throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Paper 18
`Date: January 10, 2017
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`HOLOGIC, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`ENZO LIFE SCIENCES, INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`
`
`
`Case IPR2016-00820
`Case IPR2016-00822
`Patent 7,064,197 B11
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Before MICHAEL J. FITZPATRICK, ZHENYU YANG, and
`CHRISTOPHER G. PAULRAJ, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`
`
`
`FITZPATRICK, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`ORDER AMENDING SCHEDULING ORDER
`
`
`
`1 This Order employs a joint caption, as it is being entered in both of the
`identified inter partes reviews. The parties may not use a joint caption
`unless authorized.
`
`
`

`
`IPR2016-00820
`IPR2016-00822
`Patent 7,064,197 B1
`
`
`
`The Scheduling Order (Paper 9 in both proceedings) had scheduled
`
`oral argument, if requested and granted, to be heard on May 31, 2017 (Due
`
`Date 7). A conflict since has arisen for the panel on that date. Accordingly,
`
`any oral argument instead will be heard June 1, 2017 – Due Date 7 as set
`
`forth in the Amended Due Date Appendix appended hereto.
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`
`IPR2016-00820
`IPR2016-00822
`Patent 7,064,197 B1
`
`AMENDED DUE DATE APPENDIX
`
`DUE DATE 1 ............................................................................ Dec. 19, 2016
`
`Patent owner’s response to the petition
`
`Patent owner’s motion to amend the patent
`
`DUE DATE 2 .............................................................................. Mar. 3, 2017
`
`Petitioner’s reply to patent owner’s response to petition
`
`Petitioner’s opposition to motion to amend
`
`DUE DATE 3 .............................................................................. Apr. 3, 2017
`
`Patent owner’s reply to petitioner’s opposition to motion to amend
`
`DUE DATE 4 ............................................................................ Apr. 24, 2017
`
`Motion for observation regarding cross-examination of reply witness
`
`Motion to exclude evidence
`
`Request for oral argument
`
`DUE DATE 5 .............................................................................. May 8, 2017
`
`Response to observation
`
`Opposition to motion to exclude
`
`DUE DATE 6 ............................................................................ May 15, 2017
`
`Reply to opposition to motion to exclude
`
`DUE DATE 7 ........................................................ May 31, 2017 June 1, 2017
`
`Oral argument (if requested and granted)
`
`3
`
`

`
`IPR2016-00820
`IPR2016-00822
`Patent 7,064,197 B1
`
`For Petitioner:
`
`M. Paul Barker
`Arpita Bhattacharyya
`paul.barker@finnegan.com
`arpita.bhattacharyya@finnegan.com
`
`
`
`For Patent Owner:
`
`Kevin McNish
`kmcnish@desmaraisllp.com
`
`4

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket