throbber
________________________________
`
`AAPS PharmsciTech 2001
`PIiiiiiiISdtecIr
`http//www.pharmscitech.com
`Preparation Characterization and In Vivo Evaluation of Salmon
`Calcitonin Microspheres
`DcLuca2
`Dani and Patrick
`Bhas
`
`article 22
`
`Inhale Therapeutic Systems 150 Industrial Road San Carlos CA 94070
`2Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences University of Kentucky College of Pharmacy Lexington KY 40536
`
`Submitted June
`ABSTRACT
`
`2001 Accepted October
`
`2001
`
`Published October 17 2001
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`Purpose
`
`characterize
`
`hydrophilic
`
`was
`This
`done
`prepare
`study
`and evaluate salmon calcitonin sCT
`microspheres ms in vivo using
`low molecular
`5050
`weight
`poly DL-lactide-co
`glycolide polymer PLGA Methods sCT ms were
`
`to
`
`prepared
`
`by
`
`particle
`
`dispersion/solvent
`process and characterized for
`extraction/evaporation
`drug content particle size surface morphology and
`integrity of encapsulated peptide Peptide
`structural
`stability and binding to the polymer was studied in 0.1
`phosphate buffer PB pH 7.4 and 0.1
`acetate
`buffer AB pH 4.0
`Serum sCT
`levels were
`monitored for weeks after subcutaneous injection of
`sCT ms to rats Results sCT ms were essentially free
`of discernible
`surface pores with
`size
`distribution in the range of 16 to 89 mm and mean
`particle size of 51 and 53 mm for
`batches Fourier
`Transform Matrix-assisted Laser Desorption mass
`spectrometry of the extracted peptide showed that the
`chemical
`did not
`alter
`its
`process
`encapsulation
`structure The peptide was substantially more stable in
`AB than in PB Peptide binding to the polymer was
`dependent on pH and was markedly higher in PB than
`in AB In vivo study proved that elevated serum sCT
`levels could be sustained for at
`least 10 days after
`administration of sCT ms to rats at
`dose of 1.0
`mg/kg Conclusions
`It was demonstrated that sCT
`into polymeric ms prepared
`could be incorporated
`low molecular weight hydrophilic PLGA
`from
`without
`
`using
`
`dispersion
`
`molecular
`
`structure
`
`tecbnique
`2-week
`
`altering
`
`formulation was
`
`dose of 1.0 mg/kg
`
`prepared at
`KEYWORDS
`Salmon
`calcitzzonin
`microspheres PLGA peptide interaction
`
`sCT
`
`Corresponcling Author Patrick
`of Pharmaceutical
`College
`Sciences
`Faculty
`Rose
`of Kentucky
`Pharmacy
`University
`Lexington KY 40536 USA Telephone 859-27- 1831
`859-323-0242 E-mail ppdelul pop.uky.edu
`Facsimi
`
`DeLuca Ph.D
`of
`
`Street
`
`Salmon
`
`calcitonin
`
`32
`
`amino
`
`acid
`
`sCT
`polypeptide has
`physiological role in the regulattin
`of calcium homeostasis and is
`inhibitor of
`
`potent
`from clinical
`
`trials
`
`in
`
`and
`
`bone
`
`early
`
`resorption Results
`animal studies have shown that sCT depresses
`and
`bone
`loss
`turnover
`prevents
`postmenopausal women
`sCT
`being
`
`bone
`
`is
`
`and ovariectomized rats
`
`used
`
`to
`
`treat
`
`clinically
`formulated
`
`It
`
`is currently
`
`or as
`
`as
`
`sterile
`
`osteoporosis
`solution for intramuscular or subcutaneous
`injection
`pulypeptide sCT is
`nasal spray Being
`vulnerable to digestive degradation and has
`very
`t2 after parenteral
`in the body
`short half- life
`administration is approximately 15 to 20 minutes
`The treatment of osteoporosis
`long-term
`requires
`therapy and because of these properties which are
`drawbacks to long-term therapy patient compliance
`limited especially when
`be
`can
`severely
`daily
`injection regimen of sCT is required Hence there is
`an ongoing effort to develop controlled-release dosage
`forms formulations that can effectively deliver sCT
`Poly DL lactide-co-glycolide copolymer PLGA
`has shown promise for the delivery of sCT
`This
`variety of
`commercially available in
`copolymer
`comonomer
`ratios and molecular weights Previous
`work in this laboratory has shown that sCT could be
`successfully encapsulated with high loading efficiency
`in PLGA microspheres ms made from
`high
`molecular weight hydrophobic polymer that had end
`However wetting
`groups protected alkylated
`was difficult
`and required
`long time for bond
`and the release of sCT
`and biodegradation
`cleavage
`from these ms occurred in intermittent pulses through
`120 days followed by
`large peak between 120 and
`148
`The
`coincided with
`days
`latter
`solubilization of
`
`the polymer
`Recently because of the interest
`
`complete
`work
`in theft application as
`
`EXHIBIT _QOc-1
`WIT ________
`
`DATE QjL
`
`DAWN HILLIER RMR CRR
`
`ALKERMES Exh. 2027
`Luye v. Alkermes
`IPR2016-1096
`
`

`

`delivery matrices PLGA polymers with
`drug
`hydrophilic end groups have become available This
`focused
`and
`on
`study
`preparing
`characterizing
`sustained-release delivery system for sCT made from
`5050 low molecular weight hydrophilic PLGA
`and evaluating the system in vivo
`MATERIALS AND METHODS
`
`Materials
`
`Boehringer
`
`sCT was purchased from Bachem Inc Torrance
`CA PLGA RGSO2H polymer
`34035
`lot
`7800
`was obtained from
`molecular weight
`Ingelheim Inc Ingeiheim Gennany and
`was used for ms preparation Polyvinyl alcohol PVA
`average MW 30 000-70 000 was obtained from
`Sigma Chemical Co St Louis MO The solvents and
`grade and were
`other excipients were analytical
`from commercial sources Female Sprague
`purchased
`and
`Dawley rats that weighed approximately 250
`were 90
`days old were purchased from Harlan
`IN and
`in vivo
`the
`Indianapolis
`studies were conducted at the University of Kentucky
`College of Pharmacy Animal Research Facility in
`accordance with the institutional guidelines
`HPLC method for peptide assay
`
`Laboratories
`
`Bondclone
`
`The peptide was analyzed by reverse-phase high-
`performance liquid chromatography HPLC using
`LC-6A pumps an SIL-6B autoinjector an SPD-6AV
`and an SCL-6B system controller all
`from
`detector
`Instruments mc Columbia
`Shimadzu Scientific
`MID The column used was
`Bondclone
`10 C-18
`3.90 mm with
`column 150
`reversed-phase
`3.90 mm guard column
`10 C-l8 30
`Phenomenex Torrance CA Gradient elution was
`accomplished with 0.1% trifluoroacetic
`and acetonitrile 0.1% trifluoroacetic
`and
`acid
`from 30% to 50%
`increasing the amount of phase
`flow of 1.5 mL/min Standard
`over 10 minutes at
`curves of sCT ranging
`from 6.25
`to 200 j.tg/mL
`yielded linear responses over that concentration range
`with detection at 220 nm
`
`acid in water
`
`Polymer Characterization
`The molecular weight distribution of RG5O2H PLGA
`was
`determined
`by
`polymer
`permeation
`gel
`chromatography GPC using Waters M-45 solvent
`delivery system with Waters 990 Photodiode Array
`Detector and ultrastyragel columns connected
`in series
`
`Tg was determined
`calorimeter DSC equipped with
`refrigeration
`system Thermal Analysis Instruments DSC 2920
`New Castle DE From to 10 mg of the polymer
`in an aluminum pan Then under
`was
`sealed
`nitrogen purge the sample and reference empty pan
`rate of 5C mm
`from 20C to 80C
`were heated at
`to 20C then heated at 5C miii
`cooled at 10C miii
`to 65C
`Preparation of sCT ms
`dispersion method
`sCT ms were prepared
`and
`followed by solvent
`evaporation
`in methanol was
`solution of peptide
`Briefly
`solution of PLGA in methylene
`combined with
`chloride and stirred until clear The solution was then
`reactor with baffles Ace
`slowly injected into
`Glass mc Vineland NJ containing the continuous
`phase CP 0.35%
`solution of PVA pH 7.2
`L4R
`stirred at 3500 rpm with
`homogenizer Silverson Machines Ltd Waterside
`Chesham Buckinghamshire UK The temperature of
`at 25C for 30
`the reactor was maintained initially
`minutes and then at 35C for
`hours Once ms were
`formed and hardened the contents of the reactor were
`equipped with
`transferred to
`apparatus
`0.8 ji membrane filter Gelman Sciences Ann Arbor
`MI and the recovered product was rinsed with water
`and either lyophilized or dried under reduced pressure
`for 48 hours at room temperature Blank ms without
`sCT were prepared similarly
`
`by
`
`extraction
`
`filtration
`
`7.8
`
`300 mm each one with Jo4
`pores and one
`pores The polymer was dissolved in
`with i03
`tetrahydroftiran THF at 0.1% wtlvol eluted with
`THF at mL/min and analyzed at 230 nm Number
`weight Me weight
`average molecular
`average
`molecular weight Mw and polydispersity M/M
`
`were determined
`
`using
`
`differential
`
`scanning
`
`and
`
`Silverson
`
`Microsphere Characterization
`in ms was determined by HPLC after
`Peptide content
`the ms
`and
`chloride
`in methylene
`dissolving
`acetate buffer AB
`extracting the peptide with 0.1
`pH 4.0 Fourier Transform Matrix-assisted
`Laser
`Desorption FT-MALDI mass spectrometry with
`dihydrobenzene as the matrix and nitrogen laser at
`260 intensity was used to determine the molecular
`weight of sCT The integrity of encapsulated sCT was
`confirmed by comparing the mass spectrum of sCT
`extracted from the ms to that of standard sCT solution
`
`

`

`glass
`
`transition
`
`using
`
`Malvern 2600c Particle Sizer Malvern UK Surface
`morphology was analyzed
`scanning
`electron
`microscopy SEM with
`800 Tokyo
`on
`instrument after palladium/gold
`Japan
`coating
`aluminum stubs Total product yield was assessed
`gravimetrically on the basis of polymer/drug
`IN VITRO STUDIES
`
`of ms
`The
`was
`temperature
`determined by DSC Particle size distribution was
`determined
`
`laser
`
`diffraction
`
`technique
`
`by
`
`Hitachi
`
`recoveiy
`
`Peptide Stability
`
`Stock solutions of sCT were prepared by dissolving
`10 mg of sCT in 50 mL of 0.1
`phosphate buffer
`PB pH 7.4 or 0.1
`AB pH 4.0 All solutions were
`used immediately upon preparation Peptide stability
`temperatures 4C
`was determined in PB and AB at
`25C and 37C Approximately mL of fresh stock
`solutions were placed in mL glass scintillation vials
`and the vials were sealed Periodically aliquots were
`removed from each vial and the amount of intact
`peptide was assayed by HPLC
`Peptide Adsorption to PLGA ms
`Stock solutions of sCT were prepared by dissolving
`lsmgofsCTin30niLof0.l MPBpH7Aor0.l
`AB pH 4.0 AU solutions were used immediately
`preparation One milliliter
`sCT
`of
`stock
`upon
`solutions in PB and AB were incubated at 37C with
`10 mg of blank ms At each time point
`samples of
`each suspension were removed from the incubator
`The samples were centriffiged and the amount of
`peptide in the supernatant was determined by HPLC
`In Vivo Evaluation of sCT ms
`
`sCT ms were evaluated
`in vivo in female Sprague
`Dawley rats Three groups of rats were subjected to
`Free sCT was
`the treatments described in Table
`single injection was
`dissolved in 0.9% saline and
`administered
`dose of 71 ug/kg
`subcutaneously
`The microsphere lots were suspended
`in mixture of
`1% CMC and 2% mannitol The formulations were
`volume ie pL
`body weight
`body weight
`subcutaneously
`just
`single injection was given to
`below the neck region
`each animal
`
`at
`
`injected
`
`at point
`
`administered
`
`immediately after collecting
`
`predosing
`
`sample
`
`Blood samples were collected from the tail vein under
`light ether anesthesia
`Samples from the animals
`
`Treatment Regimens of Free sCT and sCT
`Table
`ms Administration in Rats
`
`Group
`Group
`
`Group
`
`sCT indicates
`
`Free sOT
`sCT ms
`sCT02
`sOT ms
`sOTO2
`salmon calcitonin
`
`0.071
`
`0.5
`
`1.0
`
`receiving free sCT were collected at
`from the
`
`hours after
`
`and 24
`
`animals
`
`Samples
`injection
`receiving the microsphere formulations at 0.5 mg/kg
`hour and
`and 1.0 mg/kg doses were collected at
`12 and 15 days after injection The samples
`in Microtainer
`tubes Becton
`were
`centrifuged
`Dickinson Franldin Lakes NJ to separate and collect
`the serum Serum samples were frozen and stored at
`radioimmunoassay RIA
`20C until analysis using
`Serum sCT analysis
`Serum sCT was measured by 125j RIA with
`commercially available kit Peninsula Laboratories
`San Carlos CA Serum samples were incubated with
`rabbit sCT antiserum for 24 hours at 4C followed by
`addition of 251-labeled sCT After an additional 24-
`hour
`second
`antirabbit
`antibody-goat
`incubation
`immunoglobulin G-was
`followed by 90-
`added
`minute incubation at room temperature to separate the
`and free sCT The antibody-bound
`antibody-bound
`then measured by MINAU
`radioactivity was
`counter Packard Downers Grove IL
`
`RESULTS
`
`The
`
`and
`
`Polymer Characterization
`of RG5O2H were approximately 7800
`1.8
`
`and
`4500
`RGS02H showed
`
`polydispersity
`respectively
`Tg of 36.4C
`
`Microsphere Characterization
`
`Thermal analysis of blank ms prepared from RGSO2H
`polymer showed an increase in Tg 39.5C compared
`to that of the raw polymer However
`the Tg of the
`lots of sCT ms sCTOl
`sCTO2 40.5C and
`and
`40.3C respectively was not much different
`than
`that of the blank ms Table
`
`

`

`Table
`
`Physical Properties of sCT and Blank ms
`
`Batch
`
`sCT Load
`wt
`
`Incorporation
`
`Efficiency
`
`wt%
`
`Blank ms
`sd mssCTO1
`sCT mssCTO2
`4.5
`90
`sCT indicates salmon cal citonin ms microspheres
`
`5.1
`
`102
`
`Yield
`wt
`
`80
`
`78
`
`80
`
`Ig
`
`39.5
`
`40.5
`
`40.3
`
`Particle Size jim
`90% 50% 10%
`
`86
`
`89
`
`89
`
`48
`
`53 ij
`nfl
`
`Figure
`
`Scanning electron microqraphs
`
`showing the surface morphology of blank and salmon calcitonin sCT
`
`of
`
`lots of sCT ms was
`The average particle size of the
`sCTO2 mm Incorporation
`53 sCTO1 and 51
`efficiencies of 102% and 90% revealed that most of
`within the ms
`sCT had
`been
`the
`encapsulated
`surface morphology by SEM
`Examination
`the
`revealed that both sCT as well as blank ms were free
`The mass
`of discernible
`surface pores Figure
`spectrum of sCT extracted from ms Figure
`was
`standard sCT solution figure
`similar to that of
`2figures should be called out in numerical order
`figures which
`rewrite senteuce or renumber
`integrity of the peptide
`
`confirmed that the structural
`was intact within the ms
`
`Pep tide Stability
`
`shows the effect of pH and temperature on
`Figure
`the stability of sCT in solution The peptide was
`substantially more stable in AB pH 4.0 than in PB
`pH 7.4 In PB at 37C 37% of the peptide was
`degraded within 24 hours and 100% after
`days In
`AB at 7C 95% of the initial amount still
`remained
`days 90% after
`days 71% after 15 days and
`after
`63% after 22 days Peptide degradation was slower at
`lower temperatures in both buffers and as much as
`82% and 91% of the initial amount still
`remained after
`in AB
`22 days at 22C and 4C respectively
`
`

`

`100
`
`80
`
`B6
`
`DC
`
`20
`
`t- 37C PB
`-25C PB
`t-4C PB
`37C AB
`25C AB
`--4C AB
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`Days
`
`Figure
`
`Stability of salmon calcitonin sd at 37C
`25C and 4C in 0.1M phosphate buffer PB and
`acetate buffer AB
`
`30
`
`cc
`
`-J
`
`c20
`
`-D
`
`10
`
`10
`Time hours
`
`20
`
`Figure
`blank ms
`
`buffers
`
`Adsorption of salmon calcitonin 5CT to
`phosphate PB and acetate AB
`
`in 0.1
`
`In Vivo Study
`
`Single administration of free sCT to rats at 71 pg/kg
`dose Figure 6A resulted in
`serum sCT peak
`hour
`later observed C0 760 pg/mL As expected the
`sCT levels returned rapidly to baseline levels at 24
`hours since sCT has
`very short half- life in vivo after
`Administration of 0.5
`parenteral administration
`mg/kg dose of sCT microspheres Figure 6B resulted
`in C11 of 791 pg/nt at
`hour Elevated serum sCT
`days and
`levels were sustained for at least
`
`LJiiL-
`
`Figure
`
`Fourier Transform Matrix-assisted
`FT-MALDI mass
`Desorption
`calcitonin sCT standard in 0.1
`
`Laser
`
`spectrum of salmon
`acetate buffer
`
`Figure
`
`Laser
`
`Fourier Transform Matrix-assisted
`FT-MALDI mass
`sCT
`Desorption
`spectrum of
`extracted from salmon calcitonin 5CT microspheres
`ms in 0.1
`acetate buffer
`Peptide Adsorption to PLGA ms
`As shown in Figure
`there was not much adsorption of
`AB pH 4.0 at 37C
`sCT to blank PLGA ms in 0.1
`and the amount of peptide remaining in the supematant
`24 hours was 97%
`2% of the imtial
`the amount of peptide adsorbed to
`In contrast
`PB pH 7.4 increased with time
`the blank ms in 0.1
`and approximately 19.7 ug of peptide was adsorbed to
`hours 41% of the initial amount
`mg of ms after
`Although no samples were analyzed between
`and 24
`hours saturation binding appeared to occur within 24
`hours at appmximately 20 jig/mg
`
`throughout
`amount
`
`

`

`1200
`
`1000
`
`800
`
`600
`
`400
`
`200
`
`1200
`
`1000
`
`800
`
`I-
`
`600
`
`c0
`
`400
`
`200
`
`1200
`
`1000
`
`800
`
`600
`
`400
`
`200
`
`Free sOT 71 pg/kg
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`scT ma 0.5 mg/kg
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`aCT ma 1.0 mg/kg
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`Time days
`
`Figure
`
`free sd
`
`Serum sCT levels after administration of
`and sCT ms to rats
`
`for
`
`detectable
`
`levels were observed
`days following
`administration Administration of 1.0 mg/kg dose of
`sCT microspheres produced C1 of 984 pg/nil at
`hour Figure 6C and elevated serum sCT levels were
`days after administration with the
`sustained beyond
`levels returning to baseline after 12 days
`
`.tnIt
`I..1j 001 LI IN
`
`UI
`
`elevated
`
`serum
`
`levels
`
`for
`
`shorter
`
`lithe
`
`GPC analysis of the raw 502H polymer showed that
`was 7800
`This was lower
`the
`than the typical
`502H lots which have
`in the range of 10 000
`account
`of
`This would
`the
`duration
`DSC
`desired
`than
`the blank ms prepared
`measurements indicated that
`slightly higher Tg 39.5C
`from 502H polymer had
`than did the raw polymer 36.4C This slight shift
`in
`T6 was most
`likely the result of the processing of the
`polymer during the microsphere preparation process
`On the other hand Ill of sCT ms 40.3C and 40.5C
`was comparable to blank ms
`marked shift
`in
`would have
`between
`indicated
`strong interaction
`sCT and the polymer in the dry state Thus the DSC
`in the dry state sCT did not
`that
`results suggest
`strongly with the hydrophilic
`low
`interact
`very
`molecular weight 502H PLGA polymer
`higher
`502H polymer would have
`molecular weight
`slightly higher T6 which would facilitate processing
`FT-MALDI mass spectmm of the extracted peptide
`showed that the encapsulation process did not alter its
`chemical structure Stability studies confirmed that the
`peptide was substantially more stable in solution at
`pH of 4.0 than at
`pH of 7.4 which was consistent
`pH of 3.3 for
`with previous studies that had reported
`maximum stability
`There was
`very
`adsorption of sCT to blank PLGA ms at
`pH of 4.0
`However
`the alsorption increased dramatically at
`pH of 7.4 These results indicate that the nonspecific
`adsorption of sCT to PLGA ms was greater at
`pH
`to the isoelectric point @j of sCT which is
`closer
`This is consistent with earlier work
`around 10.2
`sCT adsorption
`PLGA Mw 34
`alkylated
`maximum
`end
`where
`hydrophobic
`groups
`adsorption occurred near the p1 of sCT and almost no
`pH less than
`adsorption was observed at
`was thought
`higher net charge on the peptide
`that
`pH below p1 could result
`molecules at
`in repulsion
`within and between peptide molecules At the p1 of
`the peptide molecules with
`zero net charge could
`approach each other more closely and form more
`compact conformation resulting in more effective
`adsorption The results of that study suggested that
`interactions played an important role in
`hydrophobic
`the adsorption Interestingly at pH 7.4 the amount of
`sCT
`adsorbed
`low molecular
`weight
`the
`hydrophilic PLGA 502H was much lower 19.7 jig
`
`on
`
`to
`
`higher molecular weight
`
`000
`
`containing
`
`It
`
`to
`
`

`

`elevated
`
`sCT/mg PLGA compared with the high molecular
`weight hydrophobic PLGA 80 jig sCT/mg PLGA
`serum sCT levels could be
`
`Because
`sustained for about
`II days following administration
`of sCT ms to rats at
`dose of 1.0 mg/kg this was
`2-week formulation
`to be promising as
`thought
`502H
`higher molecular weight
`especially with
`PLGA
`
`CONCLUSIONS
`
`the
`
`It was demonstrated that sCT could be incorporated
`into polymeric ms prepared from
`low molecular
`hydrophilic PLGA with
`weight
`dispersion
`technique without altering
`its molecular structure
`DSC measurements
`lack of strong
`indicated
`interaction between sCT and the polymer in the dry
`state Peptide stability was greater at lower pH while
`at higher pH
`binding was
`higher
`significantly
`Elevated serum sCT levels could be sustained for at
`least 10 days following administration of 1.0 mg/kg of
`sCT ms to rats
`
`REFERENCES
`
`Wronski TJ Yen CF Burton KW et al Skeletal
`
`effects
`
`of
`
`calcitonin
`
`in
`
`ovariectomized
`
`rats
`
`Endocrinology 1991 1292246-2250
`Ohnhaus EE Fischer JA
`Born
`Huwyler
`Plasma kinetics and urinary excretion of exogenous
`human and salmon calcitonin in man Am Physiol
`l979236E15-E19
`
`Millest AJ Evans JR Young JJ Johnstone
`release of salmon calcitonin in vivo from
`Sustained
`
`lactideglycolide copolymer depots Calcif Tissue Tnt
`19935236l-364
`Mehta RC Thanoo BC DeLuca PP
`Jeyanthi
`Effect of processing parameters on the properties of
`PLGA
`microspheres
`1997 142 163-174
`10 Lee KC Lee YJ Song HM Chun CJ DeLuca PP
`Degradation of synthetic salmon calcitonin in aqueous
`
`peptide-containing
`
`Microencapsulation
`
`solution Pharm Res 1992
`
`11 Tsai
`
`Mehta RC DeLuca PP Adsorption of
`Effect
`peptides to poly DL-lactide-co-glycolide
`of solution properties on the adsorption Tnt Pharm
`1996 12743-52
`
`Montagnani
`Agnusdei
`An effective
`regimen of
`salmon calcitonin in early postmenopausal bone loss
`
`Gennari
`
`Civitelli
`
`Calcif Tissue mt 1992
`
`Gonnelli
`
`intranasal
`
`Bigi
`
`et al Effects of
`
`ovariectomy Calcif Tissue Tnt 990 14
`
`JC Whitehead MI
`Stevenson
`Maclntyre
`Wimalawansa SJ Banks LM Healy MJR Calcitonin
`for prevention of postmcnopausal bone loss Lancet
`1988 l8591900-902
`Mazzuoli GF Tabolli
`salmon
`on the
`
`calcitonin
`
`bone loss
`
`induced
`
`by
`
`Ballanti
`
`in rats after
`
`11
`
`Ramires PA Richardson JL
`Bonucci
`Benedetti LM Prevention of ovariectomy
`osteopenia
`administration of hyaff
`vaginal
`salmon
`calcitonin Calcif
`
`microspheres
`containing
`Tissue Tnt 199556274-279
`McSheehy PM Farina
`evaluation of the calcitonin
`analogue
`Pharmacologic
`SB 205614 in models of osteoclastic bone resorption
`in vitro and
`vivo
`comparison with salmon
`calcitonin and elcatonin Bone 1995l6435-444
`
`Airaghi
`
`et al
`
`in
`
`

`

`
`
`.
`
`I
`
`i
`
`I
`
`-_
`
`II
`
`5‘l
`
`7.
`
`.
`
`i
`
`-
`
`I
`
`II
`_
`
`I
`
`-
`
`_
`
`I
`
`_
`
`I
`
`'
`
`—
`
`I
`
`I
`
`,
`
`7I
`I
`
`l
`
`I
`
`I.
`—
`
`I
`
`_
`
`—
`
`I
`
`J
`
`_
`
`r
`
`I
`
`-
`
`I
`
`I
`I
`I
`Ir.
`
`-I
`
`II
`
`_
`_
`
`-
`
`V
`
`I
`
`_
`I
`
`1
`I
`
`I
`
`f
`
`'
`
`_
`
`_
`
`I
`
`II
`
`I
`
`_
`
`_'J
`
`.I
`
`I
`
`
`
`II
`
`J
`I
`I'l
`_
`,I_
`I
`I
`
`—
`
`_
`
`_
`
`I
`
`-
`
`_
`
`—
`
`-
`
`—
`
`I
`
`.I
`I
`
`_
`
`_
`
`,
`
`-_
`
`I
`
`-
`
`I
`
`I
`
`_
`
`I
`
`I
`
`.-
`
`-
`
`I
`
`—
`
`.
`
`I
`
`—
`
`J
`
`_I
`
`_
`
`I
`
`-
`
`
`
`.I
`
`_
`
`7
`
`l.
`
`_
`
`I
`
`_
`
`I
`
`'—
`
`h
`
`_
`I
`
`I
`
`I
`
`I
`
`_
`
`I
`
`_
`
`_
`
`_
`
`"'I
`II
`
`I
`
`I
`
`I
`
`I
`
`.
`
`-
`
`I.
`
`I
`
`I
`
`I
`
`_
`
`v
`I
`
`_
`
`_
`
`I
`
`—
`_
`
`L
`
`I
`
`_
`
`'
`
`.
`
`I
`
`\
`L-
`
`_
`
`_
`
`_
`
`_
`
`'
`
`I.
`
`.
`
`_
`
`I
`
`—
`
`o
`
`I
`
`II
`
`_
`
`I
`
`_
`
`I
`
`|
`
`_
`
`_
`
`I
`
`'
`
`I
`
`III
`E
`7
`I
`
`I
`,
`I
`
`,
`J—
`I
`
`,
`
`;
`III
`.—
`I
`
`I
`.
`
`'
`
`I
`
`.I
`
`_
`
`I
`
`I
`
`‘
`
`_
`
`_
`
`F
`_
`
`_
`
`I
`
`I
`
`l
`
`-
`I
`
`II
`I
`I
`
`_
`
`—
`.I
`
`_
`
`I
`
`—
`
`I
`II
`_
`
`I
`
`_
`
`_
`
`-
`
`—
`—
`
`_
`
`_
`
`'
`
`I
`
`I
`
`_
`
`'
`
`.II
`
`A
`
`I
`
`_
`
`_
`I
`
`I
`
`I
`
`.
`'
`
`_
`
`—_
`
`—
`
`__
`
`7
`I
`I;
`'
`
`r
`_,
`I
`'L
`III
`
`-
`
`.
`
`7
`I
`
`_.
`
`'
`
`I
`
`S.
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket