`
`NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
`
`United States Court of Appeals
`for the Federal Circuit
`______________________
`
`UUSI, LLC, DBA NARTRON,
`Appellant
`
`v.
`
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.,
`Cross-Appellant
`
`KATHERINE K. VIDAL, UNDER SECRETARY OF
`COMMERCE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
`AND DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED STATES
`PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE,
`Intervenor
`______________________
`
`2021-1060, 2021-1122
`______________________
`
`Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark
`Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2016-
`00908.
`
`______________________
`
`JUDGMENT
`______________________
`
`LAWRENCE MILTON HADLEY, Glaser Weil Fink Howard
`Avchen & Shapiro LLP, Los Angeles, CA, argued for appel-
`lant. Also represented by STEPHEN UNDERWOOD.
`
`
`
`
`Case: 21-1060 Document: 88 Page: 2 Filed: 03/09/2023
`
`
`
` NAVEEN MODI, Paul Hastings LLP, Washington, DC,
`argued for cross-appellant. Also represented by CHETAN
`BANSAL, STEPHEN BLAKE KINNAIRD, JOSEPH PALYS, TOR
`TARANTOLA.
`
` BRADLEY HINSHELWOOD, Civil Division, United States
`Department of Justice, Washington, DC, argued for inter-
`venor. Also represented by PETER J. AYERS, SARAH E.
`CRAVEN, BENJAMIN T. HICKMAN, THOMAS W. KRAUSE,
`FARHEENA YASMEEN RASHEED, Office of the Solicitor,
`United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria,
`VA.
` ______________________
`
`THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
`
`ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
`
` PER CURIAM (DYK, BRYSON, and PROST, Circuit
`Judges).
`
`AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
`
`
` ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
`
`
`
`March 9, 2023
`Date
`
`/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner
`Peter R. Marksteiner
`Clerk of Court
`
`
`
`