throbber
ELSEVER
`
`Journal of Controlled Release
`
`75 2001 307
`
`315
`
`journal of
`controlled
`release
`
`www.elsevier.com/locate/jconrel
`
`Preparation characterization and in vivo evaluation of 120-day
`
`polyDL-lactide leuprolide microspheres
`
`Byung Wo Janusz
`
`Kostanski Sisay Gebrekidanc Bhas
`B.C Thanoo
`DeLuca
`Patrick
`800 Rose Street Lexington KY 40536 USA
`Faculty of Phormoceutical Sciences College of Phormocy University of Kentucky
`Institute One Squibb Drive P0 Box 191 New Brunswick NJ 08903 USA
`Reseorch
`bBristolMyers Squibb Phormoceuticol
`Esterbrook Lone Cherry Hill NJ 08002 USA
`Wyeth-Ayerst Loborotories
`d0oood Loborotories 7670 First Ploce
`Ookwood OH 44146 USA
`Suite
`
`Dania
`
`Received
`
`12 February 2001 accepted
`
`21 May 2001
`
`Abstract
`
`luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone LHRH
`120-day polyDL-lactide PLA microsphere delivery system for
`analogue leuprolide was prepared and evaluated Leuprolide microspheres were prepared with PLA mw 11 000 Da by
`characterized for drug load by HPLC particle
`extraction-evaporation method and
`dispersion/solvent
`size by laser
`and surface morphology by scanning electron microscopy
`release and polymer degradation
`In vitro peptide
`diffractometry
`modified dialysis method Serum peptide and testosterone
`were studied using
`levels were analyzed after subcutaneous
`rat model Spherical microspheres with
`mean diameter of 52 pm containing 13.4% peptide released
`administration using
`10% of the peptide within 24
`linear release for 150 days Serum leuprolide levels increased
`followed by
`immediately
`after administration of the microspheres to 45.6 ng/ml
`at 15 days and
`at 30 days
`to 4.3 ng/ml
`2.0 ng/ml
`where they remained for 120 days The testosterone
`to 15 ng/ml and then decreased to below 0.5
`increased initially
`where they remained for 120 days In conclusion
`ng/ml by day
`120-day microsphere formulation of leuprolide was
`2001 Elsevier Science BY All
`developed with excellent controlled peptide release characteristics and in vivo efficacy
`rights reserved
`
`but
`
`then fell
`
`levels
`
`Keywords Leuprolide Luteinizing
`
`hormone-releasing hormone LHRH analogue PolyoL-lactide Microsphercs
`
`Testosterone suppres
`
`sion
`
`Introduction
`
`Controlled release dosage forms have been investi
`
`Conesponding author Tel
`323-0242
`
`1-859-257-1831
`
`fax
`
`1-859-
`
`moil oddress ppde1u1pop.uky.edu
`
`PP DeLuca
`
`gated to improve the efficacy of peptide drugs and
`frequent administration Bio
`eliminate the need for
`degradable microsphcres were shown to improve the
`hioavailahility of peptides by protecting them from
`and proteolysis in body fluids
`PolyDL-lactide PLA and polyuL-lactide-co-gly
`colide PLGA are the most widely used and well-
`
`physical degradation
`
`0168-3659101/8
`see front matter
`P11 SOl 68-365901 00403-5
`
`2001 Elsevier Science BY All
`
`rights reserved
`
`WIT
`
`DATES
`
`LLUERRMRCRR
`
`ALKERMES Exh. 2026
`Luye v. Alkermes
`IPR2016-1096
`
`

`

`308
`
`EN Woo ci 0/
`
`Journol
`
`Controlled Releose
`
`75 2001 307 315
`
`characterized materials for the preparation of bio
`
`Materials and methods
`
`potent
`
`luteinizing hormone-releasing
`
`degradable microspheres
`Leuprolide the peptide drug used in this study is
`agonist of
`hormone LHRH currently used for the treatment of
`endometriosis and precocious pu
`prostatic cancer
`in-water drying method
`Utilizing an
`berty
`based on the w/o/w emulsion technique 1- 3- and
`4-month release leuprolide microcapsules Lupron
`16 In the in-water-drying
`have been developed
`method leuprolide acetate was dissolved in aqueous
`polymer solution
`gelatin or water dispersed
`into
`which was then emulsified into an external aqueous
`phase to form droplets The microcapsules solidified
`removal and were freeze-dried Several
`after solvent
`publications have described in vivo pharmacological
`and pharmacokinetic evaluations of these microcap
`sules
`
`In most
`
`in
`
`literature reports of in vitro release the
`certain volume of
`microspheres were incubated
`release medium generally phosphate buffered saline
`PBS with
`preservative using glass or plastic test
`tubes at 37C with optional agitation
`In these
`methods the pH of the release medium consistently
`dropped due to the formation and accumulation of
`Con
`acidic polymer degradation products
`tinuous removal of the acidic polymer
`fragments and
`released
`be desirable to
`drug by dialysis might
`the release medium
`the pH drop of
`an LHRH
`release method
`antagonist omtide loaded PLGA microspheres has
`small dialysis unit and 0.1
`been developed by using
`The in vitro release
`acetate buffer pH 4.0
`profile obtained with the dialysis method permitted
`better correlation with in vivo release However only
`information is available on in vitro degra
`in vitro and
`dation kinetics and correlation betweeii
`
`prevent
`
`dialysis
`
`in vitro
`
`for
`
`little
`
`in vivo release of long-term release peptide loaded
`PLA microspheres
`The goal of this study was to prepare and char
`4-month formulation of leuprolide micro-
`acterize
`dispersion method
`and to study in
`spheres using
`vitro drug release and in vivo efficacy Also an
`modified dialysis method for
`to develop
`in vitro release from biodegradable micro-
`testing
`spheres which would exhibit
`good in vitro in vivo
`correlation was undertaken
`
`attempt
`
`2.1 Materials
`
`Leuprolide
`
`ethylamide was obtained
`
`Pro9-LHRH
`o-Leu6
`from Bachem Torrance
`CA USA PolyDL-lactide mw 11 000 Da
`Resomer R202H PLA was supplied by Boehringer
`Ingelheim Ingelheim Germany Polyvinyl alcohol
`mw 30 000 70 000 PVA was supplied by Sigma
`St Louis MO USA Dialysis
`tubes Tube-O
`Dialyzer were purchased
`from Research Products
`Co Mount
`IL and
`Prospect
`International
`Spectrapor CE dialysis membranes MWCO 7000
`300 000 Da were supplied by Spectrum Medical
`Industries Houston TX All other chemicals were
`obtained commercially as analytical grade reagents
`
`2.2 Preparation of microspheres
`
`solution of
`
`drug into
`
`Leuprolide PLA microspheres were prepared by
`solution of polymer and
`dispersing the homogeneous
`PVA solution followed
`by
`solvent
`de
`extraction evaporation dilution
`as previously
`leuprolide in methanol
`scribed
`34% w/w solution of polymer
`was added into
`in
`methylene chloride to form the clear solution The
`resulting solution was
`then
`slowly injected into
`0.35% aqueous PVA solution while mixed with
`Silverson L4R mixer Silverson Machines MA
`USA at 7000 rpm The solvents were removed by
`stirring and continuous
`phase replacement at 38
`40C for
`The
`solidified microspheres were
`by filtration and dried under
`vacuum at
`recovered
`room temperature for 48
`
`2.3 Particle characterization
`
`2.3.1 Particle size distribution
`Particles were sized by laser diffractometry using
`Malvern 2600 laser sizer Malvem 2600c Particle
`Sizer Malvem UK The average particle size was
`the volume mean diameter Vmd
`
`expressed
`microns
`
`as
`
`in
`
`2.3.2 Surface morphology
`The surface morphology was examined by scan-
`
`

`

`RH Woo el ol
`
`.Joornol of Controlled Releose
`
`75 2001 307 315
`dry weight Wa The mass remaining MR and the
`degree of hydration DH were calculated
`MR%-/ 100
`DHWW-Wd/Wd
`
`309
`
`as follows
`
`ning electron microscopy Hitachi Model
`800
`Japan after palladium/gold
`of
`the micro-
`coating
`sphere sample on an aluminum stub
`
`solved
`
`2.3.3 Peptide content
`the microspheres was dis
`10-mg amount of
`The peptide
`in 2.0 ml methylene chloride
`from the polymer solution by addition
`was extracted
`acetate buffer pH 4.0 followed
`of 10 ml of 0.1
`The peptide was assayed in the
`by agitation for
`aqueous phase by HPLC method Bondclone 10 C18
`column 150X3.Q mm Phenomenex Torrance CA
`USA mobile phase 27% v/v acetonitrile
`0.1%
`acid flow rate 1.0 ml/min UV de
`trifluoroacetic
`tection at 215 nm
`
`2.4 In vitro release study
`
`in 0.1
`
`large
`
`PBS at
`In vitro release was carried out
`37C using
`which
`modified dialysis method
`allowed control of the pH of the release medium and
`complete sample recovery Dialysis membranes with
`various MWCOs
`and dialysis tubing with
`used
`area were
`surface
`the release
`to optimize
`method by assessing the permeability of the peptide
`through the membranes and the recovery of
`the
`50-mg amount of microspheres was
`peptide
`suspended in ml 0.1
`phosphate buffered saline
`pH 7.4 PBS containing 0.02% sodium azide in
`cm
`tube 1.5 cm i.d.X5.5
`7-ml Tube-O-Dialyzer
`length The
`tubes were
`capped with
`dialysis
`dialysis membrane-windowed screw cap molecular
`weight cut off 300 000 placed in
`4-1 dialysis tank
`filled with the same release medium and incubated at
`37C with continuous
`agitation At each
`time point
`remaining microspheres were recovered
`by filtration
`The amount of
`through
`0.8-jim filter
`leuprolide
`remaining in the microspheres was determined by
`HPLC as described previously
`
`2.5 In vitro polymer degradation
`
`2.51 Mass loss and hydration
`At
`time point
`each
`recovered
`weighed accurately wet weight
`under vacuum at
`room temperature and reweighed
`
`wet mass was
`dried for 48
`
`gel
`
`permeation
`
`2.52 Molecular weight Mw of polymer
`The molecular weight distribution of PLA was
`determined
`by
`chromatography
`GPC as described previously
`Waters M-45
`Waters 990 Photo-
`solvent delivery system with
`diode Array Detector was used Two Ultrastyragel
`300 mm each one
`columns connected in series 7.8
`with 104-A pores and one with 103-A pores were
`used Samples mg/ml were eluted with tetrahy
`drofUran at ml/min The weight average molecular
`weight Mw of each
`sample was calculated
`using
`standards molecular
`
`monodisperse
`polystyrene
`weight 100050 000
`
`2.6 In vivo study
`
`at
`
`weighing 300
`Male Sprague Dawley rats
`were used to evaluate
`in vivo performance of
`The microspheres were
`leuprolide microspheres
`the back of the neck 12
`injected subcutaneously
`mg leuprolide/kg after reconstitution in
`suitable
`vehicle 1% carboxymethylcellulose
`and 2% man
`nitol w/v Blood samples were collected
`from the
`time points The samples were
`vein at specific
`centrifuged in Microtainer
`tubes Becton Dickin
`son Franklin Lakes NJ and serum was collected
`20C
`Serum samples were frozen and stored at
`
`tail
`
`using
`
`until analysis
`in rats were
`Serum leuprolide levels
`radioimmunoassay RIA method as de
`The lower detection
`scribed previously
`pg/ml The intra- and interassay
`of the assay was
`and 9% respectively
`coefficients of variation were
`levels were
`Serum testosterone
`assayed
`using
`TM Testosterone RIA DSL-4000 kits Diagnos
`tic Systems Webster TX The
`lower
`of
`limit
`for this assay was 0.08 ng/ml
`detection
`intra- and interassay
`coefficients of variation were 10
`and 9% respectively
`The cross-reactivity of
`testosterone antiserum was less than 6%
`
`assessed
`
`limit
`
`and the
`
`the
`
`

`

`310
`
`Bk Woo ci ol
`
`.Joorno/ of Coo/rolled Releose
`
`75 2001 3073 15
`
`Results and discussion
`
`at
`
`the bottom of
`
`the tube
`
`that
`
`could
`
`affect
`
`the
`
`Microsphere characterization
`
`Leuprolide microspheres were
`spherical with
`relatively non-porous surface Fig
`The aver
`age particle size was 51.7 sm which is suitable for
`injections The target
`intramuscular or subcutaneous
`load was 16.5% and the actual peptide content was
`determined to be 13.4% Leuprolide encapsulation
`efficiency was 81.2% The major difference between
`and the
`the microspheres prepared
`in this study
`microcapsules of 4-month Lupron depot
`is the drug
`in the polymer matrix Lupron mi
`distribution
`water-in-oil-in-
`are prepared
`crocapsules
`using
`water w/o/w emulsion technique
`and the particles
`of drug hence
`contain
`discrete
`intemal
`pockets
`called microcapsules The microspheres in this study
`from clear homogeneous
`solution of
`are prepared
`polymer and drug and the drug is believed to be
`molecularly distributed in the PLA matrix
`
`3.2 In vitro release
`
`that membranes with higher
`Table
`indicates
`MWCOs showed higher rates of peptide permeabili
`ty faster equilibrium between the dialysis cells and
`the media and good peptide
`recovery The dialysis
`large surface area showed
`tubing with
`complete
`equilibrium after 48
`it showed
`lower
`however
`to the dialysis cells due
`peptide recovery compared
`the peptide
`to higher adsorption of
`area Based
`on these
`membrane MWCO 300 000 was selected for the in
`vitro release study The dialysis method used in this
`the conven
`study showed
`over
`several advantages
`tionally used test
`tube methods This method elimi
`nated
`
`surface
`
`on the large
`
`results
`
`dialysis
`
`the undesired loss of microspheres during
`pH changes of
`sample preparation and handling
`the release medium and
`shear stresses due to the
`centrifugation for sample recovery Use of higher
`and frequent
`buffer
`the
`replacement of
`capacity
`release medium in the conventional
`tube method
`
`pH change However centrifu
`could also prevent
`gation is necessary to remove the supematant with
`loss of microspheres for
`the conventional
`out
`tube
`method This will
`
`cause the packing of microspheres
`
`of the microspheres
`physical characteristics
`The in vitro release study of
`spheres is shown in Fig
`15 days
`In the initial
`29% peptide released Thereafter release was nearly
`linear through day 150 with 0.5% released per day
`is 10%
`during this period Release in the first 24
`probably due to the fast diffusion of
`associated peptide The initial
`24-h release is illus
`5% initial
`trated in the small panel
`decrease to 2%
`observed in 30 mm followed by
`Then
`
`leuprolide micro-
`
`the surface-
`
`burst was
`
`in the next
`
`linear
`
`release
`
`ensued
`
`thereafter The initial
`
`decrease in release in the first
`
`few hours
`
`has been
`
`typical
`leuprolide microspheres and the only reason which
`
`observation with
`
`can be offered is that adsorption of released peptide
`occurs to the hydrated polymer surface in the early
`phase of release Once the binding sites are saturated
`release proceeds
`
`then the diffusional
`
`3.3 In vitro polymer degradation
`
`the initial
`
`and blank PLA micro-
`Both the peptide
`loaded
`spheres showed slow mass loss in the first 50 days
`followed by linear profiles for 150 days Fig
`The
`was only 2.0% confirm
`initial mass loss within 24
`release was caused by diffusion of
`ing that
`on the surface of
`located
`the peptide
`the micro-
`spheres Blank microspheres showed lower mass loss
`than drug loaded microspheres The peptide loaded
`and blank microspheres were slowly hydrated within
`50 days Fig
`between
`Hydration rate increased
`50 and 90 days with the peptide
`loaded micro-
`higher degree of hydration The
`spheres showing
`loading of PLA microspheres led to higher
`drug
`into the polymer matrices and
`uptake of water
`faster mass loss The molecular weight of residual
`and blank micro-
`polymers from both drug loaded
`spheres gradually decreased from 11 000 to 7000 Da
`There was no significant
`after 90 days Table
`difference in polymer degradation rate between drug
`and blank microspheres Blank and drug
`loaded
`loaded microspheres showed relatively smooth sur
`the beginning of
`the
`faces with spherical shape at
`study Fig
`The drug loaded micro-
`very porous interior
`spheres possessed
`while the blank microspheres showed an extremely
`shrunken shape after 35 days After 70 days the drug
`
`degradation
`
`structures
`
`

`

`RH Woo
`
`et ol
`
`Journol of Conarolled Releose
`
`75 2001 307
`
`315
`
`311
`
`Scanning electron microscopy of
`Fig
`Ieuprolide microsphere
`PLA blank microspheres
`PLA blank microspheres incubated
`
`and
`
`leuprolide microsphere incubated
`in PBS at 37C for 35 days
`
`in PBS at 37C for 35 days
`
`

`

`112
`
`RH 11
`
`fl
`
`1W
`
`.UUU I/CC
`
`It
`
`/1/C
`
`2001
`
`/1
`
`Table
`Equilibrium of leuprolide thiough dialysis membranes and peptide
`
`recovery
`
`MWCO
`Da
`
`8000
`
`14000
`
`50000
`
`300 000
`
`300 000
`
`Dialysis
`
`unit
`
`Equilibrium
`
`Dialysis cell
`
`Dialysis cell
`
`Dialysis cell
`
`Dialysis cell
`
`Dialysis tubing
`
`66.62.1
`
`67.33.4
`
`964
`1.8
`97.3 1.8
`102.52.2
`
`Peptide
`
`recovety
`
`88.8l.2
`
`88.30.5
`92.3 0.2
`91.90.6
`
`77.02.4
`
`deformed cake-like
`
`loaded microspheres showed
`shape compared to the lumpy shape of blank micro-
`spheres This suggests that
`the presence of peptide
`the morphological
`in the polymer
`changes
`matrix during in vitro release The overall
`
`affects
`
`in vitro
`
`release of
`
`the peptide
`
`correlated well with the
`
`polymer degradation profile
`
`3.4 In vivo leuprolide level
`
`Fig 5A shows serum leuprolide levels in rats after
`the subcutaneous administration of the microspheres
`Serum leuprolide levels increased immediately after
`administration to 45.6 ng/ml due to the initial burst
`
`100
`
`80
`
`60
`
`40
`
`20
`
`Cu
`
`4-
`
`Cu
`
`30
`
`60
`90
`Time day
`
`120
`
`150
`
`Mass
`Fig
`PBS at 37C
`
`loss of peptide loaded
`
`and blank microspheres in
`
`release
`
`the
`
`initial
`
`fell
`
`at day
`
`15
`
`from the microspheres After
`elevation the levels
`to 4.3 ng/ml
`plateau level around
`ng/ml or less
`second dose of the microspheres at
`
`followed by
`over 120 days
`
`100
`
`Cu
`
`60
`
`Cu
`
`40
`
`20
`
`Drug loaded
`Blank
`
`18
`
`16
`
`14
`
`12
`
`1-I
`Cu
`
`24
`
`12
`
`18
`
`Time hr
`
`30
`
`60
`90
`Time day
`
`120
`
`150
`
`30
`
`60
`90
`Time day
`
`120
`
`150
`
`In vitro release of leuprolide loaded PLA microspheres in
`Fig
`PBS at 37C for 150 days large panel and initial
`release within
`small panel
`24
`
`Fig
`Hydration of peptide loaded
`PBS at 37C
`
`and blank microspheres in
`
`

`

`fiji
`
`Woo
`
`0/
`
`Joiwool of Cooov/leci Release
`
`2001 307
`
`315
`
`313
`
`20
`
`c16
`
`E12
`
`-J
`
`Cl
`
`CO
`
`CO
`
`2nd Dose
`
`30
`
`60
`
`90
`
`120
`
`150
`
`180
`
`30
`
`00
`
`00
`
`120 150
`
`ieo
`
`Time tdeyt
`
`Dose
`
`30
`
`60
`90
`120
`Time day
`
`150
`
`180
`
`AUC
`In vitro release
`
`120
`
`-100
`
`CO
`
`Ct
`
`80
`
`40
`
`30
`
`60
`90
`Time day
`
`120
`
`150
`
`Fig
`Comparison of in vitro leuprolide release profile with in
`vivo release profile the latter plotted as cumulative area under
`serum peptide curve nonrialized as percent of the total area large
`
`panel and in vitro in vivo correlation plot small panel
`
`for
`
`The testosterone levels were suppressed to 0.5 ng/ml
`and the levels remained near
`at day
`this level
`50 days before falling below 0.5 ngfml
`through day
`120 The challenges
`of 100 p.g of aqueous
`leup
`at 40 64 89 105 and 120 days did not
`rolide/kg
`levels which suggests that
`elevate the testosterone
`the pituitary LHRH receptors were occupied by the
`analogue and down-regulated Leuprolide challenges
`135 and 160
`the
`caused an elevation
`of
`
`Fig
`
`trations
`
`in
`
`In vivo serum leuprolide
`after single administration
`dose 12 mg/rat n6 small panel and
`panel Arrows
`indicate challenges of 100 sg/kg
`
`testosterone concen
`and
`of PLA mierospheres
`second
`dose large
`
`leuprolide
`
`at
`
`days
`
`123 days resulted in
`the first dose
`
`serum peptide level similar to
`
`3.5 In vivo testosterone
`
`suppression
`
`The small panel of Fig SB shows
`single subcutaneous administra
`levels in rats after
`the peptide-containing PLA microspheres
`
`testosterone
`
`tion of
`
`testosterone
`
`level
`
`the microspheres
`suggesting that
`for 120 days The large panel of
`were only effective
`Fig SB shows that
`elevation of
`following the initial
`testosterone the levels were suppressed below 0.5
`ngl ml through 123 days and
`second dose did not
`similar initial elevation of testosterone
`
`cause
`
`Fig
`
`compares
`
`profiles plotted as cumulative area Tinder
`
`the in vitro and in vivo release
`semm
`
`leuprolide normalized as percent of
`between days
`and 123 total area under
`AUC0 23d447 ng/day per ml The overall
`vitro release rate was slower
`vivo release However
`the in vitro release of leup
`rolide obtained with the modified dialysis method
`
`than the estimated
`
`in
`
`in
`
`the total area
`
`the curve
`
`

`

`314
`
`Table
`
`B.H Woo
`
`ci 0/
`
`.Jnnrnc/ of Control/ed Re/cave
`
`75 21W 217
`
`2/5
`
`Molecular weight changes of the residual polymer of leuprolide loaded
`
`and blank PLA microspheres
`
`Time
`
`day
`
`14
`
`24
`
`35
`
`50
`
`70
`
`Drug loaded
`
`10100
`
`9800
`
`9710
`
`8870
`
`7910
`
`7830
`
`6780
`
`S850
`
`5350
`
`5510
`
`4920
`
`5050
`
`4720
`
`PD
`
`1.49
`
`1.68
`
`1.81
`
`1.61
`
`1.61
`
`1.55
`
`1.56
`
`Blank
`
`Al
`
`11 000
`
`10700
`
`9830
`
`8780
`
`8530
`
`8540
`
`7610
`
`Sf
`
`6830
`
`6420
`
`5950
`
`5210
`
`6450
`
`5120
`
`5070
`
`PD
`
`1.61
`
`1.67
`
`1.65
`
`1.69
`
`1.32
`
`1.67
`
`1.50
`
`90
`
`7340
`
`6910
`
`4480
`
`1.54
`
`7060
`
`4640
`
`1.52
`
`average of molecular weight with three-significant
`Weight
`Number average of tnolecular weight
`
`Polydispersity PD MM
`
`figures
`
`correlated rather well with the estimated
`release r0.995 as shown in Fig
`
`small panel
`
`in vivo
`
`Conclusions
`
`controlled release 4-month formulation of leup
`from PLA
`rolide microspheres was
`fabricated
`dialysis method for measurement of in vitro release
`and successfully applied In vitro
`was developed
`release of
`leuprolide conelated well with polymer
`as with in vivo release The
`as well
`degradation
`leuprolide PLA microspheres are potentially useful
`formulation for testosterone
`suppres
`120-day
`
`as
`
`sion
`
`References
`
`Hausberger
`
`P.R DeLuca Characterization of biodegra
`
`dable
`
`spheres
`
`Sato
`
`polyoL-1actide-co-glycolide
`polymers
`13 1995 747
`Pharm Biomed Anal
`760
`Kanke HG Schroeder PP DeLuca Porous
`biodegradable microspheres for controlled drug delivery
`
`and micro
`
`removal
`
`Assessment of processing conditions
`and solvent
`1988 21 30
`techniques Pharm Res
`K.C Lee E.E Soltis PS Newman
`K.W Burton R.C
`Mehta PR DeLuca In vivo assessment of salmon calcitonin
`Con
`
`sustained
`
`release from biodegradable microspheres
`17 1990 199 206
`trolled Release
`Jeyanthi R.C Mebta B.C Thanoo PP DeLuca Effect of
`processing parameters on the properties of peptide-contain
`ing PLGA
`14 1997 163174
`
`Microencapsul
`
`cellular
`
`D.A Puleo W.W Huh S.S Duggirala PP DeLuca In vitro
`to biocrodible particles loaded with recom
`responses
`Biomed
`binant human bone morphogenetic protein-2
`Mater Res 411998104110
`Ahmed PP DeLuca
`Capan B.F1 Woo
`Gcbrekidan
`Preparation and characterization of polyoL-lactide-co gly
`colide microspheiea for controlled release of polyL-lysine
`complexed plasmid DNA Phanm Res 16 1999 509
`513
`DeLuca Recombinant human bone mor
`J.A Schrier
`in PLGA
`and incorporation
`phogenetic protein-2 binding
`1999 611
`microsphere delivery Pharm Dev Technol
`621
`Capan B.H Woo
`Ahmed PP DeLuca
`Influence of formulation parameters on the characteristics of
`
`Gebrekidan
`
`polyoL-lactide-co glycolide microspheres containing poly
`
`Controlled
`
`Release
`
`60
`
`Leuprolide
`
`gonadotropin-releasing
`
`for
`
`L-lysine complexed plasmid
`1999 279 286
`Trachtenberg The treatment of metastatic prostatic cancer
`hormone releasing hormone ana
`with
`potent
`luteinizing
`Urol 129 1983 1149 1152
`logue
`N.J Wojciechowski
`hormone analogue
`treatment of prostatic
`the palliative
`cancer Drug Intell Clin Pharm 20 1986 746
`751
`Yashiki Prolonged release mi
`Ogawa
`Okada
`US
`4652441
`and
`Patent
`
`their production
`
`Okada
`
`Heya
`
`Shimamoto Controlled
`
`sules
`
`from microcap
`leuprolide acetate
`serum drug profiles and pharmacological
`effects in
`Phaim Pharmacol 411989 439 444
`animals
`Heya
`Ogawa
`Okada
`Toguchi
`Shimamoto
`Sustained pharmacological activities in rats following single
`
`and
`
`repeated
`
`microspheres of
`584
`587
`
`administration
`of once-a-month
`leuprolide acetate Phann Res
`
`injectable
`1991
`
`Okada
`
`Inoue
`
`Heya
`
`Toguchi
`
`Pharmacokinetics
`
`of
`
`Ueno
`once-a-month
`
`Ogawa
`
`injectable
`
`eroeapsules
`1987
`Ogawa
`release of LHRI-I agonist
`
`

`

`B.H Woo ci
`
`Journal of Controlled Release
`
`2001 307 315
`
`315
`
`microspheres of leuprolide
`787 791
`
`acetate Pharm Res
`
`1991
`
`Doken
`
`Ogawa
`
`Toguchi Preparation of
`
`Okada
`3-month depot
`injectable microspheres of leuprorelin acetate
`using biodegradable polymers Phann Res 1119941143
`1147
`Okada
`
`Doken
`
`Toguchi
`
`Sustained
`
`Ogawa
`axis by leuprorelin 3-
`suppression of the pituitary-gonadal
`month depot microspheres in rats and dogs Pharm Res 11
`1994 1199
`1203
`Blanco-Prieto
`Besseghir
`Deuschel H.P Merkle
`Nam-Trãn
`test medium for
`tance of
`the
`
`Orsolini
`
`Heimgartner
`
`Gander
`
`Impor
`
`the release
`
`kinetics of
`
`somatostatin
`
`analogue
`
`microspheres
`T.G Park
`
`Int
`Lu
`
`from polyoL-lactide co-glycolide
`Pharm 184 1999 243250
`in vitro ex
`Crotts Importance of
`
`perimental
`
`conditions
`
`on protein release
`
`kinetics
`
`and polymer degradation in protein encapsulated
`
`stability
`polynL
`Controlled Release
`33
`
`lactide-co-glycolide
`1995 211 222
`Brunner
`
`microspheres
`
`Mäder
`
`Ghpferich
`
`pH and
`
`osmotic
`
`gonadotropin Endocrinol
`
`inside biodegradable microspheres during erosion
`pressure
`Phanm Res 16 1999 847
`853
`PP DeLuca
`J.W Kostanski
`
`in vitro release
`
`novel
`
`technique
`
`for
`
`spheres article
`
`peptide-containing
`PhannSciTech
`
`biodegradable micro
`2000 httpl
`
`/www.pharmscitech.com
`B.C Thanoo
`Ivlurtagh Continuous microsphere process
`US Patent 5945126 1999
`K.J Pekarek M.D Dyrud
`Ferrer Y.S Jong
`Mathiowitz In vitro and
`in vivo degradation of double-
`
`inicrospheres
`
`Controlled
`
`Release
`
`40
`
`polymer
`walled
`1996 169 178
`Okada
`Yamazaki
`
`Yashiki
`
`Shimamoto
`
`Mima
`
`Vaginal absorption of
`potent luteinizing
`hormone-releasing
`leuprolide in rats IV Evaluation of the
`hormone analogue
`by radioim
`vaginal absorption and gonadotropin responses
`Phann Sci 73 1984 298302
`Okada
`radioimmunoassay
`honnone releasing analogue
`serum level of
`the
`and
`analogue
`Jpn 27 1980 593 605
`
`munoassay
`
`Yamazaki
`
`active
`
`luteinizing
`
`between
`
`the
`
`for
`
`highly
`
`and relation
`
`that of
`
`

`

`_
`II_I_II_II'I_
`1¥-+IIII¥* Iii-ll?
`l—
`I__-l
`i
`
`III.
`
`,1
`
`I
`
`IFIFII_ I
`__-—
`i
`'I‘
`
`:
`
`“I
`:l Uri -Il r‘ I
`_IIII
`'~ Illlll Elfin}
`IIII:.F_I
`l‘—
`I'Ll
`
`-I' E III
`I
`
`;b—I
`*—
`
`'l
`
`I L
`{IL '.
`"'
`I
`_ ._ II
`'_" tltl
`
`Ilirr
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket