`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Paper 33
`Entered: June 13, 2017
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`UUSI, LLC d/b/a NARTRON,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2016-00908
`Patent 5,796,183
`____________
`
`
`
`Before THOMAS L. GIANNETTI, CARL M. DEFRANCO, and
`KAMRAN JIVANI, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`JIVANI, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`ORDER
`Trial Hearing
`37 C.F.R. § 42.10
`
`
`
`IPR2016-00908
`Patent 5,796,183
`
`
`The Scheduling Orders in these proceedings set the date for oral
`hearing to June 22, 2017, if a hearing was requested by the parties and
`granted by the Board. Paper 13. Each party requested oral hearing pursuant
`to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70. Papers 29, 30. The requests for oral hearing are
`granted.
`The hearing will commence at 10:00 AM, on June 22, 2017, on the
`ninth floor of Madison Building East, 600 Dulany Street, Alexandria,
`Virginia. The Board will provide a court reporter for the hearing and the
`reporter’s transcript will constitute the official record of the hearing. There
`are no motions to seal in the present proceeding. Accordingly, the Board
`exercises its discretion to make the final hearing publically available via in-
`person attendance. The hearing will be open to the public for in-person
`attendance that will be accommodated on a first-come, first-served basis.
`Each party will have a total of forty-five (45) minutes to present any
`arguments relating to this case. Petitioner bears the ultimate burden of proof
`that the claims under review in this case are unpatentable. Therefore,
`Petitioner will proceed first, and Patent Owner will follow. Petitioner may
`then use any time Petitioner reserved for rebuttal. The parties are reminded
`that the presenter must identify clearly and specifically any demonstrative
`exhibit (e.g., by slide or screen number) referenced during the hearing to
`ensure the clarity and accuracy of the reporter’s transcript and the ability of
`all judges to follow the presenter’s arguments.
`Under 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(b), the parties shall serve any demonstrative
`exhibits upon each other at least seven (7) business days prior to the hearing.
`The parties also shall provide the demonstrative exhibits to the Board at least
`two (2) business days prior to the hearing by emailing them to
`
`2
`
`
`
`IPR2016-00908
`Patent 5,796,183
`
`Trials@uspto.gov. The parties shall not file any demonstrative exhibits in
`this case without prior authorization. The parties are directed to St. Jude
`Medical, Cardiology Division, Inc. v. The Board of Regents of the University
`of Michigan, Case IPR2013-00041, Paper 65, 2–5 (PTAB Jan. 27, 2014), for
`guidance regarding the appropriate content of demonstrative exhibits.
`Patent Owner has filed a motion seeking authorization for backup
`counsel to attend and argue at the hearing in lieu of lead counsel.
`Paper 32, 1; Ex. 2013 ¶¶ 2–4. Patent Owner’s motion is hereby granted.
`If Petitioner anticipates that its lead counsel will not be able to attend the
`hearing, Petitioner shall request a conference call with the Board to occur no
`later than two (2) business days prior to the hearing.
`Any requests regarding special equipment or needs, such as for
`audio/visual equipment, should be directed to Trials@uspto.gov. Requests
`for special equipment will not be honored unless presented in a separate
`communication directed to the identified email address not less than five (5)
`business days before the hearing.
`
`3
`
`
`
`IPR2016-00908
`Patent 5,796,183
`
`
`FOR PETITIONER:
`Naveen Modi
`Joseph Palys
`Chetan Bansal
`PAUL HASTINGS LLP
`naveenmodi@paulhastings.com
`josephpalys@paulhastings.com
`chetanbansal@paulhastings.com
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`Jay P. Kesan
`Teresa M. Summers
`DIMURO GINSBERG PC
`jay@keyiplaw.com
`teresa@keyiplaw.com
`
`
`4
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
