throbber
Pratt & Whitney's surprise leap
`Interavia; Jun 1998; 53, 621; ABI/INFORMĀ® Professional Advancedpg. 25
`
`Rated at 32,000shp, the
`PWBOOO gearbox is just
`17 inches (43cm) in
`diameter.
`
`Pratt &
`Whitney's
`surprise leap
`
`The announcement of the PW8000 geared
`turbofan caught the industry unawares.
`
`Planned as a follow-on to today 's V2500 and CFM56, pow(cid:173)
`ering future developments of the A320 and, perhaps, a new(cid:173)
`family 737, Pratt & Whitney's PW8000 breaks new ground
`in having a gear-driven fan and a higher bypass ratio than any
`current engine ( 1 1: 1, versus 9: I for the GE90).
`Together with the PW6000, a conventional turbofan with the
`same core, it will provide Pratt & Whitney with a family of
`modem , economical engines from 67 kN to 155 kN , that
`promise to offer significant improvements in airline operating
`economics. The PW8000, claims Pratt, will increase reliabil(cid:173)
`ity while reducing operating costs, fuel bum and noise.
`P&W will start detailed de sign of the engine this month
`(June), and could run the first engine as early as September
`1999. However, the actual timing will depend on when there
`is an application for the engine -
`and the main reason that
`the company's rivals did not see the PW8000 coming is that
`there is no clear application for such a family of engines.
`This may be about to change. The PW8000 will cover a range
`of25,000 to 35,000lb thrust, suitable for aircraft between 120
`and 180 passengers. With its 76-inch fan diameter the engine
`will fit the Airbus A320 family, but not under the wing of the
`
`current new-generation Boeing 737 . Talks are taking place
`with Airbus to flight test the PW8000 on an A320 in the time
`period 200 I, with production scheduled for two years later.
`An inservice date could be around 2005-7.
`Pratt & Whitney says that is trying to position itself ahead of
`the market, so that it can produce new engines quickly enough
`to match the airframe manufacturers' development schedules.
`Engine companies have not tried to do this since the 1980s,
`when both P&W and GE invested heavily in high-speed pro(cid:173)
`pel le rs for Boeing's aborted 7 J7 project. Now that Boeing and
`Airbus are taking less time to produce major derivatives and
`new ai rcraft, engine manufac turers may have to invest more
`in speculative technology developments unless they are con(cid:173)
`fident that they can win business with derivatives.
`P&W saw that it had few options left. The company' s share
`of the gigantic market for narrow-body aircraft is in single
`digits (comprising P&W's share of the V2500 program and
`the PW2000) while CFM's share of the business expands
`inexorably.
`
`Common core for a new family
`P&W's strategy is to invest its earnings from the wide-body
`market in a new family , based on a common core, which cov(cid:173)
`ers a huge range of applications -
`almost the entire narrow(cid:173)
`body segment from 80 to 180 passengers. The PW6000 core
`is already running. It shares some aerodynamic technology
`and design philosophy with the military Fl 19, with a sharp
`reduction in the number of blades and stages compared with
`earlier engines. The geared fan concept is important to
`P& W's strategy, because it allows the common core to cover
`a significantly larger thrust bracket. The cost of developing
`the gearbox is more than offset by the ability to cover most of
`the narrow-body market with one core.
`Gearing boosts performance because it eases a difficult com(cid:173)
`promise in engine design. The fan' s tip speed cannot go much
`above 450 m/sec -
`above that point, noise statts to become
`unacceptable. As the designers increase the fan diameter in
`pursuit of more thrust, the tip speed limit means an ever lower
`
`INTERAVIA June 1998
`
`25
`
`Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
`
`GE-1012.001
`
`Sweetman, Bill;Sutton, Oliver
`

`
`rotational speed, so that each
`blade and stage in the low-pres(cid:173)
`sure system can do less work.
`The result is that high-bypass,
`high-thrust engines have large
`and complex low-pressure com(cid:173)
`pressors and turbines. More(cid:173)
`over, as the rotational speed
`slows
`down,
`the
`torque
`increases,
`demanding
`a
`stronger, thicker LP shaft which
`makes a poor match with a
`small, compact core.
`
`Solid
`Shroudless Fan
`
`Fan Case
`Mount
`
`Fan Drive
`Gear Sy.stem
`
`PWSOOO Geared Turbofan
`
`5stage
`High Speed I High Pr
`HP Compressor
`
`but the 3: I ratio is modest, so the
`gearbox can be a straightforward
`planetary design. The ADP gear(cid:173)
`box underwent extensive test(cid:173)
`ing, including 1,000 hour in a
`full demonstrator engine.
`Gearbox design and history of
`failures in seven turbofan and
`turboprop engines and two heli(cid:173)
`copters were analysed back to
`1962. The results showed that
`most problems came
`from
`bearings, lubrication/cooling
`systems, and flexing of the gear(cid:173)
`box during normal flight. The
`new gearbox design features
`small, light self-aligning bear(cid:173)
`ings, a lubricating system that places oil only where it is
`directly needed, and which circulates it out of the gearbox
`to avoid a build up of heat. To cope
`as quickly as possible -
`with the flexing of the engine structure in flight, which tends
`to cause gear wear and cracking, engineers came up with a
`design to mount the gearbox on a kind of bellows, that
`resembles a large spring. This physically isolates the gear(cid:173)
`box from the normal bending loads and keeps gear align(cid:173)
`ment precise. The PWSOOO gearbox is just 17 inches (43cm)
`in diameter.
`Full-scale tests, the equivalent of
`18,000 flight cycles and 25,000 flight
`hours of normal service, were carried
`out by Pratt and FiatA vio, including a
`40,000shp gearbox that ran without
`problems for over 500 hours at its rated
`loading.
`The development of the PWSOOO could
`lead to an interesting situation among
`the airframers- Airbus Industrie could find itself able to
`offer significant economic advantages to operators with a
`PWSOOO under the wing of its A320 family. This in tum
`could push Boeing into the design of a totally new family,
`replacing the present 737, and possibly the 757, to accom(cid:173)
`modate the PWSOOO. This is the situation that CFMl will be
`seeking to head off.
`BY BILL SWEETMAN AND OLIVER SUTTON
`
`The fan .will rotate at about one-third compresso_r speed, and
`provide 90% of the engine's propulsive power
`
`Gearing does the trick
`Gearing solves the problem.
`The LP turbine and compressor
`spin faster, which means that they can be made smaller in
`diameter, shorter and simpler: the engine has 52% fewer com(cid:173)
`pressor and turbine blades than a conventional turbofan.
`according to P& W. The speed of the fan can be optimized for
`noise, efficiency and structural considerations (P& W is talk(cid:173)
`ing about a 300 m/sec tip speed for the PW8000) and the LP
`shaft shrinks back to a nomrnl size, making the core more
`compact and efficient. The low tip speed reduces noise -
`P&W claims a cumulative margin of 30dB below current
`rules -
`and the high bypass ratio boosts
`propulsive efficiency and reduces fuel
`bum by 9%. This is enough to make the
`A320 and A32 I into transcontinental
`aircraft, and get the attention of airline
`financial officers.
`The PWSOOO design draws on the tech(cid:173)
`nology that P&W, MTU and Fiat dem(cid:173)
`onstrated in the Advanced Ducted Pro(cid:173)
`peller (ADP) engine in the early 1990s,
`but it is not an ADP. It has a lower bypass ratio and a higher
`fan pressure ratio, which eliminates the need for variable
`pitch; and it has a conventional reverser and solid titanium
`blades. The fan, gear driven off the LP spool, will rotate at
`about one-third compressor speed, and provide 90 percent
`of the engine's propulsive power.
`Fiat developed the gearbox for the ADP and will be a part(cid:173)
`ner on the PWSOOO, as will MTU. It transmits 32,000 shp,
`
`THE PW8000 DRAWS ON TECHNOLOGY
`THAT P&W, MTU AND FIAT
`DEMONSTRATED IN THE ADVANCED
`DUCTED PROPELLER (ADP) ENGINE
`
`MTU SET FOR PWSOOO STAKE
`M TU President and CEO Rainer Hertrich is
`progress will also depend on Airbus's 100-seater
`preaching the advantages of its linear friction
`welding repair technology to the airline industry,
`project, either with the Chinese, where the PW6000
`is a prime candidate engine, or on the A319-MS,
`which today may be more comfortable with
`which could also take it.
`traditional blade repair methods.
`MTU is running a demonstrator core with a six-stage
`MTU's contribution to the PWBOOO will focus on
`HP compressor, while Pratt is trialling a five-stage
`capabilities in blisk technology, developed for the
`Eurofighler's EJ200 engine, on
`transonic
`core. On the PWBOOO, MTU will bid for the LP
`turbine and LP compressor, both MTU core
`compressor
`technology developed under
`competencies, which Hertrich stresses are
`Germany's Je engine programme, and on earlier
`work on the LP turbine and compressor for Pratt's
`equivalent to today's HP stages, since air flow will
`ADP demonstrator engine. MTU will also be
`be transonic.
`
`enthusiastic about the market potential far
`the PWBOOO, and, as a Pratt & Whitney preferred
`partner, intends lo toke a 20-25 percent stoke in
`the programme. MTU earlier declined to go with the
`PW6000, and Hertrich acknowledges that progress
`on the PWBOOO wi11 depend on Pratt's common core
`development of the PW6000, since Pratt does not
`intend lo start development of both engines
`simultaneously. The next priority is engineering
`design, and a demonstrator engine. The rate of
`
`26
`
`INTERAVIA June 1998
`
`Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
`
`GE-1012.002

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket