throbber
Rigid rod polymers with flexible side chains
`Synthesis, structure and phase behaviour of
`po ly(3-n-a I kyl-4-oxybenzoate )s*
`
`R. Stern, M. Ballaufft. G. Lieser and G. Wegner
`Max-Planck·fnstitut fiir Polymerforschung, Postfach 3148, 65 Mainz, Germany
`(Received 26 February 1990; revised 31July1990; accepted 31 July 1990)
`
`The synthesis of poly{3·n-alkyl·4·oxybenzoate)s (PAOB·n) with n= 3-18 is reported. The sulllcient solubility
`of these comb-like polymers with stiff.chain backbones allows the determination of the Kuhn length
`(l00-200A). The unit cells could be determined for PAOB·11 with n=3 and 5. All PAOB·n form
`thermotropic mcsophases. For n=3 a nematic phase is found. For n=S there is a transition from a
`smectic·like, layered mesophase to a nematicmesophase. PAOB-n with n~6 solely form layered mesophases.
`Except for n=3, all PAOB-n exhibit a transition to the isotropic state. The transition temperature is
`lowered monotomically with increasing n.
`
`(Kt)'llords: rigid rod polymer; synch~ls; pb•se heha\iour)
`
`The synthesis of the mono1ners, the 3-n-alkyl-4-
`hydroxybenzoic acids (I-11), proceeds along the following
`lines: the monomer bearing the propyl substituent (1-3,
`11=3) is easily available from the 3-allyl-4-hydroxybenzoic
`acid 9 through catalytic hydrogenation at atmospheric
`pressure. The monomers bearing longer 11-alkyl chains
`(1-5 to 1-18) are obtained through a Fries rearrange(cid:173)
`ment 10 of the respective 0-acylated 4-hydroxybenzoic
`acids (2-n) and subsequent Clemmensen reduction of the
`ketones 3-11 (Schen1e 1). The polycondensatiori of the
`monomers 1-11 is performed by heating the monomer
`with an excess of acetic anhydride (cf. ref. 3).
`
`EXPERIMENTAL
`/>.faterials
`All chemicals were purchased from Merck or Fluka.
`They were used without further purification unless
`otherwise stated. All solvents used were of p. a. quality;
`1, 1,2,2-tetrachloroethane, phenol and o-dichlorobenzenc
`e1nployed as solvents for viscosity measurements were
`distilled prior to use.
`
`Synthesis of nwnon1ers
`J,3-Propyl-4-hydroxybenzoic acid (l-3). The 3-allyl-4-
`hydroxybenzoic acid was synthesized through Claiscn
`rearrangement of ethyl-4-allyloxybcnzoate which was
`prepared from ethyl-4·hydroxybcnzoate9
`• Hydrogenation
`using palladium on charcoal as catalyst and subsequent
`saponification in 30°/o aqueous sodium hydroxide solution
`led to 3-propyl~4-hydroxybenzoic acid. The monomer
`
`INTRODUCTION
`Rigid rod polymers usually exhibit very low solubility
`and melting points far above the temperatures of thermal
`decomposition. In a number of recent publications it has
`been shown that flexible side chains appended to the rigid
`backbones lower the melting point and increase the
`solubility in a systematic fashion 1
`• Most of the fully
`aromatic systen1s studied so far are ·composed of rather
`synlmetric repeating units, i.e. the different conformers
`of these polymers exhibit nearly the same shape. Asym~
`metric monomers, on the other hand, should cause a
`further disturbance of crystallization because of the vast
`number of shapes generated by different confonncrs. In
`this work we present a con1prehensive study of the
`poly (J-11-alk y 1-4-ox y bcnzoa te )s( PA 0B·11)
`
`as an example of a comb-like polymer composed of
`asymntetric repeating units. The number of carbon aton1s
`n in the side chains is varied between 3 and 18, thus
`PAOB-12 is poly(J-dodecyl-4-oxybenzoate). The choice
`of poly(4-oxybenzoate) as the stiff backbone derives from
`the fact that this polymer has already been the subj~t
`7
`of a number of exhaustive studies 2-
`• Hence the influence
`of the side chains on the structure can be asse!i!ied in
`detail by comparing the results found here with the data
`obtained on the unsubstituted poly(4-oxybcnzoate). To(cid:173)
`gether \Vi th a previous investigation 8 of defined oligomcrs
`of PAOB-3 the present study aims at a full understanding
`of the structure and the phase behaviour of these
`comb·like polyesters.
`
`• Part of the PhD Thesis of R. Stern
`t To whom oorrespondence should be addressed. Present addrcs.s:
`Polymer-Institut der UniVersitiil Karlsruhe, Kaiserslr. 12, 7500
`Karl>ruhe, Gennany
`0032-3861/91/112096--10
`© 1991 Bucterworth-Heinemann Ltd.
`2096 POLYMER, 1991, Volume 32, Number 11
`
`Sch~me I
`
`OH ~
`rAY -R
`Y' 21 NoO~ '9'
`
`o-tR'
`~ OAtCt
`
`COOEt
`
`COOH
`
`,
`
`OH
`Zo/HCI &R
`
`Hg Y'
`
`COOH
`
`Roxane Labs., Inc.
`Exhibit 1023
`Page 001
`
`

`

`T1ble I Melting point~ and elemental analyses of the 3-n-alky!-4-
`hydroxy~nzoic acids (l-n)
`- - - - - - ------------
`Cale.
`Found
`--
`-
`fl(%)
`
`C(%)
`
`H {o/o)
`
`-
`Cl%)
`
`Melting
`point
`CC)
`
`3
`
`'
`
`6
`10
`12
`14
`16
`18
`
`~------
`
`115-118
`126-127
`100---lOl
`103-104
`98-99
`JO! -!02
`100-102
`100---101
`
`666-l
`69.20
`70.23
`73.33
`74.45
`75.39
`76.18
`76.86
`
`6.73
`7.76
`8.18
`9.43
`9.89
`10.26
`10.58
`10.86
`
`66.58
`69.39
`70.11
`73.46
`74.38
`75.53
`76.31
`76.91
`
`6.76
`7.75
`8.14
`9.26
`9.77
`10.14
`10.36
`10.77
`
`1H n.m.r. (acetone): J=0.89 (t, CH 1Cl::h), J .2-1.7 (m, ·(CthJ,-), 2.69
`(t, Ar-CU 1-), 6.93, 7.72 (d, Ar-8), 7.82 (s, Ar-UJ
`
`T•bl:e 2 11elting points and elemental analyses of the 3-(n-alkyl-2-
`one)-4-hydro:q·benzoic acids (3--u)
`
`t.telting
`point
`('C)
`
`191-193
`185-187
`179-180
`174-176
`173-175
`168-170
`
`"
`6
`10
`12
`14
`16
`18
`
`Elemental analysis
`
`Cale.
`
`Found
`
`C(%)
`
`H ('%)
`
`C(%)
`
`H (%)
`
`-----------~-
`
`66_08
`69.82
`71.20
`72.36
`73.35
`74.20
`
`6.84
`8.29
`8.82
`9.27
`9.66
`9.98
`
`66.13
`70.00
`71.32
`72.22
`73.57
`73.07
`
`6.71
`8.13
`8.70
`9.13
`9.53
`9.90
`
`1H n.m.r. [trifluoro:u:etic acid): ,)=0.95 (t, CH 1C!:J 3 ), 1.2-2.2 (m,
`-1Clj 1 ).--). J.24 (t, COCU 1CH 2 ). 7.18 and 8.34 (d, Ar-tl). 8.81 (s.
`Ar-8)
`
`1-3 was purified from H 20 and dried carefully prior to
`use. The overall yield of the four-step reaction was 45o/o.
`The melting point and the cle1nental analysis of l ·3 is
`given in Table I.
`
`Synthesis of 1110non1ers 1-5 to 1-18. The ethyl-4~
`alkanoyloxybenzaotcs 2-5 to 2--18 were prepared by
`reacting ethyl-4-hydroxybenzoatc with an excess of the
`respective acid chloride according to
`the standard
`procedures given in the literature 11 . The Fries rcarrange(cid:173)
`ntent of 2-11 was achieved in the following way {cf. ref.
`10): 0.3 mol of 2-11 was dissolved in 500 ml CS 2 and
`1.2 n1ol AICl3 were added in small portions leading to a
`slightly exothern1ic reaction and evolution of HCJ. After
`the last addition the mixture was refluxed for 3 h. Then
`the solvent was distilled off and the remainder heated to
`140-160°C followed by evolution of HCl and strong
`foatning. After 2 h and cooling to roo1n temperature
`800 ml H 20 were added and subsequently 160 g NaOH
`with caution. The n1ixture dissolved upon heating to
`1 l0-120°C and the resulting ketone 3-11 could be isolated
`by acidification with 400 ml concentrated HCI. Purifica(cid:173)
`tion was achieved through recrystallization from ethanol,
`toluene or chlorofonn (yields 40-45°/o). Table 2 shows
`the melting points and the elemental analyses of 3-5 to
`3-18.
`The Clemmensen reduction was carried out in the usual
`way fo!lowing references 10 and 11: 0.1 mol 2-11 was
`refluxed for 24 h in 350 nil of a mixture of H 20/ethano!jHCl
`(1:1:2) with zinc amalgan1 prepared from 200g zinc
`powder 11
`• During this time 10 n1l of concentrated HCI
`were added several tin1es. The resulting 1-n was isolated
`
`Rigid rod polyn1ers: R. Stern et al.
`
`from the cold mixture by extraction with diethyl ether.
`Analysis by 1 H nuclear magnetic resonance (n.tn.r.)
`spectroscopy demonstrated that the raw materials still
`contained a side product having a double bond in the a
`position of the alkyl side chain. For further purification
`20 g of the raw material were dissolved in 300 111\ ethanol
`and hydrogenated after addition of 0.5 g palladium on
`charcoal (10°/o) at 50°C for 24-30 h. Then the catalyst
`was filtered off and the mono1ners J-11 were recrystallized
`three tilnes from CH 30H/H 20 or CHJOH (yields
`50-75%).
`
`Poly1nerization {cf. ref. 3)
`For the poly1ncrization reaction, 1.5-3.0 g of l-11 were
`added to 1.2 equivalents of acetic anhydride and refluxed
`under an atinosphere of argon at l 80~c for 30 min. Then
`the condenser was taken off and the acetic acid ren1oved
`by a slow stream of argon. \Vhile raising the temperature
`to 260"'C the evolution of acetic acid started again at
`-245"C. By variation of the reaction time from 45 min
`to 7 h poly1ners with different molecular weights could
`be obtained (Table 3). Purification of PAOB-3 was
`carried out by refluxing the polymer with acetone;
`polyesters with longer side chains were dissolved in hot
`chloroform and precipitated fron1 methanol. All poly1ners
`reported in this investigation gave satisfactory elemental
`analyses when taking into account the measured molecular
`weights and the respecti\•e end groups.
`
`Deterlllill(Jlion of 1110/eni/ar 11·eiyht throuf!h end group
`analysis
`According to Kricheldorf and Schwarz3
`, 20-30 mg of
`the polyester PAOB-11, -200 ntg 40°/o NaOD in 0 20
`and 500 n1g CD 30D were weighed carefully in a n.m.r.
`
`Table 3 Char.icterization of the PAOB-n
`
`Reaction time
`(min)
`180°C/260"'C
`Polymer
`--~- ------- --
`PAOB-3,I
`30/45
`PAOB-3,2
`30/60
`PAOB-3,3
`30/160
`PAOB-3,4
`30/240
`PAOB-3,5'
`30/240
`30/240
`30/360
`30/240
`30/360
`
`PAOB-6,1
`PAOB·6,2
`
`PAOB-5,I
`PAOB-5,2
`
`PAOB·lO,l
`PAOll-10,2
`
`PAOB-12,\
`PAOB-12,2
`
`PAOB-14,l
`PAOB·l4,2
`PAOB·\6,1
`PAOB-16,2
`PAOB-16.3
`PAOB·\6,4
`PAOB-16,5
`PAOJl.J6,6
`
`PAOB-18
`
`30/240
`30/360
`
`30/150
`30/300
`
`30/240
`60/240
`3-0/60
`30(120
`30/180
`J0/240
`30/360
`30/420
`60/180
`
`,,, ..
`
`2650
`3600
`6350
`20000
`12100
`4450
`7650
`
`3350
`1600
`4500
`10750
`3800
`24300
`6400
`8600
`2950
`5650
`7550
`7800
`!{)lllO
`13900
`13100
`
`0.3\0l'
`0.4<JOI
`1.620"
`0.8601
`
`0.096'
`0.180'
`0.290'
`0.350'
`0.485'
`
`DP"
`
`16
`
`"
`
`39
`123
`74
`23
`40
`16
`J7
`
`17
`41
`13
`84
`20
`27
`8
`16
`
`"
`
`23
`JO
`40
`
`"
`
`'Determine-ct by 11{ n.m.r. end-group analysis
`~ }.{easured in phcnol/o-dichlorobenzene (I:\) at 50°C
`'Measured in tet1achloroethane/o--<lichlorob<:nzenr (\:!)at 5-0'C
`4 Polymerized l'oith addition of 5 mnl"/~ 4-methoxyl-3-propylbenzoic
`acid
`
`POLYMER, 1991, Volume 32, Number 11 2097
`
`Roxane Labs., Inc.
`Exhibit 1023
`Page 002
`
`

`

`Rigid rod polymers: R. Stern et al.
`
`tube and heated to 50-60°C. The solution obtained was
`analysed by 300 MHz or 400 MHz 1H n.m.r. spectroscopy
`to yield the an1ount of end groups quantitatively (see
`below).
`
`Afetliods
`1H n.m.r. spectra were recorded with 80 MHz con·
`tinuous wave, 300 MHz Fourier transfonn (F1) and
`400 MHz FTspcctron1eters (Bruker A \V 80, AC 300 and
`\VM 400). Vapour pressure osmon1ctry (v.p.o.) was done
`at 50°C using toluene as a solvent (\Vescan 232 A,
`Corona). The concentration of the polyn1er was 2-10 g 1- 1•
`For polarizing n1icroscopy a Zeiss Fotomikroskop III
`equipped with a Leitz hot stage was used. Differential
`scanning calorimetry (d.s.c.) was done with a Perkin(cid:173)
`Elmer DSC-7 calibrated with indium and tin. Thermo(cid:173)
`gravimetric data were obtained by means of a TG 50 of
`Mettler under an atmosphere of oxygen or nitrogen
`e1nploying a heating rate of 10 K min- 1
`• The intrinsic
`viscosity of the polyesters was determined using an
`Ubbe!ohde capillary viscosimeter. All data arc mean
`values of at least four measurements corrected 1 3 according
`to Hagenbach. High performance liquid chrotnatography
`(h.p.J.c.) was carried out on Li Chrosorb RP 18 or Li
`Chrosorb diol columns (Knauer) using a 1nixturc of
`diethyl acetate and n-hcptane (1: 1) with ultraviolet (u.v.)
`detection at).= 254 nm. For gel permeation chromatog(cid:173)
`raphy (g.p.c.) 1011m Styragel columns (!Os, 103 and
`10 2, Polymer Laboratories) with
`tetrahydrofuran
`(1 ml inin- 1) as the inobile phase (u.v. detection at
`A.= 254 nn1) were used. \Vide-angleX-ray analysis (\VAXS)
`was performed using Ni-filtered CuKa radiation in
`reflection mode on a Siemens D 500 diffracton1etcr
`equipped with a hot stage. All diffractogran1s are
`uncorrected. Electron diffraction was done using a
`Philips EM 300 calibrated with thallium chloride. The
`density of polymer films and fibres was determined in a
`density gradient set up from 1nixtures of H 20 and
`Ca(N0 3h at room temperature.
`
`RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
`All polymers investigated were synthesized by the acetoxy
`method 3
`, i.e. by reaction of the unsubstituted hydroxy(cid:173)
`bcnzoic acid with acetic anhydride. Since the 1naxi1nun1
`ten1perature applied in the course of the polycondensation
`did not exceed 260°C, no side products as discussed by
`Economy and co-workers1 have been observed. The
`satisfactory degrees of polymerization achieved and the
`absence of any by-products to be detected in the analysis
`of the saponificated polyesters arc furthermore indicative
`of the absence of side reactions. Special care has been
`taken to remove the evolving acetic acid as well as excess
`acetic anhydride by a slow strca1n of argon. During the
`reaction small atnounts of a solid material sublimed out
`of the mixture. Analysis by infra-red (i.r.) and n.1n.r.
`spectroscopy unambiguously demonstrated this substance
`to be identical with the acctylated monon1er. In the c-ase
`of short side chains (11=3, 5, 6) the melt turned turbid
`after 40--120 min indicating the formation of a mesophase.
`For monon1ers having longer side chains the resulting
`n1elt became increasingly viscous during polycondensation
`but only turned turbid when cooled to te1nperatures
`below 200°c. As is obvious from Table 3 the degree of
`polymerization (DP) can be adjusted by the length of the
`
`2098 POLYMER, 1991, Volume 32, Number 11
`
`reaction time. The present data indicate that even higher
`molecular weights could be obtained if desired. However,
`raising the DP beyond the values given here resulted in
`difficulties when determining the molecular weight by
`end-group analysis (sec below).
`In contrast to the unsubstituted poly(4-oxybenzoate)3
`the PAOB-3 already exhibits sufficient solubility in
`mixtures like o-dichlorobenzene with tetrachloroethane
`or phenol. Polyesters bearing longer side chains 1nay be
`dissolved in toluene or chloroforn1. Therefore purification
`can be achieved through dissolution in these solvents
`and reprecipitation into n1ethanol. This finding is in
`accordance with observations on a number of other rigid
`rod polymers being sin1ilarly substituted by flexible side
`chains 1
`• It indicates that the side chains act as a 'bound
`solvent'. However, investigations of solutions of PAOB-
`16 in solvents like toluene lead to the conclusion that
`these polyesters still have a strong tendency for association
`in solution. This fact 1nay be also inferred from the
`fornullion of gels by these solutions at room tcn1pcraturc.
`Mixtures of strong polar solvents like o-dichlorobenzene
`and tetrachloroethane prevent the formation of such gels
`if the concentration is not too high. Up to now attempts
`to determine the molecular weight and the radius of
`gyration by light scattering have failed because of either
`strong association or s1nall refractive index incren1ent.
`Thus the DP of the polyn1ers had to be determined by
`1 H n.m.r. end-group analysis according to Kricheldorf
`and Schwarz3 . For this the magnitude of the triplet of
`the CH 2 group neighbouring the aromatic core of the
`monomer is compared to the signal of the acetic acid
`anion after saponification with Na0D/D 20. \Vhen
`evaluating the magnitude of the latter signal, a small
`triplet resulting from partial H-D exchange on the acetic
`acid has to be taken into account. By this method the
`nu1nber average DP could be obtained within 10% error
`for smaller molecular weights; higher DPs are determined
`with less accuracy. For PAOB-16 the DP thus 1neasured
`compares favourably with data derived from v.p.o. The
`DPs given by the latter n1ethod arc in general higher by
`10-15o/o which certainly can be assigned to association
`in solution. Therefore only DPs derived from end-group
`analysis are used in this work (cf. Table 3).
`It has been observed that substitution of the poly(4-
`oxybenzoate) backbone n1ay lower the thermal stability
`of the resulting poly1ners considerably 14
`• Thern1ogravi(cid:173)
`metric measuren1ents on the PAOR-11 conducted in
`nitrogen (10 K 1nin- 1 heating rate) showed these polymers
`to be stable up to ,..., 350°C. A residual weight loss at
`lower ten1peraturcs can be traced back to the onset of
`further polycondensation. Nevertheless the oxidative
`degradation of the side chains represents a severe
`constraint for the stability at elevated temperatures in
`the presence of oxygen. All thermogravimetric data
`obtained so far indicate the upper limit for \ong-ter1n
`stability in air to be at temperatures between 160°C and
`220°C. Polyesters having longer side chains are more
`susceptible to degradation. Hence, measurements at
`elevated te1nperatures have to be conducted in an inert
`atmosphere or in vacuo.
`Another point of great interest is the stiffne-ss of the
`1nain chain. Since the unsubstituted polyester is not
`soluble in any known solvent there are no experin1ental
`data on its persistence length. Calculations by Erman
`et a1. 1s using the rotational isomeric state model lead to
`the prediction of a rather rigid chain \Vith a persistence
`
`Roxane Labs., Inc.
`Exhibit 1023
`Page 003
`
`

`

`(':';,_)'
`
`lo I
`
`1SO
`
`soo
`
`ISO
`
`0
`
`+
`
`0
`
`+ +
`
`so
`
`100
`
`1SO
`
`100
`
`Figure l Bohdanecky plot of the intrinsic viscosities of PAOB-J 101
`and PAOB-16 ( +)
`
`length of the order of 700 A. However, these authors
`ren1ark that such a high value has to be regarded as an
`upper limit since torsional fluctuation about the ester
`bonds should lower it appreciably 16
`• Molecular dynamics
`calculations performed by Jung and Schtirmann 11 lead
`to a much smaller value of the persistence length ( -60 A)
`for this reason. Experimental data on similar polyamidcs
`are of limited use for settling this question since the values
`for the persistence length of these systems given by
`various methods arc not conclusive1. 1s. By virtue of their
`in1proved solubility in aprotic solvents the PAOR-11 arc
`n1uch better candidates for an expcriinental tesl of the
`above conflicting predictions. In the absence of reliable
`1neasuremcnts of the radius of gyration by light scattering
`data, the intrinsic viscosity [11] 1nay serve as a first
`estimate of the chain stiffness. Thus [11] has been
`measured for PAOB-3 in phenoljo-dichlorobenzcnc and
`for PAQB.16 in tetrachloroethane/o·dichlorobcnzene at
`50°C (cf. Tal1le 3). The dependence on temperature as
`well as the dependence on concentration is well-behaved
`for these systen1s \vhereas solutions of PAOB-16 in
`toluene and in chloroform did not lead to reproducible
`results (sec above). The resulting t\fark-Houwink relations
`aro ([>1] in di g- '):
`[>1]=6.95x 10- 2 M~· 06
`PAOB-3
`in phenol/o-dichlorobenzene at SO''C
`PAOB-16 [11]=2.87x l0- 2Af!· 1
`6
`in tetrachloroethane/o-dichlorobenzene at S0°C
`A quantitative interpretation of the data for [11] 1nay be
`given in tenns of the worm-like chain n1odel developed
`by Yan1akawa and Fujii 19
`• Based on this
`theory,
`Bohdanecky 20 has recently given a simple procedure for
`data evaluation leading to the following relation:
`(i\1 2 /[t/]) 113 =A"+ B,At 111
`
`where A" is a quantity depending on the hydrodynamic
`diameter d of the chain and B" is expressed by
`B"= Bo<I>O.!f l((r2 )o/Af);, i12
`where (r 2
`) 0 is the mean-square end-to-end distance, and
`the subscript oo indicates that the (r 2 )/M value obtained
`fro1n 8" is the random coil value.
`The quantity <1>0 ."" is the viscosity function for infinite
`chain length (¢ 0 ,.,, = 2.86 x 1023
`20
`• The quantity 8 0
`)
`varies between 1.10 and LOO and may be set to a 1nean
`
`Rigid rod polymers: R. Stern et al.
`
`value of I.OS at the present level of accuracy. Figure I
`shows a Bohdanecky plot of the present data. The weight
`a\•eragc 1nolecular weights ha\'e been calculated fron1 the
`data given in Table 3 by assuming a 1nost probable
`distribution.
`The Kuhn length is calculated as /K=(r 2)/N/u where
`N=Af/Afu with A1u and lu being the mass per unit length
`and the length of the monomer unit, respectively. The
`latter quantity is given by 6.2 A in good approximation
`(see below). From these data and the slope of the
`respective curves in Figure J, /K is -90 A for PAOB-3
`and -190 A for PAOD-16. The intercept A may be used
`to yield first esti1nates of the hydrodyna~ic radius r
`20
`according 10
`:
`d'
`A'
`0
`where tl,=<i/IK is the reduced hydrodynamic radius and
`tl:/A 0 is related to <1, by 2o
`ln(d; I A0 )=0.! 73 + 2.158 ln(d,)
`!s approximated 7 unity, we obtain for PAOB-3 a value
`If the partial specific volun1e ii of the polymer in solution
`
`=(4'1>0 .. :c1.21 SnJ\f A)(ii/A~)B!
`
`, and for PAOB-1611-13A. Similar
`111 the range 7-8
`values have been found recently for substituted cellulose
`polyn1ers 21 and seem to be quite reasonable. One has to
`bear in n1ind that these values have been derived under
`20
`a number of stringent assu1nptions 19
`. On the molecular
`•
`level the poly1ner chain is approximated by a cylinder
`which 1nay be rather questionable when looking at the
`structure of PAOB-11 with 11 > 6. Hence, these data should
`be only regarded as rough estimates and the present
`investigation of chain stiffness 1nust be certainly supple-
`1nented by other methods.
`Despite t~ese proble1ns it is clear that our findings data
`arc inore 1n support of the prediction of Jung and
`Schtirmann 17
`• Krigbaum and Tanaka 22 recently found
`IK. values of similar n1agnitude for poly(phenyl p·
`phenyleneterephthalate) by a variety of methods. Thus
`the present data indicate that the stiffness of the fully
`aron1atic polyester chain is significantly smaller than
`anticipated by the calculations neglecting the effect of
`bond-angle fluctuations. The surprising fact that the
`stiffness seems to increase with increasing length of the
`side chains 1nay be explained 23 by the notion that steric
`interactions between bulky side chains lead to a significant
`rise in IK. In the absence of further information on the
`shape of the PAOB-11 chain as revealed by small angle X-ray
`or neutron scattering no finn conclusions can be drawn.
`
`Phase behaviour of PAOB·3
`In the following it will beco1nc obvious that the phase
`behaviour of PAOD-3 is significantly different from the
`phase behaviour of PAOR-11 bearing longer side chains.
`In the case of PAOB-3 the n1ain chains control the
`structure and thcnnal transitions. For longer side chains
`the vohunc fraction of the main chains is decreasing and
`the most favourable arrangement of the side chains
`detennincs the packing of the polyn1er in the solid state
`as well as in the mesophase.
`
`Solid state. Figure 2 shows the \VAXS patterns of
`PAOB-3 recrystallized from the n1ell (Figure 2a) and
`fro1n dioxane {Figure 2b ). From this it is evident that
`two different modifications have been forn1ed through
`
`POLYMER, 1991, Volume 32, Number 11 2099
`
`Roxane Labs., Inc.
`Exhibit 1023
`Page 004
`
`

`

`Rigid rod polymers: R. Stern et al.
`a
`
`---~
`
`2 a JO
`
`10
`
`15
`
`10
`
`15
`
`b
`
`" c
`" -e
`" ?:'
`" c • c
`
`5
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`JO
`
`18
`
`Figure 2
`\Vidc·angle X-ray diffractograms (uncorr.xted) of PAOB-3
`recrystalli1.ed from the melt (a) and from dioxarte (b)
`
`Figure 3 X-ray fibre diagram of PAOD-3 drawn from the melt
`(modifications Ta and lb). The Miller indires are gh·en in Table 4
`
`the different conditions of crystallization. The \VAXS
`patterns furthermore show both modifications to have a
`high degree of crystallinity. Melt-crystallized san1ples
`(referred to as modification I fibres) with a high degree
`of orientation 1nay be drawn. The resulting fibre diagram
`is shown in Figure 3.
`The distance between the layer lines demonstrates
`that the identity period along the chain consists of two
`oxybenzoate monomer units. This is in accordance with
`the crystal structure of the din1eric model compound 8 in
`which the planes of subsequent benzene rings are rotated
`through an angle of 90° with respect to each other. The
`
`2100 POLYMER, 1991, Volume 32, Number 11
`
`absence of meridional reflections with odd 1 indices
`indicates a 21 or a 42 helical structure of the main chain.
`An additional feature is the presence of two series of
`reflections on the different layer lines leading to two
`hyperbolas per layer. This can be seen tnost clearly from
`the splitting of the 002 reflection. Variations of the
`c-parameter within a range of 12.4-12.9 A were observed
`in earlier work on poly(4-hydroxybcnzoic acid) and were
`shown to be a function of the DP 3
`• All reflections found
`in this work nuiy be indexed satisfactorily in tenns of
`two tetragonal modifications, Ia and lb, which differ only
`with regard to tbc c vector of the unit cell. Tcible 4 gives
`the Bragg distances and their respective indices.
`The presence of two very sin1ilar 1nodifications Ia and
`
`Titble 4 Calculated and ob>erved X-ray refleetions of modifications
`la, lb and rl of l•AOB-3
`
`Reflection
`index
`(h kl)
`
`Calculated
`~,\icing
`
`Observed
`spacing
`{A)
`
`Position/modific.ation
`
`Tetragonal modifications Ia and lb, a=b= 16.95 A, c= 12.36 A (la),
`c=t2.86A (lb)
`I JO
`020
`
`11.99
`8.48
`
`Equator (a, b)
`
`I 1.99(vs)
`8.47(vs)
`7.16(vw)
`5.96(vw)
`5.34(s)
`4.70(s)
`4.24(,·s)
`4.12(m)
`3.99(s)
`3.78(m)
`3.34(w)
`
`5.99
`5.36
`4.70
`4.24
`4.11
`4.00
`3.79
`3.32
`
`6.46
`4.92
`4,39
`
`5.17
`4.42
`4.02
`3.6-1
`3.22
`
`6.18
`5.81
`4.79
`4.05
`
`6.43
`5.!2
`4.JS
`
`120
`130
`230
`040
`140
`·330
`240
`150
`I 2 I
`13 I
`231
`OJI
`2 JI
`041
`24 I
`I 5 I
`001
`0 I 1
`112
`131
`002
`032
`222
`0 I J{a}
`OJJ/113(b)
`02 )(a)
`023/123(b)
`004
`
`4.0(a)
`4.16/4.M(b)
`J.71(o)
`3.83/J.7J{b)
`3.0'J(a)
`3.22(b)
`- - - - - - -
`Reflection
`Ca!C1Jlated
`index
`s~acing
`(hkl)
`{)
`
`6.SO(n\')
`4.86(m)
`4.28{m)
`
`5.ll{m)
`4.50(m)
`4.03(vw)
`3.68(w)
`3.19(vw)
`
`6.18{s)
`5.85(w)
`4.69(w)
`3.95(\'\\')
`6.43(s)
`5.0S(vw)
`4.50(\'W)
`
`4.06(m)
`
`!st layer line: a
`
`1st la}·cr line: b
`
`2nd layer line: a
`
`2nd la)·er line: b
`
`3.77(m)
`
`3rd !a)'er line
`
`3.ll(w)
`
`4th layer line
`
`Observed spacing (A)
`
`X-ray
`
`Ekctron diffraction
`--------
`
`Orthorhombic modification JI
`a= 14.20 A, b=9.60A,c=12.48 A
`110
`7.95
`7.94(s)
`200
`7.10
`7.07(m)
`002
`6.24
`6.24{w)
`
`020
`310
`220
`420
`
`4.80
`4.25
`3.98
`2.85
`
`4.72(w')
`4.22(s)
`3.96(s)
`
`7.99(s)
`7.l2(s)
`
`4.83(w)
`4.25(s)
`4.00(s)
`2.87(w)
`
`•Shoulder of 3 I 0 reflection
`Abbreviations: vs. \'erystrong;s, strong; m, medium; w, weak; vw, \·cry
`wc.ak
`
`Roxane Labs., Inc.
`Exhibit 1023
`Page 005
`
`

`

`Rigid rod polyrners: R. Stern et al.
`
`by material with lower degrees of polymerization. Since
`crystallites of stiff polyn1crs usually have dimensions
`which arc n1uch larger in the direction perpendicular
`rather than parallel to the chains4
`, these crystallites will
`lie ft.at on the 00 l surface. Thus with this geometry
`(electron beam perpendicular on the crystal surface) only
`Ii k 0 reflections will be monitored. Figure 5 shows the
`result whereas Table 4 gives the d-spacings of modification
`[J which can be indexed by an orthorhon1bic unit cell
`(a~ 14.20 A, b ~ 9.60 A, c ~ 12.48 A, four chains per unit
`cell). The 6.24 A reflex which is only visible in the \VAXS
`diffractogran1 (Figure 2b) is interpreted as the 002 reflex
`in analogy to modification I. The length of the repeating
`unit (12.48 A) is the mean value of the data derived from
`the ds and tra11s chains (see above). The X·ray density
`(l .27 g cni- 3 ) is similar to values (l .2-1.3 g cm - 3 ) found
`for the solution.crystallized oligomers 8 •
`
`Elevated ten1peral11res. All PAOB·3 samples exhibit a
`broad bimodal n1elting peak with temperatures depending
`on molecular weight. Since the specimens ha,·ing a
`smaller DP still contain reactive end groups, heating up
`in
`leads
`to further polycondensation. Second runs
`consequence exhibit higher melting temperatures. If the
`materials arc annealed at the temperature of the lower
`1nelting peak a second run only gives a single sharp
`melting transition at T=294°C and no indication of a
`glass transition (Figure 6).
`This value nearly coincides with the melting point of
`the oligomers extrapolated to infinite molecular weight 8
`•
`It is thus concluded that the crystallinity in the annealed
`1naterial is very high. This finding is already obvious from
`the fibre diagra1ns of melt·drawn specimens. In this
`context it is interesting to note that the heat of fusion
`) is approxi1nately equal to the value found 3 for
`{36 J g- 1
`the high temperature solid-solid transition (38 J g- 1 ) of
`the unsubstituted poly(4·oxybcnzoatc). \VAXS dilfracto(cid:173)
`grams and polarizing microscopy however, revealed that
`PAOB-3 is transforn1ed into an ordinary nematic phase.
`No transition to the isotropic fluid occurred within the
`accessible range of ten1perature. The extrapolation of the
`transition
`temperatures obtained from oligo1ners
`to
`infinite nlolecular weight indicates8 the Tn1 of the polymer
`to be located at ,...,4]0''C, i.e. where thermal decomposition
`pre\•ails.
`
`" 100
`E
`' ~
`.9
`
`50
`
`o.o~~-~-~~-~-~-~___,
`lOO
`0
`100
`200
`300
`
`T/°C
`Figure 6 Differential £canning calurinietry ana\y~is of an annealed
`sample of PAOB-J at 20 K min-· i
`
`POLYMER, 1991, Volume 32, Number 11
`
`2101
`
`cis chain
`
`Figure 4 Representation of the trans and cis conformers of the
`p·oxybenlOate backbone together with the cakula!ed c values (modifi·
`cations la and lb)
`
`Figure 5 Elet:lron diffraction of PAOfJ.J recrystallized from dioxane
`(modifirntion H). Talile 4 gh·es the Miller indi~s
`
`lb 1nay be due lo the formation of crystals with different
`conformalion of the n1ain chains (Figure 4). The length
`of the identity period along the c direction can be
`calculated fro1n the bond lengths and angles derived from
`the crystal structure or the dimer. This leads to 12.60
`or 12.36 A for the trans and cis chains, respectively.
`The values derived fron1 the analysis of the fibre diagram
`(Ia: 12.36; lb: 12.86) compare favourably with these
`deductions if the slightly higher value of c found for
`lb is explained in tenns of s1nall distortions of bond
`angles. Also the mean value of the theoretical density
`(1.190 g cm·· 3 ) is in accordance with the experitnental
`result (1.!83gc1n- 3
`). The only reflection not being
`indexed by the above unit cell corresponds to a Bragg
`distance of 7. l 6 A and is the strongest one of a series of
`reflections (21.3, 10.7, 7.1 ). The rnost probable explanation
`is the assun1ption of a third orthorhotnbic
`for this
`modification le which scen1s to be forn1ed during solid
`state polycondcnsation (cf. ref. 4 for similar observations
`on the unsubstituted polyester).
`In the case of solution-crystallized san1ples {er. Figure
`2b) the corresponding structure may be elucidated by
`electron diffraction applied to srnall crystallites formed
`
`Roxane Labs., Inc.
`Exhibit 1023
`Page 006
`
`

`

`Rigid rod polymers: R. Stern et al.
`
`along the chain consists of two monomer units. However,
`there is no splitting into cis or trans segments, the chains
`seem to contain both fonns in statistical sequence. A
`con1parison with modification II of PAOB·3 shows the
`nlagnitude of b to be identical. From Table 5 and Figure
`7b it is obvious that the gradual loss of long-range
`correlation does not allow an una1nbiguous assignment
`of the unit cell o\ving to the absence of 1nixed reflections.
`On the other hand, all reflections of PAOB-6 can be
`satisfactorily indexed in terms of modification III (cf.
`Table 5). No new feature appears in the fibre diagran1s
`
`Table 5 Calculated and observed X-rny reflectiom of orthorhombic
`mo<lific.ation III (PAOB-5 to PAQB.J8) a=· ·. b=9.6 A, c"' 12.6 A
`
`Reflection
`inde~
`(hk I)
`
`PAOB-5
`JOO
`200
`300
`400
`020
`220
`33 0
`
`Calculated
`sp~cing
`<A>
`
`17.80
`8.90
`5.93
`4.45
`4.80
`4.22
`2.82
`
`02 1/3 11
`221
`321/4 I I
`002
`012/202
`212
`302
`022/312
`022/122
`004
`4.6 A {\'W,d): halo
`PAOB-6
`JOO
`200
`300
`400
`500
`
`4.5/4.6
`4.0
`3.6/3.8
`6.3
`5.3/5.1
`4.5
`4.3
`3.8/3.9
`3.8/J.7
`3.15
`
`19.80
`9.90
`6.60
`4.95
`196
`
`021/401
`lll
`002
`11 2
`004
`4.6 A {w,dl: halo
`
`4.5/4.6
`4.1
`6.2.5
`5.10
`
`3.15
`
`PAOB-10
`100
`200
`400
`500
`
`26.80
`13.40
`6.70
`5.36
`
`002
`
`6.25
`
`004
`4.1:5A (w,d): halo
`
`3.15
`
`Obsen'ed
`spacing
`(A)
`
`17.75(vs)
`8.90(m)
`5.92(m)
`4.43(m)
`4.80(s)
`4.34(s)
`2.86(w)
`4.45(w,d)
`
`4.6(m)
`4.0{vw)
`3.7(vw)
`
`6.3(s)
`5.2{vw)
`4.7(m)
`4.3{vw)
`3.9(m)
`3.7(vw)
`3.l{m)
`
`19.SO{vs)
`9.91{vw)
`6.60{w)
`4.96(m)
`4.00(vw)
`4.47(m,d)
`4.60(w)
`4.0

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket