throbber
Case IPR2016-01096
`Patent No. 6,667,061
`Objections Under 37 C.F.R. §§ 42.63 and 42.64
`Attorney Docket No. 9LUYE 7.1R-004
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________________________
`
`LUYE PHARMA GROUP LTD., LUYE PHARMA (USA) LTD., SHANDONG
`LUYE PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD., and NANJING LUYE
`PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD.
`Petitioners
`
`v.
`
`ALKERMES PHARMA IRELAND LTD. and
`ALKERMES CONTROLLED THERAPEUTICS, INC.
`Patent Owners.
`
`
`Patent No. 6,667,061 to Ramstack et al.
`Issue Date: December 23, 2003
`Title: PREPARATION OF INJECTABLE
`SUSPENSIONS HAVING IMPROVED INJECTABILITY
`____________________________
`Inter Partes Review No. IPR2016-01096
`__________________________________________________________________
`
`PETITIONERS’ OBJECTIONS UNDER 37 C.F.R. §§ 42.63
`AND 42.64 TO EVIDENCE SUBMITTED BY PATENT OWNERS’
`POST-INSTITUTION (EXHIBITS 2073-2079, 2081)
`
`
`Mail Stop: Patent Board
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`U.S. Patent And Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`5086748_1.docx
`
`

`

`Case IPR2016-01096
`Objections Under 37 C.F.R. §§ 42.63 and 42.64
`Patent No. 6,667,061
`Attorney Docket No. 9LUYE 7.1R-004
`
`
`Petitioners Luye Pharma Group Ltd., Luye Pharma (USA) Ltd., Shandong
`
`Luye Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., and Nanjing Luye Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
`
`(collectively “Petitioners”) object under the Federal Rules of Evidence (“FRE”)
`
`and 37 C.F.R. §§ 42.63 and 42.64 to the admissibility of the following exhibits on
`
`the grounds set forth below. All evidence objected to below was served by
`
`Patent Owners Alkermes Pharma
`
`Ireland Ltd. and Alkermes Controlled
`
`Therapeutics, Inc. (collectively “Patent Owners”) with Patent Owners’ Exhibit
`
`List 5 on July 24, 2017 (Paper No. 52). Therefore, Petitioners’ objections are
`
`timely.
`
`All objections under FRE 802 (hearsay) apply to the extent Patent Owners
`
`rely on the exhibits identified in connection with that objection for the truth of the
`
`matters asserted therein.
`
`Petitioners object as follows:
`
`Exhibit 2073
`Petitioners object to Exhibit 2073 under FRE 802 (hearsay), FRE 402
`
`(relevance), FRE 403 (confusing, waste of
`
`time), and FRE 901 (lack of
`
`authentication).
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case IPR2016-01096
`Objections Under 37 C.F.R. §§ 42.63 and 42.64
`Attorney Docket No. 9LUYE 7.1R-004
`
`Exhibit 2074
`Petitioners object to Exhibit 2074 under FRE 402 (relevance) and FRE 403
`
`(confusing, waste of time).
`
`Exhibit 2075
`Petitioners object to Exhibit 2075 under FRE 402 (relevance), FRE 403
`
`(confusing, waste of time), and 37 C.F.R. § 42.63(b) (failing to provide an English
`
`translation and an affidavit attesting to the accuracy of the translation).
`
`Exhibit 2076
`Petitioners object to Exhibit 2076 under FRE 402 (relevance) and FRE 403
`
`(confusing, waste of time).
`
`Exhibit 2077
`Petitioners object to Exhibit 2077 under FRE 402 (relevance), FRE 403
`
`(confusing, waste of time), and 37 C.F.R. § 42.63(b) (failing to provide an English
`
`translation and an affidavit attesting to the accuracy of the translation).
`
`Exhibit 2078
`Petitioners object to Exhibit 2078 under FRE 402 (relevance) and FRE 403
`
`(confusing, waste of time).
`
`Exhibit 2079
`Petitioners object to Exhibit 2079 under FRE 402 (relevance) and FRE 403
`
`(confusing, waste of time).
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case IPR2016-01096
`Objections Under 37 C.F.R. §§ 42.63 and 42.64
`Attorney Docket No. 9LUYE 7.1R-004
`
`Exhibit 2081
`Petitioners
`
`reserve
`
`all
`
`their
`
`objections
`
`under
`
`reassert
`
`and
`
`37 C.F.R. § 42.64(a) made during the deposition of Dr. Patrick DeLuca on July 13,
`
`2017.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`LERNER, DAVID, LITTENBERG,
` KRUMHOLZ & MENTLIK, LLP
`600 South Avenue West
`Westfield, NJ 07090-1496
`Tel: 908.654.5000
`Fax: 908.654.7866
`
`
`
`By: s/ Paul H. Kochanski /
`Paul H. Kochanski
`Registration No. 29,660
`pkochanski@lernerdavid.com
`
`
`
`Dated:
`
`July 31, 2017
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case IPR2016-01096
`Objections Under 37 C.F.R. §§ 42.63 and 42.64
`Attorney Docket No. 9LUYE 7.1R-004
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`The undersigned hereby certifies
`that a copy of
`
`the
`
`foregoing
`
`PETITIONERS’ OBJECTIONS UNDER 37 C.F.R. §§ 42.63 AND 42.64 TO
`
`EVIDENCE SUBMITTED BY PATENT OWNERS’ POST-INSTITUTION
`
`(EXHIBITS 2073-2079, 2081) was served on July 31, 2017, as follows.
`
`VIA E-MAIL
`
`FITZPATRICK, CELLA, HARPER & SCINTO
`Scott Reed
`sreed@fchs.com
`Justin J. Oliver
`joliver@fchs.com
`Ha Kung Wong
`hwong@fchs.com
`Christina Schwarz
`cschwarz@fchs.com
`Melinda Roberts
`mroberts@fchs.com
`Una Fan
`ufan@fchs.com
`
`alkermesipr@fchs.com
`
`Counsel for Patent Owners Alkermes Pharma Ireland
`Ltd., and Alkermes Controlled Therapeutics, Inc.
`
`July 31, 2017
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`By: s/ Paul H. Kochanski /
`Paul H. Kochanski
`Registration No. 29,660
`pkochanski@lernerdavid.com
`
`
`
`4
`
`
`
`
`Dated:
`
` 5086748_1.docx
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket