`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`____________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`____________________
`
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.,
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`UUSI, LLC d/b/a NARTRON,
`Patent Owner
`
`____________________
`
`Case IPR2016-00908
`Patent No. 5,796,183
`____________________
`
`PATENT OWNER’S UNOPPOSED MOION TO WITHDRAW AND
`SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL UNDER 37 CFR § 42.10(e)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Filed: August 22, 2019
`
`
`
`Pursuant to 37 CFR § 42.10(e), Patent Owner moves to withdraw Jay P.
`
`Kesan (Reg. No. 37,488) as lead counsel and Teresa M. Summers (pro hac vice
`
`admission) as backup counsel in the above-captioned proceeding and to substitute
`
`Patent Owner’s new counsel for representation on remand from the U.S. Court of
`
`Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
`
`In its August 13, 2019, Revocation of Prior Patent Owner, Grant of New
`
`Power of Attorney, and Designation of New Lead and Backup Counsel (Paper 38),
`
`Patent Owner, Nartron, pursuant to 37 CFR § 1.36, revoked all prior Powers of
`
`Attorney that it had granted in this IPR. Jay P. Kesan and Teresa M. Summers
`
`were previously granted Power of Attorney on May 6, 2016 (Paper 6), and their
`
`Powers of Attorney were thus revoked. Patent Owner has already filed an Update
`
`to Mandatory Notice Information (Paper 37) (reflecting new lead and backup
`
`counsel) along with its Revocation of Prior Power of Attorney.
`
`On August 15, 2019, the Board convened a call with all counsel and
`
`requested that Patent Owner’s former lead and backup counsel file a motion to
`
`withdraw and substitute Patent Owner’s new counsel. Accordingly, Patent Owner
`
`believes that permission to file the present motion has previously been granted and
`
`Patent Owner is therefore filing the requested motion.
`
`
`
`Patent Owner represents that it has consulted with both Patent Owner’s new
`
`lead and backup counsel as well as with Petitioner and understands that no Party or
`
`Filed: August 22, 2019
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`counsel oppose this motion.
`
`Dated: August 22, 2019
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/Jay P. Kesan/
`Jay P. Kesan
`Reg. No. 37,488
`
`Prior Counsel for Patent Owner
`
`
`
`Filed: August 22, 2019
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.6(e), the undersigned certifies that on the date
`indicated below, a complete and entire copy of the foregoing Motion was served
`by email on the following counsel of record in this matter:
`
`Attorneys for Petitioner Samsung:
`• Naveen Modi (naveenmodi@paulhastings.com)
`• Joseph E. Palys (josephpalys@paulhastings.com)
`• Chetan R. Bansal (chetanbansal@paulhastings.com)
`
`
`Attorneys for Patent Owner
`• Stephen Underwood (sunderwood@glaserweil.com)
`• Jan Weir (jweir@glaserweil.com)
`
`Prior attorneys for Patent Owner Nartron:
`• Jay P. Kesan (jay@keyiplaw.com)
`• Teresa M. Summers (teresa@keyiplaw.com)
`
`
`
`
`Dated: August 22, 2019
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/Jay P. Kesan/
`Jay P. Kesan
`Reg. No. 37,488
`
`Prior Counsel for Patent Owner
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
