throbber
3/16/2016
`
`Reshaping Flight for Fuel Efficiency: Five Technologies on the Runway Post-Boeing Dreamliner
`
`NATIONAL
`GEOGRAPHIC
`
`http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/energy/2013/04/130423—reshaping—f|ight—for—fuel—
`
`efficiency.htm|
`
`Reshaping Flight for Fuel Efficiency: Five
`
`Technologies on the Runway
`
`Beyond Boeing Dreamliner 787, a new thrust to curb soaring emissions.
`
`By Thomas K. Grose, for National Geographic
`Ll
`
`http'l/newsnationalgeographic com/newsIenetgyQ0l3I04l130423—reshaping—flight—for—fuel£mciency/
`'
`’
`
`GE V. UTC
`Trial IPR2016-00952
`
`1/17
`
`UTC-2002.001
`
`GE v. UTC
`Trial IPR2016-00952
`
`UTC-2002.001
`
`

`
`3/16/2016
`
`Reshaping Flight for Fuel Efficiency: Five Technologies on the Runway Post-Boeing Dreamlinet
`
`Super-efficient geared turbofans like the one shown here during assembly of a
`
`Pratt & Whitney PurePower engine are one of many strategies currently being
`
`tested to help commercial aircraft become more fuel efficient.
`
`A half-mile per gallon might seem like dreadful fuel
`
`economy, but for vehicles carrying hundreds of
`
`passengers at high altitude, it marks a huge advance in
`
`efficiency.
`
`For U.S. airlines, domestic flights now average 0.54
`
`aircraft-mile per gallon ofjet fuel (0.23 kilometer per
`
`liter), an increase of more than 40 percent since 2000.
`
`There's also been progress for the heavierjets on
`
`international flights: a 17 percent improvement to 0.27
`
`http:l/newsnationalgeogmphiccomlnewslenetgynol3104/1 30423—reshaping—flight—for—fuel£mciency/
`
`2/17
`
`UTC-2002.002
`
`UTC-2002.002
`
`

`
`3/16/2016
`
`Reshaping Flight for Fuel Efficiency: Five Technologies on the Runway Post-Boeing Dreamliner
`
`mpg (0.12 km/l.)
`And yet, there's a need to do far more. (See related quiz:
`"What You Don't Know About Flights and Fuel.")
`Air traffic worldwide is increasing so rapidly that global
`carbon dioxide emissions from aviation, which now represent
`just 2 to 3 percent of all CO2 pollution, could jump as much as
`500 percent by 2050, according to one forecast. And for most
`airlines, fuel costs have surpassed labor costs as their largest
`expense, about 40 percent of operations, or $47.3 billion last
`year for U.S. carriers. Renewable jet fuel is available, but
`currently it is even more expensive than the petroleum-based
`kerosene it replaces. (See related stories: "As Jet Fuel Prices
`Soar, A Green Option Nears The Runway" and "First
`Commercial U.S. Biofuels Flight Takes Off.")
`That's why the aviation world is looking at technologies,
`shapes, and materials that would transform flight far more
`dramatically than the advances embodied in Boeing's 787
`Dreamliner, which before it was grounded in January was one
`of the world's most fuel-efficient commercial airliners. The
`Dreamliner uses 20 percent less fuel per mile than the similar-
`size Boeing 767, thanks mainly to improved aerodynamics and
`the use of lightweight composite materials.
`Boeing also relied on a powerful lithium-ion battery so it
`could replace some mechanical components with electronics
`
`http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/energy/2013/04/130423-reshaping-flight-for-fuel-efficiency/
`
`3/17
`
`UTC-2002.003
`
`

`
`3/16/2016
`
`Reshaping Flight for Fuel Efficiency: Five Technologies on the Runway Post-Boeing Dreamliner
`
`to cut the plane's weight. But two nasty battery incidents—one
`overheated on a runway in Boston, while another caught fire,
`forcing an emergency landing in Japan—led to the grounding of
`all 50 Dreamliners in operation. Boeing has taken steps to
`rewire the batteries to prevent them from overheating, and will
`also encase them in heavy-duty steel boxes that vent outside
`the aircraft.
`On Friday, the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration
`approved the modifications, and the Dreamliners are expected
`to be back in the air soon. The U.S. National Transportation
`Safety Board is holding investigative hearings on the battery
`this week.
`While the Dreamliner moves closer to retaking the skies,
`here are five new technologies—including one that will debut
`within months—that could soar far higher in fuel efficiency.
`Geared Turbofan Engine
`Connecticut-based engine-maker Pratt & Whitney, a
`division of United Technologies, tried a radical approach for
`making turbofan engines more efficient—adding a gear. The
`resulting fan-drive gear system engine, more than a decade in
`the making, can cut fuel use by up to 16 percent. "That's huge,"
`says Magdy Attia, a professor of aerospace engineering at
`Florida's Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University. "It's a real
`game-changer."
`
`http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/energy/2013/04/130423-reshaping-flight-for-fuel-efficiency/
`
`4/17
`
`UTC-2002.004
`
`

`
`3/16/2016
`
`Reshaping Flight for Fuel Efficiency: Five Technologies on the Runway Post-Boeing Dreamlinet
`
`The use of the "blended-wing" design seen here on this Boeing X-48C Hybrid
`
`Wing Body demonstration aircraft, when used with lightweight materials, could
`
`improve aerodynamics on commercial airliners. (More on this design below.)
`
`It was11't a new idea. Honeywell years ago used geared
`
`engines for very s111all private jets, but never advanced the
`
`technology. That's probably because it's difficult to do, Attia
`
`says. The 250-pou11d (113.4—ki1ogra1n), 18-inch (45.7-
`
`ce11ti111eter) gearbox 11as 30,000 horsepower passing through it,
`
`111ea11i11g there is a lot of heat to manage a11d expel quickly. A11d
`
`lmpjlnewsnationalgeogtaphic.comlnewslenetgyI2013I04ll30423-teshaping-flight-for-fnelefficiency/
`
`UTC-2002.005
`
`5/17
`
`UTC-2002.005
`
`

`
`3/16/2016
`
`Reshaping Flight for Fuel Efficiency: Five Technologies on the Runway Post-Boeing Dreamliner
`
`most aeronautical engineers aren't experts in gearboxes. But
`Pratt focused on making a geared engine that works, and the
`payoff has been huge. Five manufacturers—including Airbus,
`Bombardier, and Embraer—have so far placed orders for 3,500
`PurePower engines. According to Attia, an engine-maker
`typically has to sell 350 units before it starts recouping its
`investment in developing a new engine. So already the geared
`engine is a success, well in advance of its June debut aboard the
`new Bombardier C Series planes.
`Pratt & Whitney says the PurePower line of engines will
`be able to cut carrier operating costs by 20 percent (or about
`$1.7 million per plane per year), dampen noise levels by half,
`and cut CO2 emissions by 3,600 metric tons a year.
`Why does the gear improve efficiency? Modern turbofan
`engines create thrust by expelling fast-moving hot gases from
`their core. But they also use their fans to push slower air
`around the outside of the engine, so it mingles with the faster
`hot gases at the rear, increasing thrust. Typically, engines have
`a bypass ratio of 8:1; eight pounds of the air hitting the engine
`bypass the core for every pound that enters. The higher the
`bypass ratio, the greater the engine's thrust and efficiency.
`Pratt's geared engine has a ratio of 12:1. A jet engine's fan works
`more efficiently at slower speeds than does the core's turbine,
`and the gearbox allows the two to spin independently, each at
`
`http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/energy/2013/04/130423-reshaping-flight-for-fuel-efficiency/
`
`6/17
`
`UTC-2002.006
`
`

`
`3/16/2016
`
`Reshaping Flight for Fuel Efficiency: Five Technologies on the Runway Post-Boeing Dreamliner
`
`its optimum speed. Accordingly, PurePower engines have
`larger fans, and smaller, lighter turbines.
`The geared engine does come with its own unique set of
`problems, however. With a larger fan, it cannot be retrofitted
`beneath the wings of existing aircraft. All the planes that will
`use it will be new, designed especially to accommodate the
`fatter fan. Moreover, gearboxes have metal-on-metal moving
`parts, which jet engines don't have. Attia expects that will
`require carriers to schedule more frequent inspections and
`require them to look for cracks and fatigue that they don't have
`to worry about now.
`The first PurePower engines are designed for single-aisle
`jets. But Attia says their "true potential" would be fully realized
`if they were used on larger, 777-size aircraft. "At that size, the
`savings would be just astronomical." Pratt, in an email
`response to questions from National Geographic News,
`certainly indicated larger engines are in the pipeline.
`Eventually. Said Pratt: "We have not yet announced a definitive
`timetable for a Pratt & Whitney Geared Turbofan widebody
`engine."
`Composite Ceramics
`While Pratt opted for a major design change to improve
`jet engine efficiency, other researchers are focused on
`materials, especially those that would allow for hotter
`
`http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/energy/2013/04/130423-reshaping-flight-for-fuel-efficiency/
`
`7/17
`
`UTC-2002.007
`
`

`
`3/16/2016
`
`Reshaping Flight for Fuel Efficiency: Five Technologies on the Runway Post-Boeing Dreamliner
`
`combustion. In fact, one of the primary ways engine-makers
`have improved jet efficiency so far has been finding ways to
`burn the fuel and air mix inside turbofan jet engine combustors
`at hotter temperatures, while developing nickel-based alloys
`that can withstand the heat. But there's been a problem with
`this approach. "We have hit their thermodynamic limit,"
`Robert O. Ritchie, a materials scientist at the U.S. Department
`of Energy's Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory in
`California, says of those alloys. That's around 1,150°C (2,102°F).
`"If we go much hotter, they (engine turbine blades) will
`literally melt."
`So researchers have turned to a material found in most
`cupboards: ceramics.
`Some engine parts, including turbine blades, have
`ceramic coatings, but it's not an ideal solution because the
`coatings can spall off, and they also reduce the blades'
`efficiency, Ritchie says. But parts made purely from ceramics
`could withstand temperatures approaching 1,300°C to 1,500°C
`(2,372°F to 2,732°F).
`However, as anyone who has ever dropped a teacup
`knows, ceramics are brittle. Metals, on the other hand, have
`ductility; they bend before they break. But materials scientists
`have developed composite ceramics reinforced with, well,
`ceramics. They've introduced ceramic fibers to the mix, giving
`
`http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/energy/2013/04/130423-reshaping-flight-for-fuel-efficiency/
`
`8/17
`
`UTC-2002.008
`
`

`
`3/16/2016
`
`Reshaping Flight for Fuel Efficiency: Five Technologies on the Runway Post-Boeing Dreamlinet
`
`the material ductility.
`
`An engine component developed for the Reaction Engine Skylon space plane
`
`above could also be used to boost the efficiency of current plane engines. (See
`
`more below.)
`
`There are still 111a11y u11know11s about co111posite
`
`cera111ics, including 110W best to make them a11d improve their
`
`properties. To aid u11dersta11ding, Ritchie recently developed a
`
`scanning device that uses three—di111e11sional tomography that
`
`literally peers through the materials i11 real time as they're
`
`pulled apart amid temperatures reachi11g 111ore than 1,700°C
`
`(3,092°F). His imaging device 11as a resolution of half a micron.
`
`lmpjlnewsnationalgeogtaphic.comlnewslenergyI2013I04ll30423-teshaping—flight-for-fnelefl'1ciency/
`
`UTC-2002.009
`
`9/17
`
`UTC-2002.009
`
`

`
`3/16/2016
`
`Reshaping Flight for Fuel Efficiency: Five Technologies on the Runway Post-Boeing Dreamliner
`
`(For comparison, a human hair is roughly 75 microns in
`diameter). "We test it to the breaking point to see how it fails,"
`he explains. That information can be used to compute the
`predicted life of the material and how far it can be safely
`pushed. It also allows scientists to reformulate a composite's
`mix to improve its microstructure and make it more robust and
`reliable.
`Ritchie predicts that within five to ten years, commercial
`jet engines with a significant number of parts composed
`entirely of ceramic composites will be in use, allowing engines
`to run hotter by several hundred degrees Celsius. "Today we're
`excited if we can increase temperatures by 5°C (9°F)."
`Moreover, fuel efficiency will be further improved because the
`ceramic parts should decrease engine weight by 10 to 30
`percent. "This is truly a disruptive technology," Ritchie says.
`The "Double Bubble"
`Could changing the shape of the fuselage, the iconic
`tube-like central body of an aircraft, make a difference in fuel
`economy?
`Researchers at the Massachusetts Institute of
`Technology (MIT) think so. In a project funded by NASA, an
`MIT team came up with a concept called the "double bubble,"
`which essentially merges two fuselages into one rather chubby
`one. It also has two rear-mounted engines. According to Rich
`
`http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/energy/2013/04/130423-reshaping-flight-for-fuel-efficiency/
`
`10/17
`
`UTC-2002.010
`
`

`
`3/16/2016
`
`Reshaping Flight for Fuel Efficiency: Five Technologies on the Runway Post-Boeing Dreamliner
`
`Wahls, a NASA project scientist, it is designed to provide part of
`the lift in the fuselage, not just the wings, which allows it to
`have much thinner, lighter wings made from new-age
`materials.
`Moreover, the rear engines ingest boundary layer airflow,
`giving the aircraft better drag. The bottom line: The technique
`allows the engines to use less fuel for the same amount of
`thrust as a conventional aircraft.
`Wahls reckons the double bubble would be 60 to 70
`percent more efficient than current passenger jets, although
`those estimates are based, in part, on assumptions that the
`materials and structures of choice will, by then, be stronger
`and lighter. Half of that efficiency gain would be due to the new
`shape, says Wahls, and nearly half of that projected
`improvement relies on the assumption that the plane's cruise
`speed is Mach 0.72, or slightly slower than today's average,
`Mach 0.8.
`A more detailed assessment of the double bubble
`potential will be developed later this year, when a prototype is
`to be tested in a wind tunnel at the NASA Langley Research
`Center in Virginia. The MIT concept emerged from a project
`that NASA initiated in 2008, challenging engineering teams to
`restyle jetliners to use considerably less fuel. Boeing also came
`up with a concept in the NASA program that will be tested later
`
`http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/energy/2013/04/130423-reshaping-flight-for-fuel-efficiency/
`
`11/17
`
`UTC-2002.011
`
`

`
`3/16/2016
`
`Reshaping Flight for Fuel Efficiency: Five Technologies on the Runway Post-Boeing Dreamliner
`
`this year at Langley.
`Boeing's concept is nicknamed SUGAR, for Subsonic
`(slower than the speed of sound) Ultra Green Aircraft
`Research. In SUGAR, wings sit atop the fuselage and are held in
`place with struts fastened to the body's undercarriage—like
`small, single-engine Cessnas. Boeing's engineers believe that
`by using modern computational fluid dynamics they can
`minimize the extra drag caused by the struts, allowing for the
`longer, lighter, and higher wings—a weight reduction that saves
`fuel. The longer wings also lower drag, another fuel savings.
`Overall, Boeing estimates that the strut-wing design could
`reduce fuel consumption by about 60 percent.
`Boeing is also considering different propulsion systems.
`The SUGAR Volt would use an electric battery/gas turbine
`hybrid power system. Conventional jet engines would be used
`for takeoffs, but the aircraft would cruise using battery power.
`Another version is the SUGAR Freeze, which would be powered
`by liquefied natural gas.
`The Flying Wing
`Imagine commercial flight in an aircraft shaped like a B-
`2 stealth bomber.
`Aviation engineers have long known that the manta-ray
`silhouette of a "flying wing," also known as a "blended wing," is
`a highly efficient shape for airborne vehicles, from a lift-to-
`
`http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/energy/2013/04/130423-reshaping-flight-for-fuel-efficiency/
`
`12/17
`
`UTC-2002.012
`
`

`
`3/16/2016
`
`Reshaping Flight for Fuel Efficiency: Five Technologies on the Runway Post-Boeing Dreamliner
`
`drag ratio perspective. But the cigar-shaped fuselage with
`which we're all familiar is easier to design to withstand outside
`forces while maintaining cabin pressure. A blended-wing
`aircraft built using conventional materials and frames would
`be very heavy, indeed. But NASA has been working with Boeing
`on a blended-wing aircraft using lightweight composites.
`For the past six years, in a flight test project that ended
`just this month, NASA and Boeing have been conducting aerial
`research on the concept using a drone, Boeing's X-48 remotely
`piloted blended-wing aircraft. Working with the unmanned
`aircraft allowed the researchers to address issues such as how
`to transform the airframe so it does a better job of shielding
`engine noise from the ground, an improvement that would be
`key for gaining acceptance for such aircraft in communities
`near airports.
`NASA says that, working with Boeing, it has devised a
`method to manufacture a 777-size blended-wing plane that
`would be at least 50 percent more efficient. Strong, but
`lightweight, carbon-composite rods would be used for the
`wing's structural skeleton. Its skin would be made from carbon
`fiber fabric, stitched together, and then coated in epoxy to
`make it rigid. The design overcomes a big hurdle, because the
`lighter a fabric is, the less tolerant it is to damage. That's where
`the stitching comes in. "If you develop a crack in a composite
`
`http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/energy/2013/04/130423-reshaping-flight-for-fuel-efficiency/
`
`13/17
`
`UTC-2002.013
`
`

`
`3/16/2016
`
`Reshaping Flight for Fuel Efficiency: Five Technologies on the Runway Post-Boeing Dreamliner
`
`structure, what stops it from growing? The stitching is the low-
`weight solution," Wahls explains.
`While the concepts from other NASA-led projects, the
`double bubble and SUGAR planes, are unlikely to take to the
`skies anytime soon, blended-wing jets could become
`commercially viable within a few years, says Wahls. "Years of
`research have put us ahead of the game on that one," he says.
`High-Speed Heat Exchanger
`Since the retirement of the Concorde in 2003, there have
`been no civilian aircraft in operation that fly faster than the
`speed of sound (Mach 1). But Britain's Reaction Engine aims to
`build Skylon, a space plane that would reach speeds of Mach 5
`and bring any destination on Earth to no more than four hours
`away.
`
`Reaction says its Sabre engine, which would operate like
`a jet engine in the atmosphere and like a rocket in space, could
`fly far faster than today's military supersonic jets, which are
`limited to Mach 2.45. (See related story: "First Green
`Supersonic Jet to Launch on Earth Day.") That's because the air
`first has to be compressed before it enters the core, and trying
`to compress enough air to reach faster speeds produces metal-
`melting heat.
`So Reaction has developed a heat exchanger, a pre-
`cooler, that has a spiral matrix of tubes, each with a wall
`
`http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/energy/2013/04/130423-reshaping-flight-for-fuel-efficiency/
`
`14/17
`
`UTC-2002.014
`
`

`
`3/16/2016
`
`Reshaping Flight for Fuel Efficiency: Five Technologies on the Runway Post-Boeing Dreamliner
`
`thickness of only 27 microns, to keep it lightweight. Reaction's
`exchanger can cool air from 1,000°C to -150°C (1,832°F to
`-238°F) within a hundredth of a second, or faster than a blink of
`an eye. Cooling something to that icy a temperature so quickly
`could, however, cause frost to build up and block the engine.
`But Reaction has also developed a technology that prevents the
`formation of frost. For competitive reasons, it's not saying how
`it's done that, but the technology was certified late last year by
`the European Space Agency.
`What's all that got to do with making planes more
`efficient? Reaction says the exchanger could be installed inside
`current subsonic engines to make them 5 to 10 percent more
`efficient. A jet engine's turbine powers its compressor. But if
`the air entering the compressor is chilled, it needs less power
`to compress it. That means that without increasing the
`temperature within the combustion chamber, the turbine will
`create excess power that can be used to generate more thrust.
`Embry-Riddle's Attia says that weight and cost would have to
`be factored in, "but the principle is very smart, indeed."
`A Reaction Engines spokesman says a workable,
`commercial version of the heat exchanger could be on the
`market "as soon as anyone wants one." For now, it's just one of
`the new efficiency technologies waiting on a long runway;
`history has shown the process of testing and adoption of new
`
`http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/energy/2013/04/130423-reshaping-flight-for-fuel-efficiency/
`
`15/17
`
`UTC-2002.015
`
`

`
`3/16/2016
`
`Reshaping Flight for Fuel Efficiency: Five Technologies on the Runway Post-Boeing Dreamliner
`
`ideas in aviation moves a good deal more slowly than the speed
`of sound.
`This story is part of a special series that explores energy
`issues. For more, visit The Great Energy Challenge.
`
`(cid:28) Comment on This Story
`
`You Might Also Like
`
`5HE 4TRANGE AND 4URPRISING )ISTORY OF %AYLIGHT 4AVING 5IME
`
`The practice of moving our clocks twice a year is awash with colorful characters and strange-but-true
`tales.
`
`5HESE 'ARMERS 4LASH AND #URN 'ORESTSÀ#UT IN A (OOD 8AY
`
`Farmers in northern Thailand cut small patches of forest, grow crops, then let the trees regrow. The
`result: good harvests and happy woods.
`
`64 (OVERNMENT 4AYS /O TO (RAND $ANYON 1ROJECT
`
`Tusayan project gets major setback while conservationists target uranium mining and ask for national
`monument.
`
`Comment on This Story
`
`http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/energy/2013/04/130423-reshaping-flight-for-fuel-efficiency/
`
`16/17
`
`UTC-2002.016
`
`

`
`3/16/2016
`
`Reshaping Flight for Fuel Efficiency: Five Technologies on the Runway Post-Boeing Dreainlinet
`
`I 0 comments
`
`Sign in
`
`2 people listening
`
`III
`
`Newest \ G{r5.~.<i
`
`T- In C~>u’e=‘.~.«’—m.<
`
`I we
`
`NATIONAL
`GEOGRAPHIC
`
`© 1996-2016 National Geographic Society.
`
`Imp:IInewsnationalgeog1aphic.comInemlenetgyl20l3I04Il30423-Ieshaping-flight-for-fue1-efflciency/
`
`17/17
`
`UTC-2002.017
`
`UTC-2002.017

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket