`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`Civil Action No. 2:14-cv-1165
`
`
`
`Judge:
`
`
`
`Jury Trial Demanded
`
`
`
`'
`'
`'
`'
`'
`'
`'
`'
`'
`'
`'
`
`
`
`
`
`
`KONINKLIJKE KPN N.V.
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`v.
`
`SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS
`AMERICA LLP, SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS
`CO., LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS
`AMERICA, INC.
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ORIGINAL COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
`
`Plaintiff, Koninklijke KPN N.V. (hereafter “KPN”), files this Original Complaint against
`
`Samsung Telecommunications America LLP, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., and Samsung
`
`Electronics America, Inc. (collectively, “Defendants” or “Samsung”), and alleges as follows:
`
`BACKGROUND
`
`1.
`
`KPN’s extensive research and development efforts have led to hundreds of issued
`
`patents in the United States and across the world. These patents have in turn been licensed by
`
`leading global telecommunications companies, including many of Samsung’s mobile technology
`
`competitors.
`
`2.
`
`Despite more than two years of negotiations involving senior members of both
`
`companies, Samsung has refused to license, on mutually agreeable terms, KPN’s patents, including
`
`those described herein. KPN therefore files this suit against Samsung seeking the Court’s protection
`
`of KPN’s valuable intellectual property rights.
`
`PARTIES
`
`
`
`Samsung, Exh. 1008, p. 1
`
`
`
`3.
`
`KPN is a telecommunications (including fixed, mobile, television and internet) and
`
`ICT solution provider headquartered at Maanplein 55, NL-2516 CK, The Hague, the Netherlands.
`
`4.
`
`Samsung Telecommunications American LLP (“STA”), is upon information and belief a
`
`Delaware limited liability company with its principal place of business at 1301 East Lookout Drive,
`
`Richardson, Texas 75082. SEA can be served with process by serving Corporation Service
`
`Company DBA CSC – Lawyers Incorporating Service Company, 211 E. 7th Street, Suite 620,
`
`Austin, Texas 78701-3218.
`
`5.
`
`Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. (“SEC”), is upon information and belief a Korean
`
`corporation with its principal place of business at 416, Maetan 3-dong, Yeongtong-gu, Suwon-si,
`
`Gyeonggi-do 443-742, South Korea. SEC can be served with process by serving in accordance with
`
`the Hague Convention on the Service Abroad of Judicial and Extrajudicial Documents, in
`
`accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(f).
`
`6.
`
`Samsung Electronics America, Inc. (“SEA”), is upon information and belief a New
`
`York corporation with its principal place of business at 85 Challenger Road, Ridgefield Park, New
`
`Jersey 07660. STA, SEC, and SEA are referred to herein as “Samsung.”
`
`JURISDICTION AND VENUE
`
`7.
`
`This is a civil action for patent infringement arising under the patent laws of the
`
`United States, 35 U.S.C. § 1 et seq. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this case under
`
`28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1338(a).
`
`Venue is proper in this federal district pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1391 and 1400(b) because
`
`Defendants have done business in this District, have committed acts of infringement in this District,
`
`and continue to commit acts of infringement in this District, entitling KPN to relief.
`
`
`
`THE ASSERTED PATENTS
`2
`
`Samsung, Exh. 1008, p. 2
`
`
`
`8.
`
`This lawsuit asserts causes of action for infringement of United States Patent Nos.
`
`5,930,250, and 6,212,662 (collectively, the “Asserted Patents”).
`
`9.
`
`On July 27, 1999, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office duly and legally issued U.S.
`
`Patent No. 5,930,250 (“the ‘250 patent”) entitled, “Communication System for Interactive Services
`
`with a Packet Switching Interaction Channel Over a Narrow-Band Circuit Switching Network, as
`
`well as a Device for Application in Such a Communication System.” Following a request for
`
`reexamination made on September 28, 2012, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office issued an Ex
`
`Parte Reexamination Certificate for the ‘250 patent on September 16, 2013. KPN is the owner by
`
`assignment of the ‘250 Patent and holds all right, title and interest to the ‘250 patent. A true and
`
`correct copy of the ‘250 patent, along with the reexamination certificate, is attached as Exhibit A.
`
`10.
`
`On April 3, 2001, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office duly and legally issued U.S.
`
`Patent No. 6,212,662 (“the ‘662 patent”) entitled, “Method and Devices for the Transmission of
`
`Data With the Transmission Error Checking.” KPN is the owner by assignment of the ‘662 patent
`
`and holds all right, title and interest to the ‘662 patent. A true and correct copy of the ‘662 patent is
`
`attached as Exhibit B.
`
`11.
`
`KPN is the exclusive owner of all rights, title, and interest in the Asserted Patents,
`
`including the right to bring this suit for injunctive relief and damages. The Asserted Patents are
`
`valid and enforceable.
`
`12.
`
`Upon information and belief, Samsung has had knowledge of and notice of the
`
`Asserted Patents, and of its infringement, prior to the filing of this lawsuit in connection with
`
`licensing negotiations that have taken place between the parties, and has engaged in the activities
`
`detailed below despite an objective likelihood that its actions constituted infringement of a valid
`
`
`
`3
`
`Samsung, Exh. 1008, p. 3
`
`
`
`patent. Samsung has also received notice of the Asserted Patents and of its infringement with the
`
`filing of this Original Complaint for Patent Infringement.
`
`COUNT 1
`
`(Samsung’s Infringement of the ‘250 Patent)
`
`13.
`
`KPN repeats and re-alleges the allegations in the preceding paragraphs as if fully set
`
`forth herein.
`
`14.
`
`Samsung has infringed and continues to infringe the ‘250 Patent under 35 U.S.C. §
`
`271, literally or under the doctrine of equivalents, by making, using, selling, and/or offering for sale
`
`in the United States, and/or importing into the United States, infringing products without
`
`authorization by KPN.
`
`15.
`
`Samsung directly infringed and continues to directly infringe one or more claims of
`
`the ‘250 Patent by importing, offering to sell, selling, or using products or methods that infringe the
`
`‘250 Patent, including but not limited to the Samsung Galaxy S4 and S5 and related Samsung
`
`Communication Devices, products incorporating the same or similar Multimedia Messaging Service
`
`technology, and infrastructure incorporating the same or similar technology (hereafter “the ‘250
`
`Accused Products”). Samsung has directly infringed and continues to directly infringe one or more
`
`of the claims of the ‘250 Patent by making, using, offering to sell, selling, or importing the ‘250
`
`Accused Products.
`
`16.
`
`In addition to the foregoing and/or in the alternative, Samsung indirectly infringes the
`
`‘250 Patent by inducing and contributing to infringement by others, including but not limited to
`
`OEMs, partners, service providers, manufacturers, importers, resellers, customers, and/or end users,
`
`in accordance with 35 U.S.C. § 271(b), in this District and elsewhere in the United States. Samsung
`
`is actively, knowingly, and intentionally inducing infringement of the ‘250 Patent by practicing the
`4
`
`
`Samsung, Exh. 1008, p. 4
`
`
`
`methods set forth therein and by selling, offering to sell and/or importing into the United States the
`
`‘250 Accused Products; with the knowledge and specific intent that third parties, such as those
`
`described above, will continue to, either alone or in combination with Samsung, practice the
`
`patented methods, and use, sell, offer for sale, and/or import the ‘250 Accused Products supplied by
`
`Samsung to infringe the ‘250 Patent; and with the knowledge and specific intent to encourage and
`
`facilitate the infringement through the dissemination of the ‘250 Accused Products and/or the
`
`creation and dissemination of promotional and marketing materials, supporting materials,
`
`instructions, product manuals, and/or technical information relating to the ‘250 Accused Products
`
`and infringing uses thereof.
`
`17.
`
`In addition to the foregoing and/or in the alternative, Samsung has knowingly
`
`contributed to the infringement of one or more claims of the ‘250 Patent under 35 U.S.C. § 271(c).
`
`Samsung is actively, knowingly and intentionally contributing to the infringement of the ‘250 Patent
`
`by selling, offering to sell, and/or importing into the United States, the ‘250 Accused Products, with
`
`the knowledge that they are especially designed or adapted to operate in a manner that infringes the
`
`‘250 Patent; with the knowledge that third parties, including those set forth above, will continue to,
`
`either alone or in combination with Samsung, infringe the claims of the ‘250 patent, and with the
`
`knowledge that the infringing technology in the ‘250 Accused Products is not a staple article of
`
`commerce suitable for substantial non-infringing use.
`
`18.
`
`Samsung’s acts of infringement have caused damage to KPN, and KPN is entitled to
`
`recover from Samsung the damages it has sustained as a result of Samsung’s wrongful acts in an
`
`amount subject to proof at trial.
`
`
`
`5
`
`Samsung, Exh. 1008, p. 5
`
`
`
`19.
`
`Samsung’s infringement of KPN’s exclusive rights under the ‘250 Patent has caused
`
`KPN irreparable harm for which there is no adequate remedy at law, unless the infringement is
`
`enjoined by this Court.
`
`COUNT 2
`
`(Samsung’s infringement of the ‘662 Patent)
`
`20.
`
`KPN repeats and re-alleges the allegations in the preceding paragraphs as if fully set
`
`forth herein.
`
`21.
`
`Samsung has infringed and continues to infringe the ‘662 Patent under 35 U.S.C. §
`
`271, literally or under the doctrine of equivalents, by making, using, selling, and/or offering for sale
`
`in the United States, and/or importing into the United States, infringing products without
`
`authorization by KPN.
`
`22.
`
`Samsung directly infringed and continues to directly infringe one or more claims of
`
`the ‘662 Patent by importing, offering to sell, selling, or using products or methods that infringe the
`
`‘662 Patent, including but not limited to the Samsung Galaxy S4 and S5 and related Samsung
`
`Communication Devices as well as infrastructure incorporating the same or similar technology
`
`(hereafter “the ‘662 Accused Products”). Samsung has directly infringed and continues to directly
`
`infringe one or more of the claims of the ‘662 Patent by making, using, offering to sell, selling, or
`
`importing the ‘662 Accused Products.
`
`23.
`
`In addition to the foregoing and/or in the alternative, Samsung indirectly infringes the
`
`‘662 Patent by inducing and contributing to infringement by others, including but not limited to
`
`OEMs, partners, service providers, manufacturers, importers, resellers, customers, and/or end users,
`
`in accordance with 35 U.S.C. § 271(b), in this District and elsewhere in the United States. Samsung
`
`is actively, knowingly, and intentionally inducing infringement of the ‘662 Patent by practicing the
`6
`
`
`Samsung, Exh. 1008, p. 6
`
`
`
`methods set forth therein and by selling, offering to sell and/or importing into the United States the
`
`‘662 Accused Products; with the knowledge and specific intent that third parties, such as those
`
`described above, will continue to, either alone or in combination with Samsung, practice the
`
`patented methods, and use, sell, offer for sale, and/or import the ‘662 Accused Products supplied by
`
`Samsung to infringe the ‘662 Patent; and with the knowledge and specific intent to encourage and
`
`facilitate the infringement through the dissemination of the ‘662 Accused Products and/or the
`
`creation and dissemination of promotional and marketing materials, supporting materials,
`
`instructions, product manuals, and/or technical information relating to the ‘662 Accused Products
`
`and infringing uses thereof.
`
`24.
`
`In addition to the foregoing and/or in the alternative, Samsung has knowingly
`
`contributed to the infringement of one or more claims of the ‘662 Patent under 35 U.S.C. § 271(c).
`
`Samsung is actively, knowingly and intentionally contributing to the infringement of the ‘662 Patent
`
`by selling, offering to sell, and/or importing into the United States, the ‘662 Accused Products, with
`
`the knowledge that they are especially designed or adapted to operate in a manner that infringes the
`
`‘662 Patent; with the knowledge that third parties, including those set forth above, will continue to,
`
`either alone or in combination with Samsung, infringe the claims of the ‘662 patent, and with the
`
`knowledge that the infringing technology in the ‘662 Accused Products is not a staple article of
`
`commerce suitable for substantial non-infringing use.
`
`25.
`
`Samsung’s acts of infringement have caused damage to KPN, and KPN is entitled to
`
`recover from Samsung the damages it has sustained as a result of Samsung’s wrongful acts in an
`
`amount subject to proof at trial.
`
`
`
`7
`
`Samsung, Exh. 1008, p. 7
`
`
`
`26.
`
`Samsung’s infringement of KPN’s exclusive rights under the ‘662 Patent has caused
`
`KPN irreparable harm for which there is no adequate remedy at law, unless the infringement is
`
`enjoined by this Court.
`
`DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
`
`27.
`
`KPN hereby demands a jury trial for all issues so triable.
`
`PRAYER FOR RELIEF
`
`
`
`WHEREFORE, KPN prays for judgment as follows:
`
`A. Declaring that Samsung has infringed the Asserted Patents;
`
`B. Awarding damages arising out of Samsung’s infringement of the Asserted Patents, including
`
`enhanced damages pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 284 and a compulsory future royalty until expiration of
`
`the Asserted Patents, to KPN, together with prejudgment and post-judgment interest, in an amount
`
`according to proof;
`
`C. Permanently enjoining Samsung, its officers, agents, and employees, and those persons in
`
`active concert or participating with any of them, and its successors and assigns, from infringement,
`
`inducement of infringement, and contributory infringement of the Asserted Patents, including but
`
`not limited to making, using, selling and/or offering for sale within the United States or importing
`
`into the United States, any devices, products, software, or methods that infringe the Asserted Patents
`
`before the expiration of the Asserted Patents;
`
`D. Awarding attorneys’ fees to KPN pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 285 or as otherwise permitted by
`
`law;
`
`E. Awarding such other costs and further relief as the Court may deem just and proper.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`8
`
`Samsung, Exh. 1008, p. 8
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`SUSMAN GODFREY, L.L.P.
`
`/s/ Lexie White
`Lexie G. White
`State Bar No. 24048876
`lwhite@susmangodfrey.com
`SUSMAN GODFREY, L.L.P.
`1000 Louisiana Street, Suite 5100
`Houston, Texas 77002
`Telephone: (713) 651-9366
`Facsimile: (713) 654-6666
`
`Attorney-in-charge for Plaintiff
`
`
`
`
`9
`
`Stephen D. Susman
`State Bar No. 19521000
`ssusman@susmangodfrey.com
`SUSMAN GODFREY, L.L.P.
`1000 Louisiana Street, Suite 5100
`Houston, Texas 77002
`Telephone: (713) 651-9366
`Facsimile: (713) 654-6666
`
`Attorney for Plaintiff
`
`
`
`
`
`Samsung, Exh. 1008, p. 9