throbber
Kent State University
`Digital Commons @ Kent State University Libraries
`
`Chemical Physics Publications
`
`Department of Chemical Physics
`
`5-11-1998
`
`Mechanism of Unidirectional Liquid-Crystal
`Alignment on Polyimides with Linearly Polarized
`Ultraviolet Light Exposure
`M. Nishikawa
`
`Bahman Taheri
`Kent State University, bahman@alphamicron.com
`
`John L. West
`Kent State University, jlwest@kent.edu
`
`Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.kent.edu/cpippubs
`Part of the Physics Commons
`
`Recommended Citation
`N sh kawa M.; Taher Bahman; and West John L. (1998). Mechan sm of Un d rect onal L qu d Crystal Al gnment on Poly m des
`w th L nearly Polar zed Ultrav olet L ght Exposure. Applied Physics Letters 72(19) 2403 2405. Retr eved from
`http://d g talcommons.kent.edu/cp ppubs/91
`
`Th s A c e s b oug o you o ee a d ope access by e Depa
`o s @ Ke S a e U ve s y L b a es.
`ca P ys cs a D g a Co
`e o C e
`I as bee accep ed o c us o
` C e
`ca P ys cs Pub ca o s by a au o zed ad
`s a o o D g a Co
`o s @ Ke S a e U ve s y
`L b a es. Fo o e
`o
`a o , p ease co ac ea c a1@ke .edu, k@ke .edu.
`
`Page 1 of 4
`
`Tianma Exhibit 1026
`
`

`
`APPLIED PHYSICS LETTERS
`
`VOLUME 72, NUMBER 19
`
`11 MAY 1998
`
`Mechanism of unidirectional liquid-crystal alignment on polyimides
`with linearly polarized ultraviolet light exposure
`M. Nishikawa,a) B. Taheri, and J. L. Westb)
`Liquid Crystal Institute, Kent State University, Kent, Ohio 44242
`共Received 9 February 1998; accepted for publication 5 March 1998兲
`Unidirectional liquid-crystal 共LC兲 alignment by a linearly polarized ultraviolet light 共UV兲 exposure
`was examined using two types of polyimide 共PI兲. PI with a fluorene unit incorporated in a side chain
`showed LC alignment perpendicular to those of conventional PIs, i.e., perpendicular to the rubbing
`direction and parallel
`to the exposure polarization of UV. The results of the dichroic ratio
`measurement of LC cells, UV absorption spectra, birefringence, infrared absorption spectra, and PI
`conformation calculations using molecular mechanics suggest that the photodecomposition of PI by
`UV exposure produces anisotropic van der Waals forces, which align LC along its optical axis.
`© 1998 American Institute of Physics. 关S0003-6951共98兲00919-X兴
`
`Liquid-crystal 共LC兲 displays 共LCDs兲 are widely used be-
`cause of their low-power consumption, thin profile, and full
`color capability. To fabricate LCDs, unidirectional LC align-
`ment with a controlled pretilt angle is typically produced
`using surface rubbing techniques.1 However, rubbing may
`cause static charge, dust, or scratches, which lower the pro-
`duction yield of LCDs. Methods such as Langmuir–Blodgett
`polymers,3 microgrooves,4
`films,2
`stretched
`stamped
`polymers,5 and linearly polarized ultraviolet light 共UV兲 ex-
`posure of polymers,6 have been proposed, which produce
`unidirectional LC alignment without rubbing. Among them,
`LC alignment using linearly polarized UV exposure is a
`strong candidate for overcoming the above problems in ad-
`dition to greatly simplifying production of multidomain dis-
`plays.
`Two main types of material for LC alignment using a
`polarized UV exposure have been proposed. One is based on
`photoisomerization of azocompounds doped in polymers.7–9
`The other utilizes anisotropic photoreactions of poly共vinyl
`cinnamate兲 derivatives6,10–12 and polyimides 共PIs兲13–15 pro-
`duced by linearly polarized UV exposure. Much effort has
`been devoted to develop photoreactive PIs which show high
`heat resistance compared with those of azocompounds and
`poly共vinyl cinnamate兲 derivatives. However, the mechanism
`of unidirectional LC alignment using PIs exposed to linearly
`polarized UV has yet to be clarified. In this letter, we wish to
`explore the mechanism and characteristics of unidirectional
`LC alignment using UV exposed PIs.
`The PI materials used in these experiment are shown in
`Fig. 1. PI films were prepared by heat curing of precursor
`polyamic acid solutions, which were synthesized from the
`reaction between tetracarboxylic dianhydride and diamines.
`LC cells were prepared to measure dichroic ratios of LCs
`aligned by linearly polarized UV-exposed PI films. PI films
`were deposited by first spin coating dilute solutions of the
`respective polyamic acids on indium tin oxide glass sub-
`strates and then curing at 250 °C for an hour. The thickness
`
`a兲On leave from Yokkaichi Research Laboratories, JSR Co., Yokkaichi, Mie,
`510-0871, Japan. Electronic mail: mnishi@lci.kent.edu
`b兲Electronic mail: johnwest@scorpio.kent.edu
`
`FIG. 1. Chemical structures of PIs used.
`
`of the PI film was controlled at 50 nm. The PI films were
`exposed with linearly polarized UV incident normal to the
`surface. We used a 450 W xenon lamp 共Oriel, model 6266兲
`as the UV source, and a surface film polarizer 共Oriel, model
`27320兲 whose effective range is between 230 and 770 nm.
`The intensity of UV after passing through the polarizer was
`about 6 mW/cm2. LC cells for dichroic ratio measurement
`were fabricated using two polarized UV-exposed substrates
`with parallel polarization axes. Dichroic LC, ZLI-2293
`共Merck兲 and 0.5% M-618 共Mitsuitoatsu, ␭max⫽550 nm兲,
`was filled into the cells in the isotropic state 共120 °C兲. Di-
`chroic ratios of the LC cells were measured using one polar-
`izer and a UV–visible spectrometer, Perkin Elmer Lambda
`19. PI film birefringences were measured using an instru-
`ment described previously.16 Infrared spectra of the PI films
`were measured using an infrared spectrometer, Nicolet 550.
`The LC alignments produced by either rubbing or expo-
`sure to normally incident polarized UV are summarized in
`Table I. PI-1 shows LC alignment parallel to the rubbing
`direction and perpendicular to the UV polarization. This is
`consistent with results reported previously.13,14 PI-2, how-
`ever, aligns LC perpendicular to the rubbing direction and
`
`TABLE I. LC alignment on PIs.
`
`LC alignment direction
`
`PI
`
`PI-1
`PI-2
`
`Rubbing
`
`Parallel
`Perpendicular
`
`Polarized UV
`
`Perpendicular
`Parallel
`
`0003-6951/98/72(19)/2403/3/$15.00
`
`2403
`
`© 1998 American Institute of Physics
`
`Page 2 of 4
`
`

`
`2404
`
`Appl. Phys. Lett., Vol. 72, No. 19, 11 May 1998
`
`Nishikawa, Taheri, and West
`
`FIG. 2. Relationship between UV exposure time and dichroic ratios of LC
`cells on PI films.
`
`parallel to the UV polarization. Figure 2 shows the relation-
`ship between the polarized UV exposure time and dichroic
`ratios of LC cells. Dichroic ratios of LC cells initially in-
`crease logarithmically with UV dosage, and approach a con-
`stant value at higher dosage. Furthermore, PI-2 shows low
`sensitivity to UV exposure compared with that of PI-1.
`To elucidate the LC alignment mechanism, we con-
`firmed the effective axis for LC alignment. Rubbed PI films
`were exposed normally with polarized UV parallel and per-
`pendicular to the rubbing axis for 0–40 min. Figure 3 shows
`the relationship between polarized UV irradiation time and
`dichroic ratios of LC cells. In both PIs, dichroic ratios of LC
`cells exposed with polarized UV parallel to the rubbing di-
`rection gradually decreased with UV irradiation time. On the
`other hand, those with polarized UV exposure perpendicular
`to the rubbing direction showed no change of their dichroic
`ratios. It is well known that the rubbing treatment of the PI
`surface results in the alignment of PI chains parallel to the
`rubbing direction.17 These results suggest that polarized UV
`absorbed parallel to the aligned PI main chains selectively
`causes the photochemical reaction of PI, and results in the
`decreases of the dichroic ratios of the LC cells.
`Changes in the UV absorption spectra of the PI films
`
`FIG. 4. UV absorption spectra of PI films.
`
`before and after polarized UV exposure were monitored. PI
`films on quartz substrates were prepared after polarized UV
`exposure for 2 h at surface normal. Figure 4 shows UV ab-
`sorption spectra of the PI films before and after polarized UV
`exposure. After UV exposure, both PI films showed de-
`creases in the broad absorption around 250 nm, which can be
`attributed to ␲– ␲* transitions of benzene rings in PI, and
`increases in the broad absorption above 290 nm. We have
`not yet determined the photochemical changes in the PI
`films, but it is clear that the broad absorption above 290 nm
`is generated by the decomposition of PI, which corresponds
`to the broad absorption around 250 nm. These phenomena
`have been previously reported on PI material with different
`chemical structure.13
`Figures 5 and 6 show the dichroic UV absorption spectra
`obtained by subtracting absorptions measured parallel (A para)
`and perpendicular (A per) to the rubbing direction and the
`exposed UV polarization, respectively. Dichroic UV absor-
`bance was measured using a surface film polarizer. In the
`case of rubbing 共Fig. 5兲, PI-1 shows a positive dichroic spec-
`trum, and PI-2 shows a negative dichroic spectrum. The be-
`haviors using polarized UV exposure are opposite to those
`produced by rubbing 共Fig. 6兲. Furthermore, it should be
`noted that the subtraction spectra of UV absorption spectra
`
`FIG. 3. Relationship between polarized UV exposure time after rubbing and
`dichroic ratios of LC cells.
`
`FIG. 5. Dichroic UV absorption spectra (A para⫺A per) of rubbed PI films
`measured relative to the rubbing direction.
`
`Page 3 of 4
`
`

`
`Appl. Phys. Lett., Vol. 72, No. 19, 11 May 1998
`
`Nishikawa, Taheri, and West
`
`2405
`
`we conclude that before UV exposure, PI chains in the film
`are randomly aligned. PI chains parallel to the exposed UV
`polarization direction are selectively decomposed by UV ex-
`posure, and photoproducts after UV exposure are randomly
`relocated in the PI films. The residual PI chains perpendicu-
`lar to the exposed UV polarization, which show no photode-
`composition, cause the anisotropic van der Waal forces to
`align the LC along its optical axis. Also, the interplay be-
`tween the main chain and the side fluorene unit leads PI-2 to
`have low sensitivity to polarized UV compared with that of
`PI-1 as shown in Fig. 2.
`
`The authors acknowledge Dr. L. C. Chien, Dr. T. Kosa,
`and Dr. X. D. Wang of Kent State University for material
`synthesis, birefringence measurement, and useful discus-
`sions. They also acknowledge Dr. N. Bessho and Dr. Y.
`Matsuki of JSR Co., Ltd. for their support in this research.
`Research was supported in part by NSF Science and Tech-
`nology Center ALCOM, DMR 89-201747.
`
`1 M. Nishikawa, T. Miyamoto, S. Kawamura, Y. Tsuda, and N. Bessho,
`Proceedings of the 12th International Display Research Conference, 819
`共1992兲.
`2 T. Sasaki, H. Fujii, and M. Nishikawa, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., Part 2 31, L632
`共1992兲.
`3 H. Aoyama, Y. Yamazaki, N. Matsuura, H. Mada, and S. Kobayashi, Mol.
`Cryst. Liq. Cryst. 72, 127 共1981兲.
`4 Y. Kawata, K. Takatoh, M. Hasegawa, and M. Sakamoto, Liq. Cryst. 16,
`1027 共1994兲.
`5 E. S. Lee, P. Vetter, T. Miyashita, T. Uchida, M. Kano, M. Abe, and K.
`Sugawara, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., Part 2 32, L1436 共1993兲.
`6 A. Dyadyusha, V. Kozenkov, T. Marusii, Y. Reznikov, V. Reshetnyak,
`and A. Khizhnyak, Ukr. Fiz. Zh. 36, 1059 共1991兲.
`7 P. J. Shannon, W. M. Gibbons, and S. T. Sun, Nature 共London兲 368, 532
`共1994兲.
`8 Y. Iimura, J. Kusano, S. Kobayashi, Y. Aoyagi, and T. Sugano, Jpn. J.
`Appl. Phys., Part 2 32, L93 共1993兲.
`9 K. Ichimura, Y. Hayashi, H. Akiyama, and T. Ikeda, Appl. Phys. Lett. 64,
`449 共1993兲.
`10 M. Schadt, K. Schmitt, V. Kozinkov, and V. Chigrinov, Jpn. J. Appl.
`Phys., Part 1 31, 2155 共1992兲.
`11 Y. Iimura, T. Saitoh, S. Kobayashi, and T. Hashimoto, J. Photopolym. Sci.
`Technol. 8, 258 共1995兲.
`12 N. Kawatsuki, H. Ono, H. Takatsuka, T. Yamamoto, and O. Sangen, Mac-
`romolecules 30, 6680 共1997兲.
`13 M. Hasegawa and Y. Taira, J. Photopolym. Sci. Technol. 8, 703 共1995兲.
`14 J. L. West, X. D. Wang, Y. Ji, and J. R. Kelly, SID Symp. Dig. 26, 703
`共1995兲.
`15 J.-H. Kim, Y. Shi, S. Kumar, and S.-D. Lee, Appl. Phys. Lett. 71, 3162
`共1997兲.
`16 D.-S. Seo, S. Kobayashi, M. Nishikawa, and Y. Yabe, Liq. Cryst. 19, 289
`共1995兲.
`17 M. Nishikawa, Y. Yokoyama, N. Bessho, D.-S. Seo, Y. Iimura, and S.
`Kobayashi, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., Part 2 33, L810 共1994兲.
`18 M. Nishikawa, N. Bessho, T. Natsui, Y. Ohta, N. Yoshida, D.-S. Seo, Y.
`Iimura, and S. Kobayashi, Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. 275, 15 共1996兲.
`
`FIG. 6. Dichroic UV absorption spectra (A para⫺A per) of UV exposed PI
`films measured relative to the UV polarization.
`
`above 290 nm show no dichroism 共Fig. 6兲. The birefringence
`measurement of PI films after linearly polarized UV expo-
`sure also showed that PI-1 had the optic axis perpendicular
`to the UV polarization, and PI-2 had the optic axis parallel.
`Changes in the PI films before and after polarized UV
`exposure were also monitored using infrared absorption
`spectra. PI films on silicon wafers were normally exposed to
`polarized UV for 2 h. In both PI films, peak intensities at
`1380 cm⫺1 attributed to the ␯(imide C–N–C) decrease and
`those at 1720 cm⫺1 attributed to the ␯(C⫽0) increase after
`UV exposure. These results suggest that imide rings in PIs
`were decomposed by UV exposure, and a new band with
`infrared absorption at around 1720 cm⫺1 was generated by
`the by-product after the decomposition of PI.
`We calculated the conformations of PI-1 and PI-2 using
`the molecular mechanics method 共Fig. 7兲.18 The optical axis
`of PI-1 is aligned along the polymer backbone. On the other
`hand, the fluorene unit in PI-2, which has a large birefrin-
`gence, is aligned perpendicular to the axis of the main chain.
`Through the experiments and simulation in this letter,
`
`FIG. 7. PI conformations calculated using the molecular mechanics method.
`
`Page 4 of 4

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket