throbber
Paper No.
`Filed: November 10, 2016
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`
`
`GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION,
`Patent Owner
`
`
`
`
`
`Case IPR2016-00952
`Patent No. 9,121,412
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PATENT OWNER’S OBJECTIONS TO PETITIONER’S EXHIBITS
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`
`Case IPR2016-00952
`Patent 9,121,412
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.64(b)(1), Patent Owner submits the following
`
`objections to certain exhibits submitted by Petitioner. Patent Owner’s objections
`
`apply equally to Petitioner’s reliance on these exhibits in any subsequently-filed
`
`documents. These objections are timely, having been served within ten business
`
`days of the Board’s decision to institute a trial in this proceeding. Patent Owner
`
`objects to the following exhibits:
`
`GE-1003 Declaration of Reza Abhari, Ph.D.
`
`GE-1004 Curriculum Vitae of Reza Abhari
`
`GE-1005 D.G.M. Davies, et al., A Variable Pitch Fan for an Ultra Quiet
`Demonstrator Engine
`GE-1006 Pete Middleton, 614: VFW’s Jet Feedliner, Flight International
`
`GE-1008 NASA SP-7037 (92), A Cumulative Index to the 1977 Issues of
`Aeronautical Engineering: A Special Bibliography
`John W. Schaefer et al., Dynamics of High-Bypass-Engine Thrust
`Reversal Using A Variable-Pitch Fan
`GE-1010 NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS) Record Details
`
`GE-1009
`
`GE-1011 William S. Willis, Quiet Clean Short-Haul Experimental Engine
`(QCSEE) Final Report
`GE-1012 Bill Sweetman et al., Pratt & Whitney’s surprise leap, INTERAVIA
`
`GE-1013 Gerald Brines, The Turbofan of Tomorrow, Mechanical Engineering
`
`Jack D. Mattingly, Elements of Gas Turbine
`Propulsion
`GE-1015 Bill Gunston, Pratt & Whitney PW8000, Jane’s Aero-Engines Issue
`Seven
`GE-1016 Bruce E. Wendus et al., Follow-On Technology Requirement Study
`for Advanced Subsonic Transport
`
`GE-1014
`
`1
`
`

`
`GE-1017 Richard Whitaker, ALF502: plugging the turbofan gap, Flight
`International
`GE-1018 About NASA Technical Reports Server (www.sti.nasa.gov/find-sti)
`
`Case IPR2016-00952
`Patent 9,121,412
`
`
`GE-1019 University of California at Davis MARC record
`
`GE-1020 NASA Technical Reports Server Record Details
`
`GE-1021 U.S. 5,141,400 to Murphy et al
`
`GE-1022 S.A. Savelle et al., Application of Transient and Dynamic
`Simulations to the U.S. Army T55-L-712 Helicopter Engine
`GE-1023 A Summary of Commonly Used MARC 21 Authority Fields, MARC 21
`REFERENCE MATERIALS
`
`
`
`GE-1003 and 1004
`
`Patent Owner objects to GE-1003 and 1004 under Federal Rules of Evidence
`
`(“FRE”) 401-403 as prejudicial, confusing, or a waste of time. Patent Owner also
`
`objects to GE-1003 under FRE 702 because opinions contained therein are
`
`conclusory and lack sufficient explanation. The opinions are not based on
`
`sufficient facts or data and are not the product of reliable principles and methods
`
`reliably applied to the facts of the case. See 37 C.F.R. § 42.65. Until Petitioner
`
`provides the declarant for cross-examination, GE-1003 and 1004 are inadmissible
`
`hearsay.
`
`2
`
`

`
`GE-1005, 1006, 1008-1013, 1015-1020, 1022, and 1023
`
`Case IPR2016-00952
`Patent 9,121,412
`
`
`
`
`Patent Owner objects to GE-1005, 1006, 1008-1013, 1015-1020, 1022, and
`
`1023 under FRE 901. Petitioner has not submitted evidence to authenticate these
`
`exhibits or to otherwise establish that they are what Petitioner claims them to be.
`
`Additionally, to the extent Petitioner relies on any one of GE-1005, 1006, 1008-
`
`1013, 1015-1020, 1022, and 1023 for the truth of matters they assert, including,
`
`without limitation, alleged publication or purported publication dates, Patent
`
`Owner objects to them as inadmissible hearsay. FRE 802.
`
`GE-1008 and 1010-1023
`
`Patent Owner objects to GE-1008 and 1010-1023 under FRE 401-403 as
`
`irrelevant or, in the alternative, prejudicial, confusing, and a waste of time.
`
`Petitioner expressly states that GE-1005, 1006, and 1009 are bases for “statutory
`
`grounds for the challenges” and alleges no other prior art references in the grounds
`
`submitted. See Petition at 13. It follows that the Petition does not contend that GE-
`
`1008 and 1010-1023 are part of any challenge to the claims or contend that the
`
`claimed subject matter is disclosed anywhere in the exhibits. See 35 U.S.C.
`
`§ 312(a)(3); 37 C.F.R. § 42.6(a)(3); 37 C.F.R. § 42.104(b)(4); 37 C.F.R.
`
`§ 42.104(b)(5).
`
`3
`
`

`
`Case IPR2016-00952
`Patent 9,121,412
`
`Patent Owner also objects to GE-1008, 1010, 1015, and 1017 because the
`
`Petition never cites the exhibit. It is irrelevant or, in the alternative, prejudicial,
`
`confusing, and a waste of time.
`
`For GE-1011, 1013, 1014, 1016, 1018, and 1021-1023, the Petition cites
`
`only small portions of those exhibits. For example, GE-1011 is a 312-page
`
`document, but Petitioner cites only a single figure and a few sentences of this
`
`exhibit as background discussion outside of its challenges. Petitioner has not
`
`demonstrated this exhibit’s relevance to this proceeding, and even if some portions
`
`were deemed relevant, most of the exhibit is uncited and irrelevant or, in the
`
`alternative, prejudicial, confusing, and a waste of time. FRE 401-403.
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`By: /M. Andrew Holtman/
`M. Andrew Holtman
`Reg. No. 53,032
`
`Lead Counsel for Patent Owner
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: November 10, 2016
`
`
`
`4
`
`

`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`Case IPR2016-00952
`Patent 9,121,412
`
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that a copy of the foregoing PATENT
`
`OWNER’S OBJECTIONS TO PETITIONER’S EXHIBITS was served
`
`electronically on November 10, 2016, on counsel of record for the Petitioner as
`
`follows:
`
`Brian E. Ferguson
`Anish Desai
`Christopher Pepe
`Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP
`1300 Eye Street, N.W., Suite 900
`Washington, D.C. 20005
`GE.WGM.Service@weil.com
`
`By: /M. Andrew Holtman/
`M. Andrew Holtman
`Reg. No. 53,032
`
`Lead Counsel for Patent Owner
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: November 10, 2016

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket