throbber
(2560-1016
`
`Cisco v. TQ Delta
`
`Page 1 of 5
`
`CSCO-1016
`Cisco v. TQ Delta
`Page 1 of 5
`
`

`
`Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
`
`Goralski, Walter
`ADSL and DSL technologies I Walter Goralski.
`p.
`cm.
`Includes index.
`ISBN 0-07-024679-3
`1. Telephone switching systems, Electronic. 2. Digital
`I. Title.
`communications. 3. Telecommunication-Standards.
`TK6397.G65 1998
`621.387-dc21
`
`98-5178
`CIP
`
`McGraw-Hill
`A Division ofTheMcGraw·HiUCompanies ~
`
`Copyright © 1998 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
`Printed in the United States of America. Except as permitted under the United
`States Copyright Act of 1976, no part of this publication may be reproduced or
`distributed in any form or by any means, or stored in a data base or retrieval
`system, without the prior written permission of the publisher.
`
`5 6 7 8 9 0 DOC/DOC 9 0 3 2 1 0 9
`
`ISBN 0-07-024679-3
`
`The sponsoring editor for this book was Steven Elliot and the production
`supervisor was Sherri Souffrance. It was set in Century Schoolbook by Douglas
`& Gayle, Limited.
`
`Printed and bound by R. R. Donnelley & Sons Company.
`
`McGraw-Hill books are available at special quantity discounts to use as
`premiums and sales promotions, or for use in corporate training programs.
`For more information, please write to Director of Special Sales, McGraw-Hill,
`11West19th Street, New York, NY 10011. Or contact your local bookstore.
`
`Information contained in this work has been obtained by The McGraw-Hill
`Companies, Inc. ("McGraw-Hill") from sources believed to be reliable. However,
`neither McGraw-Hill nor its authors guarantees the accuracy or completeness
`of any information published herein and neither McGraw-Hill nor its authors
`shall be responsible for any errors, omissions, or damages arising out of use of
`this information. This work is published with the understanding that
`McGraw-Hill and its authors are supplying information but are not attempt(cid:173)
`ing to render engineering or other professional services. If such services are
`required, the assistance of an appropriate professional should be sought.
`
`0
`
`This book is printed on recycled, acid-free paper containing a minimum of 50%
`recycled de-inked fiber.
`
`Page 2 of 5
`
`

`
`The Asymetric Digital Subscriber Line (ADSL) Architecture
`
`187
`
`-
`
`nple QAM example
`ves. If the four am(cid:173)
`ent signal types are
`ides combined with
`\1 sin (Ft) + Al cos
`Y signal types. This
`duced in all modem· ·
`ne). A sample "con(cid:173)
`'.luch more common
`>ws have been used
`ices.
`12 different phase
`;ine components (a
`signal, in this case
`3 greater (or fewer)
`ie number of phase
`:illation points and
`ke all multibit en(cid:173)
`ls that can be dis-
`
`ital video informa-
`into 4-bit nibbles
`~AM/CAP with 16
`'he nibbles are fed
`amplitudes for the
`
`. modulator, which
`:i.tor actually com-
`
`1al
`bits)
`
`bines the appropriate amplitudes of the sine and cosine of the carrier fre(cid:173)
`quency, thus creating the phase and amplitude shifts associated with the
`correct constellation point. Finally, the signal is filtered to assure that it
`does not interfere with other channels. Note that the resulting signal con(cid:173)
`tains substantial energy at the carrier frequency; this should not be sur(cid:173)
`prising.
`
`DMTforADSL
`
`ADSL devices (the ATU-C and ATU-R) have been built that use QAM,
`CAP, and DMT technology as line codes. However, the official standard
`line code for ADSL is DMT, as defined by the American National Stan(cid:173)
`dards Institute ANSlTl.413 standard in 1995 for ADSL. Although DMT
`is often said to be "newer" than CAP or QAM, DMT was actually invented
`years ago by Bell Labs. DMT was never implemented until recently for
`many reasons, not the least of which was that CAP and QAM were suffi(cid:173)
`cient for all telecommunications purposes common at the time.
`DMT works by first dividing the entire b,andwidth range on the for(cid:173)
`merly analog passband limited local loop into a large number of equally
`spaced subchannels. Technically, they are called subcarriers, but many
`people still call them subchannels. Above the preserved baseband analog
`signaling range, this bandwidth usually extends to 1.1 MHz. The entire
`1.1 MHZ bandwidth is divided into 256 subchannels, starting at 0 Hz.
`Each subchannel occupies 4.3125 kHz, giving a total bandwidth of 1.104
`MHz on the loop. Some of the subchannels are special, and others are not
`used at all. For example, channel #64 at 276 kHz is reserved for a pilot
`signal.
`Most DMT systems use only 250 or 249 subchannels for information.
`The lower subchannels, #1 through #6 in most cases, are reserved for 4
`kHz passband analog voice. Because 6 times 4.3125 Hz is 25.875 kHz, it
`is common to see 25 kHZ as the starting point for ADSL services. Note
`that a wide guardband is used between the analog voice and the DMT sig(cid:173)
`nals. In addition, the signal loss at the upper subchannels, such as #250
`and above, is so great that it is difficult to use them for information trans(cid:173)
`fer on long loop at all.
`There are 32 upstream channels, usually starting at channel #7, and
`250 downstream channels, which gives ADSL its distinct asymmetric
`bandwidth. Each of the subchannels is 4.3125 kHz wide, of course, and
`only when echo cancellation is used are there actually 250 downstream
`
`Page 3 of 5
`
`

`
`TheAsymetI --(cid:173)
`
`Figure 8-6
`DMT in operatior
`
`-
`
`188
`
`Chapter Eight
`
`subchannels. When only FDM is used for echo control, there are typically
`32 upstream c~annels and only 218 or less downstream channels because
`they no longer overlap. The upstream channels occupy the lower end of
`the spectrum for two reasons. First, the signal attenuation is less here,
`and customer transmitters are typcially lower-powered than local ex(cid:173)
`change transmitters, which is a concern. Second, there is more noise at
`the local exchange with the possibility of crosstalk, so it only makes sense
`to use the lower portions of the frequency range for the upstream signals.
`When ADSL devices that employ DMT are activated, each of the sub(cid:173)
`channels is "tested" by the end devices for attenuation. In actual practice,
`the "testing" is a complex kind of handshaking procedure, and the para(cid:173)
`meter used is gain (the reciprocal of the attenuation). The noise present
`in each of the subchannels is measured as well.
`Not all of the subchannels are used for information transfer, as men(cid:173)
`tioned above. Some are reserved for network management and perfor(cid:173)
`mance measurement functions. For instance, in the downstream direction,
`only 249 of the 256 subchannels available downstream are typically used
`for information. transfer.
`Usually, each of the numerous subchannels employs its own coding
`technique based on QAM. This may strike some as odd, given the fervor
`that vendors have when seeking to distinguish CAP/QAM and DMT. Nev(cid:173)
`ertheless, there obviously is at some of QAM in DMT. The real attraction
`of DMT is not so much that it is different than CAP and QAM, but rather
`that based on DMT's performance monitoring, some subchannels will
`carry more bits per baud than others. The total throughput is the sum of
`all the QAM bits sent on all the active subchannels (some may be com(cid:173)
`pletely "turned off").
`Moreover, all of the subchannels are constantly monitored for perfor(cid:173)
`mance and errors. The speed of an individual subchannel or group of sub(cid:173)
`channels can actually vary, giving DMT a granularity of 32 kbps. In other
`words, a DMT device might function at 768 kbps or 736 kbps (that is, 32
`kbps less), depending on operational and environmental conditions. Just
`by way of comparison, CAP devices usually offer 340 kbps granularity
`(768 kbps or 428 kbps), but pure QAM can offer granularity as fine as 1
`bps, which means that there is nothing that technically limits CAP/QAM
`to one level of granularity but not another. In fact, some vendors of CAP(cid:173)
`based ADSL equipment have claimed 32 kbps granularity, and even
`RADSL capabilities, for their latest products. It should be noted that
`these CAP RADSL products modify their spectrum when the rate
`changes, and now become a real issue to manage with regard to spectral
`compatibility.
`
`Page 4 of 5
`
`

`
`---(cid:173)
`
`Figure 8-6
`DMT in operation
`
`tpter Eight
`
`' are typically
`mels because
`lower end of
`L is less here,
`:ian local ex(cid:173)
`nore noise at
`makes sense
`ream signals.
`:h of the sub(cid:173)
`tual practice,
`md the para(cid:173)
`:ioise present
`
`sfer, as men(cid:173)
`G and perfor(cid:173)
`am direction,
`ypically used
`
`; own coding
`en the fervor
`LdDMT. Nev(cid:173)
`'al attraction
`v.I, but rather
`hannels will
`is the sum of
`may be com-
`
`'d for perfor-
`51"ou p of sub(cid:173)
`bps. In other
`s (that is, 32
`.ditions. Just
`granularity
`·as fine as 1
`;s CAP/QAM
`dors ofCAP(cid:173)
`;y, and even
`"noted that
`en the rate
`d to spectral
`
`The Asymetric Digital Subscriber Line (ADSL) Architecture
`
`189
`
`Ideal bits/channel
`
`Typical Loop Gain
`
`Actual bits/channel
`
`Frequency Range
`
`Frequency Range
`
`Frequency Range
`
`Ideal bits/channel
`
`Real Loop Gain
`
`Typical bits/channel
`
`Frequency Range
`
`Frequency Range
`
`Frequency Range
`
`("Notch" from bridged tap
`Noise from AM radio station)
`
`Experts generally concede that finer granularity is a benefit that can
`maximize user acceptance and deployment situations.
`
`Discrete Multitone (DMT)
`Operation
`
`Figure 8-6 shows discrete multitone technology in operation in an ADSL
`device on a typical local loop. The figure actually has two parts. The up(cid:173)
`per shows a kind of ideal situation, such as that found in a straight run
`of 24 gauge copper wire less than 18,000 feet without a lot of outside noise
`(good luck finding one of those). The only real attenuation effects come
`from the distances and frequencies involved. The lower part of the figure
`shows a typical local loop in the real world.
`Consider the design ideal first.Across the frequency range, on the left,
`there exists a targeted maximum number of bits per second per subcar(cid:173)
`rier (channel) that the device would like to send and receive. However, the
`middle figure shows the situation on a typical loop. The gain (the recip(cid:173)
`rocal of the attenuation) is better or worse depending on frequency. At
`higher frequencies, distance effects domi:riate; at lower frequencies, im(cid:173)
`pulse noise and crosstalk dominate. This leaves a broad middle range
`(about 25 kHz to 1.1 MHz) for signals, with the gain slowly dropping off
`with increasing frequency.
`
`Page 5 of 5

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket