throbber
IPR2016-01111
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_______________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`_______________
`
`
`
`DR. REDDY’S LABORATORIES, LTD. AND DR. REDDY’S
`LABORATORIES, INC.,
`Petitioners
`
`v.
`
`MONOSOL RX, LLC,
`Patent Owner
`_______________
`
`Case: IPR2016-01111
`
`Patent 8,603,514
`_______________
`
`PATENT OWNER MONOSOL RX, LLC’S UPDATED EXHIBIT LIST
`
`
`
`

`
`EXHIBIT
`
`*2001
`*2002
`
`*2003
`
`*2004
`
`*2005
`
`*2006
`*2007
`*2008
`
`*2009
`
`*2010
`
`*2011
`
`*2012
`
`*2013
`
`2014
`
`IPR2016-01111
`
`PATENT OWNER’S EXHIBIT LIST
`
`
`DESCRIPTION
`
`Transcript of Conference Call of August 1, 2015
`Redline comparison of Teva petition in IPR2016-00281
`and Dr.Reddy’s petition in IPR2016-01111
`Redline comparison of Dr. Panyam declaration in Teva
`IPR2016-00281 and Dr. Celik declaration in Dr.
`Reddy’s IPR2016-01111
`“Dr. Reddy’s to acquire product portfolio from TEVA
`for US Market,” Press Release, June 11, 2016
`Email from Dr. Reddy’s counsel summarizing meet and
`confer teleconference conducted July 6, 2016
`Teva/Allergan Divestiture Products Table
`FTC Complaint with list of products
`“Teva Pharm finalizing asset sales to clear Allergan
`deal: source,” Reuters, May 5, 2016
`June 3, 2016 Trial Opinion, Reckitt v. Watson, 1:13-cv-
`1674 (D. Del.) (Richard G. Andrews, J.)
`J. O. Morales and J. T. McConville, Manufacture and
`Characterization of Mucoadhesive Buccal Films,
`European Journal of Pharmaceutics and v
`Biopharmaceutics 77, pp. 187-99 (2011)
`A. F. Borges et al., Oral Films: Current Status and
`Future Perspectives II – Intellectual Property,
`Technologies and Market Needs, Journal of Controlled
`Release 206, pp. 108-21 (2015).
`V.A. Perumal et al., Investigating a New Approach to
`Film Casting for Enhanced Drug Content Uniformity in
`Polymeric Films, Drug Dev. & Indust. Pharm. 34, pp.
`1036-47 (2008).
`H. Kathpalia and A. Gupte, An Introduction to Fast
`Dissolving Oral Thin Film Drug Delivery Systems: A
`Review, Drug Delivery & Formulation 10, pp. 667-84
`(2013).
`Email correspondence between counsel for Patent
`Owner and Petitioner, September 8-9, 2016
` 
`
`

`
`*Patent Owner’s exhibits 2001-2013 were previously filed and are listed here again
`
`IPR2016-01111
`
`pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.63.
`
`
`
`Date: September 14, 2016
`
`Steptoe & Johnson LLP
`1330 Connecticut Avenue, N.W.
`Washington, DC 20036-1795
`Telephone: (202) 429-3000
`Facsimile: (202) 429-3902
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/Harold H. Fox/
`
`
`
`
`
`Harold H. Fox
`Reg. No. 41,498
`Counsel for MonoSol Rx, LLC
`
`

`
`IPR2016-01111
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.6, I hereby certify that on this 14th day of
`
`
`
`September 2016, the foregoing PATENT OWNER MONOSOL RX, LLC’S
`
`UPDATED EXHIBIT LIST were served by filing this document through the
`
`Patent Trial Appeal Board End To End system as well as by delivering a copy via
`
`electronic mail, by agreement of the parties, on the following counsel of record for
`
`Jeffrey B. Arnold
`jarnold@cantorcolburn.com
`Peter R. Hagerty
`phagerty@cantorcolburn.com
`Leslie-Ann Maxwell, Ph.D.
`amaxwell@cantorcolburn.com
`Andrew C. Ryan
`ryan@cantorcolburn.com
`Cantor Colburn LLP
`
`
`
`Petitioner.
`
`
`
`
`
`Date: September 14, 2016
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/Harold H. Fox/
`Harold H. Fox
`Reg. No. 41,498
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` 
`
` 
`
` 

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket