throbber
Tm: JOL'R.\‘AL or PHARMACOLOGY AND EXP!-:RI.\lI-JNTAL TIHJBAPEUTICB
`Copyright 0 1909 by The Williams dz Wilkins Co.
`
`Vol. 166, No. 2
`Printed in U.S.A.
`
`THE CHOLINERGIC EFFECTS AND RATES OF HYDROLYSIS OF
`CONFORMATIONALLY RIGID ANALOGS OF ACETYLCHOLINE1
`
`C. Y. CHIOU, J. P. LONG, J. G. CANNON AND P. D. ARMSTRONG
`
`Departmenl of Pharmacology, College of Medicine and Division of Medicinal
`C'hemz'slry, College of Pharmacy, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa
`
`Accepted for publication November 18, 1968
`
`ABSTRACT
`
`CIHOU, C. Y., J. P. Loxo, J. G. CANNON AND P. D. ARMSTRONG: The cholincrgic efiects and
`rates of h_vdrol_\'sis of conformationally rigid analogs of acetylcholine. J. Pharmacol. Exp.
`Ther. 166: 243-248, 1969. 2-Acetoxy eyclopropyl
`trimethylammonium iodides (ACTM)
`are 1-onformationally rigid analogs of acetyleholine (ACh) with transoid and cisoid conforma-
`tions. The (+)-!.rans—ACTM had strong musearinic activities on dog blood pressure and
`guinea-pig ileum preparations, suggesting that the transoid form of ACTM was associated
`with its muscarinic activities. The (+),(—)-cis-ACTM was expected to have strong
`nicotiuic activities owing to its cisoid conformation. However, it had negligible nicotinic
`:w1ivil_v on frog rectus abdominis muscle, presumably due to the 1,3-interaction of the
`inetliylcne group of cyclopropane ring with the carbonyl oxygen which is believed to be
`required for nicotinic activities. The potency ratios of muscarinic activities between (+)-
`and (-)-trans-ACTM were very close to those between L(+)- and I>(—)-acetyl-fi-meth_vl-
`choline. The muscarinic activities of ACh and (+)-trans-ACTM on dog blood pressure were
`iuarkcdly potentiated by neostigmine (41-fold and 23-fold, respectively), but that of (—-)-
`lran..s‘-AC'I‘1\I was poorly potcntiated (3-fold). The studies on enzymatic hydrolysis of
`Irrm.<-—ACTM by acetylcholinesterase and cholinesterase revealed that the relative rates of
`h_vdrol_vsis of (+)- and (—)-trans-ACTM by acetylcholinesterasc were 96 and 59% that of
`.~\Ch. With the isomers the hydrolysis rates by cholinesterase were 61 and 34% in relation
`to acetylcholine. These results indicate that the biologic activity of (+)-trans-ACTM is
`potcnliated by neostigmine more than that of (—)-trans-ACTM because the former is a
`lwttw .<ub.-trate for the cholinesterases.
`
`Despite intensive studies on the molecular
`features of acetylcholine (ACh),
`the possible
`biologic importance of conformational isomerism
`remains uncertain. For the elucidation of this
`problem,
`the compounds reported have been
`1) structurally as close to ACh as possible and
`2) conformationally as rigid as possible (Martin-
`Smith at al., 1967). In the present work 2-
`acetoxy cyclopropyl trimethylammonium iodides
`(ACTM) were selected to meet
`the require-
`ments stated above because these compounds
`have a cyclopropane ring in place of the choline
`moiety and are considered to be the smallest
`chemical
`.=tru(-ture among ACh derivatives ca-
`pable
`of
`conferring conformational
`rigidity.
`The transoid and cisoid conformers of ACTM
`are shown in figure 1. The cholincrgic etiects and
`the cholinesterase h_vdrol_vsis of ACTM are re-
`
`Received for publication September 16, 1968.
`‘This work was supported in part by U.S.
`Public Health Service Grants NB-1396, NB—4431
`and NB-06100.
`
`investigation. The rela-
`ported in the present
`tionships of conformational variations and the
`role of the unsubstituted methylene group of
`the cyclopropane ring of ACTM to nicotinic
`and muscarinic effects are also discussed. The
`potentiation by neostigmine of the muscarinic
`activities of
`(+)- and (—)-trans-ACTM on
`dog blood pressure is correlated with their rates
`of enzymatic hydrolysis by acetylcholinesterase
`(AChE) and cholinesterase (ChE).
`
`METHODS. Dog blood pressure preparations.
`Mongrel dogs of either sex, weighing 9 to 13
`kg, were anesthetized with 15 mg/kg of thiopental
`sodium and 250 mg/kg of barbital
`sodium
`administered i.v. The trachea was cannulatcd,
`and the vagi were sectioned. Throughout
`the
`experiments the dogs were artificially ventilated
`with 21 Palmer
`respirator. The right
`femoral
`arterial pressure was measured with a Stalham
`pressure transducer (P23AA) and recorded on an
`Offner Dynograph (type RS). All compounds
`were injected via a polyethylene. catheter
`in-
`
`243
`
`WOCK— EXHIBIT 1021
`
`

`
`244
`
`CHIOU
`
`ET
`
`AL.
`
`Vol.
`
`166
`
`(cid:1)3I
`
`#{149}:Carbon
`:Nitrogen
`:Qxyg(cid:1)n
`zHyd(cid:1)g(cid:1)n
`
`1(cid:1)
`it
`(ACT(cid:1)\I).
`which
`
`1
`
`fhe
`ihe
`cannot
`
`tr
`
`tn(cid:1)oid
`
`(+)-
`
`be
`
`and
`superimposed.
`
`( \.)
`mtl
`(-)-isomers
`
`clsol(l
`
`(B)
`either
`
`onformations
`transoid
`
`of
`
`of 2 iceto(cid:1)v
`cisoid
`ACTM
`
`c(cid:1) clopiop(cid:1)
`constitute
`
`or
`
`1 t(cid:1)
`
`inieth(cid:1)
`two
`
`1
`mirror
`
`immonium
`images
`
`the
`
`in
`
`into
`washed
`all
`
`cases
`was
`
`In
`injected
`(loses
`used
`intervals:
`
`left
`with
`the
`kept
`
`in
`
`0.1
`
`20
`and
`
`of
`
`serted
`rapidly
`saline.
`tions
`The
`4-fold
`by
`(+)-trans-ACTM,
`(-)-trans-ACTM
`for ACh.
`The
`degree
`these
`activity
`of
`\V:LS
`neostiginine
`the
`neostigmine,
`used.
`above
`(cid:1)zg/kg
`anti
`pg/kg
`and
`and
`0.064
`ag/kg
`administrations
`domized,
`bioassay
`line
`
`were
`0.032
`32
`
`and
`
`of
`
`vein
`
`2 ml
`
`were
`and
`femoral
`isotonic
`of
`about
`solu-
`total
`of the
`volume
`at 3 ml.
`constant
`bioassay
`I lie
`and
`pg/kg
`and
`(cid:1)gkg
`(cid:1)zg/kg
`0.4
`potentiation
`
`varied
`
`for
`for
`
`were
`ag/kg
`0.4
`pg/kg
`80
`(cid:1)(cid:1)g/kg
`1.6
`and
`of musearinic
`50
`pg/kg
`addition
`as
`0.008
`
`of
`of
`
`stated
`gig/kg
`(cid:1)zg/kg
`8
`0.016
`and
`The
`used.
`ran-
`were
`parallel-
`
`were
`(hugs
`valid
`
`a
`
`for
`
`by
`compounds
`stlI(li((l. Before
`dose
`levels
`same
`After
`neostiginine,
`of
`(+)-trans-ACTM,
`(-)-trans-ACTM.
`pg/kg
`of ACh
`an(i
`of
`(loses
`criteria
`all
`were met.
`al)(10)ilii(i.(
`muscle
`was
`Burn
`by
`en(
`Is
`1)0111
`solution
`0.23:
`
`I(cid:1)!OfJ
`
`reettis
`
`pipiens
`was
`with
`020;
`
`i.(cid:1)
`rUe!
`al )(lonlinis
`as
`described
`threaded
`at
`frog
`TIingcr’s
`CaCI221LO.
`
`ill
`
`The
`prepamtion.
`iscie
`Rena
`obtained
`from
`(1952).
`The
`muscle
`was
`and
`silperfilsed
`(NaCI.
`KC1,
`glucose,
`
`6.43;
`
`026:
`
`XaHCO:.
`
`with
`rate
`
`The
`4 ml/min
`pump
`into
`not
`
`was
`
`at
`
`the
`
`in
`
`by
`
`02-.
`flow
`was
`RD
`stream
`than
`initial
`con-
`on
`
`95%
`of
`and
`(type
`the
`niore
`an
`by
`grams
`recorded
`RS).
`in
`drugs
`in-
`and
`(cid:1)g
`for
`
`40
`and
`400
`
`in
`and
`(type
`prepared
`of
`4-fold
`(cid:1)g
`800
`(cid:1)g
`
`oxygenated
`this was
`g/liter);
`0.71
`room
`temperature.
`5% CO2
`at
`to
`fluid
`of
`superfusion
`3
`was
`motor
`maintained
`a Holter
`by
`solutions
`were
`injected
`45).
`Drug
`fluid
`in
`of
`superfusion
`of
`volumes
`placed
`0.1 ml.
`rectus
`muscle
`The
`developed
`1 g.
`The
`tension
`of
`tension
`tile muscle
`was measured
`traction
`of
`transducer
`GT-03)
`ham
`a Stat
`(type
`Offner
`Dynograph
`on
`recorder
`an
`of
`Solutions
`were
`compounds
`water.
`The
`concentrations
`distilled
`used
`the
`bioassay
`wen
`spaced
`0.4
`(cid:1)g
`and
`1.6
`(cid:1)tg
`for
`tervals:
`160
`(+)-trans-ACTM,
`for
`(cid:1)g
`for
`(-)-trans-ACTM
`(+)
`, (-)-cis-ACTM.
`and
`doses
`drugs
`Guinea-pig
`weighing
`the
`head.
`
`ACh,
`200
`(cid:1)zg
`(cid:1)g
`and
`
`100
`
`administrations
`
`and
`The
`randomized.
`were
`preparations.
`ilemirn
`g were
`500
`stunned
`terminal
`cm
`g
`1
`injection
`
`to
`300
`The
`
`port
`
`ion
`
`approximately
`initial
`The
`
`tension
`methods
`
`3
`
`of
`of
`
`in
`
`was
`
`length,
`placed
`drugs
`
`of
`
`of
`
`pigs
`on
`
`Guinea
`a blow
`by
`the
`ileum,
`used.
`An
`the
`tissue.
`recor(ling
`
`of
`was
`on
`and
`
`(cid:1)
`(cid:1)
`

`
`1969
`
`PHARMACOLOGY
`
`OF ACTM
`
`245
`
`were
`95%
`
`the
`as
`were
`contractions
`of
`in
`described
`the
`with Krebs-bicar-
`superfused
`The
`ilea were
`section.
`KC1,
`0.354;
`CaCl(cid:1)
`solution
`(NaC1,
`6.93;
`bonate
`0.373;
`KH,P04,
`211,0,
`0.163;
`MgSO4,
`0.143;
`2.09;
`glucose,
`NaHCO,,
`g/liter).
`con-
`The
`1.80
`of
`bioassay
`centrations
`in
`drugs
`used
`by
`4-fold
`were
`spaced
`intervals:
`and
`(cid:1)ig
`(+),
`0.004
`for ACh
`10 (cid:1)ig
`(cid:1)g
`for
`and
`and
`The
`of
`administration
`drugs
`(-)-cis-ACTM.
`The
`relative
`p0-
`and
`doses
`randomized.
`tencies
`confidence
`of
`and
`limits
`and
`(+)-
`(-)-trans-ACTM
`were
`from
`et
`Armstrong
`cited
`al.
`(1968).
`method
`cholinesterase
`titration
`Radiometer
`hy-
`during
`the
`acid
`formed
`The
`activity.
`acetic
`0J)5 N NaOH
`titrated
`with
`of
`esters
`was
`drolysis
`on
`a Radiometer
`titrator
`and
`titri-
`TTT1c
`type
`graph
`One
`of
`milliliter
`type
`SBR2c.
`potassium
`(0.3676
`1 ml
`ml;
`hydrogen
`phthalate
`g/200
`=
`0.05 N NaOH
`j(cid:1)mo1
`of NaOH)
`was
`titrated
`with
`From
`under
`N,
`gas.
`this
`titration
`curve,
`the
`the
`calibrated
`ordinate
`of
`was
`titrigraph
`chart
`directly
`in micromoles
`of NaOH
`used,
`which
`equivalent
`to micromoles
`of
`acetic
`liberated
`acid
`from
`esters
`by
`cholinesterases.
`The
`values
`were
`expressed
`in micromoles
`hour
`per
`of
`per
`unit
`1.0 U/mI
`The
`enzyme
`was
`prepared
`used
`enzyme.
`without
`NaHCO,
`in Krebs.-bicarbonate
`solution
`(7.5 X 10’ M NaCl,
`7$ X 10’ M KG!
`4 X
`and
`10’
`M MgCl,(cid:1)6H(cid:1)0).
`The
`substrate
`solutions
`the
`were
`prepared
`with
`same
`solution
`in
`a
`con-
`5.6 X 10’ M. The
`total
`volume
`of
`centration
`of
`The
`reaction
`con-
`the
`reactants
`was
`1 ml.
`vessel
`0.8 ml
`the
`7.0.
`The
`tained
`of
`enzyme
`at
`sample
`the
`substrate
`(02
`ml)
`was
`added
`through
`and
`hole,
`the
`reaction
`mixture
`was
`titrated
`pH 7.0 at
`10 mm.
`The
`the
`38#{176}Cfor
`in
`reaction
`vessel
`replaced
`by N, gas.
`was
`in
`The
`Drugs
`used.
`drugs
`used
`sulfate,
`ACh
`bromide,
`atropine
`methyl
`sulfate
`d-tubocurarine
`
`last
`
`9
`
`is
`
`at
`
`the
`0.001
`ig
`
`40
`
`for
`
`pH
`
`air
`
`and
`
`this
`
`were
`study
`neostigmine
`chloride.
`The
`
`et
`
`as
`
`(+),
`and
`(-)-trans-ACTM
`(+)-trans-ACTM,
`by
`synthesized
`iodides
`were
`(-)-cis-ACTM
`doses
`(1968).
`All
`at.
`of
`used
`drugs
`Armstrong
`ob-
`ChE
`form.
`AChE
`salt
`the
`were
`refer
`to
`and
`Nutritional
`Biochemicals
`Corpora-
`from
`tained
`tion with
`specific
`activities
`of
`1000 U/mg
`of
`pro-
`and
`4 U/mg
`tein
`of protein,
`respectively.
`The
`relative
`Statistical
`analysis.
`degree
`of potentiation
`the
`the
`of
`from
`a
`four-point
`calculated
`assay
`described
`by
`Finney
`with
`were
`servations
`evaluated
`(Snedecor,
`1956).
`A probability
`less was
`considered
`to be
`significant.
`
`potencies
`compounds
`parallel-line
`(1955).
`Paired
`Student’s
`value
`
`of
`
`and
`were
`bio-
`ob..
`test
`or
`
`t
`.05
`
`The
`muscarinic
`The
`pressure.
`blood
`fall
`onset
`of
`
`a
`
`of ACTM
`activities
`elicited
`by
`response
`that
`pressure
`in
`was
`duration.
`The
`brief
`and
`95% confidence
`limits
`and
`the
`shown
`are
`(-)-trans-ACTM
`4.7
`(+)-trans-ACTM
`was
`whereas
`than
`ACh,
`(-)-trans-
`as ACh.
`Direct
`only Ms
`potent
`as
`and
`of
`(-)-trans-ACTM
`(+)-
`192
`times
`former
`the
`was
`95% confidence
`latter
`(the
`effects
`of
`The
`depressor
`(+)-
`were
`completely
`and
`ACh
`sulfate.
`of atropine
`of ACTM
`actimties
`1 shows
`the
`relative
`and
`(-)-trans-ACTM
`
`RESULTS.
`dog
`blood
`on
`ACTM
`was
`immediate
`relative
`of
`(+)-
`table
`more
`ACTM
`comparison
`that
`showed
`than
`active
`105-385).
`were
`(-)-trans-ACTM
`2 mg/kg
`blocked
`by
`The muscarinic
`Table
`ileum.
`pig
`of
`activities
`(+)-
`(-)-cis-ACTM
`on
`guinea-pig
`Mo.ooo
`, (-)-cis-ACTM
`was
`significant
`There
`no
`was
`on guinea-pig
`activity
`(+)-trans-ACTM.
`
`in
`potencies
`and
`1. The
`potent
`was
`
`the
`
`(+),
`
`(+)
`ACh.
`muscarinic
`ACh
`and
`
`in
`times
`
`more
`limits
`and
`
`guinea-
`on
`muscarinic
`and
`The
`as
`in
`
`ilea.
`active
`as
`difference
`ileum
`between
`The
`(-)-trans-
`
`The
`
`relative
`
`muscarinic
`
`activities
`
`of
`
`(+)-
`
`1
`TABLE
`(-)-trans-ACTM#{176}
`and
`to acetykholine
`(ACh)
`
`and
`
`(+),
`
`(-)-cis-ACTM
`
`with
`
`respect
`
`Dog Blood
`
`Pressure
`
`Guinea-Pig
`
`fleum
`
`Compound
`
`of
`
`No.
`animals
`
`Relative
`potency
`
`95% Confidence
`limits
`
`of
`
`No.
`animals
`
`Relative
`potency
`
`95% Confidence
`limits
`
`0.81-1.46
`0.0019-0.0025
`0.00004-0.00029
`
`1 1
`
`.136
`0.0O22(cid:1)’
`0.00010
`
`10
`10
`5
`
`3.21-9.79
`0.021-0.025
`
`1 4
`
`.70
`0.023
`
`10
`10
`
`ACh
`(+)-trans-ACTM
`(-)-trans-ACTM
`(+),(-)-cis-ACTM
`
`#{176}ACTM,
`Cited
`
`2-acetoxy
`from
`Armstrong
`
`cyclopropyl
`et al.
`
`trimethylammonium
`(1968).
`
`iodide.
`
`

`
`(cid:1)oo
`
`as
`
`active
`
`as ACh
`
`(Arm-
`
`about
`was
`1968).
`at.,
`et
`of
`activities
`nicotinic
`The
`muscle.
`abdominis
`abdominis
`frog
`rectus
`abolished
`which
`was
`As
`chloride.
`357
`times
`77
`and
`(-)-trans-ACTM,
`and
`comparison
`of
`the
`made,
`and
`was
`4.6
`be
`found
`to
`was
`95% confidence
`limits
`, (-)-cis-ACTM
`was
`
`ACTM
`effect
`muscle
`by
`indicated
`times
`
`5
`
`on
`frog
`of ACTM
`was
`con-
`10-’ M
`x
`table
`2,
`in
`active
`more
`respectively.
`and
`(-)-
`(+)-trans-
`more
`active
`3.3-6.5).
`The
`(cid:1)so
`as
`active
`
`(+)-
`the
`times
`were
`about
`
`246
`
`ACTM
`
`by
`cated
`ACh
`
`strong
`The
`rectus
`the
`on
`traction,
`d-tubocurarine
`ACh
`was
`than
`(+)-
`A
`direct
`trans-ACTM
`ACTM
`(the
`(-F)
`asACh.
`activities
`of muscarinic
`Potentiation
`pressure.
`on
`dog
`blood
`neostigmine
`3,
`the
`muscarinic
`in
`table
`(+)-trans-ACTM
`were
`and
`
`CRIOU
`
`ET
`
`AL.
`
`Vol.
`
`166
`
`and
`
`50 pg/kg
`by
`both
`compounds
`cholinesterases.
`was
`potentiated
`it was
`a
`poor
`
`The
`
`of neostigmine,
`were
`good
`activity
`of
`3-fold
`only,
`substrate
`for
`
`that
`
`41-fold
`23-fold
`that
`indicating
`for
`substrates
`(-)-trans-ACTM
`suggesting
`cholinesterases.
`The
`hydrolysis
`eneymic
`The
`relative
`cholinesterases.
`at
`trans-ACTM
`of ACh
`and
`of 5.6 x 10’ M are
`centration
`indicated
`that
`The
`results
`were
`good
`(+)-trans-ACTM
`(-)-trans-ACTM
`AChE,
`whereas
`than
`(+)-trans-ACTM
`substrate
`The
`rate
`of hydrolysis
`was measured
`concentrations
`of
`x
`10-’ M,
`5.6
`x
`10-’ M,
`32
`10-’ M,
`1.8
`x
`1
`10’
`M.
`substrate
`activity
`were
`curves
`optimum
`rates
`
`of
`
`trans-ACTM
`rates
`of hydrolysis
`the
`substrate
`con-
`shown
`in table
`4.
`both
`ACh
`and
`substrates
`for
`a poorer
`was
`for
`AChE.
`at
`substrate
`1 x
`10’ M,
`x
`10-s M and
`concentration-
`bell-shaped
`a substrate
`
`by
`
`with
`con-
`
`of ACTM
`As
`indi-
`activities
`of
`potentiated
`
`1.8
`x
`The
`obtained
`of hydrolysis
`
`at
`
`TABLE
`activity
`(-F)(cid:1)
`
`nicotinic
`relative
`The
`trans-ACTM#{176}
`and
`respect
`to
`acetylcholine
`abdominis
`muscle
`
`2
`
`of
`(+)-
`(-)-cis-ACTM
`(ACh)
`on
`
`and
`
`frog
`
`(-)-
`with
`rectus
`
`Compound
`
`of
`No.
`Animals
`
`Relative
`Potency
`
`95% Confidence
`Limits
`
`degree
`The
`of
`(+)-
`(ACh)
`
`and
`by
`
`of
`
`3
`TABLE
`activities
`of muscarinic
`potentiation
`acetyicholine
`(-)-trans-ACTM#{176}
`and
`neostigmine”
`on
`blood
`pressure
`
`dog
`
`Compound
`
`of
`
`No.
`Ani.
`,,(cid:1),
`
`Degree
`Potentiation
`
`of
`
`95%
`Confidence
`Limits
`
`41-fold
`23-fold
`2.8-fold
`
`22-100
`11-79
`1.6-5.4
`
`7 7
`
`0.008-0.021
`0.0018-0.0046
`0.0039-0.0047
`
`ACh
`(+)-trans-ACTM
`(-)-tran8-ACTM
`
`ACh
`(+)-trans-ACTM
`(-)-trans-ACTM
`(-)-cis-
`(+),
`ACTM
`
`1
`0.013
`0.0028
`0.0042
`
`10
`10
`5
`
`#{176}ACTM,
`monium
`
`2-acetoxy
`iodide.
`
`cyclopropyl
`
`trimethylam-
`
`2-acetoxy
`#{176}ACTM,
`iodide.
`monium
`b 50 pg/kg
`of neostigmine
`
`cyclopropyl
`
`trimethylam-
`
`methyl
`
`sulfate.
`
`The
`
`rates
`
`of hydrolysis
`
`of
`
`(+)-
`
`and
`
`TABLE
`(-)-lrans-ACTM#{176}
`
`4
`
`and
`
`acetylcholine
`
`(AC/i)
`
`by AChE”
`
`and
`
`ChEC
`
`AChE
`
`ChE
`
`of
`
`No.
`expts.
`
`of
`Rate
`(mean
`
`hydrolysis

`S.E.)
`
`Relative
`hydrolysis
`(mean

`
`rate
`
`of
`
`S.E.)
`
`of
`
`No.
`expts.
`
`of hydrolysis
`Rate

`S.E.)
`(mean
`
`rate
`Relative
`hydrolysis
`(mean

`
`S.E.)
`
`of
`
`pmol/Isr/U
`enzyme
`
`of
`
`33.8
`20.5
`11.3
`
`0.6

`± 0.2
`0.3

`
`100.3
`60.8
`33.5
`
`1.8

`0.7’

`± 0.8’
`
`55 5
`
`99.8
`96.0
`58.9
`
`5.4

`± 4.4(cid:1)’
`± 7.9’
`
`pmol/kr/U
`enzyme
`
`of
`
`9.2
`8.8
`6.2
`

`
`0.5
`0.4

`± 0.9
`
`5 55
`
`Substrate
`
`ACh
`(+)-trans-ACTM
`(-)-trans-ACTM
`
`#{176}ACTM,
`b AChE,
`ChE,
`d P>
`#{149}P <
`
`trimethylammonium
`1 U/nil.
`
`cyclopropyl
`2-acetoxy
`acetyicholinesterase,
`cholinesterase,
`1 U/mi.
`.05 compared
`with
`acetyicholine.
`.05 compared
`with
`acetyicholine.
`
`iodide
`
`at 5.62 X 10’ M.
`
`

`
`1969
`
`PHARMACOLOGY
`
`OF
`
`ACTM
`
`247
`
`x 10-i M for ACh
`as well
`5.6
`(-)-trans-ACTM,
`indicating
`of
`concentration
`(+)-
`inhibits
`of
`
`61
`
`as
`that
`and
`relative
`The
`AChE.
`and
`(-)-trans-
`(+)-
`34% of
`that
`and
`concentration-activity
`of
`by
`ChE
`
`of
`
`high
`
`of
`centration
`and
`for
`(+)-
`a
`high
`substrate
`(-)-trans-ACTM
`hydrolysis
`rates
`of
`were
`ChE
`by
`ACTM
`substrate
`The
`ACh.
`no
`inhibition
`showed
`curves
`concentrations.
`substrate
`It
`is
`that
`DIscussIoN.
`reasonable
`con-
`ACh
`molecule
`flexible
`the
`the
`thus
`is
`capable
`formations
`and
`been
`has
`types
`of ACh
`receptors.
`different
`is
`that
`the
`cisoid
`form
`suggested
`asso-
`with
`its
`nicotinic
`activity
`transoid
`ciated
`1956;
`muscarinic
`activity
`with
`form
`1966).
`1962;
`Archer
`Smissman
`at.,
`et
`this
`on
`expected
`hypothesis,
`it would
`Based
`(fig.
`1A)
`transoid
`form
`of
`ACTM
`the
`that
`mainly
`muscarinic
`responses
`and
`elicit
`would
`form
`(fig.
`1B)
`mainly
`nicotinic
`re-
`cisoid
`the
`The
`results
`indicate
`that
`this
`true
`sponses.
`(table
`1)
`but
`for
`for muscarinic
`responses
`nicotinic
`responses
`(table
`2).
`Therefore,
`some
`factors
`other
`than
`isomerism
`be
`cis-trans
`involved
`in determining
`nicotinic
`activity.
`Structurally,
`ACTM
`acetyl
`is
`similar
`to
`acetyl-
`methyicholine
`and
`resembles
`a hybrid
`of
`acetyl-
`a-methylcholine
`(A-a-MCh)
`and
`which
`(A-/3-MCh),
`both
`of
`/3-methyicholine
`Simonart
`by
`have
`been
`synthesized
`and
`studied
`The
`pre-
`(1932)
`and Major
`and Bonnett
`(1935).
`is
`dominant
`muscarinic
`activity
`of A-f3-MCh
`presumably
`due
`the
`to
`the
`1,3-interaction
`of
`/3-methyl
`group
`with
`the
`carbonyl
`oxygen,
`which
`the
`nicotinic
`activity
`is
`required
`for
`and Holland,
`1961a,b;
`Sekul
`1963;
`et
`al,
`(Sekul
`Coleman
`at.,
`1965;
`Triggle,
`1968),
`whereas
`et
`the
`predominant
`nicotinic
`activity
`of A-a-MCh
`the
`is
`probably
`to
`the
`1,3-interaction
`of
`a-methyl
`with
`ether
`which
`the
`oxygen
`is
`required
`the
`muscarinic
`activity
`(Ing
`at.,
`et
`at.,
`1952;
`Waser,
`1961;
`Beckett
`Triggle,
`1961;
`1965).
`shown
`in
`figure
`the
`methylene
`group
`of
`cyclopropane
`of
`oxy-
`ACTM
`would
`interact
`with
`the
`carbonyl
`gen
`not
`with
`the
`ether
`oxygen.
`Therefore,
`but
`the
`methylene
`group
`abolishes
`nicotinic
`activity
`of
`ACTM.
`Accordingly,
`ACTM
`structurally
`similar
`to A-/3-MCh
`not
`MCh.
`studies
`on
`cholinergic
`effects
`ACTM
`the
`present
`work
`support
`this
`
`to
`
`has
`
`to
`
`of
`
`assume
`different
`fitting
`It
`of ACh
`and
`the
`(Schueler,
`et
`at.,
`be
`
`is
`not
`
`must
`
`due
`group
`for
`
`The
`in
`
`As
`the
`
`et
`1,
`ring
`
`the
`
`but
`
`is
`
`A-a-
`of
`con-
`
`1)
`
`1)
`
`is
`
`(table
`to
`
`the
`
`2).
`
`a
`
`is
`
`is
`
`a
`
`of
`
`In
`
`hydrolysis
`that
`for
`
`(+)-
`AChE
`as ACh.
`fast
`for
`substrate
`is
`hydrolysis
`hy-
`rates
`of
`by CItE
`4).
`These
`the musca-
`(-)-trans-
`41-fold,
`3).
`
`strong
`has
`(+)-trans-ACTM
`because
`clusion
`weak
`very
`but
`(table
`activity
`muscarinic
`words,
`other
`In
`2).
`(table
`activity
`nicotinic
`muscarinic
`predominant
`has
`(+)-trans-ACTM
`transoid
`con-
`to
`owing
`activity
`(table
`its
`proper
`fitting
`for
`favorable
`formation,
`which
`addition,
`the
`In
`receptor.
`with
`the
`muscarinic
`1 , 3-interaction
`group
`of
`the
`methylene
`of
`oxygen
`elimi-
`the
`carbonyl
`with
`trans-ACTM
`cis-ACTM
`activity.
`The
`the
`nicotinic
`nates
`cisoid
`to
`due
`not
`a muscarinic
`its
`stimulant
`nicotinic
`it
`1),
`is
`nor
`conformation
`of
`the
`1,3-interaction
`the
`due
`stimulant
`oxygen
`the
`carbonyl
`group
`methylene
`with
`suggesting
`hypothesis
`opposite
`The
`(table
`nicotinic
`of ACh
`favors
`form
`transoid
`the
`that
`form
`muscarinic
`ac-
`cisoid
`activities
`and
`Canepa
`1966)
`1957;
`(Jellineck,
`tivities
`et
`at.,
`present
`study
`the
`in
`because
`is unlikely
`(+)-
`muscarinic
`activities.
`strong
`had
`trans-ACTM
`there
`that
`is about
`to
`note
`It
`is
`interesting
`in
`the muscarinic
`activities
`250-fold
`difference
`D(-)-A-/3-MCh
`on
`guinea-
`and
`between
`L(+)-
`blood
`pressure
`(Beckett
`cat
`pig
`ileum
`and
`et
`at.,
`It
`1963).
`been
`1961;
`Beckett
`et
`has
`at.,
`difference
`in
`activity
`due
`suggested
`that
`the
`group
`in
`to
`the
`/3-methyl
`D(-)-A-/3-MCh,
`the
`proper
`interaction
`with
`its
`which
`prevents
`This
`hypothesis
`is
`further
`muscarinic
`receptor.
`a
`present
`work,
`there
`is
`as
`supported
`in
`the
`in muscarinic
`be-
`difference
`activities
`similar
`(-)-trans-ACTM
`(192-fold
`tween
`and
`(+)-
`and
`330-fold
`differences
`in
`activities
`on
`dog
`blood
`and
`guinea-pig
`ileum,
`respec-
`pressure
`tively).
`The
`ACTM
`AChE
`is
`trans-ACTM
`is hydrolyzed
`it
`since
`(-)-Trans-ACTM
`AChE
`since
`59%
`that
`of
`drolysis
`and
`are
`61
`explain
`results
`activities
`rinic
`are
`ACTM
`and
`23-fold
`words,
`other
`trans-ACTM
`than
`more
`the
`former
`
`studies
`by
`
`on
`
`a
`
`as
`
`of
`
`enzymic
`the
`and
`reveal
`CItE
`substrate
`good
`by AChE
`poorer
`a
`is
`rate
`relative
`its
`relative
`of ACh.
`The
`and
`(-)-trans-ACTM
`(+)-
`(table
`34% that
`of ACh
`that
`the
`observation
`and
`of ACh
`and
`(+)-
`neostigmine
`potentiated
`by
`3-fold,
`respectively
`(table
`the
`muscarinic
`activity
`is
`potentiated
`by
`of
`(-)-trans-ACTM
`better
`substrate
`
`that
`is
`
`a
`
`of
`(+)-
`neostigmine
`because
`the
`cho-
`
`for
`
`

`
`248
`
`CHIOU
`
`ET
`
`AL.
`
`Vol.
`
`166
`
`Since
`
`the
`
`the
`than
`more
`are much
`enzyme
`preparations,
`that
`the
`degrees
`activities
`of
`in
`the
`of
`
`of
`
`intact
`latter.
`linesterases
`iso-
`animals
`than
`complex
`the
`lated
`ex-
`not
`would
`one
`bio-
`of
`potentiation
`of
`pect
`neostigmine
`by
`the
`logic
`drugs
`in magni-
`the
`difference
`and
`measured
`vivo
`rates
`of
`relative
`tude
`enzymatic
`hy-
`these
`compounds
`measured
`drolysis
`vitro
`in
`the
`It
`should
`be
`true,
`however,
`be
`would
`same.
`relative
`rates
`of
`hydrolysis
`of
`these
`the
`that
`cholinesterases
`and
`the
`degrees
`of
`by
`esters
`the
`of
`muscarinic
`activities
`of
`potentiation
`these
`compounds
`by
`neostigmine
`are
`the
`in
`in
`same
`order
`this
`study:
`that
`and
`the
`case
`ACh
`(-I-)-trans-ACTM>
`(-)-trans-ACTM.
`The
`activities
`of
`2-acetoxy
`CONCLUSIONS.
`cyclopropyl
`trimethylammonium
`iodide
`(ACTM)
`been
`studied
`pharmacologic
`and
`enzymologic
`had
`strong
`muscarinic
`trans-ACTM
`but
`The
`weak
`nicotinic
`activities.
`had
`negligible
`muscarinic
`nicotinic
`The
`these
`ties.
`reasons
`of
`possible
`The
`potency
`have
`been
`discussed.
`muscarinic
`activities
`between
`(+)-
`to
`were
`fairly
`close
`trans-ACTM
`n(-)
`-acetyl-/3-methylcholine.
`L (+)-
`relative
`hydrolysis
`of
`by
`ACh
`and
`tentiation
`order:
`ACTM.
`
`a
`of
`number
`The
`systems.
`activities
`css-ACTM
`activi-
`findings
`ratios
`and
`(-)-
`between
`The
`and
`po-
`same
`
`ACTM
`degrees
`had
`
`the
`(-)-trans-
`
`have
`
`in
`
`is
`
`and
`
`and
`of
`rates
`cholinesterases
`biologic
`of
`their
`(+)-trans-ACTM>
`
`ACh
`
`the
`effects
`
`those
`
`of
`
`of
`
`REFERENCES
`Lzwis,
`A. M.
`S., L(cid:1)s,
`AND
`ARCHER,
`methiodides.
`2-acetoxytropine
`meric
`Chem.
`5:
`1962.
`423-430,
`Pharm.
`J. G. AND
`ARMSTRONG, P. D.,
`CANNON,
`of
`analogs
`Conformationally
`rigid
`65-66,
`Nature
`(London)
`220:
`1968.
`A. H., HANPER, N.
`J. AND CLITHEBOw,
`BECKZrT,
`The
`W.:
`absolute
`configuration
`the
`and
`a-
`fi-methylcholine
`acetyl
`isomers
`and
`their
`15:
`succinylesters.
`Pharm.
`Pharmacol.
`361,
`1963.
`A. H.,
`N.
`HARPER,
`BECKETT,
`LERszit, W.:
`Muscarinic
`AND
`189:
`(London)
`671-673,
`1961.
`
`Iso-
`T. R.:
`J. Med.
`
`J. P.:
`LoNG,
`acetylcholine.
`
`J.
`and
`and
`349-
`
`J.,
`
`CLITHEROW
`receptors.
`
`J. W.
`(cid:1)ature
`
`J.
`
`Pharmacology,
`Oxford,
`1952.
`P.
`AND
`substrates
`other
`(London)
`
`Blackwell
`
`SORUM,
`of
`
`H.:
`cholin-
`
`210:
`
`907-909,
`
`Hou(cid:1),
`of
`J.
`
`W. C.:
`several
`sub-
`Pharmacol.
`
`Design
`of Chicago
`
`and
`Its
`Press,
`
`Sta-
`Chi-
`
`P.
`
`D. P.
`Wn(cid:1)u(cid:1)ss,
`TUDoR
`AND
`relationship
`structure-action
`J. Pharmacol.
`Chem-
`Brit.
`
`Acta
`
`muscarine.
`
`of
`1957.
`Preparation
`T.:
`H.
`acetyl
`and
`dextro-
`J. Amer.
`Chem.
`
`F.
`
`10:
`
`The
`
`: Practical
`J. H.
`BURN,
`Scientific
`Publications,
`G.,
`CANEPA,
`PAULINO
`Structure
`of ACh
`and
`Nature
`ergic
`systems.
`1966.
`(cid:1)n
`M. E., Htmrs, A. H.
`Cotmi(cid:1)x,
`Nicotine-like
`stimulant
`actions
`stituted
`phenylcholine
`ethers.
`66-70,
`Ther.
`148:
`Exp.
`1965.
`FINNEY,
`J.:
`D.
`Experimental
`tistical
`Basis,
`University
`cago,
`1955.
`ING, H.
`R., KORDIK,
`H.:
`on
`the
`Studies
`of
`the
`group.
`choline
`other.
`7:
`103-116,
`1952.
`F.:
`Structure
`JELLINECK,
`Crystallogr.
`277-280,
`T.
`MAJOR,
`R.
`BONNETT,
`of
`acetyl
`and
`properties
`levo-p-methylcholine
`chloride.
`57:
`2125-2130,
`Soc.
`1935.
`G. A.
`M.,
`S(cid:1)tm,
`MARTIN-SMITH,
`STENLAK.E,
`AND
`conformational
`role
`possible
`of
`J.
`B.:
`the
`biological
`actions
`of
`acetyl-
`in
`isomerism
`1967.
`choline.
`J. Pharm.
`Pharmacol.
`561-589,
`19:
`F. W.:
`analogs
`Two
`cyclic
`of
`acetyl-
`SCHUELER,
`J.
`Amer.
`Pharm.
`Ass.
`Ed.
`45:
`choline.
`Sci.
`197-199,
`1956.
`Snxur(cid:1),
`A. A.
`(cid:1)eo
`HOLLAND,
`certain
`of
`pressor
`effect
`of
`choline.
`J. Pharmacol.
`318, 1961a.
`A. A.
`SEKUL,
`AND
`of
`senecioylcholine.
`171-175,
`132:
`A. A.,
`SEKuL.,
`Relationship
`intensity
`Arch.
`1963.
`SIMONART,
`of choline.
`1932.
`L.,
`W.
`E.
`SMISs(cid:1),
`NELSON,
`DAY,
`L.:
`Conformational
`AND
`receptor
`sites.
`The
`acetylcholine
`methylammonium-2-acetoxy-trans-decalin
`lides
`and
`the
`isomeric
`a,fl-dimethylacetylcholine
`J. Med.
`9:
`halides.
`Chem.
`458-465,
`1966.
`SNEDECOR, G. W.:
`Statistical
`Methods,
`1956.
`Iowa
`State
`College
`Press,
`Tiuaoi(cid:1),
`D.
`J.:
`of Autonomic
`Chemical
`Nervous
`System,
`pp.
`Academic
`Press,
`New
`York,
`1965.
`WASER,
`P. G.:
`muscarine,
`pounds.
`
`W. C.:
`unsaturated
`Ther.
`Exp.
`
`Comparative
`esters
`acid
`313-
`133:
`
`HOLLAND,
`J.
`
`W. C.:
`Pharmacol.
`
`Pharmacology
`Exp.
`
`Ther.
`
`1961b.
`HOLLAND,
`between
`of nicotine
`like
`Pharmacodyn.
`
`Int.
`
`(cid:1)xi
`
`HOUSE,
`C.
`W.
`structure
`electronic
`choline
`of
`action
`Th#{233}r.141:
`
`R.:
`and
`esters.
`404-411,
`
`A.: On
`the
`J. Pharmacol.
`
`action
`
`of
`Exp.
`
`certain
`Ther.
`
`derivatives
`46:
`157-193,
`
`E.,
`J.
`
`LAPnrns,
`aspects
`isomeric
`
`J. B.
`of
`
`3-tn-
`ha-
`
`5th
`
`ed.,
`
`Ames,
`Aspects
`74-165,
`
`Chemistry
`muscarone
`Pharmacol.
`
`Rev.
`
`and
`
`and
`13:
`
`pharmacology
`some
`related
`465-515,
`1961.
`
`of
`com-
`
`(cid:1)
`(cid:1)
`(cid:1)

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket