`Patent No. 6,667,061
`Request for Oral Argument
`Attorney Docket No. 9LUYE 7.1R-004
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________________________
`
`LUYE PHARMA GROUP LTD., LUYE PHARMA(USA) LTD., SHANDONG
`LUYE PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD., and NANJING LUYE
`PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD.,
`Petitioners,
`
`v.
`
`ALKERMES PHARMA IRELAND LTD and
`ALKERMES CONTROLLED THERAPEUTICS, INC.,
`Patent Owners.
`
`Patent No. 6,667,061 to Ramstack et al.
`Issue Date: December 23, 2003
`Title: PREPARATION OF INJECTABLE
`SUSPENSIONS HAVING IMPROVED INJECTABILITY
`____________________________
`Inter Partes Review No. IPR2016-01096
`__________________________________________________________________
`
`PETITIONERS’ REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
`
`
`Mail Stop: Patent Board
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`U.S. Patent And Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`
`
`Case IPR2016-01096
`Patent No. 6,667,061
`Request for Oral Argument
`Attorney Docket No. 9LUYE 7.1R-004
`
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(a) and the Board’s November 30, 2016
`
`Scheduling Order (Paper 15), Petitioners respectfully request that the Board hear
`
`oral argument on the instituted grounds of unpatentability in this proceeding.
`
`Petitioners request that the each party be allocated 30 minutes for oral
`
`argument.
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(a), Petitioners specify the following issues to
`
`be argued:
`
`1. Claims 1-13, 22, and 23 are rendered obvious by the combination
`
`of Johnson and Kino;
`
`2. Claims 1-3, 6-9, 12, 13, and 17-23 are rendered obvious by the
`
`combination of Gustafsson, Ramstack, and the Handbook; and
`
`3. Any motion to exclude or other motion or paper filed concurrently
`
`with or subsequent to this request.
`
`Petitioners request the ability to use audio/visual equipment to display
`
`demonstrative exhibits and evidence of record, including a computer connectable
`
`projector and screen.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case IPR2016-01096
`Patent No. 6,667,061
`Request for Oral Argument
`Attorney Docket No. 9LUYE 7.1R-004
`
`
`Counsel for Petitioners have met and conferred with counsel for Patent
`
`Owners, and the parties have agreed to the provisions in this request with the
`
`exception of the length of time for oral argument.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`Dated:
`
`July 24, 2017
`
`
`
`By:
`
`/ Tedd Van Buskirk /
`Tedd W. Van Buskirk
`Reg. No. 46,282
`
`
`
`5065147_1
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case IPR2016-01096
`Patent No. 6,667,061
`Request for Oral Argument
`Attorney Docket No. 9LUYE 7.1R-004
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`The undersigned hereby certifies
`that a copy of
`
`the
`
`foregoing
`
`PETITIONERS’ REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT was served on July 24,
`
`2017, as follows.
`
`VIA E-MAIL
`
`Scott K. Reed, Esq.
`Fitzpatrick, Cella, Harper & Scinto
`1290 Avenue of the Americas
`New York, NY 10104-3800
`Tel: 212.218.2100
`E-mail:
`sreed@fchs.com
`
`
`
`Dated:
`
`
`
`July 24, 2017
`
`
`
`By:
`
`/ Tedd Van Buskirk /
`Tedd W. Van Buskirk
`Reg. No. 46,282
`
`
`
`
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
