`
`By: Andrew J. Lagatta, Reg. No. 62,529
`Merchant & Gould P.C.
`3200 IDS Center
`80 South 8th Street
`Minneapolis, MN 55402
`Tel:
`(612) 371-5383
`Fax: (612) 332-9081
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`____________
`
`H&S MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC.
`
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`OXBO INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION
`
`Patent Owner.
`
`____________
`
`Case IPR2016-00950
`Patent 8,166,739
`____________
`
`
`
`PATENT OWNER’S THIRD SET OF OBJECTIONS TO EVIDENCE
`
`
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.64(b)(1), Patent Owner, Oxbo International
`
`Corporation, hereby submits objections to certain evidence that Petitioner, H&S
`
`Manufacturing Company, Inc., submitted in IPR2016-00950. On April 13, 2017,
`
`Petitioner filed an Updated Exhibit List (Paper 26) and three exhibits (Exhibit
`
`1022, Exhibit 1023, and Exhibit 1024). Petitioner served Patent Owner on the same
`
`date. On May 3, 2017, Petitioner filed, and served Patent Owner with, three more
`
`exhibits (Exhibit 1010, Exhibit 1025, and Exhibit 1026) with its Petitioner Reply.
`
`Patent Owner is filing these objections within five business days of service of the
`
`evidence.
`
`
`
`Exhibit # Description
`
`Objections
`
`1022
`
`1023
`
`1024
`
`Srivastava, et al. (1993).
`Chapter 8: Hay and
`Forage Harvesting in
`Principles of Agricultural
`Machines
`(pgs 325-406)
`
`Carr, Patrick M. , et al.
`“Barley Versus Oat:
`Which Makes the Superior
`Forage Crop,” 2001
`Annual Report Agronomy
`Section, Dickinson
`Research Extension
`Center
`Jonathan Chaplin, Ph.D.
`Deposition Transcript
`dated April 10, 2017
`
`Completeness, Fed. R. Evid. 106;
`Relevancy, Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, and 403;
`Hearsay Fed. R. Evid. 802; and
`37 C.F.R. § 42.53(d)(5)(ii), objection to use
`of any documents outside the scope of the
`direct testimony.
`Relevancy, Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, and 403;
`Hearsay, Fed. R. Evid. 802; and
`37 C.F.R. § 42.53(d)(5)(ii), objection to use
`of any documents outside the scope of the
`direct testimony.
`
`Relevancy, Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, and 403;
`and
`
`1
`
`
`
`Exhibit # Description
`
`Objections
`
`Completeness, Fed. R. Evid. 106, Fed. R.
`Civ. Pro. 32(a)(6), and misleading, Fed. R.
`Evid. 403:
`- p. 68:6-9; misleading and/or
`incomplete as used in Paper No. 28
`(Petitioner’s Reply to Patent Owner
`Response) at p. 8; cite does not
`support the proposition for which it is
`cited;
`- p. 52:13-55:12; misleading and/or
`incomplete as used in Paper No. 28 at
`p. 13; see p. 105:14-21;
`- pp. 72:13-73:4, 75:14-20, 77:6-78:3;
`misleading and/or incomplete as used
`in Paper No. 28 at pp. 14-15;
`- p. 130:9-21, 130:23-131:12, and
`158:17-159:9; misleading and/or
`incomplete as used in Paper No. 28 at
`p. 15; the references that were the
`subject of the questions were not at
`issue for the instituted ground;
`- p. 157:7-16; misleading and/or
`incomplete as used in Paper No. 28 at
`p. 15; see 158:5-15;
`- 157:2-6; misleading and/or incomplete
`as used in Paper No. 28 at p. 15; see
`158:5-15;
`- p. 151:6-19; misleading and/or
`incomplete as used in Paper No. 28 at
`p. 16; see 116:18-117:11;
`- p. 55:2-7; misleading and/or
`incomplete as used in Paper No. 28 at
`p. 21; cite does not support the
`
`2
`
`
`
`Exhibit # Description
`
`Objections
`
`proposition for which it is cited;
`- p. 59:12-18; misleading and/or
`incomplete as used in Paper No. 28 at
`p. 24; cite does not support the
`proposition for which it is cited; and
`- p. 129:1-5, 130:3-8; misleading and/or
`incomplete as used in Paper No. 28 at
`pp. 24-24; cite does not support the
`proposition for which it is cited.
`
`
`In addition to the objections stated on the
`record during the deposition, the following
`passages are objected to under 37 C.F.R. §
`42.53(d)(5)(ii) as outside the scope of the
`direct testimony:
`pp. 66:18-67:25;
`p.113:13-21;
`pp.153:19-158:15;
`pp.158:17-159:25; and
`pp.162:16-163:13.
`Relevancy, Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, and 403;
`and
`Hearsay, Fed. R. Evid. 802.
`Hearsay, Fed. R. Evid. 802;
`Authentication, Fed. R. Evid. 901;
`Relevancy, Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, and 403;
`and
`Completeness, Fed. R. Evid. 106, see, e.g.,
`Chaplin Report Ex. 2008 at ¶¶ 89, 91.
`Relevancy, Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, and 403;
`Hearsay, Fed. R. Evid. 802; and
`Authentication, Fed. R. Evid. 901.
`
`3
`
`1010
`
`1025
`
`1026
`
`U.S. Patent No. 4,409,780
`(Beougher)
`
`H&S 2130/2135 TRI-
`FLEX MERGERS,
`Operator’s Manual, dated
`January 15, 2015
`
`Internet Archive web page
`for AE50 Entry
`Information archived from
`www.asae.org, dated
`
`
`
`Exhibit # Description
`
`Objections
`
`December 5, 2003
`
`Date: May 10, 2017
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(Trial No. IPR2016-00950)
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`MERCHANT & GOULD, P.C.
`
`
`/Andrew J. Lagatta/
`Andrew J. Lagatta, Reg. No. 62,529
`Merchant & Gould P.C.
`80 South 8th St., Suite 3200
`Minneapolis, MN 55402
`Telephone: (612) 332-5300
`Fax: (612) 332-9081
`alagatta@merchantgould.com
`OxboIPR@merchantgould.com
`
`ATTORNEYS FOR PATENT OWNER
`
`4
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATION OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that “PATENT OWNER’S THIRD SET
`OF OBJECTIONS TO EVIDENCE” for the above-captioned matter was served in
`its entirety on May 10, 2017, upon the following parties via e-mail:
`
`
`Brad D. Pederson (Reg. No. 32,432)
`Eric H. Chadwick (Reg. No. 42,664)
`PATTERSON THUENTE PEDERSEN, P.A.
`80 South Eighth Street, Suite 4800
`Minneapolis, MN 55402
`Phone: (612) 349-5740
`Facsimile: (612) 349-9266
`chadwick@ptslaw.com
`pedersen@ptslaw.com
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`MERCHANT & GOULD, P.C.
`
`/Andrew J. Lagatta/
`
`
`
`
`
`Andrew J. Lagatta, Reg. No. 62,529
`Merchant & Gould P.C.
`80 South 8th St., Suite 3200
`Minneapolis, MN 55402
`Telephone: (612) 332-5300
`Fax: (612) 332-9081
`alagatta@merchantgould.com
`
`
`
`ATTORNEYS FOR PATENT OWNER
`
`
`
`5
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Date: May 10, 2017
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(IPR2016-00950)
`
`
`
`