throbber
Hllll||||ll||llllllllllllllllllllllllllll|||l||||||lllllllllllllllllllllll
`US005572205A
`[11] Patent Number:
`[45] Date of Patent:
`
`5,572,205
`Nov. 5, 1996
`
`4,405,918
`4,413,252
`
`'
`
`...
`
`340/365C
`9/1983 Wallet al.
`341/33
`11/1983 Tyler eta].
`.
`1Z1] HWH C
`.
`,
`,
`57$‘
`1$I‘§1a“kd‘e11° :’ta]"‘1-
`..... 341/33
`1/1985 Smith ............
`4,495,435
`219/449
`7/1985 Th
`al.
`4,527,049
`340/365 C
`7/1935 }.fi1(:::lSeetta1.
`_
`4,529,968
`........ 341/33
`4,550,310 10/1985 Yamaguchi etal.
`341/33
`4,561,002 12/1935 Chiu
`. 341/33
`4,567,470
`1/1986 Yoshikawa et
`.
`. 341/33
`4,614,937
`9/1986 Poujois ..........
`. 341/33
`4,651,133
`3/1937 Ganesan etal.
`307/126
`4,665,324
`5/1987 Ogino eta]. .......
`4,709,223
`11/1937 Hocking etal.
`.................... 340/365 13
`
`United States Patent
`Caldwell et al.
`
`[19]
`
`[54] TOUCH CONTROL SYSTEM
`
`-
`Inventors: David W. Caldwell; Nicholas W.
`Medendmp’ bmh °f H°Ha”d'M1°h'
`,
`ASSlgI16CZ Donnelly Technology, Inc., Holland,
`Mich
`
`_
`AWL N°'' ‘‘0’138
`,~
`.
`med‘
`Mar‘ 29’ 1993
`1m,c1_6 ___________,
`U.S. Cl.
`......
`
`1103K 17/955
`341/33' 341/26; 345/168;
`200/600; 361/181; 219/451
`
`Field of Search ................................ .. 341/20, 22, 26,
`341/33; 200/600; 345/168, 173; 331/65;
`361/181; 291/451, 464
`References Cited
`
`U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`11/1974 Foster .....................
`3,846,791
`7/1976 Challoner et al.
`3,971,013
`3/1975 Gould '5‘ 31‘
`3s974»472
`4356599 11/1977 10rd“
`4,090,092
`5/1978
`4,119,864 10/1978
`4_123’631
`10/1978
`4,136_291
`1,1979
`4,145,743
`3/1979 Eichelberger et a1
`4,159,473
`6/1979 Senk ....................
`4,161,766
`7/1979 Castleberry et al.
`4.175.239
`11/1979 Sandler
`4303330
`5/1930 Z1931“ 5131-
`41211315
`7/1930 Mme’ 9‘ 31'
`4,237,421
`12/1980 Waldron
`4,246,533
`1/1981 Cmang
`4,263,659
`4/1981 Hiram er a]_ .
`4,290,052
`9/1931 Eichelberger et al.
`4,291,303
`9/1931 cum, ct a1_ _______
`4,304,976 12/1981 Gottbrehtet al.
`4,308,443 12/1981 Tucker et a1.
`4,323,829
`4/1932 Wimey et a1.
`4=330s04°
`4/1933 P0555‘
`------
`4,394,643
`7/1983
`4,400,758
`8/1983
`..
`
`'
`
`4,405,917
`
`9/1983
`
`.. 340/365 C
`.. 340/337
`341/33
`341/33
`.. 307/116
`H 307/116
`341/33
`307,303
`354/352
`.. 340/565
`. 361/281
`-- 307/116
`- 363/137
`371/15
`. 307/116
`. 323/349
`341/33
`341/33
`341/33
`341/33
`. 219/10.49 R
`----- -- 341/33
`- 351/330
`341/33
`
`-
`
`(List continued on next page.)
`
`Primary Examiner—JefI”ery Hofsass
`Assistant Examiner—Daniel J. Wu
`Attorney, Agent, or Firm—Van Dykc, Gardner, Linn &
`Burkhart, LLP
`
`[57]
`
`ABSTRACT
`.
`.
`.
`A touch control system that is responsive to a user input
`selection includes an electrically non-conducting substrate,
`such as glass ceramic, and at least one capacitive—responsive
`touch pad on the substrate. A source signal having a primary
`frequency that is greater than 150 kHz, and preferably in the
`-
`.
`range of between 150 kHz and 500 kHz, is applied to one
`portion of the touch pad. The touch pad couples the electrical
`signal to another portion of the touch pad in order to develop
`a detection signal, which is decoded in order to determine
`the presence of the capacitance of a user. The decoder
`preferably includes a peak detector composed of a low gain
`circuit in order to avoid distortionof the detection signal.
`Greatly improved performance in the presence of liquids,
`such as water, on the touch pad is provided. This is espe»
`-
`-
`-
`-
`cially useful when the touch pad is applied to a horizontal
`surface, such as a cook top, upon which liquid spills may
`0°C“ A diSP1aY_ is J'“mP°_S"d W11“ }h°_81aSS Fermi“ Sub‘
`strate and an optical correction material is provided between
`the display and the underlying modulated surface that
`imparts mechanical strength to the substrate. The optical
`correction material corrects optical distortion of the visual
`indications of the display caused by the modulated surface.
`
`60 Claims, 4 Drawing Sheets
`
`HIGH
`FREQUENCY
`LINE DRIVER
`
`.
`
`PEAK
`DETECTOR
`
`AMPLITUDE
`RESPONSE
`SWITCH
`
`INDICATORS,
`POWER CIRCUITS
`
`Page 1 of 14
`
`SAMSUNG EXHIBIT 1016
`
`

`
`U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
`12/1987
`3/1988
`4/1988
`4/1988
`5/1988
`12/1988
`8/1989
`1/1990
`2/1990
`4/1990
`
`Oxlcy .................
`Grabner at al.
`Fiorella
`Brown
`Alexander
`Goessler et a1.
`Schultz, Jr.
`.
`Smith at 2.1.
`Sinn et al.
`
`.
`
`4,712,163
`4,731,694
`4,736,190
`4,740,781
`4,743,895
`4,794,233
`4,855,550
`4,894,493
`4,901,074
`4,914,553
`
`5,572,205
`Page 2
`
`362/29
`361/280
`.. 341/32
`341/33
`341/33
`.. 219/464
`280/600
`.. 200/600
`341/22
`.. 362/32
`
`4,920,343
`4,924,222
`4,954,823
`4,9 83,812
`5,012,124
`5,153,572
`5,155,338
`5,157,273
`5,183,996
`5,189,417
`5,270,710
`
`Schwartz .............
`AnLikid.is et al.
`Binstead .......
`Won-all et a1.
`Hollaway .............
`Caldwell ct al.
`Hoffmarm ........
`Medendorp et al.
`Hazan et al.
`Caldwell et a1
`Gaultier et a1.
`
`341/33
`341/26
`219/451
`....... 341/22
`341/24
`. 219/451
`. 307/147
`. 219/452
`341/26
`.. 741/33
`
`Page 2 of 14
`
`

`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Nov. 5, 1996
`
`Sheet 1 of 4
`
`5,572,205
`
`HI
`MED
`LOW
`illiiililiilfiilil
`
`HI
`MED
`LOW
`l:J::Zl:1ZC3
`
`' '
`oo
`0
`o 8 LEFT REAR
`1
`O O RIGHT REAR
`HI
`MED
`LOW
`x::u:.n::::::u::n:u::u::
`
`5
`
`OO
`O . RIGHT FRONT
`
`Page 3 of 14
`
`

`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Nov. 5, 1996
`
`Sheet 2 of 4
`
`5,572,205
`
`Page 4 of 14
`
`

`
`U.S. Patent
`
`v.0N
`
`69915,
`
`Sheet 3 of 4
`
`5,572,205
`
`
`
`m::om_omms>on_
`
`
`
`_mmoEo_oz_:o:>>mmopomfiomm>_momz_._
`mo::._n_s_<19:
`
`mmZOn_mmmv_<m_n_>ozmSom_mu_
`
`Page 5 of 14
`
`

`
`U.S. Patent
`
`V.0N
`
`6991
`
`59
`
`Sheet 4 of 4
`
`5,572,205
`
`v_N.O>>._.mZ
`
`
`
`INN.N_m._.Dn=2OO
`
`05.2
`
`3‘
`
`
`
`m::om_omm>>on_.mmop<o_oz_O...mOh<mmZm0
`
`
`
`
`
`Nxvamm
`
`Page 6 of 14
`
`

`
`5,572,205
`
`1
`TOUCH CONTROL SYSTEM
`
`BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
`
`This invention relates generally to touch control systems
`and, more particularly, to capacitance-responsive touch con-
`trol input devices for application to horizontal substrates,
`such as glass ceramic panels. The invention is particularly
`adapted for use with smooth-top induction, radiant, and
`halogen burner cooking appliances.
`Touch control input devices that respond to the capaci-
`tance of a user’s contact in order to actuate an appliance are
`typically applied to a vertical surface. While such orientation
`is primarily for the convenience of use, it avoids several
`problems associated with applying touch controls to hori-
`zontal surfaces, such as smooth-top cooking appliances. One
`difliculty with application to horizontal substrates is that
`there is a greater likelihood that liquids will be splashed on
`the touch control applied to a horizontal surface, such as a
`range cook top. Such moisture tends to cause erratic opera-
`tion of the input control, which could be dangerous in the
`case of a cooking appliance. This difficulty is typically
`overcome by separating the touch control from the cooking
`surface in order to provide a physical barrier between the
`two. This solution is not without its drawbacks. The primary
`benefit of a smooth-top cooking appliance is to eliminate the
`difiiculty of cleaning up from spills and boil-over getting
`into burner elements. While separate touch control input
`devices are an improvement over electromechanical con-
`trols, which still allow places where spills can accumulate,
`the requirement for a physical barrier between the cook top
`and the touch control is an impediment to easy cleanup and
`is a compromise in aesthetic appearance.
`An attempt to overcome the problem caused by watery
`spills on the support surface of a smooth-top cooking
`appliance causing erroneous operation of a touch control
`applied directly to the support surface is disclosed in U.S.
`Pat. No. 4,446,350 issued to Takurrn Mizukawa et al. for an
`INDUCTION HEATING COOKING APPARATUS.
`In
`Mizukawa et al., touch pads are provided on the upper
`surface of a pan supporting plate and are enclosed by guard
`rings of conductive material composed of a grounded con-
`ductor and an enclosing conductor. A control circuit, which
`is responsive to the touch pads and the guard rings, responds
`to spilled water or the like contacting the guard rings by
`latching a power control circuit at a zero power level. This
`resets the cooking apparatus to a zero heat output condition.
`The solution proposed in Mizukawa et al. has several
`dillieulties. At least one of the guard rings must be connected
`with a ground potential in order to be eifective. This requires
`conductive leads being applied to the pan support surface,
`which is costly and a potential source of failure. Addition-
`ally, Mizukawa et al. responds to spilled water by latching
`the cooking apparatus into a zero output condition. This is a
`nuisance to the user by requiting that the spill be wiped up
`and the power level of the cooking apparatus reset in order
`to continue with the cooking operation.
`to a
`Another dificulty with applying a touch control
`horizontal substrate is that code requirements, as well as
`conservative engineering practices, dictate that large hori-
`zontal panels be manufactured using particular materials and
`in a particular manner to avoid breakage due to either
`mechanical impact or thermal shock. In particular, while
`relatively thin soda-lime glass may be utilized for vertical
`touch panels, smooth-top cooking surfaces that are capable
`of supporting multiple pans above multiple burners are made
`
`2
`from glass ceramic material having a greater thickness, on
`the order of three (3) to five (5) millimeters and require
`negligible thermal expansion. Additionally, the surface of
`the substrate facing away from the user is modulated, or
`dimpled, in order to add greater mechanical strength to the
`substrate. The thickness of the glass ceramic material and
`the modulated surface have prevented, in the past, applica-
`tion of touch control technology to such large horizontal
`substrates.
`
`10
`
`SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
`
`The present invention is embodied in a touch control that
`is responsive to a user input selection. The control includes
`an electrically non-conducting substrate and a capacitance-
`responsive touch pad on the substrate. A signal generator is
`provided as a source to generate an electrical signal and to
`apply the signal to one portion of the touch pad. The touch
`pad couples the electrical signal to another portion of the
`touch pad in order to develop a detection signal. The touch
`pad responds to the presence of capacitance of a user in
`order to selectively attenuate the detection signal. A decod-
`ing circuit responds to the detection signal
`in order to
`determine the presence of the capacitance of a user.
`According to one aspect of the invention, a source signal
`generator is provided that generates a high frequency elec-
`trical signal having a primary frequency that is greater than
`150 kHz and preferably in the range of between 150 kHz and
`500 kHz. Such high frequency electrical signal may be a
`square wave, a triangular wave, a sawtooth wave, a sinu-
`soidal wave or some other waveform. This aspect of the
`invention is based upon the discovery that touch controls
`operated at such primary frequencies have improved water
`immunity performance. According to another aspect of the
`invention, the decoding circuit may include a peak detector
`that is coupled directly with the detection signal, in order to
`produce an output, and a switch circuit that is responsive to
`the output of the peak detector in order to determine an
`amplitude of the output indicative of attenuation of the
`source electrical signal. The peak detector is preferably a
`low gain circuit in order to avoid distorting the detection
`signal by exceeding the gain/bandwidth product of the
`circuit and in order to avoid fast signal slew rates. The
`switch circuit is preferably coupled to the output of the peak
`detector by an arnplifier circuit. In this manner, amplification
`is performed on the lower frequency signal of the peak
`detector output rather than on the higher frequency of the
`detection signal. The gain/bandwidth product of the system
`is not exceeded at any point -in order to provide a more
`accurate detection of the effect of a user contacting a touch
`pad and low slew-rate components may be used to embody
`the invention.
`
`According to another aspect of the invention, a touch
`control is provided for a glass ceramic substrate having a
`user contact surface and an opposite modulated surface. A
`keypad is defined by a plurality of touch pads, each of tile
`touch pads having a pair of electrically conductive elements
`aflixed to the modulated surface. A signal generator is
`provided that is adapted to generate an electrical signal and
`to apply the signal to one of the electrically conductive
`elements of at least one of the touch pads. The electrical
`signal is passively coupled to the other one of the electrically
`conductive elements in order to develop a detection signal.
`The touch pads respond to the presence of capacitance of a
`user in order to selectively attenuate the detection signal. A
`decoding circuit is provided that responds to the detection
`
`Page 7 of 14
`
`

`
`3
`
`4
`
`5,572,205
`
`circuit in order to determine the presence of capacitance of
`a user.
`
`According to yet another aspect of the invention, a display
`is juxtaposed with the substrate modulated surface in order
`to provide visual indications to a user. An optical correction 5
`material is provided between the display and the substrate.
`The optical correction material corrects optical distortion of
`the visual indications of the display caused by the modulated
`surface. In a preferred embodiment, the optical correction
`material is a transparent adhesive that adheres a flexible
`carrier carrying the display device and/or the touch pad
`flexible conductor to the glass substrate.
`The present invention overcomes tile difficulties of the
`prior art by providing a touch control
`that has greatly
`improved performance in the presence of liquids, such as
`water, on the touch pads positioned on the user interface
`surface of the substrate. Because the system’s immunity to
`water is significantly improved, there is no necessity for a
`specialized guard ring or for latching of the cooking appli-
`ance in an off state in the presence of water. Accordingly, the
`user is not bothered by having to reset the power level of the
`burner when a liquid spill occurs. The present invention
`allows, for the first time, a practical application of a touch
`control to a glass ceramic substrate having a modulated rear
`surface. A touch control circuit is provided according to the
`invention which is capable of accommodating the electrical
`characteristics of such substrate. In addition, a unique means
`is provided to correct distortions of the image displayed by
`a display device and viewed through the dimpled, modulated
`surface of the substrate.
`
`These and other objects, advantages and features of this
`invention will become apparent upon review of the follow-
`ing specification in conjunction with the drawings.
`
`BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
`
`FIG. 1 is a top plan view of a system incorporating a touch
`control according to the invention;
`FIG. 2 is a sectional view taken along the lines Il—II in
`FIG. 1;
`
`FIG. 3 is an exploded perspective view from the top of the
`touch control in FIG. 1;
`
`FIG. 4 is a block diagram of a touch control according to
`the invention;
`FIG. 5 is an electrical schematic diagram of a touch
`control according to the invention;
`FIG. 6 is an illustration of an optical indicator without an
`optical correction material; and
`FIG. 7 is an illustration of an optical indicator with an
`optical correction material according to the invention.
`
`DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED
`EMBODIMENT
`
`Referring now specifically to the drawings, and the illus-
`trated embodiment depicted therein, a touch control 10
`includes a generally planar substrate 12 and a plurality of
`touch pads, generally indicated at 14 applied to substrate 12
`(FIG.
`1 ). Each touch pad 14 includes a first portion
`composed of an electrically conducting element 16a and a
`second portion composed of an electrically conducting ele-
`ment 16b aflixed to a surface 18 of substrate 12, which faces
`away from the user (FIGS. 24). Each touch pad 14, in the
`illustrative embodiment, also includes a user contact pad 20
`overlying the conductive elements 16a and 16b. User con-
`tact pads 20 are transparent conductive metallic oxide films
`
`applied by conventional sputtering or pyrolyric techniques.
`Touch control 10 may additionally include indicators 22 in
`order to provide visual indication to the user of the condition
`of the appliance being controlled (not shown). In the illus-
`trated embodiment, substrate 12 is a glass ceramic member
`having a thickness in the range of three (3) to five (5)
`millimeters in order to provide adequate strength for hori-
`zontal applications in which mechanical stress may be
`applied to the substrate. One such application is a smooth-
`top cooking surface for a 4-burner cooking appliance. In
`order to further enhance the strength of substrate 12, surface
`18 is modulated or dimpled (FIG. 2). Substrate 12 is
`marketed under the mark “Ceran” by Schott Glass Company
`located in Yonkers, N.Y.
`In order to apply the conductive elements 16a, 16b of
`each touch pad to surface 18 of substrate 12, the conductive
`elements 16a, 16b are mounted to a flexible carrier 24.
`Carrier 24 is adhered to surface 18 by an adhesive layer 26.
`Additionally, indicators 22 are mounted to flexible carrier 24
`in order to locate the indicators in a position where they may
`be viewed through substrate 12. In order to correct optical
`distortion created by the presence of the modulations, o_r
`dimples, on surface 18, an optical correction material 23 is
`positioned between indicator 22 and modulated surface 18.
`Optical correction material 23 has an index of refraction that
`is compatible with that of substrate 12 and fills in the voids
`between the dimples of surface 18, as well as the space
`between surface 18 and indicator 22. In this manner, light
`emitted by indicator 22 passes through substrate 12 without
`substantial distortion.
`
`Operation of optical correction material 23 may be under-
`stood by comparing an indicator 22' in FIG. 6 with an
`indicator 22" in FIG. 7. Indicator 22 illustrates the optical
`effect of modulated surface 18. The different incidence
`angles of light rays caused by the dimples creates a “fish-
`eye” effect whereby an initially homogeneous indication
`takes on the appearance of numerous circles and the indi-
`cation has serrated edges. In contrast, indicator 22" illus-
`trates the corrective effect of optical correction material 23
`in eliminating distortions to the homogeneous appearance of
`the indicator, including retaining the crisp edges of the initial
`indication.
`
`Optical correction material, in the illustrated embodiment,
`is a transparent acrylic material. While optical correction
`material 23 is clear, it may be also dyed in order to modify
`the color of indicators 22. A clear acrylic material in transfer
`adhesive fonn is commercially available from the 3M Com-
`pany, Minneapolis, Minn., and marketed under Type 300MP.
`In a most preferred embodiment, a clear acrylic adhesive,
`such as 3M Type 300MP, is applied to the entire interface
`between surface 18 and flexible carrier 24 at a thickness of
`0.013 inches in order to a"1x the flexible carrier to the
`substrate and to provide optical correction material for
`indicators 22.
`
`Touch control 10 includes an electronic control 30 having
`a high frequency line driver 32 as a source for producing a
`high frequency pulsed signal at 34, which is applied to
`portion 16a of touch pad 14 (FIGS. 4 and 5). This signal is
`capacitively coupled to portion 16b of touch pad 14 in order
`to produce a detection signal at 36. When there is no user .
`contacting the user contact pad 20 associated with touch pad
`14,
`the very high frequency signal at 34 is coupled to
`detection signal 36 without attenuation by the capacitance of
`the user’s body. This is illustrated as the initial portion (left
`side) of the waveform illustrated at 36. When, however, a
`‘user engages the user contact pad 20 associated with touch
`pad 14, the detection signal becomes attenuated to a lower
`
`Page 8 of 14
`
`

`
`5
`
`5,572,205
`
`6
`
`amplitude as illustrated in the second portion (right side) of
`the waveform illustrated at 36 in FIG. 4. In the illustrated
`embodiment, portion 16a and 16b provide a 10-30 picofarad
`(pt) coupling between the high frequency signal at 34 and
`the detection signal at 36. Accordingly, a peak voltage, for
`example, of between five (5) and twelve (12) volts produced
`by the high frequency line driver may develop a detection
`signal at 36 on the order of magnitude of 70 mv.
`The detection signal on line 36 is decoded by a peak
`detector 38, which produces an output 40, and an arnplitude-
`responsive switch 42, which responds to the amplitude of
`output 40 in order to actuate appropriate indicators, power
`circuits and the like, as illustrated at 44. High frequency line
`driver 32 has a primary frequency that is at least equal to 150
`kHz. It has been discovered that, for primary frequencies of
`150 kHz and above, touch control 10 has increased immu-
`nity to cross—coupling between adjacent touch pad 14 due to
`liquids, such as water, on substrate 12. While it is believed
`that most
`frequencies above 150 kHz would provide
`improved liquid immunity, considerations of component
`configurations of control system 30 would suggest a prac-
`tical upper limit of approximately 500 kHz on the primary
`frequency for line driver 32. In the illustrated embodiment,
`line driver 32 has a primary frequency of 250 kHz. In the
`illustrated embodiment, the output signal of high frequency
`line driver 32 is a square wave varying between zero volts
`and an upper limit, such as five volts. When coupled through
`portions 16a and 16b of touch pad 14, the detection signal
`at 36 is a square wave which oscillates equally at both
`polarities with respect to signal ground. Alternatively, high
`frequency line driver 32 could produce other waveforms,
`such as a triangle, sawtooth or sinusoidal waveform.
`Another advantage of utilizing a high frequency line
`driver as a source for control system 30 is that the waveform
`of the detection signal at 36 retains its original waveform
`notwithstanding the relatively small coupling capacitance
`between conductive elements 16a and 16b. Thus, the ten-
`dency of prior art systems to distort the waveform of the
`detection signal by coupling the higher frequency primary
`component to a noticeably greater extent than the lower
`frequency components of the square wave’ is reduced
`because all frequency components are at or greater than the
`primary frequency, which is at a high frequency. This
`provides a more eflicient coupling which is desirable to
`olfset the effects of the greater thickness of substrate 12.
`Furthermore, the output of peak detector 38, at 40, exhibits
`a relatively flat amplitude for both the attenuated and
`non-attenuated conditions of detection signal at 36. This
`improves the reliability of the system by increasing the
`distinction between touched and non—touched conditions of
`touch pad 14. Furthermore, in contrast to prior systems in
`which the detection signal at 36 is amplified prior to decod-
`ing, peak detector 38 is coupled directly with the detection
`signal at 36. Because, in the illustrated embodiment, peak
`detector 38 has a low gain, the gain/bandwidth product of
`the system accommodates the very high frequency of line
`driver 32 without distortion of the signal. The gain/band-
`width product, as is well understood to those skilled in the
`art,
`is a constant for each system and dictates that
`the
`frequency band multiplied by the gain of each amplifier
`cannot exceed a predefined constant without distorting the
`signal. The output 40 of peak detector 38, in contrast, is a
`relatively low frequency signal having a significant DC
`component. Accordingly, desirable amplification can be
`applied to output 40 by amplitude-responsive switch 42
`without compromising the gain/bandwidth product of the
`system. In addition, the output 40 of peak detector 38 has a
`
`_
`
`limited amplitude range. Therefore, components utilized in
`peak detector 38 are not required to have a high slew-rate
`capability, which reduces the expense of such components.
`Although control system 30 has been described as it
`applies to an individual touch pad 14, the same principles are
`applicable to a keypad 15 composed of multiple touch pads I
`14 wherein known multiplexing techniques are utilized to
`apply high frequency line driver 32 and peak detector 38
`sequentially to touch pads 14:1, 14b .
`.
`. 14:2 in a strobed
`fashion. Such a system is illustrated in FIG. 5 in which a 250
`kHz pulsed signal generator 46 has an output 47 that is
`applied to a demultiplexing circuit 48. Under the control of
`an output line 49 of a microcomputer 50, demultiplexer 48
`sequentially applies the output of signal generator 46 to
`driver lines 52a, 52b and 52c. Because of the sequential
`nature of the application of the drive signal to the drive lines,
`the drive signal appears as a burst of high frequency pulses
`on each of the drive lines 52a—52c. The pulse bursts, in turn,
`produce detection signals on sense lines 54a—S4d, which are
`connected to diiferent groups of touch pads 14a—14n than
`the pads connected to driver lines 52a—52c. The sense lines
`54a—54d are provided as inputs to a multiplex circuit 56,
`which is under the control of microcomputer 50, via line 55,
`in order to synchronize multiplex circuit 56 with the opera-
`tion of the demultiplex circuit 48. Because multiplex circuit
`56 is a switching device, which sequentially applies each
`sense line 54a—54d to detection signal line 57 connected
`with peak detector 38, the peak detector is directly coupled
`sequentially with each of the sense lines 54a—54d. Touch
`pads 14a .
`.
`. l4n, which are sequentially coupled to signal
`generator 46 and to decoding circuit 38, are thereby multi-
`plexed with the signal generator and the decoding circuit.
`Peak detector 38, in the illustrated embodiment, is com-
`posed of an operational amplifier 58 whose output 59 is
`connected by a diode 60 with its inverting input 61. Diode
`60 is also connected, through a resistor 63, with output 40.
`Detection signal line 57 is connected with the non-inverting
`input of amplifier 58. Detection signal line 57 is additionally
`connected to signal ground through a pulldown resistor 62.
`This configuration is a low gain peak detector because the
`direct connection feedback provides amplifier 58 with a
`unity gain. Alternatively, diode 60 could be replaced with a
`short circuit and a diode connected between output 59 and
`resistor 63. Output 40 is filtered by a filter 64 in order to
`complete the peak detect function of peak detector 38. Filter
`64 is composed of a parallel combination of resistor 66 and
`capacitor 68 connected between output 40 and signal
`ground.
`In the illustratedembodiment, pull-down resistor 62 is a
`10 kohm resistor. This provides very low input impedance to
`peak detector 38 which, advantageously,
`imparts excep-
`tional static electrieity resistance to touch control 10. Static
`charges applied to substrate 12 are rapidly dissipated
`through resistor 62. This low input impedance is possible
`because of the exceptional signal strength of the detection
`signal as a result of the very high frequency primary
`component of the drive signal, as well as the equivalent
`resistance/capacitance value (RC) of this portion of the
`circuit.
`
`Output 40 is provided to the non-inverting input of an
`amplifier 70. A biasing network composed of resistors 72a
`and 72b connected in a conventional fashion between an
`inverting input of amplifier 70 and its output 88 establishes
`the gain of amplifier 70. As previously described, because
`the signal on output 40 of peak detector 38 has a relatively
`low frequency content, the gain of amplifier 70 may be set
`at a relatively high level without exceeding the gain/band-
`
`Page 9 of 14
`
`

`
`5,572,205
`
`7
`width product of the system and without creating high slew
`rates. In the illustrated embodiment,
`the voltage gain of
`amplifier 70 is between 80 and 100.
`In order to detect the capacitance of a user contacting one
`of the touch pads 14a—14n, output 88 of amplifier 70 is
`applied to an arnplitude-responsive switching circuit, which
`in the illustrated embodiment is a successive approximation
`register 74 controlled with microcomputer 50. Successive
`approximation register (SAR) 74 provides a highly accurate
`means to allow microcomputer 50 to determine relative
`amplitude of output 88 of amplifier 70. SAR 74 includes a
`resistance network 76, which is composed of a ladder of
`resistances which vary from each other in multiples of two.
`Therefore, such network is referred to as an RZR network.
`The RZR network 76 is utilized by microcomputer 50 in
`order to produce an analog signal at 78 as a function of the
`combination of output lines 75 actuated by the n1icrocom—
`puter. The analog signal at 78 is scaled by an amplifier 80
`whose scaling factor is established by bias resistors 82a and
`8212 connected in conventional fashion with respect to its
`output 84 and inverting input. Output 84 is connected with
`the inverting input of a comparator 86 whose non-inverting
`input is connected with output 88. The output of 90 of
`comparator 86 is provided as an input to microcomputer 50.
`SAR 74 operates as follows. In order to determine the
`relative analog voltage at output 88, microcomputer 50
`actuates a combination of output lines 75 representative of
`a known relative analog voltage at output 84 of scaling
`amplifier 80. Comparator 86 will compare this analog volt-
`age at 84 with the analog voltage at output 88 of amplifier
`70. Output 90 of comparator 86 will assume one of two
`alternate states depending upon whether the approximate
`voltage produced at output 84 is greater than, or less than,
`the output voltage 88 of amplifier 70. Microcomputer 50
`interprets the state of output 90 in order to adjust the states
`of output line 75 and vary the analog voltage at 84 until it
`is substantially equal to the analog voltage at 88. Micro-
`computer 50 then makes a determination whether such
`analog voltage represents a touched or non—touched condi-
`tion for the associated touch pads 14a—14rr. Such deterrni-
`nation is made in software resident in microcomputer 50 in
`the manner disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,189,417 issued to
`David Caldwell and Nicholas Medendorp for a DETEC-
`TION CIRCUIT FOR MATRIX TOUCH PAD, the disclo-
`sure of which is hereby incorporated herein by reference,
`except
`that relative amplitude is used in circuit 30 to
`determine a touchlno touch condition rather than relative
`pulse—width used as in the ’417 patent. Microcomputer 50
`may then actuate the appropriate elements of indicator 22,
`power relays or the like at output 44 depending upon the
`responses programmed within the microcomputer for vari-
`ous combinations of input selections by the user contacting
`touch pads 14a—14n.
`Successive approximation registers (SARS) are well
`known in the art. The advantage of such an SAR is that it
`provides a higher resolution detection of the relative analog
`voltage at output 88 of amplifier 70 than would be possible
`by coupling output 88 directly to an analog input port of
`microcomputer 50. However, in certain applications, it may
`be possible to read the analog level of output 88 of amplifier
`70 at an analog input port to microcomputer 50. In the
`illustrated embodiment, SAR 74 is capable of reading the
`relative analog voltage level at output 88 to an accuracy of
`nine bits. In contrast, present commercially available rnicro—
`processors that are capable of eight-bit accuracy or greater,
`in a determination of analog input voltages, are relatively
`expensive.
`
`.
`
`8
`The unique principles of the present invention allow the
`application of touch control
`technology directly to the
`unique environment of a large horizontal substrate of the
`type found in smooth cook tops and the like. The hurdle of
`the use of a substrate that not only has an exceptionally large
`thickness but also a modulated rear surface is overcome.
`Circuit means are provided that provide sufiicient signal
`differentiation to accommodate the dielectric of such sub-
`strate. Advantagcously, the invention additionally provides
`exceptional immunity to the splashing of liquids, such as
`water, on the touch control touch pads. The circuit means
`also advantageously imparts an exceptionally elfective static
`electricity (ESD) immunity to the system. In addition, the
`invention provides a means for incorporating a display
`device which produces clear and crisp images notwithstand-
`ing the detrimental eifect of the modulated rear surface of
`the substrate. These features allow the touch control to be
`applied directly to the substrate defining smooth-top cook
`top. Thus, the requirement for a physical barrier between the
`separate substrates defining a cook top and a touch control
`in prior systems is completely eliminated. This is accom-
`plished in a manner which does not require guard rings or
`the detrimental operation of shutting down the

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket