Case 1:14-cv-01103-RGA Document 67 Filed 08/14/15 Page 1 of 15 PageID #: 1929
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`M2M SOLUTIONS LLC,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`ENFORA, INC., NOVATEL WIRELESS
`SOLUTIONS, INC., and NOVATEL
`WIRELESS, INC.,
`
`Defendants.
`
`M2M SOLUTIONS LLC,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`SIERRA WIRELESS AMERICA, INC., and
`SIERRA WIRELESS, INC.,
`
`Defendants.
`
`M2M SOLUTIONS LLC,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`TELIT WIRELESS SOLUTIONS INC.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`C.A. No. 14-1101-RGA
`
`C.A. No. 14-1102-RGA
`
`C.A. No. 14-1103-RGA
`
`JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION STATEMENT
`
`Plaintiff M2M Solutions LLC (“M2M Solutions”) and Defendants Sierra Wireless
`
`America, Inc., Sierra Wireless, Inc., Enfora, Inc., Novatel Wireless Solutions, Inc., Novatel
`
`4818-8423-6326.1
`
`Telit Wireless Solutions Inc. and Telit Communications PLC Exh. 1108 p. 1
`
`

`
`Case 1:14-cv-01103-RGA Document 67 Filed 08/14/15 Page 2 of 15 PageID #: 1930
`
`Wireless, Inc., and Telit Wireless Solutions Inc. (collectively, “Defendants”) hereby submit their
`
`Joint Claim Construction Chart which is attached hereto as Exhibit 1.
`
`The parties’ Joint Claim Construction Chart identifies for the Court the terms/phrases of
`
`the asserted patent claims that are presently at issue, and includes each side’s respective proposed
`
`constructions of the disputed claim language with citations to the intrinsic evidence in support
`
`thereof.
`
`As listed below, also attached hereto are the following additional Exhibits which consist of
`
`the asserted patent and the intrinsic record that M2M Solutions and the Defendants have
`
`collectively cited to in their Joint Claim Construction Statement:
`
`Exhibit 2 – Copy of asserted U.S. Patent No. 8,648,717 (the “’717 patent”)
`
`Exhibit 3 – Copy of U.S. Patent No. 8,094,010 (the “’010 patent”)
`
`Exhibit 4 – Copy of U.S. Patent No. 7,583,197 (the “’197 patent”)
`
`Exhibit 5 – Copy of U.S. Patent No. 8,542,111 (the “’111 patent”)
`
`Exhibit 6 – Copy of U.S. Patent No. 8,633,802 (the “’802 patent”)
`
`Exhibit 7 – Prosecution History for U.S. Appl. No. 12/538,603
`
`Exhibit 8 – Prosecution History for U.S. Appl. No. 11/329,212
`
`Exhibit 9 – Prosecution History for U.S. Appl. No. 13/934,763
`
`Exhibit 10 – Prosecution History for U.S. Appl. No. 13/801,773
`
`Exhibit 11 – Prosecution History for U.S. Appl. No. 13/328/095
`
`Exhibit 12 – Prosecution History for U.S. Appl. No. 10/296,571
`
`1.
`
`The Asserted Patent And Patent Claims
`
`By way of background, M2M Solutions is asserting the ’717 patent in the above-captioned
`
`matters. The ’717 patent is a continuation that has matured from the same patent application that
`
`issued as the ’111, ’802, ’010, and ’197 patents.
`
`4818-8423-6326.1
`
`2
`
`Telit Wireless Solutions Inc. and Telit Communications PLC Exh. 1108 p. 2
`
`

`
`Case 1:14-cv-01103-RGA Document 67 Filed 08/14/15 Page 3 of 15 PageID #: 1931
`
`In C.A. No. 12-030-RGA, C.A. No. 12-032-RGA, and C.A. No. 12-033-RGA, the Court
`
`issued a Markman ruling construing “coded number,” “processing module,” and “programmable
`
`interface,” among other terms/phrases of the ‘010 patent. (D.I. 104, D.I. 98 and D.I. 94,
`
`respectively). Defendants contend that, during the course of those cases, particularly amid expert
`
`discovery, a dispute arose regarding the construction of these phrases. Defendants therefore
`
`believe that these phrases continue to be disputed, and therefore require further construction.
`
`Defendants also filed a Motion for Reconsideration of the Court’s Claim Constructions of
`
`“Processing Module” and “Programmable Interface” based on the Federal Circuit en banc
`
`Decision in Williamson v. Citrix Online (D.I. 180 in 12-030, D.I. 139 in 12-032, and D.I. 164 in
`
`12-033). Defendants contend that the outcome of the motion may be dispositive of the instant
`
`cases. If the outcome of the Motion for Reconsideration does not dispose of all cases, the
`
`Defendants respectfully request the Court consider the parties’ competing proposed claim
`
`constructions for “coded number,” “processing module,” and “programmable interface.”
`
`In the instant cases, M2M Solutions is asserting the following patent claims of the ’717
`
`patent: Claims 1-3, 6-7, 10-11, 13-23, and 29-30 against Telit Wireless Solutions Inc.; 1-3, 5-7,
`
`10-15, 18-23 and 29-30 against Sierra Wireless America, Inc. and Sierra Wireless, Inc.; 1-3, 6, 7,
`
`10, 11, 13-15, 18-23, 29 and 30 against Enfora, Inc., Novatel Wireless Solutions, Inc. and Novatel
`
`Wireless, Inc.
`
`As detailed more fully in their Joint Claim Construction Chart attached hereto as Exhibit 1,
`
`M2M Solutions and the Defendants are offering competing proposed claim constructions for the
`
`following disputed terms/phrases.
`
`4818-8423-6326.1
`
`3
`
`Telit Wireless Solutions Inc. and Telit Communications PLC Exh. 1108 p. 3
`
`

`
`Case 1:14-cv-01103-RGA Document 67 Filed 08/14/15 Page 4 of 15 PageID #: 1932
`
`Defendants’ Proposed
`Constructions
`The Court’s prior construction of “a
`designated, unique sequence of
`characters” should be further
`construed as “a sequence of
`characters designated by a central
`authority to ensure uniqueness (i.e.,
`to avoid duplication between
`communication devices), and that is
`stored on the programmable
`communicator before it receives the
`transmission being authenticated.”
`
`A single wireless transmission that
`includes both the coded number and
`the telephone number or IP address.
`
`If the claim language is construed to
`cover the coded number in a first
`transmission and the telephone
`number or IP address in a second,
`different transmission, the claims are
`invalid under section 112 ¶1 for lack
`of written description.
`
`In the alternative, this claim
`limitation is indefinite.
`
`One General Packet Radio Service
`(GPRS) or wireless packet switched
`data message, i.e., data packet.
`
`To the extent M2M Solutions
`contends that one transmission means
`something different (e.g., a string of
`multiple data messages lasting a user
`session), the claims are invalid under
`section 112 ¶ 1 for lack of written
`description.
`
`Term
`No.
`1.
`
`Claim Term
`
`“coded
`number”
`
`(Present in all
`asserted
`claims)
`
`M2M Solutions’ Proposed
`Constructions
`The Court’s prior construction,
`namely, “a designated, unique
`sequence of characters.” (D.I.
`92 at 9 (C.A.
`1:12-cv-00030-RGA).)
`
`M2M Solutions agrees with
`Defendants’ proposed
`construction, namely, “a single
`wireless transmission that
`includes both the coded number
`and the telephone number or IP
`address.”
`
`M2M Solutions disagrees,
`however, with Defendants’
`written description and
`indefiniteness contentions.
`
`“at least one
`of the
`transmission
`s including
`the at least
`one
`telephone
`number or
`IP address
`and the
`coded
`number”
`
`(Present in all
`asserted
`claims)
`
`One or more General Packet
`Radio Service (GPRS) or
`wireless packet switched data
`message(s).
`
`“[the one or
`more
`wireless
`transmission
`s from the
`programmin
`
`gt
`
`ransmitter
`comprises] a
`General
`Packet
`Radio
`Service
`
`2.
`
`3.
`
`4818-8423-6326.1
`
`4
`
`Telit Wireless Solutions Inc. and Telit Communications PLC Exh. 1108 p. 4
`
`

`
`Case 1:14-cv-01103-RGA Document 67 Filed 08/14/15 Page 5 of 15 PageID #: 1933
`
`M2M Solutions’ Proposed
`Constructions
`
`Defendants’ Proposed
`Constructions
`
`Claim Term
`
`(GPRS) or
`other
`wireless
`packet
`switched
`data
`message”
`
`(Present in
`asserted
`claim 1 and
`its dependent
`claims)
`
`No construction required. Plain
`and ordinary meaning.
`
`One SMS data message.
`
`To the extent M2M Solutions
`contends that one transmission means
`a string of multiple SMS messages
`lasting a user session, the claims are
`invalid under section 112 ¶ 1 for lack
`of written description.
`
`“[the one or
`more
`wireless
`transmission
`s from the
`programmin
`
`gt
`
`ransmitter
`containing
`instructions
`to program
`the stored
`number
`comprise]
`one or more
`short
`message
`service
`(SMS) data
`messages”
`
`Term
`No.
`
`4.
`
`(Present in
`asserted
`claim 29 and
`its dependent
`claim)
`
`4818-8423-6326.1
`
`5
`
`Telit Wireless Solutions Inc. and Telit Communications PLC Exh. 1108 p. 5
`
`

`
`Case 1:14-cv-01103-RGA Document 67 Filed 08/14/15 Page 6 of 15 PageID #: 1934
`
`M2M Solutions’ Proposed
`Constructions
`The set of numbers to which the
`programmable communicator is
`limited to sending one or more
`types of outgoing wireless
`transmissions.
`
`Defendants’ Proposed
`Constructions
`The exclusive set of numbers to
`which the programmable
`communicator is limited to send any
`outgoing wireless transmissions.
`
`A memory location for storing a
`unique identifier of the
`programmable communicator
`device.
`
`No construction required. Plain
`and ordinary meaning.
`
`This limitation is a means plus
`function limitation under 35 U.S.C.
`§112 ¶6.
`
`Function: “storing a unique identifier
`that is unique to the programmable
`communicator device.”
`
`Structure: A SIM Card.
`
`Relay data from the monitored
`technical device in response to a
`request for information from a
`remote device.
`
`To the extent M2M Solutions
`contends that processing in response
`to an incoming data message means
`something other than relaying, the
`claim is invalid under section 112 ¶ 1
`for lack of written description.
`
`Claim Term
`
`“numbers to
`which the
`programma
`ble
`communicat
`or device is
`configured
`to and
`permitted to
`send
`outgoing
`wireless
`transmission
`s”
`
`(Present in all
`asserted
`claims)
`
`“identity
`module”
`
`(Present in all
`asserted
`claims)
`
`“process
`data
`received
`through the
`programma
`ble interface
`from the at
`least one
`monitored
`technical
`device in
`response to
`programmin
`
`gi
`
`nstructions
`
`Term
`No.
`5.
`
`6.
`
`7.
`
`4818-8423-6326.1
`
`6
`
`Telit Wireless Solutions Inc. and Telit Communications PLC Exh. 1108 p. 6
`
`

`
`Case 1:14-cv-01103-RGA Document 67 Filed 08/14/15 Page 7 of 15 PageID #: 1935
`
`Term
`No.
`
`8.
`
`Claim Term
`
`…”
`
`(Present in
`asserted
`claims 1 and
`29, and their
`dependent
`claims)
`
`“programm
`able
`communicat
`or device
`configured
`to [carry out
`functions
`(A) to (D),
`listed under
`Defendants’
`Proposed
`Constructio
`ns]”
`
`(Present in all
`asserted
`claims)
`
`M2M Solutions’ Proposed
`Constructions
`
`Defendants’ Proposed
`Constructions
`
`The claimed programmable
`communicator device
`comprising each of the recited
`structural and functional
`limitations of the respective
`claims in which it appears.
`
`This limitation is a means plus
`function limitation under 35 U.S.C.
`§112 ¶6.
`
`Function (A): “use a memory to store
`at least one telephone number or IP
`address included within at least one
`of the transmissions as one or more
`stored telephone numbers or IP
`addresses if the processing module
`authenticates the at least one of the
`transmissions including the at least
`one telephone number of IP address
`and the coded number by
`determining that the at least one of
`the transmissions includes the coded
`number, the one or more stored
`telephone numbers or IP addresses
`being numbers to which the
`programmable communicator device
`is configured to and permitted to send
`outgoing wireless transmissions”
`
`Function (B): “use an identity
`module for storing an identity
`module for storing a unique identifier
`that is unique to the programmable
`communicator device”
`
`Function (C): “process data received
`through the programmable interface
`from the at least one monitored
`technical device in response to
`programming instructions received in
`an incoming wireless packet
`
`4818-8423-6326.1
`
`7
`
`Telit Wireless Solutions Inc. and Telit Communications PLC Exh. 1108 p. 7
`
`

`
`Case 1:14-cv-01103-RGA Document 67 Filed 08/14/15 Page 8 of 15 PageID #: 1936
`
`Defendants’ Proposed
`Constructions
`switched data message”
`
`Function (D): “process data received
`through the programmable interface
`from the at least one monitored
`technical device in response to
`programming instructions received in
`an at least one incoming shore
`message service (SMS) data message
`or packet switched data message”
`
`Structure: There is no corresponding
`structure. The limitation is indefinite
`under 35 U.S.C. §112 ¶2.
`
`The dependent claims use
`“programmable communicator
`device” for other functions and are
`indefinite for similar reasons.
`
`In the alternative, the claim limitation
`is indefinite because it mixes
`statutory classes of invention.
`
`The claim limitation is indefinite
`because it is not distinguished from
`any of the following similar phrases,
`which are also used in asserted claim
`29 and its dependent claim: “wireless
`packet switched data messages;” “at
`least one of the transmissions;”
`“other wireless packet switched data
`message;” “incoming wireless packet
`switched data message;” “at least one
`transmission” and “at least one
`incoming shore message service
`(SMS) data message or packet
`switched data message.”
`
`Term
`No.
`
`Claim Term
`
`M2M Solutions’ Proposed
`Constructions
`
`No construction required. Plain
`and ordinary meaning.
`
`9.
`
`“one or
`more
`wireless
`transmission
`s”
`
`(Present in
`asserted
`claims 1 and
`29, and their
`dependent
`claims)
`
`4818-8423-6326.1
`
`8
`
`Telit Wireless Solutions Inc. and Telit Communications PLC Exh. 1108 p. 8
`
`

`
`Case 1:14-cv-01103-RGA Document 67 Filed 08/14/15 Page 9 of 15 PageID #: 1937
`
`Claim Term
`
`M2M Solutions’ Proposed
`Constructions
`
`Defendants’ Proposed
`Constructions
`
`This limitation is a means plus
`function limitation under 35 U.S.C.
`§112 ¶6.
`
`Function: “determine an at least one
`location of the programmable
`communicator device, and wherein
`the programmable communicator
`device is configured to respond to an
`at least one transmission initiated by
`an at least one monitoring device
`requesting that said location data be
`sent to the monitoring device in
`response to programming
`instructions received in an incoming
`wireless packet switched data
`message.”
`
`Structure: There is no corresponding
`structure. The limitation is indefinite
`under 35 U.S.C. §112 ¶2.
`
`In the alternative, structure: Global
`Positioning System (GPS) signal
`processing circuitry.
`
`The Court’s prior construction is “an
`interface that is able to be directly
`programmed,” where
`“programmable” is construed as
`“capable of accepting instructions for
`performing a task or an operation.”
`
`However, this limitation is a means
`plus function claim limitation under
`35 U.S.C. §112 ¶6.
`
`Function: “establishing a
`communication link with at least one
`monitored technical device”
`
`Structure: There is no corresponding
`
`Term
`No.
`
`10.
`
`No construction required. Plain
`and ordinary meaning.
`
`“location
`processing
`module”
`
`(Present in
`asserted
`claim 16 and
`its dependent
`claim)
`
`11.
`
`“programm
`able
`interface”
`
`(Present in all
`asserted
`claims)
`
`The Court’s prior construction,
`namely, “an interface that is able
`to be directly programmed.”
`(D.I. 92 at 10 (C.A.
`1:12-cv-00030-RGA).)
`
`4818-8423-6326.1
`
`9
`
`Telit Wireless Solutions Inc. and Telit Communications PLC Exh. 1108 p. 9
`
`

`
`Case 1:14-cv-01103-RGA Document 67 Filed 08/14/15 Page 10 of 15 PageID #: 1938
`
`Term
`No.
`
`Claim Term
`
`M2M Solutions’ Proposed
`Constructions
`
`12.
`
`“processing
`module”
`
`(Present in all
`asserted
`claims)
`
`The Court’s prior construction,
`namely, “components or units of
`a computer program.” (D.I. 92
`at 12 (C.A.
`1:12-cv-00030-RGA).)
`
`Defendants’ Proposed
`Constructions
`structure. The limitation is indefinite
`under 35 U.S.C. §112 ¶2.
`
`In the alternative, the construction
`should be “an interface that is able to
`be directly programmed, i.e., accept
`programming instructions for
`performing a task or an operation
`independently of the processing
`module”
`
`The Court’s prior construction is
`“components or units of a computer
`program”
`
`This limitation is a means plus
`function limitation under 35 U.S.C.
`§112 ¶6.
`
`Function: “authenticating one or
`more wireless transmissions sent
`from a programming transmitter and
`received by the programmable
`communicator device by determining
`if at least one transmission contains a
`coded number”
`
`Structure: There is no corresponding
`structure. The limitation is indefinite
`under 35 U.S.C. §112 ¶2.
`
`The dependent claims use
`“processing module” for other
`functions and are indefinite for
`similar reasons.
`
`4818-8423-6326.1
`
`10
`
`Telit Wireless Solutions Inc. and Telit Communications PLC Exh. 1108 p. 10
`
`

`
`Case 1:14-cv-01103-RGA Document 67 Filed 08/14/15 Page 11 of 15 PageID #: 1939
`
`2.
`
`Reservation of Rights
`
`With regard to the disputed claim terms/phrases identified in their Joint Claim
`
`Construction Statement, the parties have made a good faith effort to identify exemplary intrinsic
`
`record support for the respective claim construction positions that they have advanced. However,
`
`the parties may seek to rely on additional intrinsic and/or extrinsic evidence in the future.
`
`The parties agree that all remaining claim terms/phrases should be given their plain and
`
`ordinary meaning. Nevertheless, it is possible that disputes as to the meanings of these remaining
`
`terms/phrases (including disputes as to what constitutes their plain and ordinary meanings) could
`
`arise as the parties continue the claim construction process, and thus may need to be addressed in
`
`the future.
`
`4818-8423-6326.1
`
`11
`
`Telit Wireless Solutions Inc. and Telit Communications PLC Exh. 1108 p. 11
`
`

`
`Case 1:14-cv-01103-RGA Document 67 Filed 08/14/15 Page 12 of 15 PageID #: 1940
`
`August 14, 2015
`
`OF COUNSEL:
`
`FOLEY & LARDNER LLP
`Marc N. Henschke
`111 Huntington Avenue, Suite 2600
`Boston, MA 02199
`(617) 342-4000
`mhenschke@foley.com
`
`Jeffrey N. Costakos
`777 E Wisconsin Avenue
`Milwaukee, WI 53202
`(414) 271-2400
`jcostakos@foley.com
`
`Jason J. Keener
`Jeffrey J. Mikrut
`Matthew J. Shin
`321 North Clark Street
`Chicago, IL 60654
`(312) 832-4500
`jkeener@foley.com
`jmikrut@foley.com
`mshin@foley.com
`
`BAYARD, P.A.
`
`/s/ Richard D. Kirk
`Richard D. Kirk (#0922)
`Stephen B. Brauerman (#4952)
`Vanessa R.Tiradentes (#5398)
`Sara E. Bussiere (#5725)
`222 Delaware Avenue, Suite 900
`Wilmington, DE 19801
`(302) 655-5000
`rkirk@bayardlaw.com
`sbrauerman@bayardlaw.com
`vtiradentes@bayardlaw.com
`sbussiere@bayardlaw.com
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff,
`M2M SOLUTIONS LLC
`
`4818-8423-6326.1
`
`12
`
`Telit Wireless Solutions Inc. and Telit Communications PLC Exh. 1108 p. 12
`
`

`
`Case 1:14-cv-01103-RGA Document 67 Filed 08/14/15 Page 13 of 15 PageID #: 1941
`
`August 14, 2015
`
`OF COUNSEL:
`
`Christopher W. Kennerly
`PAUL HASTINGS LLP
`1117 S. California Avenue
`Palo Alto, California 94304
`chriskennerly@paulhastings.com
`
`Elizabeth L. Brann
`Ericka J. Schulz
`Jeffrey D. Comeau
`PAUL HASTINGS LLP
`4747 Executive Drive, 12th Fl.
`San Diego, California 92121
`elizabethbrann@paulhastings.com
`erickaschulz@paulhastings.com
`jeffreycomeau@paulhastings.com
`
`DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP
`
`/s/ Francis DiGiovanni
`Francis DiGiovanni (#3189)
`Thatcher A. Rahmeier (#5222)
`222 Delaware Avenue
`Suite 1410
`Wilmington, DE 19899
`(302) 467-4200
`frank.digiovanni@nbr.com
`
`Attorneys for Defendants Enfora, Inc.,
`Novatel Wireless Solutions, Inc., and
`Novatel Wireless, Inc.
`
`4818-8423-6326.1
`
`13
`
`Telit Wireless Solutions Inc. and Telit Communications PLC Exh. 1108 p. 13
`
`

`
`Case 1:14-cv-01103-RGA Document 67 Filed 08/14/15 Page 14 of 15 PageID #: 1942
`
`MORRIS, NICHOLS, ARSHT & TUNNELL LLP
`
`/s/ Jeremy A. Tigan
`Thomas C. Grimm (#1098)
`Jeremy A. Tigan (#5239)
`1201 N. Market Street
`P.O. Box 1347
`Wilmington, DE 19899-1347
`(302) 658-9200
`tgrimm@mnat.com
`jtigan@mnat.com
`
`Attorneys for Defendants Sierra Wireless
`America, Inc. and Sierra Wireless, Inc.
`
`August 14, 2015
`
`OF COUNSEL:
`
`Robert E. Krebs
`Jennifer Hayes
`NIXON PEABODY LLP
`2 Palo Alto Square
`3000 El Camino Real, Suite 500
`Pal Alto, CA 94306-2106
`(650) 320-7700
`rkrebs@nixonpeabody.com
`jenhayes@nixonpeabody.com
`
`Ronald F. Lopez
`NIXON PEABODY LLP
`One Embarcadero Center, Suite 1800
`San Francisco, CA 94111
`(415) 984-8200
`rflopez@nixonpeabody.com
`
`4818-8423-6326.1
`
`14
`
`Telit Wireless Solutions Inc. and Telit Communications PLC Exh. 1108 p. 14
`
`

`
`Case 1:14-cv-01103-RGA Document 67 Filed 08/14/15 Page 15 of 15 PageID #: 1943
`
`August 14, 2015
`
`OF COUNSEL:
`
`David A. Loewenstein
`Clyde A. Shuman
`Guy Yonay
`Karen Livneh
`PEARL COHEN ZEDEK LATZER
`BARATZ LLP
`1500 Broadway
`12th Floor
`New York, NY 10036
`(646) 878-0800
`dloewenstein@pearlcohen.com
`cshuman@pearlcohen.com
`gyonay@pearlcohen.com
`klivneh@pearlcohen.com
`
`MORRIS, NICHOLS, ARSHT & TUNNELL LLP
`
`/s/ Jack B. Blumenfeld
`Jack B. Blumenfeld (#1014)
`Rodger D. Smith II (#3778)
`1201 North Market Street
`P.O. Box 1347
`Wilmington, DE 19899
`(302) 658-9200
`jblumenfeld@mnat.com
`rsmith@mnat.com
`
`Attorneys for Defendant Telit
`Wireless Solutions Inc.
`
`4818-8423-6326.1
`
`15
`
`Telit Wireless Solutions Inc. and Telit Communications PLC Exh. 1108 p. 15
`
`

`
`Case 1:14-cv-01103-RGA Document 67-1 Filed 08/14/15 Page 1 of 21 PageID #: 1944
`
`
`
`EXHIBIT 1
`
`Telit Wireless Solutions Inc. and Telit Communications PLC Exh. 1108 p. 16
`
`

`
`uniquetothe’010,’197,’111,and’802patentsisbeingusedassupportingintrinsicevidence.
`duplication,thepartieshavecitedhereinonlytothe’717patentspecificationexceptinthoselimitedinstanceswhereclaimlanguage
`specificationsowingtotheirstatusascontinuationpatentsmaturingfromacommonpriorityapplication.Toavoidunnecessary
`1Asidefromtheirclaimsets,theasserted’717Patentandthenon-asserted’010,’197,’111,and’802patentsshareidentical
`
`Error!Unknowndocumentpropertyname.
`
`(M2M0002029-2048;M2M0001910-1936;
`
`Pros.Hist.ForAppl.No.12/538,603(Ex.7)
`
`(4:45-50;9:22-54)
`
`’717PatentSpecification(Ex.2)
`
`IntrinsicEvidence
`
`beingauthenticated.”
`communicatorbeforeitreceivesthetransmission
`andthatisstoredontheprogrammable
`avoidduplicationbetweencommunicationdevices),
`acentralauthoritytoensureuniqueness(i.e.,to
`construedas“asequenceofcharactersdesignatedby
`uniquesequenceofcharacters”shouldbefurther
`TheCourt’spriorconstructionof“adesignated,
`
`17:22-24;17:51-54;17:55-57)
`36;14:37-42;14:43-47;14:48-50;17:17-21;
`(13:43-46;13:47-49;14:9-12;14:13-15;14:33-
`’010PatentSpecification(Ex.3)
`
`39;13:40-44)
`60;10:1-4;10:5-11;10:12-37;12:25-28;13:35-
`49;8:53-58;9:22-25;9:35-45;9:46-51;9:52-
`(Abstract;Fig.1;Fig.2;Fig.3;4:45-50;6:40-
`’717PatentSpecification(Ex.2)1
`
`IntrinsicEvidence
`
`(D.I.92at9(C.A.1:12-cv-00030-RGA).)
`designated,uniquesequenceofcharacters.”
`TheCourt’spriorconstruction,namely,“a
`
`assertedclaims)
`(Presentinall
`
`“codednumber”
`
`Defendants’ProposedConstructions
`
`M2MSolutions’ProposedConstructions
`
`ClaimTerm
`
`1.
`No.
`Term
`
`M2MSolutionsLLCv.SierraWirelessAmericaInc.etal.,C.A.No.14-1102-RGA
`
`M2MSolutionsLLCv.TelitWirelessSolutionsInc.,C.A.No.14-1103-RGA
`
`M2MSolutionsLLCv.EnforaInc.etal.,C.A.No.14-1101-RGA
`
`JOINTCLAIMCONSTRUCTIONCHART
`
`EXHIBIT1
`
`Case 1:14-cv-01103-RGA Document 67-1 Filed 08/14/15 Page 2 of 21 PageID #: 1945
`
`Telit Wireless Solutions Inc. and Telit Communications PLC Exh. 1108 p. 17
`
`

`
`2
`
`Error!Unknowndocumentpropertyname.
`
`(M2M0003004-3059)
`
`Pros.Hist.ForAppl.No.10/296,571(Ex.12)
`
`M2M0002153-2169;M2M0002103-2130)
`M2M002212-2230;M2M0002172-2176;
`(M2M002870-2873;M2M002438-2451;
`
`Pros.Hist.ForAppl.No.11/329,212(Ex.8)
`
`M2M0001786-1822;M2M001718-1753)
`
`(M2M0003138;M2M0002936-37)
`Pros.Hist.ForAppl.No.10/296,571(Ex.12)
`
`(M2M0004677-79)
`Pros.Hist.ForAppl.No.13/328,095(Ex.11)
`
`26;M2M0002129)
`M2M0002167;M2M0002140;M2M0002125-
`M2M0002195-99;M2M0002192-93;
`50;M2M0002241;M2M0002225-28;
`(M2M0002757;M2M0002439;M2M0002449-
`Pros.Hist.ForAppl.No.11/329,212(Ex.8)
`
`M2M0001819-22)
`(M2M0001947;M2M0001932-35;
`Pros.Hist.ForAppl.No.12/538,603(Ex.7)
`
`(13:48-51;13:52-55)
`’802PatentSpecification(Ex.6)
`
`(13:40-43;13:44-47)
`’111PatentSpecification(Ex.5)
`
`(24:3-7)
`’197PatentSpecification(Ex.4)
`
`Defendants’ProposedConstructions
`
`M2MSolutions’ProposedConstructions
`
`ClaimTerm
`
`Case 1:14-cv-01103-RGA Document 67-1 Filed 08/14/15 Page 3 of 21 PageID #: 1946
`
`No.
`Term
`
`Telit Wireless Solutions Inc. and Telit Communications PLC Exh. 1108 p. 18
`
`

`
`3
`
`Error!Unknowndocumentpropertyname.
`
`(M2M0004743-4744)
`
`Pros.Hist.ForAppl.No.13/934,763(Exh.9)
`
`(Fig.2;9:41-45;10:8-12)
`
`‘717PatentSpecification(Exh.2)
`
`IntrinsicEvidence
`
`(M2M0004743-4744)
`Pros.Hist.ForAppl.No.13/934,763(Ex.9)
`
`(Fig.2;9:41-45;10:8-12)
`’717PatentSpecification(Ex.2)
`
`Inthealternative,thisclaimlimitationisindefinite.
`
`IntrinsicEvidence
`
`112¶1forlackofwrittendescription.
`transmission,theclaimsareinvalidundersection
`numberorIPaddressinasecond,different
`numberinafirsttransmissionandthetelephone
`Iftheclaimlanguageisconstruedtocoverthecoded
`
`address.
`codednumberandthetelephonenumberorIP
`Asinglewirelesstransmissionthatincludesboththe
`
`indefinitenesscontentions.
`Defendants’writtendescriptionand
`M2MSolutionsdisagrees,however,with
`
`address.”
`codednumberandthetelephonenumberorIP
`wirelesstransmissionthatincludesboththe
`proposedconstruction,namely,“asingle
`M2MSolutionsagreeswithDefendants’
`
`assertedclaims)
`(Presentinall
`
`codednumber”
`addressandthe
`numberorIP
`leastonetelephone
`includingtheat
`transmissions
`“atleastoneofthe
`
`Defendants’ProposedConstructions
`
`M2MSolutions’ProposedConstructions
`
`ClaimTerm
`
`2.
`No.
`Term
`
`Case 1:14-cv-01103-RGA Document 67-1 Filed 08/14/15 Page 4 of 21 PageID #: 1947
`
`Telit Wireless Solutions Inc. and Telit Communications PLC Exh. 1108 p. 19
`
`

`
`4
`
`Error!Unknowndocumentpropertyname.
`
`(M2M0003059)
`Pros.Hist.ForAppl.No.10/296,571(Ex.12)
`
`(M2M0004404)
`Pros.Hist.ForAppl.No.13/801,773(Ex.10)
`
`(M2M0001820;M2M0001933-34)
`Pros.Hist.ForAppl.No.12/538,603(Ex.7)
`
`(13:7-9)
`’802PatentSpecification(Ex.6)
`
`(14:9-14,14:54-59)
`’111PatentSpecification(Ex.5)
`
`(11:38-43)
`
`‘717PatentSpecification(Exh.2)
`
`IntrinsicEvidence
`
`(14:60-65;19:15-20;23:19-24;26:32-37)
`’197PatentSpecification(Ex.4)
`
`(12:58-60;16:33-35;20:8-10;23:36-38)
`’010PatentSpecification(Ex.3)
`
`forlackofwrittendescription.
`session),theclaimsareinvalidundersection112¶1
`stringofmultipledatamessageslastingauser
`transmissionmeanssomethingdifferent(e.g.,a
`TotheextentM2MSolutionscontendsthatone
`
`12:8-16;15:19-26;15:27-34;15:35-39)
`(3:56-61;4:18-23;9:26-34;11:33-37;11:38-43;
`’717PatentSpecification(Ex.2)
`
`IntrinsicEvidence
`
`packet.
`wirelesspacketswitcheddatamessage,i.e.,data
`OneGeneralPacketRadioService(GPRS)or
`
`message(s).
`(GPRS)orwirelesspacketswitcheddata
`OneormoreGeneralPacketRadioService
`
`dependentclaims)
`claim1andits
`(Presentinasserted
`
`message”
`switcheddata
`wirelesspacket
`(GPRS)orother
`RadioService
`GeneralPacket
`comprises]a
`transmitter
`theprogramming
`transmissionsfrom
`wireless
`“[theoneormore
`
`Defendants’ProposedConstructions
`
`M2MSolutions’ProposedConstructions
`
`ClaimTerm
`
`Case 1:14-cv-01103-RGA Document 67-1 Filed 08/14/15 Page 5 of 21 PageID #: 1948
`
`3.
`No.
`Term
`
`Telit Wireless Solutions Inc. and Telit Communications PLC Exh. 1108 p. 20
`
`

`
`5
`
`Error!Unknowndocumentpropertyname.
`
`(Fig.2;10:5-37)
`
`‘717PatentSpecification(Exh.2)
`
`IntrinsicEvidence
`
`description.
`invalidundersection112¶1forlackofwritten
`messageslastingausersession,theclaimsare
`transmissionmeansastringofmultipleSMS
`TotheextentM2MSolutionscontendsthatone
`
`OneSMSdatamessage.
`
`(M2M0003059)
`Pros.Hist.ForAppl.No.10/296,571(Ex.12)
`
`(M2M0001820;M2M0001933-34)
`Pros.Hist.ForAppl.No.12/538,603(Ex.7)
`
`(14:60-65;19:15-20;23:19-24;26:32-37)
`’197PatentSpecification(Ex.4)
`
`(12:55-57;16:30-32;20:5-7;23:33-35)
`’010PatentSpecification(Ex.3)
`
`39)
`10:12-37;10:38-46;15:19-26;15:27-34;15:35-
`8:65-9:6;9:22-34;9:35-45;9:46-51;9:52-60;
`(Fig.1;1:46-61;3:28-34;4:18-23;8:53-64;
`’717PatentSpecification(Ex.2)
`
`IntrinsicEvidence
`
`meaning.
`Noconstructionrequired.Plainandordinary
`
`dependentclaim)
`claim29andits
`(Presentinasserted
`
`messages”
`(SMS)data
`messageservice
`oneormoreshort
`numbercomprise]
`programthestored
`instructionsto
`containing
`transmitter
`theprogramming
`transmissionsfrom
`wireless
`“[theoneormore
`
`Defendants’ProposedConstructions
`
`M2MSolutions’ProposedConstructions
`
`ClaimTerm
`
`Case 1:14-cv-01103-RGA Document 67-1 Filed 08/14/15 Page 6 of 21 PageID #: 1949
`
`4.
`No.
`Term
`
`Telit Wireless Solutions Inc. and Telit Communications PLC Exh. 1108 p. 21
`
`

`
`6
`
`Error!Unknowndocumentpropertyname.
`
`Pros.Hist.ForAppl.No.13/328,095(Exh.11)
`
`(M2M0002030-48;M2M0001951-52;
`Pros.Hist.ForAppl.No.12/538,603(Ex.7)
`
`M2M0011875-11885)
`(M2M0011923-11929;M2M0011901-11914;
`
`(13:10-14;13:15-19;13:20-26;13:27-33)
`’802PatentSpecification(Ex.6)
`
`Pros.Hist.ForAppl.No.13/934,763(Exh.9)
`
`M2M0002103-2130)
`M2M0002153-2169;M2M0002138-2145;
`(M2M0002757-2762;M2M0002438-2451;
`
`Pros.Hist.ForAppl.No.11/329,212(Exh.8)
`
`M2M0001786-1822)
`(M2M0001944-1958;M2M0001910-1936;
`
`Pros.Hist.ForAppl.No.12/538,603(Exh.7)
`
`11:27–11:37)
`8:24-31,47–64;9:12–67;10:5–37;10:56–10:67;
`50;4:45–59;5:32–54;6:4–12;6:64–7:3;7:65–8:7;
`(Fig.1-3;1:46-61;2:9-23;3:46-51;4:13-23;4:38–
`
`‘717PatentSpecification(Exh.2)
`
`(13:10-14;13:15-19;13:20-26)
`’111PatentSpecification(Ex.5)
`
`25:29-35;25:36-43;26:9-16;26:46-51)
`(24:11-20;24:37-45;24:46-56;25:17-20;
`’197PatentSpecification(Ex.4)
`
`18;16:36-40;16:41-45;16:46-52;16:54-59)
`(12:61-65;12:66-13:3;13:4-10;13:11-
`’010PatentSpecification(Ex.3)
`
`11:50-54;12:8-16;13:35-39;13:40-44)
`67;10:5-11;10:12-37;10:60-67;11:33-43;
`9:6;9:12-15;9:22-25;9:35-38;9:46-60;9:61-
`50;5:47-54;5:55-62;7:65-8:7;8:53-58;8:65-
`51;3:56-61;4:13-17;4:18-23;4:24-30;4:45-
`67;2:20-23;2:28-32;2:65-3:7;3:28-34;3:46-
`(Abstract;Fig.1;Fig.2;Fig.3;1:46-61;1:62-
`’717PatentSpecification(Ex.2)
`
`IntrinsicEvidence
`
`IntrinsicEvidence
`
`outgoingwirelesstransmissions.
`programmablecommunicatorislimitedtosendany
`Theexclusivesetofnumberstowhichthe
`
`typesofoutgoingwirelesstransmissions.
`communicatorislimitedtosendingoneormore
`Thesetofnumberstowhichtheprogrammable
`
`assertedclaims)
`(Presentinall
`
`transmissions”
`outgoingwireless
`permittedtosend
`configuredtoand
`deviceis
`communicator
`theprogrammable
`“numberstowhich
`
`Defendants’ProposedConstructions
`
`M2MSolutions’ProposedConstructions
`
`ClaimTerm
`
`Case 1:14-cv-01103-RGA Document 67-1 Filed 08/14/15 Page 7 of 21 PageID #: 1950
`
`5.
`No.
`Term
`
`Telit Wireless Solutions Inc. and Telit Communications PLC Exh. 1108 p. 22
`
`

`
`7
`
`Error!Unknowndocumentpropertyname.
`
`(M2M0004660-4679;M2M0004648-4657)
`
`(M2M0003041-43;M2M0003045)
`Pros.Hist.ForAppl.No.10/296,571(Ex.12)
`
`(M2M0004677-79)
`Pros.Hist.ForAppl.No.13/328,095(Ex.11)
`
`(M2M0011912-13;M2M0011884-85)
`Pros.Hist.ForAppl.No.13/934,763(Ex.9)
`
`M2M0002142-43)
`M2M0002183-87;M2M0002154-58;
`M2M0002244-46;M2M0002213-17;
`(M2M0002439-42;M2M0002263-67;
`Pros.Hist.ForAppl.No.11/329,212(Ex.8)
`
`M2M0001820-21)
`M2M0001955;M2M0001933-34;
`
`Defendants’ProposedConstructions
`
`M2MSolutions’ProposedConstructions
`
`ClaimTerm
`
`Case 1:14-cv-01103-RGA Document 67-1 Filed 08/14/15 Page 8 of 21 PageID #: 1951
`
`No.
`Term
`
`Telit Wireless Solutions Inc. and Telit Communications PLC Exh. 1108 p. 23
`
`

`
`8
`
`Error!Unknowndocumentpropertyname.
`
`(1:46-52;7:42-46;9:38-43)
`
`‘717PatentSpecification(Exh.2)
`
`IntrinsicEvidence
`
`Structure:ASIMCard.
`
`(M2M0002936)
`Pros.Hist.ForAppl.No.10/296,571(Ex.12)
`
`(M2M0011912-13)
`Pros.Hist.ForAppl.No.13/934,763(Ex.9)
`
`(M2M0002757;M2M0002241;M2M0002140)
`Pros.Hist.ForAppl.No.11/329,212(Ex.8)
`
`(14:30-34;14:35-37;14:45-46)
`’802PatentSpecification(Ex.6)
`
`10;18:11-16;18:17-21;18:22-24)
`(14:33-36;14:37-42;14:43-47;14:48-50;18:7-
`’010PatentSpecification(Ex.3)
`
`11;10:12-37;12:25-32;13:10-12)
`58;8:65-9:2;9:35-45;9:46-51;9:52-60;10:5-
`61;5:32-38;5:39-46;5:55-62;7:42-46;8:53-
`(Abstract;Fig.1;Fig.2;Fig.3;1:41-52;1:56-
`’717PatentSpecification(Ex.2)
`
`totheprogrammablecommunicatordevice.”
`Function:“storingauniqueidentifierthatisunique
`
`under35U.S.C.§112¶6.
`Thislimitationisameansplusfunctionlimitation
`
`IntrinsicEvidence
`
`device.
`identifieroftheprogrammablecommunicator
`Amemorylocationforstoringaunique
`
`assertedclaims)
`(Presentinall
`
`“identitymodule”
`
`Defendants’ProposedConstructions
`
`M2MSolutions’ProposedConstructions
`
`ClaimTerm
`
`6.
`No.
`Term
`
`Case 1:14-cv-01103-RGA Document 67-1 Filed 08/14/15 Page 9 of 21 PageID #: 1952
`
`Telit Wireless Solutions Inc. and Telit Communications PLC Exh. 1108 p. 24
`
`

`
`description.
`invalidundersection112¶1forlackofwritten
`meanssomethingotherthanrelaying,theclaimis
`processinginresponsetoanincomingdatamessage
`TotheextentM2MSolutionscontendsthat
`
`(9:2-6)
`
`‘717PatentSpecification(Exh.2)
`
`IntrinsicEvidence
`
`device.
`responsetoarequestforinformationfromaremote
`Relaydatafromthemonitoredtechnicaldevicein
`
`9
`
`17:62-64;18:51-54;18:55-58;19:6-8;19:9-12;
`43;17:44-47;17:48-50;17:55-57;17:58-61;
`17:13-16;17:22-24;17:25-29;17:30-33;17:39-
`16:60-63;16:64-67;17:1-3;17:4-8;17:9-12;
`47;15:48-50;15:51-55;16:23-25;16:26-29;
`15:13-16;15:31-33;15:34-36;15:37-44;15:45-
`8;14:13-16;14:17-20;14:21-23;15:9-12;
`49;13:50-54;13:55-58;13:63-67;14:1-5;14:6-
`13:26-28;13:29-33;13:34-38;13:39-42;13:47-
`(12:48-50;12:51-54;13:19-21;13:22-25;
`’010PatentSpecification(Ex.3)
`
`15:27-34;15:35-39;15:40-44;16:39-43)
`44;14:45-47;14:48-50;14:51-55;15:19-26;
`14:4-9;14:10-15;14:29-31;14:32-34;14:35-
`44;13:45-51;13:52-57;13:58-64;13:65-14:3;
`13:4-9;13:17-23;13:24-28;13:29-34;13:40-
`32;11:33-37;11:38-43;11:50-58;12:16-24;
`10:47-49;10:60-67;11:1-13;11:21-26;11:27-
`9:16-21;9:52-60;10:1-4;10:34-37;10:38-46;
`7:46-64;7:65-8:7;8:53-64;8:65-9:6;9:7-11;
`6:4-12;6:13-16;6:17-21;6:40-53;7:35-41;
`4:60-5:4;5:5-10;5:11-15;5:16-20;5:21-31;
`2:9-16;3:52-61;3:62-65;4:45-50;4:51-59;
`(Abstract;Fig.1;Fig.2;Fig.3;1:6-11;2:1-8;
`’717PatentSpecification(Ex.2)
`
`IntrinsicEvidence
`
`meaning.
`Noconstructi