`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`HOLOGIC, INC.,
`and BECTON, DICKINSON AND COMPANY,
`Petitioners
`
`v.
`
`ENZO LIFE SCIENCES, INC.
`Patent Owner
`
`____________
`
`Case No. IPR2016-00820
`U.S. Patent No. 7,064,197
`____________
`
`
`
`PETITIONERS’ REQUEST FOR ORAL HEARING
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case No. IPR2016-00820
`U.S. Patent No. 7,064,197
`
`The Board has scheduled oral hearing for this IPR proceeding (IPR2016-
`
`00820) and another pending IPR proceeding between Petitioners and Patent Owner
`
`(IPR2016-00822) for June 1, 2017. Paper 19 at 3. Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(a),
`
`Petitioners request oral hearing on the instituted grounds of unpatentability in each
`
`of the proceedings and all other pending issues presented in the pleadings (e.g.,
`
`Motions to Exclude). Given that both the proceedings involve the same patent and
`
`the issues and prior art references for the two proceedings overlap, Petitioners
`
`request a total of one hour of consolidated argument time for Petitioners, without
`
`restricting Petitioners to a particular schedule for the issues in each proceeding.
`
`Petitioners requests that, in addition to lead and back-up counsel (five
`
`individuals), five additional spaces be reserved at the oral hearings to
`
`accommodate Petitioners’ corporate representatives and counsel.
`
`Petitioners also request the ability to use audio visual equipment to display
`
`demonstratives and exhibits, including the use of a computer, projector, and screen.
`
`Petitioners additionally request that two attorneys at Petitioners’ counsel’s table be
`
`allowed to use computers at the hearing (in addition to the counsel making the
`
`argument using his or her computer to show the demonstratives), to avoid the need
`
`for the parties to bring entire paper copies of the record into the hearing room and
`
`to facilitate efficient answering of panel questions.
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`
`
`Case No. IPR2016-00820
`U.S. Patent No. 7,064,197
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`/M. Paul Barker/
`M. Paul Barker
`Reg. No. 32,013
`Lead Counsel for Hologic, Inc.
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`Date: April 24, 2017
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case No. IPR2016-00820
`U.S. Patent No. 7,064,197
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned certifies that the foregoing PETITIONERS’ REQUEST
`
`FOR ORAL HEARING was served on April 24, 2017, in its entirety via electronic
`
`mail to Patent Owner’s and BD’s counsel at:
`
`For Patent Owner
`
`EnzoIPRService@desmaraisllp.com
`Kevin K. McNish
`kmcnish@desmaraisllp.com
`Michael P. Stadnick
`mstadnick@desmaraisllp.com
`Justin P.D. Wilcox
`jwilcox@desmaraisllp.com
`Kerri-Ann Limbeek
`klimbeek@desmaraisllp.com
`
` For BD
`
`Jamie T. Wisz
`jamie.wisz@wilmerhale.com
`Heather Petruzzi
`heather.petruzzi@wilmerhale.com
`Nancy Lynn Schroeder
`nancy.schroeder@wilmerhale.com
`
`Patent Owner and BD have consented to electronic service.
`
`
`
`Date: April 24, 2017 Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`
`
`/Kristin M. Creed/
`Kristin M. Creed
`Case Manager
`FINNEGAN, HENDERSON,
`FARABOW, GARRETT &
`DUNNER, L.L.P.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`