`Filed: May 6, 2016
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`____________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`____________________
`
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`UUSI, LLC d/b/a NARTRON
`Patent Owner
`
`____________________
`
`Case IPR2016-00908
`Patent No. 5,796,183
`____________________
`
`
`PATENT OWNER’S MOTION FOR
`PRO HAC VICE ADMISION OF TERESA M. SUMMERS
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case IPR2016-00908
`Patent No. 5,796,183
`
`
`
`
`Patent Owner UUSI, LLC d/b/a/ Nartron. (“UUSI” or “Patent Owner”)
`
`respectfully requests that the Board recognize and admit Teresa M. Summers as
`
`counsel pro hac vice to represent UUSI during the above-captioned proceeding.
`
`The bases and support for UUSI’s requests are as follows.
`
` 1. Timing of UUSI’s Request
`
`UUSI’s motion is being filed no sooner than twenty-one (21) days after the
`
`service of the petition.
`
` 2. Good Cause Basis for UUSI’s Request
`
`The Board may recognize counsel pro hac vice during a proceeding upon a
`
`showing of good cause, subject to the condition that lead counsel is a registered
`
`practitioner and a declaration of the party seeking admission is included with the
`
`Request. 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c). Good cause has been shown where, for example,
`
`the attorney for which pro hac vice admission is sought is an experienced patent
`
`litigator and has a familiarity with the subject matter at issue in the proceeding, and
`
`the admission of the party’s counsel will facilitate the party’s ability to effectively
`
`participate in the proceeding. UUSI respectfully submits that all of these
`
`conditions have been met here.
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case IPR2016-00908
`Patent No. 5,796,183
`
`
`UUSI’s lead counsel, Jay P. Kesan, is a registered practitioner. See Exhibit
`
`2000, Declaration of Teresa M. Summers in Support of Motion for Admission Pro
`
`Hac Vice (“Summers Decl.”), at ¶ 15.
`
`As demonstrated by her declaration, Ms. Summers is an experienced
`
`litigator who has litigated patent infringement cases for various parties in federal
`
`district courts throughout the United States, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the
`
`Federal Circuit, and the International Trade Commission. Id. at ¶¶3-7. Ms.
`
`Summers clerked at the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and represents
`
`clients in appeals before that Court. Id. at ¶¶4, 6. Her legal career spans over
`
`thirteen (13) years. See Id. at ¶¶3, 7. Ms. Summers has extensive experience in
`
`litigating patent infringement cases, and has served as lead counsel in such cases.
`
`Id. at ¶¶3-7.
`
`Ms. Summers is familiar with the subject matter of this proceeding. She
`
`represents UUSI in an intellectual property dispute pending at the Court of Federal
`
`Claims, UUSI, LLC, et. al. v. The United States, et. al., Case No. 12-216 C, Ct.
`
`Fed. Cl. (“UUSI v. US”). Id. at ¶13. While the specific patents at issue in UUSI v.
`
`US do not include U.S. Pat. No. 5,796,183 (the “’183 Patent”), in her role as
`
`UUSI’s counsel and during the course of litigating on behalf of UUSI, Ms.
`
`Summers has become familiar with UUSI’s technological innovations and patent
`
`portfolio, including the ’183 Patent. Id. Ms. Summers has analyzed and studied
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`Case IPR2016-00908
`Patent No. 5,796,183
`
`the ’183 Patent. Id. Further, Ms. Summers has litigated patent infringement issues
`
`involving touch sensors on behalf of other clients. For example, Ms. Summers was
`
`part a team that represented Immersion Corporation, a developer of touch feedback
`
`technology, in patent litigation involving touchscreen products. Id. Ms. Summers
`
`has reviewed and is familiar with the ’183 Patent, its prosecution history, the prior
`
`art and other arguments concerning the validity of the patent made by petitioner.
`
`Id.
`
`UUSI submits that Ms. Summers’s participation will assist it and its lead
`
`counsel in effectively participating in this proceeding, and will facilitate timely
`
`completion of the trial proceeding.
`
`Ms. Summers has never been suspended, disbarred, sanctioned or cited for
`
`contempt by any court or administrative body, and has never had an application for
`
`admission to practice before a court or agency denied. Id. at ¶¶8-9. Ms. Summers
`
`is a member in good standing of the Bar of Virginia. Id. at ¶2. Ms. Summers has
`
`further agreed, as indicated in his declaration, to read and to be subject to the
`
`Office Patent Trial Practice Guide, the Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials set
`
`forth in part 42 of 37 C.F.R, and the USPTO’s Rules of Professional Conduct set
`
`forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et. seq., and submit to disciplinary jurisdiction under
`
`37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a). Id. at ¶¶10-11.
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`
`
`Case IPR2016-00908
`Patent No. 5,796,183
`
`
`3. Conclusion
`
`For the foregoing reasons, UUSI respectfully requests that the PTAB
`
`recognize Teresa M. Summers as its counsel, pro hac vice, in this proceeding.
`
`Dated: May 6, 2016
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/s/ Jay P. Kesan
`By:
`
`Jay P. Kesan
`
`Reg. No. 37,488
`
`Counsel for Patent Owner
`
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`
`
`Case IPR2016-00908
`Patent No. 5,796,183
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.6(e), the undersigned certifies that on the date
`
`indicated below, a complete and entire copy of this submission was provided by
`
`email to Petitioner’s counsel via email, as agreed to by Petitioner’s Service
`
`Information in the April 15, 2016 Petition submission, by serving the email address
`
`of record as follows:
`
`naveenmodi@paulhastings.com;
`josephpalys@paulhastings.com;
`chetanbansal@paulhastings.com.
`
`Dated: May 6, 2016
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/s/ Jay P. Kesan
`By:
`
`Jay P. Kesan
`
`Reg. No. 37,488
`
`Counsel for Patent Owner
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`6