`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`HOLOGIC, INC.,
`and BECTON, DICKINSON AND COMPANY,
`Petitioners
`
`v.
`
`ENZO LIFE SCIENCES, INC.
`Patent Owner
`
`____________
`
`Case No. IPR2016-00822
`U.S. Patent No. 7,064,197
`____________
`
`
`
`PETITIONERS’ REQUEST FOR ORAL HEARING
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case No. IPR2016-00822
`U.S. Patent No. 7,064,197
`
`The Board has scheduled oral hearing for this IPR proceeding (IPR2016-
`
`00822) and another pending IPR proceeding between Petitioners and Patent Owner
`
`(IPR2016-00820) for June 1, 2017. Paper 18 at 3. Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(a),
`
`Petitioners request oral hearing on the instituted grounds of unpatentability in each
`
`of the proceedings and all other pending issues presented in the pleadings (e.g.,
`
`Motions to Exclude). Given that both the proceedings involve the same patent and
`
`the issues and prior art references for the two proceedings overlap, Petitioners
`
`request a total of one hour of consolidated argument time for Petitioners, without
`
`restricting Petitioners to a particular schedule for the issues in each proceeding.
`
`Petitioners requests that, in addition to lead and back-up counsel (five
`
`individuals), five additional spaces be reserved at the oral hearings to
`
`accommodate Petitioners’ corporate representatives and counsel.
`
`Petitioners also request the ability to use audio visual equipment to display
`
`demonstratives and exhibits, including the use of a computer, projector, and screen.
`
`Petitioners additionally request that two attorneys at Petitioners’ counsel’s table be
`
`allowed to use computers at the hearing (in addition to the counsel making the
`
`argument using his or her computer to show the demonstratives), to avoid the need
`
`for the parties to bring entire paper copies of the record into the hearing room and
`
`to facilitate efficient answering of panel questions.
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`
`
`Case No. IPR2016-00822
`U.S. Patent No. 7,064,197
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`/M. Paul Barker/
`M. Paul Barker
`Reg. No. 32,013
`Lead Counsel for Hologic, Inc.
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`Date: April 24, 2017
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case No. IPR2016-00822
`U.S. Patent No. 7,064,197
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned certifies that the foregoing PETITIONERS’ REQUEST
`
`FOR ORAL HEARING was served on April 24, 2017, in its entirety via electronic
`
`mail to Patent Owner’s and BD’s counsel at:
`
`For Patent Owner
`
`EnzoIPRService@desmaraisllp.com
`Kevin K. McNish
`kmcnish@desmaraisllp.com
`Michael P. Stadnick
`mstadnick@desmaraisllp.com
`Justin P.D. Wilcox
`jwilcox@desmaraisllp.com
`Kerri-Ann Limbeek
`klimbeek@desmaraisllp.com
`
` For BD
`
`Jamie T. Wisz
`jamie.wisz@wilmerhale.com
`Heather Petruzzi
`heather.petruzzi@wilmerhale.com
`Nancy Lynn Schroeder
`nancy.schroeder@wilmerhale.com
`
`Patent Owner and BD have consented to electronic service.
`
`
`
`Date: April 24, 2017 Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/Kristin M. Creed/
`Kristin M. Creed
`Case Manager
`FINNEGAN, HENDERSON,
`FARABOW, GARRETT &
`DUNNER, L.L.P.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
