throbber
Pharmaceutical Development and Technology
`
`1Lr Francis
`
`___________________
`
`ISSN 1083-7450 Print 1097-9867 OnlineJournal homepage
`
`http2/www.tandfonline.com/Joi/iottcl2o
`
`ntwusa
`
`Enhancing Initial Release of Peptide from PoIydI
`lactide-co-glycolide PLGA Microspheres by
`Addition of Porosigen and Increasing Drug Load
`
`Harish
`
`Ravivarapu Heeyong Lee
`
`Patrick
`
`DeLuca
`
`DeLuca 2000 Enhancing
`To cite this article Harish
`Ravivarapu Heeyong Lee
`Patrick
`PLGA Microspheres by Addition
`Initial Release of Peptide from Polydl-lactide-co-glycolide
`of Porosigen and Increasing Drug Load Pharmaceutical Development and Technology 52
`287-296 DOl 10.1081/PDT-1 001 00543
`
`To link to this article http//dx.doi.org/10.1081
`
`/PDT-1 001 00543
`
`Published online 19 Apr 2000
`
`Submit your article to this journal
`
`Article views 92
`
`View related articles
`
`Citing articles
`
`View citing articles II
`
`Full Terms Conditions of access and use can be found at
`http//www.tandfonline.com/action/journallnformationjournalCodeiphd2o
`
`Download by
`
`Senezak
`
`Date l2july 201 At 0649
`
`WIT
`
`fliE
`DAWN HIWER RMRC
`
`ALKERMES Exh. 2023
`Luye v. Alkermes
`IPR2016-1096
`
`

`

`Pharmaceutical Development and Technology 52 287
`
`296 2000
`
`RESEARCH ARTICLE
`
`Enhancing Initial Release of Peptide from
`Polyd/-lactide-co-glycolide PLGA
`Microspheres by Addition of
`Porosigen
`and Increasing Drug Load
`
`Harish
`
`Ravivarapu1 Heeyong Lee2 and Patrick
`
`DeLuca3
`
`1Atrix Laboratories Inc 2579 Midpoint Drive Ft Collins Colorado 80525
`2Hundai Pharm lnd Co Ltd 213 Sosa Bon 1-Dong Sosa-Gu
`Bucheon-Si Kyoungki-Do Korea
`of Kentucky College of Pharmacy Rose Street Lexington Kentucky
`
`40536-0082
`
`.0
`
`Received May 14 1999 Accepted October 12 1999
`
`ABSTRACT
`
`The objective of this study was to evaluate formulation variables such as drug load and addition of
`release ofpeptidefrompolyd1 lactide-co-glycolide PLGA
`porosigen in achieving an increased initial
`by altering carrier characteristics Leuprolide acetate-loaded PLGA microspheres were
`microspheres
`and were characterized
`for their drug load
`prepared by
`solvent-extraction evaporation
`process
`HPLC assay bulk density tapping method size distribution dynamic light scattering specfic sur
`face area BrunauerEmmett--Teller
`analysis surface morphology scanning electron micros
`copy in vitro drug release at 37C and in vivo efficacy suppression of rat serum testosterone
`Increasing the drug load and adding various amounts of calcium chloride to organic and aqueous
`phases of the emulsion during processing yielded particles with increased porosity lower bulk density
`these formula
`higher specf Ic surface area and accordingly higher initial
`release In an animal model
`tions showed
`
`compared
`to microspheres without higher drug
`faster onset of testosterone suppression
`load or calcium chloride The approaches employed in this study were found to be effective in avoiding
`lag phase usually observed with microencapsulated macromolecular drugs
`the therapeutic
`KEY WORDS Drug load In vitro characteristics
`PLGA microspheres Porosigen
`
`In vivo efficacy Leuprolide acetate Peptide
`
`DeLuca University of Kentucky College of Phamiacy Rose Street Room 3270 Lexington
`to Patrick
`Address correspondence
`KY 40536-0082 Fax 606 323-0242 E-mail ppdelul@pop.uky.edu
`
`Copyright
`
`2000 by Marcel Dekker
`
`Inc
`
`www.dekker.com
`
`287
`
`

`

`IllI
`
`ORDER
`
`REPRINTS
`
`2S8
`
`Ravivarapu
`
`Lee and DeLuea
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`There is
`
`painful
`
`cancer
`
`sional
`
`and have been
`
`in
`
`need for developing sustained-release dos
`and proteins because these mac
`age forms for peptides
`romolecular drugs pose unique difficulties
`that
`include
`low oral bioavailability instability
`in the gastrointestinal
`frequent and
`tract dosage form design and subsequent
`injections 12 Recent
`shown that
`reports havc
`in achieving sus
`polymer-based systems can be useful
`tained and controlled delivery with less frequent paren
`teral administration
`Injectable systems of leutein
`izing hormone releasing hormone LHRH analogues
`based on polyd.1-lactide-co-glycolide PLGM were re
`ported to be therapeutically advantageous
`in hormonal
`successfi.illy commercialized
`treatment of
`11 An advantage with these systems is that
`their biodegradation and drug release can be controlled
`by modifying polymer characteristics such as molecular
`comonomer
`and
`weight hydrophilicity
`lactide/gly
`colide ratio 12 15 In particular compared to implants
`and
`and
`nonbioerodible matrices
`biodegradable
`jectable microspheres obviate the need for surgical proce
`removal
`dures during administration and subsequent
`Release of conventional
`low molecular weight drug
`molecules from polymer systems is primarily via difth
`sional process 16 Macromolecular
`drugs such as pro
`teins and peptides release via both diffusion and matrix
`degradation processes 1719 Often the initial diffu
`release of proteins and peptidcs is not sufficient
`because
`to elicit
`
`sustained
`
`pharmacological
`response
`diffusion of macromolecules through the polymer struc
`ture may be limited This results in an unwanted
`the onset of polymer erosion and
`peutic lag phase until
`drug release In addition to drug
`subsequent
`and polymer characteristics diffusional
`release of drugs
`is controlled by carrier-related factors such as structure
`size surface area porosity and drug load 16172021
`ap
`These
`factors can be
`by formulation
`proaches
`in altering the drug release
`to avoid the undesired therapeutic lag phase
`The purpose of this study was to evaluate preparation
`variables such as drug load and addition of
`porosigen
`in achieving modified and in particular increased initial
`peptide from PLGA micro
`release of
`spheres L1-IRH-analogue-loaded nuicrospheres were pre
`and
`solvent-extraction
`
`thera
`
`accelerated
`
`controlled
`
`and can be useful
`
`difflisional
`
`pared by
`
`evaporation process
`characteristics of microspheres were
`physicochemical
`correlated with in vitro release profiles of peptide These
`formulations were also compared for their efficacy in
`suppressing serum testosterone levels in rats The peptide
`for these studies was the LHRH superagonist
`
`selected
`
`leuprolide Polymer selected was 5050 PLGA with un
`capped end groups to increase hydration Calcium chlo
`ride was chosen as
`porosigen to increase the porosity
`of peptide-loaded mierospheres
`
`MATERIALS AND METHODS
`
`Materials
`
`PLGA 5050 polymer Resome RG5O3H MW
`28032 was obtained
`from Boehringer
`Ingelheim Wall
`ingford CT LHRH analogue
`and leuprolide as an ace
`tate salt was purchased
`from Bachem Inc Torrance
`CA Calcium chloride dihydrate was obtained
`from
`Sigma Chemical Co St Louis MO All other ehemi
`eals used were of analytical
`
`reagent grade
`
`Preparation of Microspheres
`
`in
`
`typical batch size of
`
`by
`
`solvent-extraction
`
`evaporation
`
`1.5
`
`follows
`
`contained
`
`mixed with
`The typical
`
`Microsphere formulations
`were prepared
`method 22 Briefly the preparation procedure was as
`methylene chloride CH2CI2 solution that
`16% w/w of polymer was
`approximately
`methanolie solution CH3OH of peptide
`ratio of CH3OH to CH2CI2 was 0.24 The
`resulting mixture dispersed phase DP was then slowly
`added to 500 ml of 0.35% w/v polyvinylalcohol PVA
`aqueous solution continuous phase CP maintained at
`25C with
`water jacket CP and DP were emulsified for
`homogenizer Silverson L4R Silverson
`mm
`using
`Instruments Corp MA at 7000 rpm The stirring rate
`was decreased
`to 500 rpm and the temperature of the
`emulsion was increased to 40C to extract and evaporate
`hr The system was cooled
`the organic phase over
`25C and particles were recovered
`on
`pore size
`solvent-resistant membrane filters
`and then dried over
`night under vacuum at room temperature
`The target drug load for the formulations was 12.5%
`ww except
`for higher drug-loaded formulation
`load of 20% slightly higher polymer
`which had
`set
`concentration 18% w/w in CT-12C1
`and 0.27 ratio of
`CH3OH/CHCl2
`were employed for the higher drug load
`tormulation For calcium-chloride containing
`formula
`various amounts Table
`of salt were also
`tions
`dissolved in the CP and the CH3OH component of the
`DP
`
`to
`
`Process Characterization
`
`The mierosphere preparation process was character
`ized by determining mierosphere yield encapsulation ef
`
`271 Madison Avenue New York New York 1001
`
`\1.ro.EL DEkKER INC 11\
`
`

`

`nhaneing Initial
`
`kelease of Peptide
`
`289
`
`ORDER
`
`REPRINTS
`
`Table
`
`Manitfoc liiiiog Parameters of Pep/ide-Loaded RGSO3H Microsplierec
`
`Addition qf Porosigen
`
`Calciun Chloride Molar Concentration
`
`Formulation
`
`ID
`
`Methanol
`
`CP
`
`Ratio Methanol/CP
`
`0.268
`
`0.268
`
`0.155
`
`0.117
`
`0.117
`
`0.100
`
`0.060
`
`0.060
`
`0.060
`
`0.045
`
`2.68
`
`4.46
`
`2.58
`
`1.95
`
`2.60
`
`Target drug load for
`
`is 12.5% w/w and
`
`for
`
`Ia 20% w/w
`
`it
`
`total mi
`ficiency and mass balance of peptide The
`yield was
`gravimetrically on the
`calculated
`crosphere
`basis of polymer/drug recovery For the incorporation ef
`in microspheres was ex
`ficiency peptide encapsulated
`load The
`percentage of theoretical
`pressed as
`target
`mass balance of the peptide was obtained as the sum of
`the peptide remaining in the CP unincorporated plus the
`amount incorporated in microspheres
`
`Characterization of Microspheres
`
`Microspheres formulated as above were characterized
`for their drug content bulk density specific surface area
`mean sizes surface morphology in vitro drug release
`and in vivo efficacy
`
`Drug Content
`
`nyvale CA and an autosampler Thenno Separation
`Products Fremont CA The mobile phase was an iso
`cratic mixture of 1-IPLC grade water and acetonitrile in
`the ratio of 68 32 adjusted to pH 4.0 by adding approxi
`mately 0.1% trifluoroaeetie acid The flow rate was set
`at 1.1 mI/mm
`
`Bulk Density
`
`to
`
`The thy mierospheres were quantitatively transferred
`tube The test
`tube was subsequently
`graduated
`test
`tapped 20 times from vertical distance of approximately
`volume was recorded The tap
`0.5 in and the occupied
`ping process was repeated until
`the volume occupied
`by
`particles remained unchanged The final volume was re
`corded as bulk volume
`and the tapped bulk density
`g/cm3 was calculated
`as rn/yb where in was the weight
`of microspheres employed
`
`Specific Surface Area
`
`area was determined using an
`The specific surface
`ASAP 2000 surface
`area analyzer Micromeritics Nor-
`cross GA by BrunauerEmmett Teller BET transfor
`isotherms of Kr on
`mation of the adsorptiondesorption
`The area values were
`the surface of the microspheres
`normalized to the sample weight The sample weight typ
`ically was in the range of 250300 mg
`
`Size Distribution
`
`by shaking
`
`for
`
`hr on wrist-
`
`re
`
`Drug-loaded microspheres were quantitatively dis
`into ace
`solved in CH2CI2 and the peptide was extracted
`tate buffer pH 0.1
`action shaker Burrell Pittsburgh PA The
`aqueous
`and ex
`buffer phase was
`by centrifhgation
`separated
`tracted peptide was quantitated by modification of
`ported reversed-phase HPLC method 23 This extrac
`tion procedure was repeated with fresh buffer and the
`combined peptide amounts from the two extractions were
`reported as the drug content expressed as percent w/w
`of microspheres Triplicate samples were used to deter
`mine the drug content and mean values HPLC analytical
`conditions were as follows ehromatographie separation
`was achieved
`C18 pBondapak column 3.9
`on
`300
`mm Waters by using
`variable-wavelength detector
`at
`220 nm gradient pump both from Dionex Corp Sun-
`
`laser diffraction
`
`particle
`
`Particle size distribution was determined by using
`sizer Malvern Instruments
`
`Southborough MA The microspheres were suspended in
`63-mm for
`0.1% aqueous Tween 80 solution and either
`
`\1.cdusonAveiiue
`
`\I%RLELDELKER
`NewYork NewYoct
`
`INc
`
`tOUtô
`
`C-
`
`

`

`ORDER
`
`REPRINTS
`
`290
`
`Ra\ varapu Lee and DeLuca
`
`100 mm for
`118 jim or
`size range of 0.5
`size range
`188 pm focal
`length lens was employed to deter
`of 1.9
`mine particle size while the sample was stirred at about
`100 rpm in the sample cell using magnetic stirrer bar
`
`calculated
`
`ited stability in the releasing medium Released drug was
`as the difference between initially loaded drug
`and that remaining in the microspheres and expressed as
`loaded amount
`percent of initially
`
`Surface Morphology
`
`In Vivo Evaluation
`
`Particle surface morphology was examined by scan
`ning electron microscopy model S800 Hitachi Japan
`the microsphere sample was
`coated with gold
`after
`palladium on an aluminum stub
`
`In Vitro Drug Release
`
`test
`
`Approximately 10mg of peptide-loaded microspheres
`was incubated with 10 ml of 0.033
`buffer
`phosphate
`pH at 37C in
`temperature-controlled oven Separate
`tubes with equal amounts of microspheres were
`maintained for each time point of the release study Ag
`gregation and settling of microspheres were noticed dur
`tubes were shaken
`twice
`Test
`ing the release
`study
`weekly and ml of supernatant was replaced with fresh
`buffer weekly to maintain sink conditions At the sam
`pling time microspheres were separated by centrifuga
`tion To minimize the loss of microspheres only ml of
`the supernatant was removed and analyzed by HPLC for
`the drug content The total peptide remaining in the mi
`that was left behind
`ml
`and supematant
`crospheres
`was extracted into acetate
`and quantitated by
`HPLC On the basis of the supematant analysis peptide
`in the remaining ml of supernatant was calculated
`and
`accounted
`for in the final calculations of peptide that re
`mained in the microspheres Compared to standards no
`additional peaks were noted in the chromatographs ob
`tained from the analysis of test samples
`release was determined on the basis of the
`Peptide
`drug remaining in the microspheres rather than on the
`released amount of peptide because the peptide has lim
`
`buffer
`
`Male Sprague Dawley rats Harlan Sprague Dawley
`Inc Chicago IL were employed
`in evaluating
`the formulation efficacy in suppressing serum testoster
`one Animals were maintained as per
`the guidelines set
`forth in reference 24 All
`formulations were suspended
`and 2% man
`in mixture of 1% carboxymethylcellulose
`nitol and injected into rats subcutaneously just below the
`based on
`neck region at
`drug dose of 100 jig/kg/day
`literature reports 25
`single injection was given to
`each animal
`immediately after an initial
`sample was col
`lected from the tail vein Additional
`samples were col
`15 25 32 33 42 and 43 days
`On days 32 and 42 all
`after dose administration
`the
`groups were challenged with 100 jig/kg of leuprolide ac
`
`lected at 0.25
`
`etate Following regular sampling additional
`samples
`were taken at
`and 24 hr after the challenge Samples
`were assayed in duplicate for testosterone analysis by ra
`dioimmunoassay using standard commercial kits
`
`RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
`
`Process Characterization
`
`The adapted manufacturing procedure resulted in
`high microsphere yield 8892% high encapsulation ef
`ficiency 7288% and close to 100% peptide mass bal
`ance Leuprolide acetate is highly water soluble and was
`to have low microencapsulation
`expected
`efficiency by
`using the conventional oil/water o/w solvent evapora
`tion method due to rapid partitioning
`into the aqueous
`
`.0
`
`-C
`
`.0
`
`CO
`
`CO
`
`Ct
`
`CO
`
`C-
`
`-c
`
`-o
`
`CO
`
`Characteristics of Peptide-Loaded Microspheres
`
`Effect of Drug Load and Calcium Chloride
`
`Formulation
`
`ID
`
`Drug Content
`%w/w
`
`Encapsulation
`
`Efficiency
`
`Surface Area
`m2/g
`
`Size
`jim 0.5
`
`Bulk Density
`g/cmr
`
`Table
`
`11.9
`
`16.3
`
`9.79
`
`9.08
`
`10.1
`
`10.9
`
`11.0
`
`95.2
`
`81.5
`
`78.3
`
`72.6
`
`80.8
`
`87.2
`
`88.0
`
`0.387
`
`7.278
`
`1.249
`
`1.480
`
`1.023
`
`0.913
`
`0.778
`
`18.0
`
`27.0
`
`24.7
`
`24.2
`
`20.5
`
`28.5
`
`24.9
`
`0.54
`
`0.29
`
`0.48
`
`0.42
`
`0.57
`
`0.56
`
`0.64
`
`Si7c distributi on on
`
`volume bans
`
`tsr
`
`RcEL DoucHe
`ulproii Ar enue New York New rI
`
`10k
`
`

`

`Enhancing Initial
`
`Release of Pcptidc
`
`291
`
`ORDER
`
`REPRINTS
`
`Figure
`
`Scanning electron micrographs of RG5O3H microsphercs with different drug loads
`
`w/w
`
`11.9
`
`16.3 at 1500X
`
`phase of the emulsion during the manufacturing process
`26 Instead of using the suggested
`and reported multi
`
`ple-emulsion water/oil/water
`
`cated that
`
`approaches
`
`to
`
`achieve high encapsulation efficiency 727 cosolvent
`system of CH1OH and CH2CI2 was employed as the or
`ganic phase of u/w emulsion The results obtained mdi
`high percentage of initially
`added peptide
`formu
`could be associated with the microspheres for all
`lations produced irrespective of variables Although the
`mechanism of peptidepolymer association is not clear
`it appears that as CH3OH rapidly partitions into the aque
`ous phase or evaporates drug precipitates and remains
`trapped in the polymeric matrix and is inhibited from par
`titioning into the continuous phase by the rapidly forming
`polymeric wall Possible interaction between peptide and
`polymer however was not evaluated
`in this study This
`for scaleup and is suitable for en
`is amenable
`procedure
`into microspheres with high
`capsulating similar peptides
`
`efficiency
`
`In Vitro Characteriation of Peptide
`Loaded Microspheres
`
`Effect of Drug Load
`
`Two microsphere batches with different drug target
`12.5%
`20.0% were prepared
`loads
`to evaluate
`the effect of drug load on microsphere characteristics
`The physicochemical properties of these formulations are
`listed in Table
`The results indicate that
`loading the
`microspheres with higher amounts of peptide
`tially increased the specific surface area and decreased
`These micro
`the bulk density of
`the microspheres
`spheres examined under scanning
`electron microscope
`
`substan
`
`at
`
`tained
`
`magnification of l500X Fig
`possessed higher
`porosity relative to lower drug-loaded micro-
`surface
`spheres When the microsphere field was examined at
`lower magnifications 40X and 200x data not shown
`con
`the higher drug-loaded microsphere formulation
`certain amuunt of norispherical and amurphous
`like material which could be polymeric debris and/or
`prematurely formed polymeric particles Coupled with
`feature of higher
`increased surface porosity this process
`drug-loaded microspheres possibly contributed to the ob
`served increase in specific surface area Another contrib
`uting factor could be an increase in internal microsphere
`porosity No attempt to fracture and examine the internal
`structure of these microspheres was made because of
`their small size Table
`
`120
`
`iR
`
`.4
`
`20
`
`aIS 3%
`ali 9%A
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`lime day
`
`In vitro peptide release from RG5O3H micro-
`Figure
`spheres Effect of drug load
`
`C-
`
`MARCEL DECKER Inc
`270 Madison Avenue New york Now York 001
`
`

`

`292
`
`Ravivarapu
`
`Lee and DeLuca
`
`IIll
`ORDER jjj
`
`REPRINTS
`
`The assumption that higher drug-loaded microspheres
`space was supported by
`increased internal porosity/void
`the bulk density data presented
`in Table
`Smaller bulk
`density values of high drug-loaded microspberes suggest
`higher number of hollow or more po
`the formation of
`rous mierospheres Another possible contribution
`less-than-optimum packing of nonspherical particles
`area porosity and de
`Because
`increased
`surface
`bulk density should increase
`drug release
`rate of peptide release was expected
`from higher
`higher
`drug-loaded mierospheres With higher drug load more
`of the drug is available at
`the surface of mierospheres
`release The cu
`which should also lead to higher initial
`rnulative release profiles of these two formulations
`shown in Fig
`discernible difference in the released
`amount of peptide was observed
`release study Increased drug load provides interconnect-
`
`creased
`
`is
`
`are
`
`at each time point of the
`
`greater poros
`ne channels in the particle structure and
`ity for penetration of water into and peptide leaching out
`of the matrix Complete release of drug was obtained by
`49 days for both formulations
`
`Effect of Calcium Chloride
`
`release of pep-
`Another approach to increase the initial
`tide from the mierospheres is to increase the porosity
`and internal by addition of porosigenie
`both surface
`materials such as water-soluble calcium chloride and so
`dium chloride salts Juni et al observed
`increased poros
`and bleomycin release from polylaetie acid micro-
`esters 28
`due to the addition of
`spheres
`fatty acid
`Recently Herrmann and Bodmeier studied the effects of
`adding salts calcium or sodium chloride to the internal
`and external aqueous phases of w/o/w emulsion on so-
`
`ity
`
`Figure
`
`Scanning electron micrographs of RGSO3H microspheres
`phases were
`none
`methanol/continuous
`0.268/0.1
`0.268/0.06
`
`1500
`
`Effect of calcium chloride Molar salt concentrations
`0.117/0.045 Magnification
`
`0.155/0.06
`
`0.117/0.06
`
`in
`
`MARCEL DEKErE
`oil Ar rru \cw York Ncu York IDOl
`
`

`

`l.Il
`
`ORDER
`
`REPRINTS
`
`Enhancing Initial Release of Peptidc
`
`293
`
`rnatostatin release
`
`125
`
`100
`
`lime days
`
`Figure
`
`In vitro peptide release from RG503H micro-
`spheres Effect of calcium chloride Molar salt concentrations
`phases were
`0.155/0.06
`
`in methanol/continuous
`
`0.268/0.06
`
`none
`
`0.117/0.06
`
`0.268/0.1
`0.117/0.045
`
`from polylactic
`acid microspheres
`29 and showed that varied particle structures and modi
`fied drug release could be obtained through variations in
`In comparison to the Herrmann
`the salt concentrations
`and Bodmeier study the present study assessed the addi
`tion of salt to both aqueous and organic phases and the
`particles were prepared from PLGA by an o/w solvent-
`extraction evaporation method in contrast
`to prepara
`tion of polylactic
`w/o/w emulsion
`system
`The physicochemical
`properties of the microsphere
`formulations prepared in the absence and presence of salt
`at various concentrations are shown in Table
`Calcium
`salt was
`
`acid particles using
`
`chloride
`
`readily
`
`soluble in methanol
`
`and
`
`in methy
`methanol/methylene
`chloride mixture but not
`lene chloride alone As an initial
`attempt salt 0.46
`was added only to the CH3OH phase of the DP However
`the drug content of these microspheres was very low at
`1.5% Because of the unacceptable
`low drug load these
`
`15
`
`13
`
`11
`
`Formulation
`
`Formulation
`
`high drug load
`
`Baseline
`
`C3
`
`59
`
`15
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`45
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`40
`
`45
`
`Time days
`
`Figure
`
`In vivo testosterone suppression with RG5O3H microspheres Effeci of drug load The inset shows the data in the extended
`range and the upward pointing arrows along the x-axis represent the challenge
`
`MAnUeL DuKes INC
`270 Muiisoo Avenue New York New York 1001
`
`Ii
`
`

`

`294
`
`Ravivarapu
`
`Lee and DeLuea
`
`ORDER
`
`REPRINTS
`
`These
`
`trations were varied in the CP and DP Table
`increases are consistent with the scanning electron photo
`which illustrate increased porosity
`mierographs in Fig
`and surface texture of formulations prepared in the pres
`For the calcium chloride
`ence of salt
`versus
`formulations as the microspheres became more porous
`and ex
`the surface area increased drug load decreased
`rate of initial
`drug
`
`trapolating this correlation
`
`higher
`
`release occurred
`
`Figure
`
`shows the in vitro cumulative release of pep-
`tide from these fomniulations The formulations seemed
`
`for
`
`the initial
`
`re
`to have similar release profiles except
`lease This particular characteristic may be advantageous
`because it
`release alone and not
`implies that diffusional
`be controlled by this formulation
`release can
`erosional
`approach As the porosity and surface area increase due
`to an osmotic gradient
`in favor of the organic phase the
`peptide release also increases Note that
`in Table
`the concentration ratio of salt in CH3OH and the CP
`was similar for some of the fonnulations
`however
`the
`
`initial
`
`characteristics including in vitro release profiles were
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`niicrospheres were not characterized further Apparently
`the osmotic gradient created with salt in the organic phase
`promoted water influx from the outer aqueous phase re
`sulting in very porous microspheres with low drug load
`As
`formulations were modified to
`
`result subsequent
`have
`lower osmotic gradient favoring the organic phase
`by incorporating salt in the CP also These modifications
`led to an increase in the drug loads which were close to
`that of formulations without calcium chloride The effect
`
`of salt gradient could be correlated with the drug content
`values For example at
`fixed salt concentration in the
`CP as the concentration in the DP decreased from 0.268
`to 0.117
`and
`Tables
`as for formulations
`an increase in the drug load was achieved
`and
`No major changes in the particle size and bulk density
`values were observed even when salt concentrations were
`varied Mean particle size of these microspheres was in
`range of 18 25 jim suitable size for convenient
`injections However notice
`subcutaneous/intramuscular
`areas were ob
`able differences in the specific surface
`because salt was added and salt concen
`served Table
`
`11
`
`Formulation
`
`.Formulation
`
`nFormulation
`
`Baseline
`
`01
`
`01
`
`In
`
`01
`
`Cl
`
`1J
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`40
`
`45
`
`Time days
`
`Figure
`
`In vivo testosterone suppression with calcium chloride formulations The inset shows the data in the extended range and
`
`the upward pointing arrows along the x-axis represent
`
`the challenge
`
`so
`
`270
`
`tadisoll As eoue Ness York
`
`York 11016
`
`MAISCELDEI
`
`hER
`
`

`

`Enhancina Initial
`
`Release of Peptvle
`
`29
`
`lHl
`
`ORDER
`
`REPRINTS
`
`jJJ
`
`very dissimilar From this observation it appears that
`the physical amount of cal
`addition to osmotic gradient
`cium chloride present
`in the aqueous and organic phases
`plays an important
`role in modifying mierosphere proper
`the higher the amount
`the higher the ini
`ties In general
`
`in
`
`tial
`
`release
`
`In Vivo Evaluation
`
`Figures
`
`and
`
`show serum testosterone profiles after
`hr val
`formulation administration
`The average of the
`ues was considered
`to be the baseline Only descriptive
`statistics mean SD were employed in comparing the
`efficacy Leuprolide acetate being an LHRH super ago
`flare-up as expected The
`nist caused initial
`with all of the formu
`levels however declined by day
`
`testosterone
`
`lations
`
`the effect of drug load on efficacy
`Figure
`compares
`Even though the levels were similar by day 15 suppres
`sion earlier to that was faster for the higher drug-loaded
`formulation
`This possibly is due to the higher release
`that was seen
`in vitro assuming similar trends in vivo
`the calcium chloride formulations
`
`Figure
`
`were chosen based on in vitro
`As discussed earlier the in vitro
`
`compares
`Formulations
`and
`release profiles Fig
`release profiles of these formulations were similar except
`for the initial burst Of the three considered formulations
`formulation
`had the lowest burst Accordingly testos
`terone suppression with this formulation was the slowest
`leuprolide re
`However
`no direct correlation between
`lease in vitro and in vivo could be made because leupro
`lide serum levels were not measured When the testoster
`one levels were measured
`
`as
`
`indicator
`
`pharmacological activity thus minimizing the undesired
`lag phase often seen with these macromolecules
`
`REFERENCES
`
`Lee Biopharmaeeutieal properties and pharmaeoki
`neties of peptide and protein drugs in Peptide-Based
`Amidon eds American
`DrugDesign
`Taylor and
`Chemical Society Washington DC 1995 pp 69 97
`Sanders Dmg delivery systems and routes of ad
`ministration of peptide and protein drugs Eur
`Drug
`152 95
`102 1990
`Metab Pharmacokinct
`Hora
`Rana
`Tafarn
`
`Nunherg
`
`Gilley and
`
`Hudson Develop
`
`Tice
`ment of
`controlled release microspheres formulation of
`interleukin-2 Proc mt Symp Controlled Release Bio
`act Mater 16 509510 1989
`The pharmaceutics and delivery of thera
`Talmadge
`and proteins Adv Drug Del Rev
`
`peutic polypeptides
`10 247299 1993
`Okada
`and
`Toguchi Biodegradable microspheres
`in drug delivery Crit Re Ther Drug Carder Sys
`121 199 1995
`Ogawa and
`Heya
`Okada
`Toguehi
`In vitro
`and
`releasing hor
`in vivo evaluation of thyrotrophin
`mone release from copolydl-Iactic/glycolic acid micro
`Pharm Sci 835 636
`640 1994
`spheres
`Cohen
`Hwang and
`Yoshioka
`Lucarelli
`Langer Controlled delivery systems for proteins based
`on polylactic/glycolic acid microspheres Pharm Res
`86 713
`720 1991
`Mchta
`
`Burton and
`
`Thanoo
`Calis
`Jeyanthi
`DeLuca Biodegradable microspheres
`as depot system for parenteral delivery of peptide drugs
`Controlled Release 29 375384 1994
`Okada
`Doken
`Ogawa and
`Toguehi Prepa
`ration of three month depot
`injectable microspheres of
`Icuprorelin acetate using biodegradable polymers Pharm
`Res 118 1143
`1147 1994
`Asch
`Bartke
`Rojas
`
`Sehally
`
`Tiee
`
`drol
`
`and
`
`Kiemeke
`Bray and
`Silerkhodr
`Hogan Prolonged suppression of plasma LH levels
`single injection of an LHRH agonist
`in male rats after
`An
`in polydl-lactide-co-glycolide microeapsules
`8388 1985
`Walker
`Turkes
`Buck
`cock
`Peeling and
`of patients with advanced
`slow-
`cancer of prostate using
`the LHRH agonist
`release depot
`formulation
`of
`103 Rl 1984
`118630 Zoladex
`Endocrinol
`Cutwright
`Perez
`Beasley
`Larson
`Posey Degradation of polylactic
`acid polymet
`Oral Surg 37
`and copolymers of polyglycolic acid
`152 1974
`142
`
`Turkes
`
`Zwink
`
`Bea
`
`Griffiths Treatment
`
`tCl
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`270 \tadison
`
`MACSOLDErER tNt
`0016
`Avenac New York NewYori
`
`.0
`
`.0
`
`to
`
`C-
`
`pharmacological
`of leuprolide released in vivo the levels did not differen
`tiate the efficacy of the calcium chloride formulations
`There were however notable differences in in vitro drug
`release More importantly as compared to formulation
`Fig
`formulations with calcium chloride showed
`suppression and met the objec
`faster rate of testosterone
`tive of providing increased
`release of peptide
`similar observation could be made with the higher drug-
`loaded formulation An unstated objective of this study
`was to maintain the testosterone
`suppression for at
`least
`1-month period This objective was met with both
`higher drug and calcium chloride formulations
`In conclusion increasing drug load and adding poro
`sigen modified the carrier characteristics by increasing
`porosity and specific surface area of PLOA mierospheres
`This enhanced initial
`drug release due to increased/rapid
`hydration of carrier particles and provided faster onset of
`
`initial
`
`

`

`lIl
`
`ORDER
`
`e_
`
`REPRINTS
`
`jJJ
`
`Ravivarapu
`
`Lee and DeLuea
`
`Kanke
`DeLuca
`Schroeder
`Sato and
`Porous mierospheres for drug delivery and methods for
`making same U.S Patent 4818 542 1990
`Ogawa
`Yamamoto
`Okada
`Yashiki and
`Shimamoto
`new technique to efficiently
`entrap lee
`acid or
`into mierospheres of polylactic
`acid Chem Pharm Bull
`
`prolide acetate
`
`296
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`Park Degradation of polydl-lactic acid micro
`Controlled Re
`cffcct of molecular weight
`sphcrcs
`173 1994
`lease 30 161
`Nimmer
`Brieh
`Laneranjan
`Bantle
`Vit Parenteral dcpot systems on thc basis of
`Controlled Release 16 27
`biodegradable polyesters
`
`Kissel
`
`fall
`
`and
`
`42 199
`Bodmer
`Traeehslin Factors influ
`Kissel and
`cncing thc release of peptides and protcins from biode
`Controlled Release
`gradable parcntcral dcpot systcms
`138 1992
`21 129
`Washington
`Drug release
`rcvicw tnt
`
`critical
`
`from mierodisperse
`sys
`Pharm 58 1120990
`tcms
`Sah
`Chicn Thc
`Toddywala and
`influence
`on thc eon
`of biodegradable microcapsule formulations
`Controlled Release 30
`trolled iclease of
`211 1994
`Shah
`Cha and
`Pitt PoIyglyeolie aeid-eo
`dI-tactie acid Diffusion or degradation controlled drug
`270 1992
`delivery
`Controlled Release 18 261
`Guy Release and diffusion of drugs
`Hadgraft and
`from polymers in Polymers in Controlled Drug Delivery
`Davis eds Wright Bristol 1987
`IlIum and
`pp 99I 16
`Heya
`Ogawa
`Toguehi Effects of counterion of TRI-1 and loading
`amount on control of TRH release from eopolydl-lactie/
`glyeolie acid mierospheres prepared by an in-water dry
`ing method mt
`75 1991
`Pharm 69 69
`Cohen
`Alanso
`Park
`Gupta
`Siber and
`Langer Determinants of release rate of teta
`from polyester mierospheres Pharm Res
`953 1993
`
`201
`
`protein
`
`Okada
`
`Tanigawara
`
`and
`
`nus vaccine
`
`107 945
`
`22
`
`23
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`29
`
`eopolylaetic/glyeolic
`1103 1988
`1095
`24 Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals
`DHEW Pub No 78-23 revised National
`Institutes of
`Health
`Okada
`
`lnoue
`
`Ueno
`
`Heya
`Ogawa and
`Toguehi
`Pharmacokineties
`of once-a-month
`jeetable mierospheres of leuprolide acetate Pharm Res
`86 787791 1991
`Bodmeier and
`
`in
`
`MeGinity Polylactie acid micro-
`
`spheres containing quinidine base and quinidine sulfate
`prepared by the solvent evaporation technique Methods
`279288 1987
`and morphology Mieroeneap
`MeGinity Preparation of multiphase
`iwata and
`
`mierospheres of polydl-laetie
`
`eo-glyeolie acid containing
`
`acid and polydl
`w/o emulsion by multiple
`
`lactic
`
`Mieroeneap
`
`emulsion solvent evaporation technique
`201214 1992
`Nakano
`Juni
`Matsui
`Kubota and
`Ogata
`Control of release rate of bleomycin from polylaetie acid
`mierospheres by additives Chem Pharm Bull 334
`16091614 1985
`Herrmann
`and
`
`Bodmeier The effect of particle
`on the somatostatin release
`from poly
`mierostrueture
`laetide mierospheres prepared by w/o/w solvent evap
`36 63
`oration method
`Controlled Release
`71
`1995
`
`no
`
`270 \l.idton Avenue
`
`MARLO DEI.KEs INt
`New York \..rn Yrk Dolt
`
`

`

`Request Permission or Order Reprints Instantly
`
`Interested in copying and sharing this article In most cases U.S Copyright
`Law requires that you get permission from the articles rightsholder before
`using copyrighted content
`
`information and materials found in this article including but not limited
`All
`to text trademarks patents logos graphics and images the Materials are
`the copyrighted works and other forms of intellectual property of Marcel
`Dekker Inc or its licensors All rights not expressly granted are reserved
`
`Get permission to law

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket