throbber
Declaration of William L. Jorgensen, Ph.D., in Support of
`Par Petition for Inter Partes Review of U-S. Patent No. 5,665,772
`
`117. This portion of the structure informs a person of ordinary skill in the
`
`art that the carbon at rapamycin’s C10 position lies in a “pocket” in the FKBP-12
`
`protein. A person of ordinary skill in the art therefore understands from the
`
`structure that the C10 position is a poor candidate for molecular modification,
`
`because any substituents added to the carbon at the C10 position (which will be
`
`larger than the hydroxyl group) are likely to interfere with rapamycin’s ability to
`
`bind to FKBP-12 and therefore interfere with rapamycin’s immunosuppressive
`
`activity. The C10 hydroxyl group is also part of an acetal, ROCI-H{'OH. Making
`
`ketal O{OCHR'OR") derivatives of acetals is generally undesirable as they may be
`
`easily hydrolyzed back to the acetal.
`
`52
`
`

`
`Declaration of William L. Jorgensen, Ph.D., in Support of
`Par Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent No. 5,665,772
`
`118.
`
`In the next figure below, the local environments of the hydroxyl
`
`groups attached to the carbons at rapamycin’s C28 and C40 positions are depicted.
`
`119. Like the carbon at rapamycin’s C10 position, a person of ordinary
`
`skill in the art would understand from the structure that the carbon at rapamycin’s
`
`C28 position is a poor candidate for molecular modification, because any
`
`substituents added to the carbon at the C28 position (which will be larger than the
`
`hydroxyl group) are likely to interfere with rapamycin’s ability to bind to FKBP-
`
`12.
`
`120. The carbon at rapamycin’s C40 position, by contrast, is farther from
`
`the core of the FKBP-12 and adjacent to empty space (the white space in the
`
`Figure above, which is only filled with water). A person of ordinary skill in the art
`
`53
`
`

`
`Declaration of William L. Jorgensen, Ph.D., in Support of
`Par Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent No. 5,665,772
`
`would recognize that substituents could be attached to the C40 oxygen atom that
`
`would extend into this water-filled space without interfering with rapamycin’s
`
`binding to FKBP—l2. As such, the structure directs a person of ordinary skill in the
`
`art that the C40 hydroxyl group is the optimal position for modifying rapamycin to
`
`avoid disrupting binding with FKBP-12 and thus its immunosuppressive activity.
`
`c.
`
`Rapamycin Was Further Known to Bind to Another
`Unidentified Biological Target
`
`121. By October 1992, as noted above,
`
`it was further known that the
`
`rapamycin/FKBP-12 complex interacted with a second unknown biological target
`
`that was essential for the immunosuppressant activity of rapamycin.
`
`(See, e.g., Ex.
`
`1012, Schreiber at 286.) Although,
`
`the biological
`
`target had not yet been
`
`identified, the effector domain, the portion of rapamycin that interacted with this
`
`second target, had been identified, as shown in the figure below- (Id. at Fig. 5(B).)
`
`
`
`54

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket