.
`
`United States Patent [19]
`Caldwell et al.
`
`[11] Patent Number:
`[45] Date of Patent:
`
`5,572,205
`Nov. 5, 1996
`
`[54] TOUCH CONTROL SYSTEM
`
`[75] Inventors: David W. Caldwell; Nicholas W.
`
`'
`Medendorp’ both of Holland’ Mlch'
`
`4,405,918 ' 9/1983 Wall et a1. .............. ..' ........ .. 340/365 C
`4,413,252 11/1983 Tyler et a1.
`341/33
`123431199110 ftalal -
`2129996574;
`
`,
`,
`4,495,485
`
`.
`z awa e
`1/1985 Smith . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
`
`.
`. . . .. 341/33
`
`_
`[73] Assrgnee: Donnelly Technology, Inc., Holland,
`Mlch-
`
`7/1985 Thomas et a1. ....................... .. 219/449
`4,527,049
`7/1985 Hilsum et a1. .................... .. 340/365 C
`4,529,968
`4,550,310 10/1985 Yamaguchi et al.
`341/33
`
`_
`[21] Appl' No" “L188
`22 Filed:
`Ma ' 29 1993
`[
`1
`r
`’
`[51] Int. Cl.“3 ................................................ .. H03K 17/955
`
`[52]
`
`..... .. 341133; 341/26; 345/168;
`200/600; 361/181; 219/451
`[58] Field of Search ................................ .. 341/20, 22, 26,
`341/33; 200/600; 345/168, 173; 331/65;
`361/181; 291/451, 464
`
`[56]
`
`References Cited
`
`NTS
`U'S‘ PATENT DOC
`3,846,791 11/1974 Foster ................................ .. 340/365 C
`3,971,013
`7/1976 Challoner et al. .................... .. 340/337
`3,974,472
`3/1976 Gould 61 a1
`341/ 33
`5381/33
`131377 gordan
`’ 9 ’
`78 ell-88°
`7
`6
`4,119,864 10/1978 Petrlzlo
`307/116
`4 123 631 10/1978 Lewis _ _
`341,33
`4:136:291
`1,1979 Wald“); __________ “
`307/308
`4,145,748
`3/1979 gichelbel-ger et a]
`364/862
`4,159,473
`6/1979 Senk .................................. .. 340/565
`4,161,766
`7/1979 Castleberry et a1. ............. .. 361/281
`4,175,239 11/1979 Saddler - - t - - - - - - - - - - - -
`- - - -- 307/116
`
`4,203,280
`
`5/1980 2193161‘ EH11
`363/187
`""" "
`i5
`121980 M111; et 31' '
`' ' ' " 3 7
`6
`1980 W81 on ' ‘ ' ' ' '
`’ 3 ’
`323/349
`l/l98l Chlang ...... ..
`4,246,533
`341/33
`4/1981 Hirata et a1. ...... ..
`4,263,659
`341,33
`9,1981 Eichelberger et 31.
`4,290,052
`. 341/33
`9/1981 Cutler et al. .......... ..
`4,291,303
`.... .. 341/33
`4,304,976 12/1981 Gottbreht et a1. ..
`. 1219/1049 R
`4,308,443 12/1981 Tucker et a1.
`----- -- 341/33
`4,323,829
`4/1982 Witney et a1-
`- 361/230
`4,380,040
`4/1933 Posse‘ -------- --
`......... .. 341/33
`4,394,643
`7/1983 Williams
`...... .. 361/290
`4,400,758
`8/1983 Frame
`4,405,917
`9/1983 Chai .................................. .. 340/365 C
`
`4,561,002 12/1985 Chiu . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
`
`. . . .. 341/33
`
`341/33
`l/1986 Yoshikawa et al.
`4,567,470
`341/33
`9/1986 Poujois ........... ..
`4,614,937
`341/33
`3/1987 Ganesan B1181. ..
`4,651,133
`307/126
`5/1987 Ogino 61 a1. .... ..
`4,665,324
`4,709,228 11/1937 Bucking el al- ------------------ ‘- 340/365E
`
`-
`ist C
`ontlnued on next a e.
`0“
`p g )
`Primary Examiner-Jeffery Hofsass
`Assistant Examiner-Daniel J. Wu
`Attorney, Agent, or Firm-Van Dyke, Gardner, Linn &
`Burkhart, LLP
`
`ABSTRACT
`[57]
`A touch control system that is responsive to a user input
`selection includes an electrically non-conducting substrate,
`Such as glass ceramic, and at least one capacitive-responsive
`touch pad on the substrate. A source signal having a primary
`frequency that is greater than 150 kHz, and preferably in the
`range of between 150 kHz and 500 kHz, is applied to one
`.
`.
`portion of the touch pad. The touch pad couples the electrlcal
`signal to another portion of the touch pad in order to develop
`a detection signal, which is decoded in order to determine
`the presence of the capacitance of a user. The decoder
`preferably includes a peak detector composed of a low gain
`circuit in order to avoid distortion-of the detection signal.
`
`Greatly improved performance in the presence of liquids,
`such as water, on the touch pad is provided. This is espe
`cially useful when the touch pad is applied to a horizontal
`urf
`h
`k t
`hi h 1.
`.d
`.11
`5
`ace’ “F as ? °_°°
`0P’ up"? w c “1m SP1 ,5 may
`occur. A display is juxtaposed with the glass ceramic sub
`Straw and an Optical Correction material is Provided between
`the display and the underlying modulated surface that
`imparts mechanical strength to the substrate. The optical
`correction material corrects optical distortion of the visual
`indications of the display caused by the modulated surface.
`
`60 Claims, 4 Drawing Sheets
`
`/’—\\
`/
`/
`I/
`
`l
`\
`\
`
`/’_“\
`/
`\
`\\
`/
`/
`\
`I
`l
`'
`I
`\
`/
`\
`/
`
`\
`
`l
`/
`I
`
`H'GH
`i?lilEEQDURElUgl:
`
`i
`'
`1
`' L34
`
`832
`
`2
`F _ _ ‘l
`'
`1
`'
`'
`I
`L_ _ _ _ _|
`16a
`161’
`
`44
`L ,
`INDICATORS,
`POWER CIRCUITS
`
`i38
`
`(
`42
`
`/'T\\
`/ /
`\
`/
`\\
`/
`\
`I
`\
`l
`I
`\
`/
`\
`/
`
`/ /
`\ \ \
`\_|_/
`l
`l
`I
`l
`l
`:
`
`'14
`
`3_O
`
`/
`\ \
`\ I. /
`'
`l
`1
`I
`l
`I
`‘
`‘
`l
`|
`K36
`
`/ / /
`\ \
`\?/
`'
`l
`|
`I
`I
`i
`l
`I
`I
`1
`L4o
`
`AMPLITUDE
`RESPONSE
`SWITCH
`
`PEAK
`DETECTOR
`
`EXHIBIT 2006
`
`

`
`5,572,205
`Page 2
`
`US. PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`4,920,343
`
`4/1990 Schwartz ................................. .. 341/33
`
`4712163 12/1987 OX1
`4,731,694
`3,1988 Gmbneret a1”
`
`,
`
`,
`
`ey ...................................... ..
`
`362/29
`361,280
`
`. . . .. 341/32
`4,736,190
`4/1988 FiDl'ella . . . . . . .
`_341/33
`4740781 4,1988 Brown ____ "
`4:743:895
`5/1988 Alexander ............................... .. 341/33
`4,794,233 12/1988 GOCSSIEI' et a1. ...................... .. 219/464
`4,855,550
`8/1989 Schultz, Jr.
`.. 280/600
`4,894,493
`1/1990 Sfnith et a1, _
`__ 200/600
`4,901,074
`2/1990 Sinn 6161. .............................. .. 341/22
`4,914,553
`4/1990 Hamada et a1. ........................ .. 362/32
`
`4,924,222
`4,954,823
`
`5/1990 Antikidis et a1. ....................... .. 341/33
`9/1990 Blnstead .......... ..
`341/26
`
`4
`
`219/451
`4981812 1/1991 W‘man ‘*1 al-
`341/22
`5,012,124
`4/1991 Hollaway .... ..
`-- 341/24
`5,153,572 10/1992 Caldwell et a1- -
`~219/451
`5,155,338 10/1992 Hoffman“
`-- 307/147
`5,157,273 10/1992 Medendom et a1-
`219/452
`5,183,996
`2/1993 Hazan 6161. .... ..
`.. 341126
`5,189,417
`2/1993 Caldwell er a1. .
`5,270,710 12/1993 Gaultier et a1. ......................... .. 741/33
`
`EXHIBIT 2006
`
`

`
`US. Patent
`
`Nov. 5, 1996
`
`Sheet 1 of 4
`
`5,572,205
`
`12
`
`22
`
`4 1.
`
`2 w:
`
`Hm W W Hm \\
`
`Wm M 1WD n
`M: A Yw Mm F w, H m mm ~U. m m mu 4
`/ m H 1m \‘M
`m EA w
`
`
`
`22"
`
`Fig. 7
`
`M / y/mk H
`
`mm Wm M E
`D: A YW 0m. Mm W MS A YW m M ?aw m w»
`
`_ / /
`4 H M
`
`4~l / _
`
`E m E c .M 2
`
`a E m w 6
`
`L2
`122
`/14
`16a
`
`{14
`16a
`
`16b
`
`18
`
`Fig. 2
`
`EXHIBIT 2006
`
`

`
`US. Patent
`
`Nov. 5, 1996
`
`Sheet 2 0f 4
`
`5,572,205
`
`EXHIBIT 2006
`
`

`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Nov. 5, 1996
`
`Sheet 3 of4
`
`5,572,205
`
`
`
`m:3om_omm=son_
`
`.mmo+<o_n_z_
`
`3
`
`mQD._._._n_S_<
`
`mmzoammm
`
`IO._._>>m
`
`v_<mn_
`
`mopomfia
`
`mvmm
`
`I0_I
`
`>ozm:ommn_
`
`mm>_momz_._
`
`EXHIBIT 2006
`
`EXHIBIT 2006
`
`
`
`

`
`US. Patent
`
`Nov. 5, 1996
`
`Sheet 4 of 4
`
`5,572,205
`
`EXHIBIT 2006
`
`

`
`5,572,205
`
`1
`TOUCH CONTROL SYSTEM
`
`BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`2
`from glass ceramic material having a greater thickness, on
`the order of three (3) to ?ve (5) millimeters and require
`negligible thermal expansion. Additionally, the surface of
`the substrate facing away from the user is modulated, or
`dimpled, in order to add greater mechanical strength to the
`substrate. The thickness of the glass ceramic material and
`the modulated surface have prevented, in the past, applica
`tion of touch control technology to such large horizontal
`substrates.
`
`SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
`
`The present invention is embodied in a touch control that
`is responsive to a user input selection. The control includes
`an electrically non~conducting substrate and a capacitance
`responsive touch pad on the substrate. A signal generator is
`provided as a source to generate an electrical signal and to
`apply the signal to one portion of the touch pad. The touch
`pad couples the electrical signal to another portion of the
`touch pad in order to develop a detection signal. The touch
`pad responds to the presence of capacitance of a user in
`order to selectively attenuate the detection signal. A decod~
`ing circuit responds to the detection signal in order to
`determine the presence of the capacitance of a user.
`According to one aspect of the invention, a source signal
`generator is provided that generates a high frequency elec
`trical signal having a primary frequency that is greater than
`150 kHz and preferably in the range of between 150 kHz and
`500 kHz. Such high frequency electrical signal may be a
`square wave, a triangular wave, a sawtooth wave, a sinu
`soidal wave or some other waveform. This aspect of the
`invention is based upon the discovery that touch controls
`operated at such primary frequencies have improved water
`immunity performance. According to another aspect of the
`invention, the decoding circuit may include a peak detector
`that is coupled directly with the detection signal, in order to
`produce an output, and a switch circuit that is responsive to
`the output of the peak detector in order to determine an
`amplitude of the output indicative of attenuation of the
`source electrical signal. The peak detector is preferably a
`low gain circuit in order to avoid distorting the detection
`signal by exceeding the gain/bandwidth product of the
`circuit and in order to avoid fast signal slew rates. The
`switch circuit is preferably coupled to the output of the peak
`detector by an ampli?er circuit. In this manner, ampli?cation
`is performed on the lower frequency signal of the peak
`detector output rather than on the higher frequency of the
`detection signal. The gain/bandwidth product of the system
`is not exceeded at any point in order to provide a more
`accurate detection of the effect of a user contacting a touch
`pad and low slew-rate components may be used to embody
`the invention.
`V
`According to another aspect of the invention, a touch
`control is provided for a glass ceramic substrate having a
`user contact surface and an opposite modulated surface. A
`keypad is de?ned by a plurality of touch pads, each of tile
`touch pads having a pair of electrically conductive elements
`a?ixed to the modulated surface. A signal generator is
`provided that is adapted to generate an electrical signal and
`to apply the signal to one of the electrically conductive
`elements of at least one of the touch pads. The electrical
`signal is passively coupled to the other one of the electrically
`conductive elements in order to develop a detection signal.
`The touch pads respond to the presence of capacitance of a
`user in order to selectively attenuate the detection signal. A
`decoding circuit is provided that responds to the detection
`
`This invention relates generally to touch control systems
`and, more particularly, to capacitance-responsive touch con
`trol input devices for application to horizontal substrates,
`such as glass ceramic panels. The invention is particularly
`adapted for use with smooth-top induction, radiant, and
`halogen burner cooking appliances.
`Touch control input devices that respond to the capaci
`tance of a user’s contact in order to actuate an appliance are
`typically applied to a vertical surface. While such orientation
`is primarily for the convenience of use, it avoids several
`problems associated with applying touch controls to hori
`zontal surfaces, such as smooth-top cooking appliances. One
`di?iculty with application to horizontal substrates is that
`there is a greater likelihood that liquids will be splashed on
`the touch control applied to a horizontal surface, such as a
`range cook top. Such moisture tends to cause erratic opera
`tion of the input control, which could be dangerous in the
`case of a cooking appliance. This dif?culty is typically
`overcome by separating the touch control from the cooking
`surface in order to provide a physical barrier between the
`two. This solution is not without its drawbacks. The primary
`bene?t of a smooth-top cooking appliance is to eliminate the
`di?iculty of cleaning up from spills and boil~over getting
`into burner elements. While separate touch control input
`devices are an improvement over electromechanical con
`trols, which still allow places where spills can accumulate,
`the requirement for a physical barrier between the cook top
`and the touch control is an impediment to easy cleanup and
`is a compromise in aesthetic appearance.
`An attempt to overcome the problem caused by watery
`spills on the support surface of a smooth-top cooking
`appliance causing erroneous operation of a touch control
`applied directly to the support surface is disclosed in U.S.
`Pat. No. 4,446,350 issued to Takumi Mizukawa et al. for an
`INDUCTION HEATING COOKING APPARATUS. In
`Mizukawa et al., touch pads are provided on the upper
`surface of a pan supporting plate and are enclosed by guard
`rings of conductive material composed of a grounded con
`ductor and an enclosing conductor. A control circuit, which
`is responsive to the touch pads and the guard rings, responds
`to spilled water or the like contacting the guard rings by
`latching a power control circuit at a zero power level. This
`resets the cooking apparatus to a zero heat output condition.
`The solution proposed in Mizukawa et al. has several
`di?iculties. At least one of the guard rings must be connected
`with a ground potential in order to be effective. This requires
`conductive leads being applied to the pan support surface,
`which is costly and a potential source of failure. Addition
`ally, Mizukawa et a1. responds to spilled water by latching
`the cooking apparatus into a zero output condition. This is a
`nuisance to the user by requiting that the spill be wiped up
`and the power level of the cooking apparatus reset in order
`to continue with the cooking operation.
`Another difficulty with applying a touch control to a
`horizontal substrate is that code requirements, as well as
`conservative engineering practices, dictate that large hori
`zontal panels be manufactured using particular materials and
`in a particular manner to avoid breakage due to either
`mechanical impact or thermal shock. In particular, while
`relatively thin soda-lime glass may be utilized for vertical
`touch panels, smooth-top cooking surfaces that are capable
`of supporting multiple pans above multiple burners are made
`
`45
`
`SO
`
`55
`
`65
`
`EXHIBIT 2006
`
`

`
`5,572,205
`
`3
`circuit in order to determine the presence of capacitance of
`a user.
`According to yet another aspect of the invention, a display
`is juxtaposed with the substrate modulated surface in order
`to provide visual indications to a user. An optical correction
`material is provided between the display and the substrate.
`The optical correction material corrects optical distortion of
`the visual indications of the display caused by the modulated
`surface. In a preferred embodiment, the optical correction
`material is a transparent adhesive that adheres a ?exible
`carrier carrying the display device and/or the touch pad
`?exible conductor to the glass substrate.
`The present invention overcomes tile dif?culties of the
`prior art by providing a touch control that has greatly
`improved performance in the presence of liquids, such as
`water, on the touch pads positioned on the user interface
`surface of the substrate. Because the system’s immunity to
`water is signi?cantly improved, there is no necessity for a
`specialized guard ring or for latching of the cooking appli
`ance in an o?c state in the presence of water. Accordingly, the
`user is not bothered by having to reset the power level of the
`burner when a liquid spill occurs. The present invention
`allows, for the ?rst time, a practical application of a touch
`control to a glass ceramic substrate having a modulated rear
`surface. A touch control circuit is provided according to the
`invention which is capable of accommodating the electrical
`characteristics of such substrate. In addition, a unique means
`is provided to correct distortions of the image displayed by
`a display device and viewed through the dimpled, modulated
`surface of the substrate.
`These and other objects, advantages and features of this
`invention will become apparent upon review of the follow
`ing speci?cation in conjunction with the drawings.
`
`20
`
`4
`applied by conventional sputtering or pyrolyric techniques.
`Touch control 10 may additionally include indicators 22 in
`order to provide visual indication to the user of the condition
`of the appliance being controlled (not shown). In the illus
`trated embodiment, substrate 12 is a glass ceramic member
`having a thickness in the range of three (3) to ?ve (5)
`millimeters in order to provide adequate strength for hori
`zontal applications in which mechanical stress may be
`applied to the substrate. One such application is a smooth
`top cooking surface for a 4-burner cooking appliance. In
`order to further enhance the strength of substrate 12, surface
`18 is modulated or dimpled (FIG. 2). Substrate 12 is
`marketed under the mark “Ceran” by Schott Glass Company
`located in Yonkers, NY.
`In order to apply the conductive elements 16a, 16b of
`each touch pad to surface 18 of substrate 12, the conductive
`elements 16a, 16b are mounted to a ?exible carrier 24.
`Carrier 24 is adhered to surface 18 by an adhesive layer 26.
`Additionally, indicators 22 are mounted to ?exible carrier 24
`in order to locate the indicators in a position where they may
`be viewed through substrate 12. In order to correct optical
`distortion created by the presence of the modulations, or
`dimples, on surface 18, an optical correction material 23 is
`positioned between indicator 22 and modulated surface 18.
`Optical correction material 23 has an index of refraction that
`is compatible with that of substrate 12 and ?lls in the voids
`between the dimples of surface 18, as well as the space
`between surface 18 and indicator 22. In this manner, light
`emitted by indicator 22 passes through substrate 12 without
`substantial distortion.
`Operation of optical correction material 23 may be under
`stood by comparing an indicator 22' in FIG. 6 with an
`indicator 22" in FIG. 7. Indicator 22 illustrates the optical
`effect of modulated surface 18. The different incidence
`angles of light rays caused by the dimples creates a “?sh
`eye” elfect whereby an initially homogeneous indication
`takes on the appearance of numerous circles and the indi
`cation has serrated edges. In contrast, indicator 22" illus
`trates the corrective effect of optical correction material 23
`in eliminating distortions to the homogeneous appearance of
`the indicator, including retaining the crisp edges of the initial
`indication.
`Optical correction material, in the illustrated embodiment,
`is a transparent acrylic material. While optical correction
`material 23 is clear, it may be also dyed in order to modify
`the color of indicators 22. A clear acrylic material in transfer
`adhesive form is commercially available from the 3M Com
`pany, Minneapolis, Minn., and marketed under Type 300MP.
`In a most preferred embodiment, a clear acrylic adhesive,
`such as 3M Type 300MP, is applied to the entire interface
`between surface 18 and ?exible carrier 24 at a thickness of
`0.013 inches in order to a?ix the ?exible carrier to the
`substrate and to provide optical correction material for
`indicators 22.
`Touch control 10 includes an electronic control 30 having
`a high frequency line driver 32 as a source for producing a
`high frequency pulsed signal at 34, which is applied to
`portion 16a of touch pad 14 (FIGS. 4 and 5). This signal is
`capacitively coupled to portion 16b of touch pad 14 in order
`to produce a detection signal at 36. When there is no user .
`contacting the user contact pad 20 associated with touch pad
`14, the very high frequency signal at 34 is coupled to
`detection signal 36 without attenuation by the capacitance of
`the user’s body. This is illustrated as the initial portion (left
`side) of the waveform illustrated at 36. When, however, a
`‘user engages the user contact pad 20 associated with touch
`pad 14, the detection signal becomes attenuated to a lower
`
`BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
`
`35
`
`FIG. 1 is a top plan view of a system incorporating a touch
`control according to the invention;
`FIG. 2 is a sectional view taken along the lines II—II in
`FIG. 1;
`FIG. 3 is an exploded perspective view from the top of the
`touch control in FIG. 1;
`FIG. 4 is a block diagram of a touch control according to
`the invention;
`FIG. 5 is an electrical schematic diagram of a touch
`control according to the invention;
`FIG. 6 is an illustration of an optical indicator without an
`optical correction material; and
`FIG. 7 is an illustration of an optical indicator with an
`optical correction material according to the invention.
`
`DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED
`EMBODIMENT
`
`Referring now speci?cally to the drawings, and the illus
`trated embodiment depicted therein, a touch control 10
`includes a generally planar substrate 12 and a plurality of
`touch pads, generally indicated at 14 applied to substrate 12
`(FIG. 1 ). Each touch pad 14 includes a ?rst portion
`composed of an electrically conducting element 16a and a
`second portion composed of an electrically conducting ele
`ment 16b a?ixed to a surface 18 of substrate 12, which faces
`away from the user (FIGS. 24). Each touch pad 14, in the
`illustrative embodiment, also includes a user contact pad 20
`overlying the conductive elements 16a and 16b. User con
`tact pads 20 are transparent conductive metallic oxide ?lms
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`EXHIBIT 2006
`
`

`
`5,572,205
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`5
`amplitude as illustrated in the second portion (right side) of
`the waveform illustrated at 36 in FIG. 4. In the illustrated
`embodiment, portion 16a and 16b provide a 10-30 picofarad
`(pf) coupling between the high frequency signal at 34 and
`the detection signal at 36. Accordingly, a peak voltage, for
`example, of between ?ve (5) and twelve (12) volts produced
`by the high frequency line driver may develop a detection
`signal at 36 on the order of magnitude of 70 mv.
`The detection signal on line 36 is decoded by a peak
`detector 38, which produces an output 40, and an amplitude
`responsive switch 42, which responds to the amplitude of
`output 40 in order to actuate appropriate indicators, power
`circuits and the like, as illustrated at 44. High frequency line
`driver 32 has a primary frequency that is at least equal to 150
`kHz. It has been discovered that, for primary frequencies of
`150 kHz and above, touch control 10 has increased immu
`nity to cross-coupling between adjacent touch pad 14 due to
`liquids, such as water, on substrate 12. While it is believed
`that most frequencies above 150 kHz would provide
`improved liquid immunity, considerations of component
`con?gurations of control system 30 would suggest a prac
`tical upper limit of approximately 500 kHz on the primary
`frequency for line driver 32. In the illustrated embodiment,
`line driver 32 has a primary frequency of 250 kHz. In the
`illustrated embodiment, the output signal of high frequency
`line driver 32 is a square wave varying between zero volts
`and an upper limit, such as ?ve volts. When coupled through
`portions 16a and 16b of touch pad 14, the detection signal
`at 36 is a square wave which oscillates equally at both
`polarities with respect to signal ground. Alternatively, high
`frequency line driver 32 could produce other waveforms,
`such as a triangle, sawtooth or sinusoidal waveform.
`Another advantage of utilizing a high frequency line
`driver as a source for control system 30 is that the waveform
`of the detection signal at 36 retains its original waveform
`notwithstanding the relatively small coupling capacitance
`between conductive elements 16a and 16b. Thus, the ten
`dency of prior art systems to distort the waveform of the
`detection signal by coupling the higher frequency primary
`component to a noticeably greater extent than the lower
`frequency components of the square wave- is reduced
`because all frequency components are at or greater than the
`primary frequency, which is at a high frequency. This
`provides a more efficient coupling which is desirable to
`oifset the effects of the greater thickness of substrate 12.
`Furthermore, the output of peak detector 38, at 40, exhibits
`a relatively ?at amplitude for both the attenuated and
`non-attenuated conditions of detection signal at 36. This
`improves the reliability of the system by increasing the
`distinction between touched and non-touched conditions of
`touch pad 14. Furthermore, in contrast to prior systems in
`which the detection signal at 36 is ampli?ed prior to decod
`ing, peak detector 38 is coupled directly with the detection
`signal at 36. Because, in the illustrated embodiment, peak
`detector 38 has a low gain, the gain/bandwidth product of
`the system accorrunodates the very high frequency of line
`driver 32 without distortion of the signal. The gain/band
`width product, as is well understood to those skilled in the
`art, is a constant for each system and dictates that the
`frequency band multiplied by the gain of each ampli?er
`cannot exceed a prede?ned constant without distorting the
`signal. The output 40 of peak detector 38, in contrast, is a
`relatively low frequency signal having a signi?cant DC
`component. Accordingly, desirable ampli?cation can be
`applied to output 40 by amplitude-responsive switch 42
`without compromising the gain/bandwidth product of the
`system. In addition, the output 40 of peak detector 38 has a
`
`6
`limited amplitude range. Therefore, components utilized in
`peak detector 38 are not required to have a high slew-rate
`capability, which reduces the expense of such components.
`Although control system 30 has been described as it
`applies to an individual touch pad 14, the same principles are
`applicable to a keypad 15 composed of multiple touch pads '
`14 wherein known multiplexing techniques are utilized to
`apply high frequency line driver 32 and peak detector 38
`sequentially to touch pads 14a, 14b .
`.
`. 14n in a strobed
`fashion. Such a system is illustrated in FIG. 5 in which a 250
`kHz pulsed signal generator 46 has an output 47 that is
`applied to a demultiplexing circuit 48. Under the control of
`an output line 49 of a microcomputer 50, demultiplexer 48
`sequentially applies the output of signal generator 46 to
`driver lines 52a, 52b and 520. Because of the sequential
`nature of the application of the drive signal to the drive lines,
`I the drive signal appears as a burst of high frequency pulses
`on each of the drive lines 52a-52c. The pulse bursts, in turn,
`produce detection signals on sense lines 54a-54d, which are
`connected to different groups of touch pads 14a—14n than
`the pads connected to driver lines 52a-52c. The sense lines
`54a—54d are provided as inputs to a multiplex circuit 56,
`which is under the control of microcomputer 50, via line 55,
`in order to synchronize multiplex circuit 56 with the opera
`tion of the demultiplex circuit 48. Because multiplex circuit
`56 is a switching device, which sequentially applies each
`sense line 5411-5441 to detection signal line 57 connected
`with peak detector 38, the peak detector is directly coupled
`sequentially with each of the sense lines 54a-54d. Touch
`pads 14a .
`. . 1411, which are sequentially coupled to signal
`generator 46 and to decoding circuit 38, are thereby multi
`plexed with the signal generator and the decoding circuit.
`Peak detector 38, in the illustrated embodiment, is com
`posed of an operational ampli?er 58 whose output 59 is
`connected by a diode 60 with its inverting input 61. Diode
`60 is also connected, through a resistor 63, with output 40.
`Detection signal line 57 is connected with the non-inverting
`input of ampli?er 58. Detection signal line 57 is additionally
`connected to signal ground through a pulldown resistor 62.
`This con?guration is a low gain peak detector because the
`direct connection feedback provides ampli?er 58 with a
`unity gain. Alternatively, diode 60 could be replaced with a
`short circuit and a diode connected between output 59 and
`resistor 63. Output 40 is ?ltered by a ?lter 64 in order to
`complete the peak detect function of peak detector 38. Filter
`64 is composed of a parallel combination of resistor 66 and
`capacitor 68 connected between output 40 and signal
`ground.
`In the illustrated‘embodiment, pull-down resistor 62 is a
`10 kohm resistor. This provides very low input impedance to
`peak detector 38 which, advantageously, imparts excep
`tional static electricity resistance to touch control 10. Static
`charges applied to substrate 12 are rapidly dissipated
`through resistor 62. This low input impedance is possible
`because of the exceptional signal strength of the detection
`signal as a result of the very high frequency primary
`component of the drive signal, as well as the equivalent
`resistance/capacitance value (RC) of this portion of the
`circuit.
`Output 40 is provided to the non-inverting input of an
`ampli?er 70. A biasing network composed of resistors 72a
`and 72b connected in a conventional fashion between an
`inverting input of ampli?er 70 and its output 88 establishes
`the gain of ampli?er 70. As previously described, because
`the signal on output 40 of peak detector 38 has a relatively
`low frequency content, the gain of ampli?er 70 may be set
`at a relatively high level without exceeding the gain/band
`
`45
`
`55
`
`65
`
`EXHIBIT 2006
`
`

`
`5,572,205
`
`.
`20
`
`25
`
`35
`
`40
`
`7
`width product of the system and without creating high slew
`rates. In the illustrated embodiment, the voltage gain of
`ampli?er 70 is between 80 and 100.
`In order to detect the capacitance of a user contacting one
`of the touch pads 14a-14n, output 88 of ampli?er 70 is
`applied to an amplitude-responsive switching circuit, which
`in the illustrated embodiment is a successive approximation
`register 74 controlled with microcomputer 50. Successive
`approximation register (SAR) 74 provides a highly accurate
`means to allow microcomputer 50 to determine relative
`amplitude of output 88 of ampli?er 70. SAR 74 includes a
`resistance network 76, which is composed of a ladder of
`resistances which vary from each other in multiples of two.
`Therefore, such network is referred to as an R2R network.
`The RZR network 76 is utilized by microcomputer 50 in
`order to produce an analog signal at 78 as a function of the
`combination of output lines 75 actuated by the microcom
`puter. The analog signal at 78 is scaled by an ampli?er 80
`whose scaling factor is established by bias resistors 82a and
`8212 connected in conventional fashion with respect to its
`output 84 and inverting input. Output 84 is connected with
`the inverting input of a comparator 86 whose non-inverting
`input is connected with output 88. The output of 90 of
`comparator 86 is provided as an input to microcomputer 50.
`SAR 74 operates as follows. In order to determine the
`relative analog voltage at output 88, microcomputer 50
`actuates a combination of output lines 75 representative of
`a known relative analog voltage at output 84 of scaling
`ampli?er 80. Comparator 86 will compare this analog volt
`age at 84 with the analog voltage at output 88 of ampli?er
`70. Output 90 of comparator 86 will assume one of two
`alternate states depending upon whether the approximate
`voltage produced at output 84 is greater than, or less than,
`the output voltage 88 of ampli?er 70. Microcomputer 50
`interprets the state of output 90 in order to adjust the states
`of output line 75 and vary the analog voltage at 84 until it
`is substantially equal to the analog voltage at 88. Micro
`computer 50 then makes a determination whether such
`analog voltage represents a touched or non-touched condi
`tion for the associated touch pads 14a—14n. Such determi
`nation is made in software resident in microcomputer 50 in
`the manner disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,189,417 issued to
`David Caldwell and Nicholas Medendorp for a DETEC
`TION CIRCUIT FOR MATRIX TOUCH PAD, the disclo
`sure of which is hereby incorporated herein by reference,
`except that relative amplitude is used in circuit 30 to
`determine a touch/no touch condition rather than relative
`pulse-width used as in the ’417 patent. Microcomputer 50
`may then actuate the appropriate elements of indicator 22,
`power relays or the like at output 44 depending upon the
`responses programmed within the microcomputer for vari
`ous combinations of input selections by the user contacting
`touch pads 14a-14n.
`Successive approximation registers (SARs) are well
`known in the art. The advantage of such an SAR is that it
`provides a higher resolution detection of the relative analog
`volt