throbber
DRUG DEVELOPMENT AND INDUSTRIAL PHARMACY, 21(17), 2013-2019 (1995)
`
`COMMUNICATIONS
`
`BIOADHESIVE POLYMER BUCCAL PATCHES FOR
`BUPRENORPHINE CONTROLLED DELIVERY: SOLUBILITY
`CONSIDERATION
`
`Jian-Hwa Guo and K. M. Cooklock
`3M Pharmaceuticals, 3M Center, 270-43-02, St. Paul, MN 55144-1000
`
`ABSTRACT
`
`By using a two-roll milling method, a new bioadhesive polymer patch
`for buprenorphine controlled delivery and consisting of
`formulation
`polyisobutylene, polyisoprene, and Carbopol@ 934P was prepared. Since
`solubility of drug in the polymer patches is the first factor which should be
`considered before to modify the feasibility of delivering drug through the
`buccal mucosa,
`the effects of a-cyclodextrin, P-cyclodextrin, sodium
`taurocholate,
`and
`sodium glycodeoxycholate on
`the
`solubility
`of
`buprenorphine were investigated, and P-cyclodextrin was found the strongest
`solubility enhancer of them. The drug release profiles were significantly
`affected by the drug loading and the existence of P-cyclodextrin. Increasing
`the drug loading and solubility enhancer would increase the drug release from
`the buccal polymer patches. The pH value change in the microenviroment of
`polymer patches during the hydration of Carbopol@ 934P could even release
`20% of drug from the polymer patches which didn’t contain any solubility
`enhancer.
`
`Copyright 0 1995 by Marcel Dekker, Inc.
`
`2013
`
`Drug Dev Ind Pharm Downloaded from informahealthcare.com by Doris Yen on 02/27/15
`
`For personal use only.
`
`RBP_TEVA05017846
`
`DRL - EXHIBIT 1033
`DRL001
`
`

`
`2014
`
`GUOANDCOOKLOCK
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`Recently the buccal mucosa has been studied as a potential site for
`
`delivery of drug, because of its accessibility and low enzymatic activity. The
`
`buccal mucosa may offer alternate route of delivery for drugs including those
`
`that are metabolically unstable (I). The buccal mucosa was investigated as a
`
`potential site for drug delivery several decades ago and interest in this area for
`
`transniucosal drug administration is still growing (1-3).
`Buprenorphine is a partial p agonist opioid analgesic that is well
`absorbed by both the intramuscular and sublingual routes and is 25-50 times
`more potent than morphine (4). The drug's onset of action occurs rapidly,
`with maximum blood drug levels attained within five minutes of intramuscular
`injection. The duration of action of buprenorphine can be extended from the
`4-5 hours obtained with a single intramuscular dose to 5-6 hours with the use
`of sublingual administration. The latter route is already being developed as an
`alternative to the injectable formulation (5).
`The in-vitro characterization of a newly developed bioadhesive patch for
`controlled drug delivery via the buccal mucosa was investigated by Guo (6-7)
`and Scherrer, et a1 (8). The effects of different ratios of Carbopol@ 934P,
`polyisobutylene, and polyisoprene on the surface properties, adhesion, and
`swelling of buccal patches were investigated. They had developed patches
`composed of Carbopol@ 934P, polyisobutylene, and polyisoprene having
`physical properties that are required for the buccal controlled drug delivery.
`Solubility of drug in the polymer patches is the first factor which
`should be considered before to modify the feasibility of delivering drug
`through the buccal mucosa. This paper describes the factors which would
`affect the solubility of buprenorphine, a partial p agonist opioid analgesic, via
`the buccal mucosa, in the polymer patches, and the effects on the release of
`buprenorphine from those patches would be discussed as well.
`
`Drug Dev Ind Pharm Downloaded from informahealthcare.com by Doris Yen on 02/27/15
`
`For personal use only.
`
`RBP_TEVA05017847
`
`DRL - EXHIBIT 1033
`DRL002
`
`

`
`BIOADHESIVE POLYMER BUCCAL PATCHES
`
`2015
`
`-
`
`Q, $ 50 -
`a,
`a, L
`
`40 -
`
`-
`
`L
`0
`a,
`$ 30
`P
`a,
`a, L
`* 20
`-
`a,
`E=
`2
`
`c
`a,
`h a
`
`R
`
`I
`
`I
`
`I
`
`I
`
`I
`
`I
`
`:lo% BP, BP/B-CD=I/I
`
`v :lo% BP-HCI. BP-HCI/B-CD=I/l
`0 : l o % BP
`: l o % BP-HCI
`
`I
`
`I
`
`I
`
`FIGURE 1
`The effect of kcyclodextrin on the buprenorphine release from the
`CP/PIB/PIP = 60/35/5 buccal patches.
`
`MATERIALS AND METHODS
`
`ratio of
`Preparation of polymer patches was as follows: a desired
`bioadhesive polymer Carbopol@ (934P grade, BF Goodrich, Cleveland, OH)
`(CP), polyisobutylene (LMMH grade, EXXON Chemical Co., Houston, TX)
`(PIB), and polyisoprene (GoodYear Chemical Co., Akron, OH) (PIP) were
`mixed homogeneously with buprenorphine (Diosyngy , NJ) and additive (a-
`cyclodextrin,
`P-cyclodextrin,
`sodium
`taurocholate,
`or
`sodium
`glycodeoxycholate) (Sigma, MO) by a two-roll mill. The elastomer polymer
`
`Drug Dev Ind Pharm Downloaded from informahealthcare.com by Doris Yen on 02/27/15
`
`For personal use only.
`
`RBP_TEVA05017848
`
`DRL - EXHIBIT 1033
`DRL003
`
`

`
`2016
`
`GUOANDCOOKLOCK
`
`(3 10% BP. BP/@-CD=I/I
`10% BP. BP/@-CD=2/1
`6% BP, BP/@-CD=Z/l
`0 6% BP. BP/@-CD=4/1
`2% BP, BP/p-CD=2/1
`
`0
`
`0
`
`5
`
`15
`10
`Time (hr)
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`FIGURE 2
`The effect of -cyclodextrin and drug loading on the burprenorphine release
`from the CP/PIB/PIP = 50/43.75/6.25 buccal patches.
`
`mixture was compressed in a predetermined thickness, and appropriate sizes
`were punched out for in-vitro testing (6-7).
`the hydrated polyvinyl
`The
`in-vitro drug
`release
`through
`pyrrolidone/cellulose acetate hydrogel film was conducted by using diffusion
`cells and were performed in phosphate buffer (pH=7) at 37OC. Aliquots were
`taken at various times up to 24 hours and assayed for buprenorphine free base
`or HCI salt by high-pressure liquid chromatography. The gradient system
`used
`in
`this study consisted of mobile phase, CH3CN/16.6 mM
`CH3(CH2),S03Na aqueos solution/CH3COOH, 70%/30%/1%, (v/v/v) at
`flow rate 1.5 ml/min.
`
`Drug Dev Ind Pharm Downloaded from informahealthcare.com by Doris Yen on 02/27/15
`
`For personal use only.
`
`RBP_TEVA05017849
`
`DRL - EXHIBIT 1033
`DRL004
`
`

`
`BIOADHESIVE POLYMER BUCCAL PATCHES
`
`2017
`
`,
`
`I
`
`I
`
`I
`
`I
`
`1
`
`1
`
`v . CP-974P
`. c p - 9 3 4 ~
`
`0.6
`0.8
`0.2
`1.2
`0.4
`0.0
`1.0
`Carbopol concentration (g/ml of buffer solution)
`
`FIGURE 3
`The pH values of different CP-934P or CP-974P concentrations
`(at pH 7 Phosphate Buffer).
`
`RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
`
`The effects of a-cyclodextrin, pcyclodextrin, sodium taurocholate, and
`sodium glycodeoxycholate on the solubility of buprenorphine free base or HCI
`salt were investigated.
`j3-cyclodextrin was found the strongest solubility
`enhancer of buprenorphine free base and HCl salt (pcyclodextrin > ct-
`cyclodextrin > sodium taurocholate > sodium glycodeoxycholate). The
`effects of P-cyclodextrin and drug loading on the buprenorphine free base or
`HCI salt release profiles from CP/PIB/PIP = 60/35/5 and CP/PIB/PIP =
`50/43.75/6.25 formulations are demonstrated in Figures 1 and 2, respectively.
`
`Drug Dev Ind Pharm Downloaded from informahealthcare.com by Doris Yen on 02/27/15
`
`For personal use only.
`
`RBP_TEVA05017850
`
`DRL - EXHIBIT 1033
`DRL005
`
`

`
`2018
`
`GUOANDCOOKLOCK
`
`e -
`
`,
`
`FIGURE 4
`The solubilities of buprenorphine in the CP-934P solutions.
`
`I ne arug release proriies were signiricantiy arrectea ~y tne arug ioaaing
`and the existence of P-cyclodextrin.
`Increasing the drug loading and
`solubility enhancer would increase the drug release from the buccal polymer
`patches, since increasing the amount of P-cyclodextrin and drug loading
`would increase the driving force of drug in the polymer patches. However, as
`shown in Figure 1, even 20% of drug released from the polymer patches
`which didn't contain the P-cyclodextrin.
`This phenomenon could be
`explained by the pH value change in the microenviroment of polymer patches
`during the hydration of CP.
`The pH values of different concentrations of CP 934P and 974P solutions
`(dissolved in pH 7 buffer solution) were indicated in Figure 3. Increasing the
`
`Drug Dev Ind Pharm Downloaded from informahealthcare.com by Doris Yen on 02/27/15
`
`For personal use only.
`
`RBP_TEVA05017851
`
`DRL - EXHIBIT 1033
`DRL006
`
`

`
`BIOADHESIVE POLYMER BUCCAL PATCHES
`
`2019
`
`CP concentration would decrease the pH value of the CP solution. The
`decrease of pH value of CP solution was accompanied by the increase of
`buprenorphine solubility in this solution (Figure 4). Therefore, it can explain
`that even 20% of drug could release from the polymer patches which didn't
`include the P-cyclodextrin. However, the buprenorphine solubility decreased
`slightly at higher CP concentration solution, because the CP solution became
`some of
`more viscous at higher CP concentration and entrapped
`buprenorphine.
`
`REFERENCES
`
`1.
`2.
`
`3.
`4.
`
`5.
`6.
`7.
`8.
`
`D. Harris and J.R. Robinson. J. Pharm. Sci. 81, 1-10 (1992).
`A.H. Beckett and E.J. Triggs. J. Pharm. Pharmucol. 19(suppl), 31s
`-41s (1967).
`T. Nagai and R. Konishi. J. Contr. Rel. 6, 353-360 (1987).
`J.H. Jaffe and W.R. Martin. Opioid analgesics and antagonists. In
`A.G. Gilman, T.W. Rall, A.S. Nies, and P. Taylor (eds.), The
`Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics, Pergamon Press, New Y ork,
`1990, pp. 485-521.
`D. Harris and J.R. Robinson. J. Pharm. Sci. 81:l-10 (1992).
`J-H. Guo. J. Pharm. Pharmucol. 46, 647-650 (1994).
`J-H. Guo. Drug Dev. Znd. Pharm. 20, 2809-2821 (1994).
`R.N. Scherrer, M.T. Scholz, R.L. McQuinn, J.K. Barkhaus and
`N.M. Marecki. Pharm. Res. 9, S252 (1992).
`
`Drug Dev Ind Pharm Downloaded from informahealthcare.com by Doris Yen on 02/27/15
`
`For personal use only.
`
`RBP_TEVA05017852
`
`DRL - EXHIBIT 1033
`DRL007

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket