throbber

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Paper No.
`Filed: December 11, 2019
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`
`
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`UUSI, LLC d/b/a NARTRON
`Patent Owner
`____________________
`
`Case IPR2016-00908
`Patent No. 5,796,183
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Petitioner’s Response to
`Board’s December 4th, 2019 Email Order
`
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Petitioner submits this paper explaining the relevance of statements in UUSI’s
`
`Patent Owner Response (Ex. 1019) filed in Apple, Inc. v. UUSI, LLC, IPR2019-
`
`00358. 1 One issue here is whether a PHOSITA would have reasonably expected
`
`success in modifying the Ingraham I-Caldwell combination such that the
`
`microcontroller is able to provide multiple frequencies to a touch pad array by
`
`selecting a frequency from multiple available frequencies. Specifically, Samsung
`
`submits that a PHOSITA would have modified the microcontroller in the Ingraham
`
`I-Caldwell combination based on Gerpheide’s teachings, to vary the oscillator
`
`frequency so that the microcontroller selectively provides multiple frequencies (as
`
`opposed to a single frequency) to the touch terminals. (See, e.g., Pet. at 26-29; Ex.
`
`1002, ¶¶ 69-72.) UUSI’s statements in IPR2019-00358 confirm that a POSITA
`
`would have expected success in making such a modification because UUSI admits
`
`that variable frequency oscillators whose frequency could be manipulated by a
`
`microcontroller were well-known and common at the time of the alleged invention
`
`and would have been readily implemented using well-known techniques. (Ex. 1019
`
`at 21-25, citing Ex. 1020.) Although these statements were in the context of written
`
`description, they reflect the understanding of a PHOSITA and are relevant here.
`
`
`1 Samsung reserves its rights to seek appropriate relief under Arthrex, Inc. v. Smith
`
`& Nephew, Inc., No. 18-2140, 2019 WL 5616010 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 31, 2019).
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`Case No. IPR2016-00908
`
`Dated: December 11, 2019
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`By: /Naveen Modi/
` Naveen Modi
` Reg. No. 46,224
` Counsel for Petitioner Samsung
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.6(e), I certify that I caused to be served on the
`
`counsel for Patent Owner a true and correct copy of the foregoing Petitioner’s
`
`Response to Board’s December 4th, 2019 Email Order by electronic means on the
`
`date below at the following address of record:
`
`sunderwood@glaserweil.com
`jweir@glaserweil.com
`lhadley@glaserweil.com
`
`
`Dated: December 11, 2019
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`By: /Naveen Modi/
` Naveen Modi
` Reg. No. 46,224
` Counsel for Petitioner Samsung
`
`
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket