CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS EYES ONLY
`
` U N I T E D S T A T E S D I S T R I C T C O U R T
`
` F O R T H E D I S T R I C T O F U T A H
`
`C O R E L S O F T W A R E , )
`
` P l a i n t i f f , ) C i v i l A c t i o n N o . :
`
` v s . ) 2 : 1 5 - c v - 0 5 2 8 - J N P
`
`M I C R O S O F T C O R P . , )
`
` D e f e n d a n t . )
`
` C O N F I D E N T I A L - A T T O R N E Y S ' E Y E S O N L Y
`
` V i d e o t a p e d D e p o s i t i o n o f :
`
` K E V I N U N B E D A C H T
`
` F e b r u a r y 1 7 , 2 0 1 6 - 8 : 5 8 a . m .
`
` L o c a t i o n : R a y , Q u i n n e y & N e b e k e r
`
` 3 6 S o u t h S t a t e S t r e e t , S u i t e 1 4 0 0
`
` S a l t L a k e C i t y , U t a h
`
`R e p o r t e r :
`
`V I C K Y M c D A N I E L , C S R , R M R
`
`P A G E S 1 - 2 6 6
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`866 299-5127
`
`Page 1
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3 4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`1 0
`
`1 1
`
`1 2
`
`1 3
`
`1 4
`
`1 5
`
`1 6
`
`1 7
`
`1 8
`
`1 9
`
`2 0
`
`2 1
`
`2 2
`
`2 3
`
`2 4
`
`2 5
`
`Corel Exhibit 2007
`Microsoft v. Corel
`IPR2016-01084
`
`
`
` U N I T E D S T A T E S D I S T R I C T C O U R T
`
` F O R T H E D I S T R I C T O F U T A H
`
`C O R E L S O F T W A R E , )
`
` P l a i n t i f f , ) C i v i l A c t i o n N o . :
`
` v s . ) 2 : 1 5 - c v - 0 5 2 8 - J N P
`
`M I C R O S O F T C O R P . , )
`
` D e f e n d a n t . )
`
` C O N F I D E N T I A L - A T T O R N E Y S ' E Y E S O N L Y
`
` V i d e o t a p e d D e p o s i t i o n o f :
`
` K E V I N U N B E D A C H T
`
` F e b r u a r y 1 7 , 2 0 1 6 - 8 : 5 8 a . m .
`
` L o c a t i o n : R a y , Q u i n n e y & N e b e k e r
`
` 3 6 S o u t h S t a t e S t r e e t , S u i t e 1 4 0 0
`
` S a l t L a k e C i t y , U t a h
`
`R e p o r t e r :
`
`V I C K Y M c D A N I E L , C S R , R M R
`
`P A G E S 1 - 2 6 6
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`866 299-5127
`
`Page 1
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3 4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`1 0
`
`1 1
`
`1 2
`
`1 3
`
`1 4
`
`1 5
`
`1 6
`
`1 7
`
`1 8
`
`1 9
`
`2 0
`
`2 1
`
`2 2
`
`2 3
`
`2 4
`
`2 5
`
`Corel Exhibit 2007
`Microsoft v. Corel
`IPR2016-01084
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS EYES ONLY
`
` Q. (By Mr. Lamberson) This bullet doesn't
`
`cause you to think that may have been the case?
`
` MR. FAHRENKROG: Objection to form.
`
` THE WITNESS: I -- I -- not from my
`
`understanding of this. 09:39
`
` Q. (By Mr. Lamberson) When you first started
`
`working on your preview capability, did somebody come
`
`to you and tell you, hey, you should work on a
`
`preview capability, or did you come up with that
`
`yourself? 09:39
`
` A. A preview capability. No one -- no one
`
`came to me and said "work on a preview capability."
`
` Q. Okay. What did they tell you to work on?
`
` MR. FAHRENKROG: Objection to form.
`
` THE WITNESS: Is the question around -- 09:40
`
`what time frame? What context?
`
` Q. (By Mr. Lamberson) Was there something
`
`that caused you to go and come up with the Real Time
`
`Preview functionality that you believe you invented?
`
` A. So, I do believe I invented it. And I 09:40
`
`would say that what caused me and the team members to
`
`come up with -- and work on this is -- I will go back
`
`to, I guess, the user experience of -- the experience
`
`of providing something that is going to be more
`
`easily understood, easier and faster for someone to 09:41
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`866 299-5127
`
`Page 32
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS EYES ONLY
`
`accomplish, was a huge undertaking, I think, from the
`
`standards of why we, as a company, would invest so
`
`much in understanding how the user worked, what they
`
`were doing, where they were having troubles and
`
`challenges. 09:41
`
` And so it's through that process of
`
`engineering and working with and seeing others and
`
`talking with usability experts, people that see more
`
`of -- of those than I would, being more in a cubical
`
`writing code, working with others like Eric Johnson, 09:41
`
`being able to come together and say, what can we do
`
`to improve the user experience? Or, maybe said a
`
`different way, what can we do to make it so that a
`
`user can accomplish their tasks faster, more
`
`accurately, and with a higher level of confidence and 09:42
`
`less frustration? That was always something we were
`
`trying to work on doing.
`
` And, you know, the -- the uber-release, if
`
`you will, of Real Time Preview was able to do all of
`
`those at one time because it actually gave the user 09:42
`
`the confidence, the ease of use, that visual feedback
`
`with no questions of how it was going to look,
`
`because they saw it as they were going through the
`
`process in their mind of changing it. Which is
`
`why -- I guess when we put it together and we start 09:42
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`866 299-5127
`
`Page 33
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS EYES ONLY
`
`prototyping ideas of modifying the actual document
`
`itself, not a small preview window that might show
`
`something like just a font type or a font size, but
`
`actually modifying the user's document that had
`
`everything they cared most about. 09:43
`
` And when we were able to do that and give
`
`them instant feedback, that was the "ah-hah" moment
`
`that we saw. And we knew we were on to something
`
`much, much different than just showing in a document
`
`and then allowing a person to go through clicks and 09:43
`
`clicks and clicks and undos and undos and undos.
`
`Even though the result was the same when you printed
`
`it, the experience of actually being able to do it
`
`faster, more accurately, and with more confidence
`
`was -- was what we knew we had once we saw that. 09:43
`
` And so it's the culmination of a couple of
`
`engineers doing their job and the usability person
`
`working with us -- and I couldn't tell you the exact
`
`moment that it happened as far as the day, but it's
`
`that experience where that explosion happened, I 09:44
`
`guess. And that's -- that's when the patent, if you
`
`will, or the Real Time Preview -- which, of course,
`
`we didn't call it that then -- that's when it
`
`blossomed.
`
` Q. Why was it important to modify the actual 09:44
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`866 299-5127
`
`Page 34
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS EYES ONLY
`
`document itself rather than a preview of the
`
`document?
`
` MR. FAHRENKROG: Objection to form.
`
` THE WITNESS: So -- important. The reason
`
`that we felt that we had something much different was 09:44
`
`because, what does the user care about most? They
`
`care about actually what they're creating. They want
`
`to make it look right. And so because we're working
`
`on the actual document, the actual text, the actual
`
`creation in their mind as happening at that time, 09:45
`
`that was important compared to looking at -- in fact,
`
`even distracting the user in probably a different way
`
`to help them through a series of tasks, like
`
`selecting the font type, going from a Times to an
`
`Arial to a -- to a -- you know, whatever other type, 09:45
`
`seeing that in a window somewhere else was good. It
`
`helped them on their path where they wanted to go.
`
` But if you used Real Time Preview, you
`
`could keep your focus, your energy, and your tasks
`
`set on your real document, which we believe -- and 09:45
`
`I'll use the word was more important or was helping
`
`them through their process, which it's important for
`
`them to complete it quickly, it's important for them
`
`to complete it accurately, and it's important for
`
`them to be able to have confidence that's it's going 09:46
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`866 299-5127
`
`Page 35
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS EYES ONLY
`
`to really, you know, print and be what it looks like.
`
`So it was easier to do it that way. So that was an
`
`important part of it.
`
` Q. (By Mr. Lamberson) Are there any
`
`drawbacks to actually modifying the active document 09:46
`
`with something that the user may not ultimately
`
`decide to apply to the document?
`
` MR. FAHRENKROG: Objection to form.
`
` THE WITNESS: Any drawbacks? So there
`
`is -- I guess I -- I probably couldn't answer that. 09:46
`
`I mean, all we're doing is providing something for
`
`them in a different timing and a different user
`
`experience. They could still get to it if they
`
`turned off our feature and wanted to go click, click,
`
`click, click, click, click. 09:47
`
` And then -- so I don't know if there was a
`
`drawback. I would say it was totally opposite. I
`
`would say it was a totally, you know, opposite of a
`
`drawback. Because they were actually being able to
`
`then make their decision process more quickly and 09:47
`
`with more confidence, and they really got it to look
`
`the way they wanted it to.
`
` Q. (By Mr. Lamberson) So you're not aware of
`
`any way the file, for example, could become corrupted
`
`through a change that was made by a preview that 09:47
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`866 299-5127
`
`Page 36
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
