RE44,l86
`
`new Lead Petitioner will effectively take Mylan’s place in this proceeding and
`
`Teva will continue to be bound hereby.
`
`Nothing in this Notice of Stipulation Regarding Joinder is intended to limit
`
`the evidence the Board may consider pursuant to Genzyme Therapeutic Partners
`
`Products LP 12. Biomarin Pharma, Ltd, __ F.3d __ (Fed. Cir. June 14, 2016).
`
`III. Patent Owner’s Stipulation
`
`If joinder is granted, AstraZeneca stipulates that it will not request any
`
`additional level of cooperation other than that specified in the previous section.
`
`

`
`Case No. IPR2016-01122
`
`Patent No. RE44,186
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`Dated:
`
`“‘1,Zz,
`
`, 2016
`
`
`
`Dated: 112- ,2016
`
`‘X3, Lia}:
`’i"”’*‘;?Reg. No.
`Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow,
`Garrett & Dunner, L.L.P.
`
`901 New York Ave., NW
`Washington, DC 20001
`
`Counselfor Patent Owner in
`IPR2016—01122
`
`/49%“?
`By-
`6‘? x‘)7""r_ V , Reg. No.
`Carlson, Caspers, Vandenburgh,
`Lindquist & Schuman, PA
`225 South Sixth Street, Suite 4200
`Minneapolis, MN 55402
`
`Counselfor Petitioner in
`IPR2016-01122
`
`

`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing NOTICE OF JOINT
`
`STIPULATION REGARDING JOINDER was served electronically via e-mail
`
`on the 2nd day of September, 2016, in its entirety on the following:
`
`Gary J. Speier
`Carlson, Caspers, Vandenburgh,
`Lindquist & Schuman, P.A.
`225 South Sixth Street, Suite 4200
`Minneapolis, MN 55402
`gspeier@carlsoncaspers.com
`
`Iain A. McIntyre
`Carlson, Caspers, Vandenburgh,
`Lindquist & Schuman, P.A.
`225 South Sixth Street, Suite 4200
`Minneapolis, MN 55402
`imcintyre@carlsoncaspers.com
`
`
`
`
`/John W. Kozikowski/
`Litigation Legal Assistant
`Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett &
`Dunner, L.L.P.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: September 2, 2016

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket