throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
` Paper No. 12
` Entered: December 7, 2016
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`
`
`APPLE, INC., MICROSOFT CORPORATION,
`MICROSOFT MOBILE OY, and MICROSOFT
`MOBILE INC. (f/k/a NOKIA, INC.),
`Petitioner,
`
`
`
`v.
`
`EVOLVED WIRELESS LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2016-00981
`Patent 8,218,481 B2
`____________
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Before CHRISTOPHER L. CRUMBLEY, PETER P. CHEN, and
`TERRENCE W. McMILLIN, Administrative Patent Judges
`
`
`McMILLIN, Administrative Patent Judge
`
`
`
`ORDER
`Conduct of the Proceeding
`37 C.F.R. § 42.5
`
`

`
`IPR2016-00981
`Patent 8,218,481 B2
`
`
`On December 6, 2016, the Board held an initial conference call with
`
`the parties, represented by their respective counsel.
`
`The parties indicated that neither party presently intended to ask for
`
`modification of the schedule set forth in the Scheduling Order (Paper 11).
`
`The parties did, however, indicate that they may in the future seek
`
`modification of the present schedule.
`
`The parties indicated that neither party presently intended to request
`
`authorization to file any motions. Patent Owner indicated that it did not
`
`presently intend to file a motion to amend the claims of the patent.
`
`Upon inquiry by the Board, the parties indicated that neither party
`
`presently intended to request that oral hearing (if requested) be held at a
`
`different location than that set forth in the Scheduling Order (Paper 11 at 4),
`
`namely, the San Jose, California, USPTO Regional Office.
`
`Upon inquiry by the Board, the parties provided information
`
`concerning the status of related matters including the District Court litigation
`
`and inter partes reviews (IPRs) involving the parties and the patent. The
`
`parties represented there are presently 18 IPRs which have been filed that
`
`involve Patent Owner and other parties from the related District Court
`
`litigations and relate to patents asserted in those litigations. The parties also
`
`discussed the pending Motion for Joinder or Consolidation filed on
`
`December 5, 2016, in IPR2016-01349 (Paper 8) in which joinder or
`
`consolidation with this proceeding is requested. The parties also reported on
`
`settlement status.
`
`Upon inquiry by the Board, the parties indicated there were no
`
`additional matters which they wished to discuss.
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`
`IPR2016-00981
`Patent 8,218,481 B2
`
`
`Therefore, it is
`
`ORDERED that this matter shall proceed in accordance with the
`
`Scheduling Order entered November 3, 2016 (Paper 11).
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`
`4
`
`IPR2016-00981
`Patent 8,218,481 B2
`
`
`
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`Walter Renner
`Roberto Devoto
`FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
`IPR00035-0010IP1@fr.com
`PTABInbound@fr.com
`
`
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`Cyrus Morton
`Ryan Schultz
`ROBINS KAPLAN LLP
`cmorton@robinskaplan.com
`rschultz@robinskaplan.com

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket