throbber

`
`DROPBOX EX. 1036
`
`DROPBOX EX. 1036
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`DROPBOX, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`
`
`SYNCHRONOSS TECHNOLOGIES, INC,
`
`Patent Owner
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`INTER PARTIES REVIEW OF US. PATENT NO. 6,671,757
`
`
`
`
`
`DECLARATION OF MAHADEV SATYANARAYANAN, PH.D.
`
`
`CONCERNING EXHIBIT 1006
`
`Dropbox Ex. 1036
`Page 1
`
`Dropbox Ex. 1036
`Page 1
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Cases [PR2016-00850, [PR2OJ6-00851
`
`Parent 6, 67K, 75 7
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`I, Mahadev Satyanarayanan, hereby declare and state the following:
`
`I.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`I am a Professor in the School of Computer Science at the Carnegie
`
`
`
`Mellon University.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`I received my Bachelor of Technology in electrical
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`engineering and Master of Technology in Computer Science from the Indian
`
`
`
`
`
`Institute of Technology in Madras, India.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`I was awarded First Class with
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Distinction, the highest honor category, for both my Bachelor and Master degrees.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`I obtained my PhD. in Computer Science from Carnegie Mellon.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`I have engaged in decades of research at Carnegie Mellon, as well in
`
`,)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`companies such as IBM, Digital Equipment Corporation and Intel.
`
`
`
`I have
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`participated in system design and development of mobile computing, pervasive
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`computing, and distributed systems, including distributed operating systems.
`
`.1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3. My design and development work includes designing enterprise—grade
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`distributed file systems. For instance, I was a principal architect ofthe Andrew
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`File System (AF S), which was the first file system to employ scalable file
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`caching, security through Access Control Lists, and volume—based system
`
`administration.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`I leveraged the experience I gained in designing AFS as one of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the principal architects ofthe Coda distributed file system. Coda was the first file
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`system designed to address problems of disconnected client operation and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`bandwidth—adaptive file synchronization between clients and servers where the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`network connection was intermittently available or low in bandwidth.
`
`Dropbox Ex. 1036
`Page 2
`
`Dropbox Ex. 1036
`Page 2
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`Cases IPR2016-00850, 1PR20] 6-0085 1
`
`Parent 6, 67], 757
`
`
`
`4.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Since 1986, l have been on the faculty of the Computer Science
`
`
`
`
`
`Department at Carnegie Mellon University.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`I have authored or co-authored at
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`least 19 invited papers, 37 refereed journal papers, 51 refereed conference papers,
`
`
`
`
`
`and 34 refereed workshop papers.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`I have received at least six “best paper” or
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`“outstanding paper" awards. According to Google Scholar, as of April 27, 2017,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`my articles have been cited over 26,000 times
`
`
`(https:L’scholargoogle.comx’citations‘hser=0y6JDD4AAAAJ).
`
`
`
`I have delivered
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`over 50 keynote speeches or distinguished lectures.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`I have authored two books, as
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`well as a chapter in a third book.
`
`
`
`5.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`In addition to publishing, 1 have occupied numerous leadership
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`positions in scientific organizations, such as the Institute ofElec-trical and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Electronics Engineers (IEEE) and the Association for Computing Machinery
`
`(ACM).
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1 have been elected to the position ofFellow of both the IEEE and the
`
`ACM.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1 am the Founding Program Chair of the IEEE-r’ACM Symposium on Edge
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Computing, a forum for discussion of technologies that place data one hop away
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`from mobile and other Internet-aware devices.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`I have been chair or co—chair of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`five other IEEE or ACM conferences. Additionally, I chaired the 18th ACM
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Symposium on Operating Systems Principles, held in Banff, Canada, in October
`
`2001.
`
`Dropbox Ex. 1036
`Page 3
`
`Dropbox Ex. 1036
`Page 3
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`Cases 1PR20] 6400850, IPR2O I 6-0085]
`
`
`Parent 6, 67], 75 7
`
`
`
`6.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Through my publishing and leadership experience in the IEEE and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ACM, 1 have gained familiarity with their publication procedures. The IE-EE and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ACM regularly publish numerous journals that are focused on technical topics,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`including many within the field of computer science. These organizations”
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`publications are considered highly prestigious and professors, researchers, and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`industry professionals seek to have their research published in IEEE and ACM
`
`
`journals.
`
`7.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The IEEE and ACM also host conferences and workshops, generally
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`organized by committees of the organization. The conferences are attended by
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`academics, researchers, students, and industry professionals having an interest in
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the particular topic. Many months before a conference is held, the committee will
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`make an announcement, called a “call for papers,” that solicits topical papers for
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`presentation at the conference. A committee receives all the papers that are
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`submitted in response to the call and reviews the content for novelty and potential
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`impact. The committee conditionally selects a certain number (typically about 20-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`30) for presentation at the conference. The conditionality of the acceptance for
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`presentation may be based on the author performing edits requested by the
`
`committee.
`
`Dropbox Ex. 1036
`Page 4
`
`Dropbox Ex. 1036
`Page 4
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`Cases IPR2016-00850, IPR2016—0085]
`
`Parent 6, 67], 757
`
`8.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Authors have a deadline by which they must make the requested edits
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`and resubmit their papers. If the committee is satisfied with an author’s edits, the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`paper is then finally selected for presentation at the conference.
`
`9.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Papers that are selected for presentation are generally collected into a
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`bound “conference proceedings” publication that is distributed to all attendees of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the conference. Conference proceedings are typically then sent to libraries that
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`have relevant subscriptions from the host organization. Research universities with
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`computer science departments typically have subscriptions to numerous technical
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`journals and receive proceedings publications from many IEEE and ACM
`
`
`conferences.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`10. Most conferences hosted by IE-EE and. ACM give awards for the best
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`papers (often called “best paper” or “outstanding; paper”) to a small subset of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`authors whose papers are presented at the conference. The organizing committee
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`determines which of the presented papers receives an outstanding paper award.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Frequently, the authors of a paper that receives such an award. will be invited to
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`republish that paper in a more prestigious, more frequently published journal of
`
`
`
`the host organization.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`11. One of the papers l co-authored on the Coda file system is entitled
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`“Disconnected Operation in the Coda File System,” which is the paper that was
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`submitted in this proceeding as Exhibit 1006.
`
`Dropbox Ex. 1036
`Page 5
`
`Dropbox Ex. 1036
`Page 5
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`Cases IPR2026-00850, IPR2OI6-0085]
`
`
`Parent 6, 6'7] _. 75 7
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`12. This paper was first presented at ACM’s Symposium on Operating
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Systems Principles (“SOSP”) in October 1991. As a paper presented at an ACM
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`conference, it followed the submission, acceptance, and publication process that I
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`described above in paragraphs 7-9. The paper was collected, along with the other
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`papers presented at SOSP, into a bound volume that was distributed to all
`
`
`
`
`
`attendees of the Symposium.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1 have maintained a record of the conference
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`attendees. According to my records, around 300 people attended the conference.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`SOSP is well known in the computer systems research community, and the. 199]
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`$08? (as is typical of SOSP) included attendees from a variety of backgrounds
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(both academic and industry) and with a wide variety of levels of experience
`
`
`
`
`
`(from students through tenured professors).
`
`l3.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`“Disconnected Operation in the Coda File System” was given an
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Outstanding Paper award by the organizing committee of SOSP and was also
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`forwarded to ACM’s Transactions on Computer Systems (“TOCS”), ajournal
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`which has been published about four times per year since 1983, with a
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`recommendation that the paper be published in TOCS as well. The TOC S journal
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`accepted “Disconnected Operation in the Coda File System" for publication, and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the paper was published in the February 1992 issue.
`
`14.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`“Disconnected Operation in the Coda File System" has been
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`considered a seminal paper in the field of distributed operating systems and has
`
`
`Dropbox Ex. 1036
`Page 6
`
`Dropbox Ex. 1036
`Page 6
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`Cases [PR2016-00850, IPR20 I 6-0085]
`
`
`
`Parent 6, 671, 75 7
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`frequently been an assigned reading in graduate and undergraduate courses
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`dealing with operating system design principles. Even today, the paper continues
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`to be referred to in the classroom and in publications, and still receives praise
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`from the research community. For instance, in 2015, “Disconnected Operation in
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the Coda File System” was awarded ACM’S Special Interest Group on Operating
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Systems” (“SIGOPS”) “Hall ofFame” award. And in 2016, the paper was given
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ACM’S Special Interest Group on Mobility of Systems, Users, Data and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Computing‘s (“SIGMOBILE”) Inaugural “Test—of-Time” Award.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`15. After “Disconnected Operation in the Coda File System” received the
`
`
`
`
`
`outstanding paper award at SOSP, professors from a number of universities
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`contacted me seeking a copy of the paper.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`in response to these inquiries, I
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`emailed copies of the paper to several professors before the publication of the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`paper in TOC‘S in February 1992.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`I have examined Exhibit 1006 and it is the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`same document that l sent in response to emails requesting a copy of the paper.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`16. The version of“Disconnected Operation in the Coda File System” that
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`I distributed and that has been submitted as Exhibit 1006 was a version that was
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`nearly identical to the version published in TOCS, save for three minor
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`differences. First, the version I sent stated the Coda system had successfully
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`operated while disconnected for “four to five hours.” By the time the TOCS
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`version was published, we had obtained better results and were able to report the
`
`
`
`
`Dropbox Ex. 1036
`Page 7
`
`Dropbox Ex. 1036
`Page 7
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Cases IPR20] 6-00850, {PR2016-0085]
`
`
`Parent 6:, 6 7] _. 75 7
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`system has been operated while disconnected for “one to two days.” Second, the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`emailed version omitted an endnote referring to a distributed mail system
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(_“Lambert, M. PCMAlL-: A distributed mail system for personal computers.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`DARPA—Intemet RFC 1056, 1988”). Third, the emailed version used a two-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`column format, whereas the TOC S version has only one column of text. The
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`remaining content is substantively identical between the two versions.
`
`17.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`I understand that this declaration will be filed as evidence in a
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`contested case before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board ofthe United. States
`
`
`
`
`Patent and Trademark Office.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1 also understand that 1 may be subject to cross-
`
`
`
`
`examination concerning this declaration.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`I hereby declare that all ofthe statements made herein of my own
`
`18.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`knowledge are true and that all statements made on information and belief are
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`believed to be true; and further that these statements were made with knowledge
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`that willful false statements and the like so made are punishable by fine or
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`imprisonment, or both, under Section 1001 of Title 18 of the United States Code.
`
`
`
`Date: April 27, 2017
`
`
`
`
`v Satyanarayanan
`
`
`
`Dropbox Ex. 1036
`Page 8
`
`Dropbox Ex. 1036
`Page 8
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket