throbber
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`TALARI NETWORKS, INC.,
`
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`FATPIPE NETWORKS INDIA LIMITED,
`
`Patent Owner.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CASE: IPR2016-00976
`Patent No. 6,775,235 B2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`EXCLUSIVE LICENSEE FATPIPE, INC.’S OBJECTIONS TO
`PETITIONER'S EVIDENCE IN A PRELIMINARY PROCEEDING
`UNDER 37 C.F.R. § 42.64(b)(1)
`
`
`
`
`

`
`PTAB Case No. IPR2016-00976, Patent 6,775,235 B2
`Patent Owner's Objections to Petitioner's Evidence
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.64(b)(1), Exclusive Licensee, FatPipe, Inc.,
`
`
`
`hereby timely objects to the evidence submitted by Petitioner, Talari Networks,
`
`Inc., with the Petition for Inter Partes Review (Paper 1) filed April 29, 2016. The
`
`objections are made based on rules under 37 C.F.R. Part 42 on IPR proceedings
`
`and relevant portions of Federal Rules of Evidence (“FRE”) that are applicable to
`
`IPR proceedings under 37 C.F.R. § 42.62.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1.
`
`Patent Owner objects to Exhibit 1011 (William Stallings, “Data and
`
`Computer Communications”) and it should be excluded for at least the
`
`following reasons: the exhibit lacks authentication under FRE 901, 902,
`
`and 903; the exhibit is not relevant under FRE 402 and confuses the issues
`
`and wastes time under FRE 403. Petitioner has purported that Exhibit
`
`1011 bears a prior art qualifying date of 1997. Exhibit 1011, however,
`
`was published in April of 2001.
`
`These objections have been timely filed and served within TEN business
`
`
`
`days of the institution of the trial.
`
`1
`
`

`
`PTAB Case No. IPR2016-00976, Patent 6,775,235 B2
`Patent Owner's Objections to Petitioner's Evidence
`Respectfully submitted,
`
` /Bing Ai/
`Lead Counsel,
`Bing Ai, Reg. No. 43,312
`Back-Up Counsel,
`Douglas Sawyer, Pro Hac Vice
`Timothy Carroll, Pro Hac Vice
`
`Attorneys for Exclusive Licensee
`FatPipe, Inc.
`
`2
`
`Dated: November 17, 2016
`
`
`
`PERKINS COIE LLP
`11988 El Camino Real, Suite 350
`San Diego, CA 92130
`(858) 720-5700
`
`
`
`

`
`PTAB Case No. IPR2016-00976, Patent 6,775,235 B2
`Patent Owner's Objections to Petitioner's Evidence
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that a true copy of the foregoing
`
`EXCLUSIVE LICENSEE FATPIPE, INC.’S OBJECTIONS TO PETITIONER'S
`
`EVIDENCE IN A PRELIMINARY PROCEEDING UNDER 37 C.F.R. §
`
`42.64(b)(1) has been served in its entirety this 17th day of November 2016 by
`
`electronic mail on the Petitioner via its attorneys of record:
`
`Andy H. Chan (chana@pepperlaw.com)
`Charles F. Koch (kochc@pepperlaw.com)
`Thomas F. Fitzpatrick (fitzpatrickt@pepperlaw.com)
`Pepper Hamilton LLP
`333 Twin Dolphin Dr., Suite 400
`Redwood City, CA 94065
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`Dated: November 17, 2016
`
`
`
`PERKINS COIE LLP
`11988 El Camino Real, Suite 350
`San Diego, CA 92130
`(858) 720-5700
`
`
`
` /Bing Ai/
`Lead Counsel,
`Bing Ai, Reg. No. 43,312
`Back-Up Counsel,
`Douglas Sawyer, Pro Hac Vice
`Timothy Carroll, Pro Hac Vice
`
`Attorneys for Exclusive Licensee
`FatPipe, Inc.
`
`
`
`1

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket