`
`
`
`
`
`Trials@uspto.gov
`571.272.7822 Filed: January 3, 2017
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`LUPIN LTD. and LUPIN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.,
`Petitioners,
`
`v.
`
`HORIZON THERAPEUTICS, INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2016-00829
`Patent 9,095,559 B2
`____________
`
`
`
`Before GRACE KARAFFA OBERMANN, TONI R. SCHEINER, and
`DEBORAH KATZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`KATZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ORDER
`Petitioners’ Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission of Robert V. Cerwinski
`37 C.F.R. § 42.10
`
`Petitioners filed a Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Robert V.
`Cerwinski under 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c). Paper 19. The Motion is supported
`by the Declaration of Mr. Cerwinski. Ex. 1024. Petitioners represent that
`Patent Owner does not oppose grant of this motion.
`
`
`
`IPR2016-00829
`Patent 9,095,559 B2
`
`
`The Board has reviewed the submissions and determined that the
`requirements of 37 C.F.R. § 42.10 have been met and there is good cause to
`admit Mr. Cerwinski pro hac vice in the proceeding.
`It is, therefore,
`ORDERED that Petitioners’ Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of
`Robert V. Cerwinski under 37 C.F.R. § 42.10 is granted;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Cerwinski shall comply with the
`Office Patent Trial Practice Guide and the Board’s Rules of Practice for
`Trials, as set forth in Part 42 of 37 C.F.R.; and
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Cerwinski shall be subject to the
`Office’s disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a) and the Office’s
`Rules of Professional Conduct set forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101–11.901.
`
`
`Petitioners:
`Elizabeth J. Holland
`Cynthia Lambert Hardman
`Goodwin Procter, LLP
`eholland@goodwinprocter.com
`chardman@goodwinprocter.com
`
`Patent Owner:
`James B. Monroe
`Maureen D. Queler
`james.monroe@finnegan.com
`maureen.queler@finnegan.com
`
`Lauren Stevens
`Matthew Phillips
`lstevens@horizonpharma.com
`matthew.phillips@renaissanceiplaw.com
`2
`
`
`
`