throbber
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`___________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`___________________
`
`TALARI NETWORKS, INC.
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`FATPIPE NETWORKS INDIA LIMITED,
`Patent Owner
`
`
`
`___________________
`
`Case No. IPR2016-00976
`Patent 6,775,235 B2
`___________________
`
`PETITIONER’S REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`IPR2016-00976
`Patent No. 6,775,235 B2
`
`
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(a), Scheduling Order (Paper No. 8), and the
`
`Second Joint Notice Of Stipulation To Revised Schedule (Paper No. 21), Petitioner
`
`submits this Request for Oral Argument on all of the instituted grounds of
`
`unpatentability of U.S. Patent No. 6,775,235 B2. Pursuant to the Scheduling Order
`
`of January 17, 2017 (Paper No. 18), oral argument is currently scheduled for
`
`June 26, 2017. A Request for Oral Argument in related IPR proceeding 2016-
`
`00977 is being filed on this same day.
`
`With regard to this particular proceeding, Petitioner requests (without
`
`waiving consideration of any issue not listed below) to address the following
`
`issues:
`
`1. Whether claims 4, 5, 7-11, 14, and 19 are anticipated under 35 U.S.C.
`
`§ 102 by Karol (Ex. 1006);
`
`2. Whether claims 5, 11-15, and 19 are obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103
`
`based on Karol (Ex. 1006) in view of Stallings (Ex. 1011);
`
`3. Whether claims 4, 5, 7-15, and 19 are obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103
`
`based on Karol (Ex. 1006);
`
`4. Any motions to exclude evidence by Patent Owner;
`
`5. Rebuttal to Patent Owner’s presentation on all matters; and
`
`6. Any additional issues on which the Board seeks clarification.
`
`
`
`-1-
`
`

`

`IPR2016-00976
`Patent No. 6,775,235 B2
`
`
`
`Petitioner respectfully requests the ability to use audio visual equipment to
`
`display demonstrative exhibits, including the use of a projector and screen that
`
`connects to a laptop computer. Petitioner’s counsel requests that an ELMO-type
`
`projector be made available for use.
`
`Petitioner also respectfully requests the Silicon Valley Regional Office for
`
`the location of the oral argument.
`
`
`
`Dated: May 25, 2017
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`By: /Andy H. Chan/
`Andy H. Chan
`Reg. No. 56,893
`Pepper Hamilton LLP
`333 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 400
`Redwood City, CA 94065
`Telephone: (650) 802-3600
`Facsimile: (650) 802-3650
`Email: chana@pepperlaw.com
`
`Attorney for Petitioner
`
`-2-
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`IPR2016-00976
`Patent No. 6,775,235 B2
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.6(e)(4)(i) et seq., the undersigned certifies that on
`
`May 25, 2017, a complete and entire copy of this Petitioner’s Request for Oral
`
`Argument was served on the following counsel of record for Patent Owner via
`
`email:
`
`
`
`Robert C. Mattson
`Sameer Gokhale
`Oblon, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, LLP
`1940 Duke Street
`Alexandria, VA 22314
`
`cpdocketmattson@oblon.com
`cpdocketgokhale@oblon.com
`
`Dated: May 25, 2017
`
`
`
`By: /Andy H. Chan/
`Andy H. Chan
`Reg. No. 56,893
`chana@pepperlaw.com
`Attorney for Petitioner
`
`
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket