throbber
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_________________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`_________________________
`
`WILLIS ELECTRIC CO., LTD
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`POLYGROUP MACAU Ltd (BVI)
`_________________________
`
`Case Number Unassigned
`Patent 8,863,416
`_________________________
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PETITION FOR INTER PARTES REVIEW OF U.S. PATENT 8,863,416
`
`
`
`Mail Stop PATENT BOARD
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`United States Patent and Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`Page 1
`
`POLYGROUP EX. 1050
`POLYGROUP V. WILLIS
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`TABLE OF CONTENTS
`
`I. INTRODUCTION AND STATEMENT OF RELIEF REQUESTED (37 C.F.R.
`§42.22(A)) ............................................................................................................. 1
`II. PROPOSED GROUNDS (§42.104(B))................................................................ 1
`III. THE ‘416 AND ASSERTED PRIOR ART ......................................................... 2
`A.
`Priority Date of the ‘416 Patent .................................................................. 2
`B.
`Summary of the ‘416 .................................................................................. 2
`i.
`The Independent Claim ................................................................... 4
`ii.
`Dependent Claims............................................................................ 5
`C.
`Prosecution History of the ʼ416 .................................................................. 6
`D.
`Summary of the asserted prior art .............................................................. 8
`i.
`USPN 8,454,186 to Chen ................................................................ 8
`ii.
`Otto DE 8436328.2 ........................................................................17
`iii. USPN 7,066,739 to McLeish.........................................................18
`IV.
`CLAIM CONSTRUCTION (37 C.F.R. §42.104(B)(3)) .......................... 19
`Level of ordinary skill in the art. .............................................................. 19
`A.
`i.
`“central prong” of claim 1 .............................................................20
`ii.
`“channel prong” of claim 1 ............................................................20
`iii.
`“channel void” of claim 1 ..............................................................23
`iv.
`sections” of claim 1 .......................................................................23
`V. DETAILED EXPLANATION OF PROPOSED GROUNDS. .......................... 24
`A. Ground 1: Claims 1-4, 6-10 are Obvious over Chen in view of the
`Ordinary Knowledge of One Skilled in the Art ....................................... 26
`Element 1[a]-[b] ............................................................................26
`i.
`ii.
`Element 1[c] ..................................................................................27
`iii.
`Element 1[d] ..................................................................................28
`iv.
`Element 1[e] ..................................................................................29
`v.
`Element 1[f] ...................................................................................30
`
`“contact device comprising one or more spring activated contact
`
`ii
`
`Page 2
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`Elements 1[a]-[i] are disclosed by the ‘751 provisional disclosure
`
`Element 1[g] ..................................................................................32
`vi.
`vii. Element 1[h] ..................................................................................35
`viii. Element 1[i] ...................................................................................36
`ix.
`incorporated into Chen by reference. ............................................37
`x.
`
`Claim 2-3 “The artificial tree of Claim 1, wherein the channel
`prong of the male end is configured to engage the channel void of
`the female end at a plurality of locations” & “The artificial tree of
`claim 1, wherein the channel prong of the male end is configured
`to engage the channel void of the female end on a plurality of
`configurations, each configuration providing a different rotational
`alignment between the first trunk section and the second trunk
`
`Claim 4: “The artificial tree of claim 1, wherein the channel void
`of the female end is substantially circular, and the central void of
`the female end is disposed proximate the center of the
`
`section.” .........................................................................................42
`xi.
`substantially circular channel void.” .............................................43
`xii. Claim 6: “The artificial tree of claim 1 further comprising an
`electrical power to a strand of lights.” ...........................................44
`xiii. Claim 7: “The artificial tree of claim 1 further comprising
`rotating with respect to the second trunk section.” .......................44
`xiv. Claim 8 “The artificial tree of claim 1, wherein the first trunk
`sleeve configured to engage the outer sleeve.” .............................45
`xv. Claim 9: “The artificial tree of claim 8, wherein two or more pivot
`second trunk section.” ...................................................................46
`xvi. Claim 10: The artificial tree of claim 1 further comprising a power
`second power distribution subsystem.” .........................................47
`
`outlet disposed on a trunk section, the outlet configured to provide
`
`alignment mechanisms to prevent the first trunk section from
`
`section comprises an inner sleeve proximate an end of the first
`trunk section, and the second trunk section comprises an outer
`sleeve proximate an end of the second trunk section, the inner
`
`areas between the inner sleeve and the outer sleeve substantially
`prevent the first trunk section from rocking with respect to the
`
`cord, the power cord configured to engage a wall outlet and
`provide power to the first power distribution subsystem and the
`
`iii
`
`Page 3
`
`

`
`
`
`Ground 3: Claims 1-4, 8-10 are obvious over Otto in view of the
`
`Ground 2: Claims 1-10 are obvious over Chen in view of McLeish. ...... 48
`i.
`Element 1[d] ..................................................................................50
`ii.
`Element 1[f] ...................................................................................51
`iii.
`Element 1[g] ..................................................................................53
`iv.
`Element 1[h] ..................................................................................54
`v.
`Element 1[i] ...................................................................................55
`vi.
`Claim 5 ..........................................................................................56
`Ordinary Knowledge of One Skilled in the Art ....................................... 56
`i.
`Element 1[a]-[b] ............................................................................57
`ii.
`Element 1[c] ..................................................................................57
`iii.
`Element 1[d] ..................................................................................58
`iv.
`Element 1[e] ..................................................................................58
`v.
`Element 1[f] ...................................................................................59
`vi.
`Element 1[g] ..................................................................................60
`vii. Element 1[h] ..................................................................................61
`viii. Element 1[i] ...................................................................................62
`ix.
`Claims 2-3 ......................................................................................63
`x.
`Claim 4 ..........................................................................................64
`xi.
`Claim 8 ..........................................................................................65
`xii. Claim 9 ..........................................................................................65
`xiii. Claim 10 ........................................................................................67
`GROUNDS FOR STANDING ................................................................ 67
`MANDATORY NOTICES ...................................................................... 68
`Real Parties-in-Interest (§42.8(b)(1)) ....................................................... 68
`Related Matters: 37 C.F.R. §42.8(b)(2).................................................... 68
`Petitioner’s Lead and Back-up Counsel and Service Information ........... 69
`Payment of fees ........................................................................................ 70
`CONCLUSION ........................................................................................ 70
`
`
`
`B.
`
`C.
`
`VI.
`VII.
`A.
`B.
`C.
`D.
`VIII.
`
`iv
`
`Page 4
`
`

`
`
`
`TABLE OF AUTHORITIES
`
`
`
`Cases
`
`Advanced Display Systems, Inc. v. Kent State Univ.,
`212 F.3d 1272 (Fed. Cir. 2000) ............................................................................38
`
`Custom Play, LLC v. Clear Play, Inc.,
`IPR2014-00430, Paper 20 (PTAB Aug. 14, 2015) ..............................................24
`
`Graham v. John Deere Co.,
`383 U.S. 1 (1966) .................................................................................................24
`
`Harari v. Lee,
`656 F.3d 1331 (Fed. Cir. 2011) ............................................................................38
`
`In re Giacomini,
`612 F.3d 1380 (Fed. Cir. 2010) .............................................................................. 8
`
`In re Kuhle,
`526 F.2d 553 (C.C.P.A. 1975) ................................................................ 25, 34, 61
`
`KSR Int’l Co. v. Teleflex, Inc.,
`550 U.S. 398 (2007) .............................................................................................24
`
`McCaskey Reg. Co. v. Divens,
`194 F. 967 (3d. Cir. 1912) ............................................................................. 25, 60
`
`New Railhead Mfg. LLC v. Vermeer Mfg. Co.,
`298 F.3d 1290 (Fed. Cir. 2002) .........................................................................2, 8
`
`Renishaw PLC v. Marposs Societa’ per Azioni,
`158 F.3d 1243 (Fed. Cir. 1998) ............................................................................18
`
`Riverwood Intern. Corp. v. R.A. Jones & Co., Inc.,
`324 F.3d 1346 (Fed. Cir. 2003) .............................................................................. 5
`
`Statutes
`
`35 U.S.C. §112 .........................................................................................................22
`
`35 USC §102 ........................................................................................... 5, 16, 17, 56
`
`35 USC §103 ..........................................................................................................1, 6
`
`v
`
`Page 5
`
`

`
`
`
`Manuel of Patent Examining Procedures
`
`MPEP 2141 ..............................................................................................................24
`
`MPEP 244.04 (VI) ................................................................................ 25, 34, 60, 62
`
`
`
`MPEP 609 ................................................................................................................16
`
`Rules and Regulations
`
`37 C.F.R. § .68(a)(3) ................................................................................................16
`
`37 C.F.R. §42.8(b)(1) ...............................................................................................67
`
`37 C.F.R. §42.8(b)(2) ...............................................................................................68
`
`37 C.F.R. §§42.22(a) ...............................................................................................1,9
`
`37 C.F.R. §42.100(b) ...............................................................................................18
`
`37 C.F.R. §42.104(b) ...................................................................................... 1, 9, 18
`
`
`vi
`
`Page 6
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`Exhibit List
`
`Exhibit 1001
`
`U.S. Patent No. 8,863,416 (“the ‘416”)
`
`Exhibit 1002
`
`Declaration of Prof. William Durfee
`
`Exhibit 1003
`
`File History for Provisional Application No. 61/522,944
`
`Exhibit 1004
`
`File History for Non-Provisional Application No. 13/659,737
`
`Exhibit 1005
`
`U.S. Patent No. 8,053,042 to Loomis
`
`Exhibit 1006
`
`U.S. Patent No. 6,869,316 to Hinkie
`
`Exhibit 1007
`
`U.S. Patent No. 8,454,186 B2 to Chen
`
`Exhibit 1008
`
`File History for Provisional Application No. 61/385,751
`
`Exhibit 1009
`
`German utility Model Register Number G8436328.2
`(DE8436328U1) to Otto and Otto with translation and
`certification
`
`Exhibit 1010
`
`IPR2014-01263 – ‘186 IPR Petition
`
`Exhibit 1011
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,066,739 to McLeish
`
`Exhibit 1012
`
`Excerpt from Webster’s New Collegiate Dictionary
`
`Exhibit 1013
`
`Excerpt from the American Heritage Dictionary
`
`Exhibit 1014
`
`Excerpt from Webster’s New World Dictionary
`
`Exhibit 1015
`
`Excerpt from the Oxford Dictionary
`
`Exhibit 1016
`
`Patent Owner’s Infringement Claim Charts from Polygroup
`Macau Ltd. (BVI). v. Willis Electric Co., Ltd., Case No. 3:15-
`cv-552 (W.D.N.C.)
`
`Exhibit 1017
`
`U.S. Patent No. 6,241,559 to Taylor
`
`vii
`
`Page 7
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Exhibit 1018
`
`U.S. Patent Application 2010/0159713 (Nishihira)
`
`Exhibit 1019
`
`U.S. Patent No. 3,985,924 (Pritza)
`
`Exhibit 1020
`
`U.S. Patent No. 1,656,148 (Harris)
`
`Exhibit 1021
`
`Mike Wood Declaration (IPR2014-01263)
`
`Exhibit 1022
`
`Mike Wood Declaration (IPR2014-00800)
`
`viii
`
`Page 8
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`I.
`
`Introduction and Statement of Relief Requested (37 C.F.R. §42.22(A))
`Willis Electric Co., Ltd. (“Petitioner”) requests institution of inter partes
`
`review of U.S. Patent No. 8,863,416 (“the ‘416”, Ex. 1001) and cancellation of
`
`claims 1-10. The ‘416 was filed on October 24, 2012, issued October 21, 2014, and
`
`is presently assigned to Polygroup Macau Ltd. (BVI) (“Patent Owner” or “PO”).
`(Id.) The prior art offered with this Petition establishes that all elements in the
`
`challenged claims of the ‘416 were well known, and the claimed configurations
`
`resulting from the ‘416 would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art
`
`as of the earliest available priority date to which the claims are entitled.
`
`II.
`
`Proposed grounds (§42.104(b))
`The claims of the ‘416 are rendered obvious by the following grounds:
`
`• Ground 1: 1[a] Claims 1-4, 6-10 are rendered obvious by Chen in view of
`the knowledge of a POSA pursuant to 35 USC §103; 1[b] Claims 1-4, 6-10
`
`are rendered obvious by Chen and its provisional 61/385,751, incorporated
`
`by reference, in view of the knowledge of a POSA pursuant to 35 USC
`
`§103. Though this is one Ground, they are identified separately contingent
`
`upon the Panel’s determination that the provisional application is properly
`
`incorporated.
`• Ground 2: Claims 1-10 are rendered obvious by Chen in view of McLeish
`pursuant to 35 USC §103.
`• Ground 3: Claims 1-4, 8-10 are rendered obvious by Otto in view of the
`knowledge of a POSA pursuant to 35 USC §103.
`
`1
`
`Page 9
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`III.
`
`The ‘416 and asserted prior art
`A. Priority Date of the ‘416 Patent
`The priority date for the ‘416 is its filing date, October 24, 2012. The ‘416
`
`claims priority to provisional application No. 61/522,944, filed on October 28,
`
`2011. As described in Part (IV)(ii)&(iv), the provisional filing does not include
`
`§112-enabling material for two claim elements of its independent claim: a “contact
`
`device having one or more spring activated contact sections” or a “channel prong”
`disclosure that is broader than a “prong” within the understanding of a POSA, e.g.,
`
`Dr. William Durfee “Durfee.” (Ex. 1002 ¶¶29-51.) A patent cannot claim priority
`
`to a provisional application where the provisional application does not disclose or
`support the limitations claimed in the patent. See New Railhead Mfg. LLC v.
`Vermeer Mfg. Co., 298 F.3d 1290, 1294 (Fed. Cir. 2002) (patent was not entitled to
`
`filing date of provisional application because provisional did not support patent
`
`claims, and thus prior art existed that rendered the claims invalid). As such, the
`
`operative priority date for the ‘416 is October 24, 2012.
`
`B. Summary of the ‘416
`The alleged invention of the ‘416 relates to a tree construction to transfer
`
`electrical power between tree trunk sections in an artificial tree. (Ex. 1001, 1:15-
`
`18.) The problem sought to be solved by the ‘416 was the difficulty in aligning
`electrical connectors in corresponding trunk sections during assembly. (Id., 2:17-
`
`23.) Thus, the ‘416 discloses a “power transfer system for an artificial tree that
`
`allows a user to connect neighboring tree trunk sections without the need to
`rotationally alight [sic] the trunk sections.” (Id., 2:17-20.) In one embodiment, the
`
`2
`
`Page 10
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`‘416 discloses a circular “prong,” rather than a slender projecting part, which fits
`
`into circular channel void, and a central prong that fits into a central void:
`Fig. 8
`Fig. 11
`
`
`
`
`
`(Id., Fig. 8 (disclosing female terminals 810 and 805); Fig. 11 (disclosing male
`terminals 1005 and 1015); see also 12:33-48; 13:14-14:13; Ex. 1002 ¶12.)
`
`In the context of this embodiment, the ‘416 discloses that the contact
`
`sections may include elastic components, or spring-activated contact sections, that
`
`maintain the pressure between the electrical terminals:
`
`
`
`3
`
`Page 11
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(Id., 13:40-50 (describing how male prong pushes contact sections 905 apart as
`
`male prong is inserted); Fig. 9 (disclosing contact device 805 with spring-
`activated-contact sections 905); see also 12:33-48; 13:14-14:13; Ex. 1002 ¶13.)
`
`The Independent Claim
`i.
`An artificial tree, comprising:
`a plurality of tree trunk sections, the trunk sections forming a trunk of
`the artificial tree;
`
`a first power distribution subsystem disposed within an inner void of a
`first trunk section of the plurality of tree trunk sections, the first power
`distribution subsystem comprising a male end, the male end having a
`central prong and a channel prong; and
`
`a second power distribution subsystem disposed within an inner void
`of a second trunk section of the plurality of tree trunk sections, the
`second power distribution subsystem comprising a female end, the
`female end having a central void and a channel void, the central void
`having a contact device disposed at least partially therein, the contact
`device comprising one or more spring activated contact sections;
`
`4
`
`Page 12
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`wherein the central prong of the male end is configured to engage the
`central void of the female end and the channel prong of the male end
`is configured to engage the channel void of the female end to conduct
`electricity between the first power distribution subsystem and the
`second power distribution subsystem; and
`
`wherein when the central prong engages the central void, the central
`prong pushes a spring activated contact section of the one or more
`spring activated contact sections causing the spring activated contact
`section to press against the central prong to maintain electrical contact
`between the central prong and the contact device.
`
`(Id., 15:57-16:26.) The ‘416 identifies several aspects of the invention and asserts
`
`that they were well known. “Prior art may be created by admissions of the parties.”
`Riverwood Intern. Corp. v. R.A. Jones & Co., Inc., 324 F.3d 1346, 1354 (Fed. Cir.
`
`2003). Artificial Christmas trees comprising a plurality of trunk sections that
`
`contain electrical systems utilizing electrical prongs and electrical slots to allow
`electricity to flow through the trunk of the tree were known. (Id. at 2:4-16.) Thus,
`
`the only purportedly novel claimed features remaining relate to the use of spring-
`
`activated-contact sections on coaxial, or rotationally independent, electrical
`
`connectors.
`
`ii. Dependent Claims
`The dependent claims add nothing new or non-obvious. Claims 2-4 relate to
`
`the rotational alignment of coaxial connectors. Other limitations, such as a safety
`
`cover (Claim 5), an outlet disposed on a trunk to connect a light string to (Claim
`
`6), distinct alignment mechanisms to prevent rotation (Claim 7), the mechanical
`
`5
`
`Page 13
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`connections of the trunk segments (Claims 8-9), and a power cord (Claim 10) are
`
`all known or disclosed in the prior art.
`
`C. Prosecution History of the ʼ416
`In the first office action, claims 1, 2, and 7-11 were rejected under pre-AIA
`
`35 USC §102(b) as being anticipated by U.S. Patent No. 8,053,042 B1 (Loomis)
`
`and claims 3, 4, 12-16 and 19 were rejected under pre-AIA 35 USC §103(a) by
`
`Loomis in view of U.S. Patent 6,869,316 B2 (Hinkie). (Ex. 1004 at 134-141.)
`
`Loomis discloses an artificial tree with an electrically-powered trunk. (Ex.
`
`1005, 3:16-4:1; Abstract.) It discloses the use of electrical connectors utilizing
`traditional wall-socket-type plugs to convey power between trunk sections. (Id.,
`
`3:42-4:8.) As seen in a comparison of Fig. 2 with Figs. 4a-c of the ‘416, it is
`
`identical to one of the ‘416’s disclosed embodiments:
`Ex. 1005 Fig. 2
`Ex. 1001 Fig. 4b
`
`
`
`6
`
`
`
`Page 14
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`PO filed a response on March 13, 2014, amending claim 1 to include a
`
`spring-activated contact device. Relevant elements of claim 1 were amended to add
`
`the following limitations:
`
`a second power distribution subsystem disposed within an inner void
`of a second trunk section of the plurality of tree trunk sections, the
`second power distribution subsystem comprising a female end, the
`female end having a central void and a channel void, the central void
`having a contact device disposed at least partially therein, the contact
`device comprising one or more spring activated contact sections;
`
`…
`
`wherein, when the central prong engages the central void, the central
`prong pushes a spring activated contact section of the one or more
`spring activated contact sections causing the spring activated contact
`section to press against the central prong to maintain electrical contact
`between the central prong and the contact device.
`
`PO also provided Remarks arguing that Loomis failed to teach spring action
`
`to secure an electrical connection, because “Loomis simply discloses a standard
`
`“socket style” electrical connector and therefore fails to disclose other aspects of
`Claim 1.” (Id., at 62-63, 68.)
`A final rejection allowed claims 1-5 and 7-11. (Id., 38-39.) A Notice of
`
`Allowance issued August 29, 2014, allowing all pending claims. (Id. at 9, 13.) The
`
`Reasons for Allowance state:
`
`The prior art does not disclose an artificial tree comprising a plurality
`of tree trunk sections; first power distribution; second power
`
`7
`
`Page 15
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`distribution; wherein the central prong engages the central void and a
`spring element is pushed as the central prong and central void is
`mated; wherein the pushing of the spring element facilitates the
`electrical contact between the first and second power distribution
`subsystem.
`
`Loomis '042 does not disclose the tree trunk assembly to have a
`central prong that engages the central void while pushing a spring
`activated contact section causing the spring to press against the central
`prong to maintain electrical contact between the central prong and
`contact device. The trunk sections are guided through and aligned by a
`recess and protrusion on the trunk sections but does not have the
`spring activated contact section to assist in the alignment and
`connection of the trunk sections.
`
`(Id., 14.) The ‘416 issued on October 21, 2014.
`
`D. Summary of the asserted prior art
`The ‘416 is directed to an artificial tree. Such artificial trees were known in
`
`the art well before the earliest possible priority date of the ‘416. A POSA would
`
`have been aware of the following prior art references, as well as typical electrical
`
`terminals and contacts which include spring-activated contact sections. (Ex. 1002,
`
`¶53-83.)
`
`i. USPN 8,454,186 to Chen
`Petitioner is the assignee of USPN 8,454,186 to Chen (“the ‘186,” Ex.
`
`1007.) The ‘186 published on March 29, 2012 as Application No. 2012/0076957,
`
`and issued on June 4, 2013. Chen’s priority date of Sept. 23, 2010, is based upon
`the provisional application 61/385,751 (Ex. 2008). (Id.)
`
`8
`
`Page 16
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`Chen is prior art under §102(e). “A reference patent is [] entitled to claim the
`
`benefit of the filing date of its provisional application if the disclosure of the
`
`provisional application provides support for the claims in the reference patent in
`compliance with §112, ¶1.” Dynamic Drinkware, 800 F.3d at 1381; In re
`Giacomini, 612 F.3d 1380, 1383 (Fed. Cir. 2010) (in order to claim priority “the
`
`provisional application must provide written description support for the claimed
`invention.”); New Railhead, 298 F.3d at 1294 (for a “non-provisional utility
`
`application to be afforded the priority date of the provisional application, the two
`
`applications must share at least one common inventor and the written description
`
`of the provisional must adequately support the claims of the non-provisional
`
`application.”). The inventorship of the provisional filing and ‘186 are the same,
`
`and Durfee explains in Appendix B1 that the provisional disclosure provides §112
`
`¶1 support for the ‘186’s claims. (Ex. 1002, ¶77-79; Appendix B.) Indeed, each
`independent and dependent claim is enabled by the provisional disclosure. (Id.) For
`
`example, Chen Provisional enables claim 10:
`
`
`1 Specific citations to another document with an explanation of their relevance
`satisfies 37 C.F.R. §§42.22(a) & 42.104. e.g., Fresh Products, LLC v. Ed Ramirez,
`
`Paper 7 at 23-24 (PTAB June 22, 2015) (holding identification of relevance of
`
`declaration evidence which included a more specific subset of the evidence
`sufficiently complies); Daicel Corp. v. Celanese Int’l Corp., IPR2015-00170,
`
`Paper 29 at 6-7 (PTAB Sept. 1, 2015).
`
`9
`
`Page 17
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`• Lighted artificial tree (162, 400), first tree portion (bottom 162), first hollow
`trunk portion 172 containing trunk connector 112, first plurality of branches
`
`168 joined to first trunk portion and an electrically connected first light
`string (light cluster 116). (Id., (Appendix B), at 157-162.)
`
`• Second hollow trunk portion 174 containing trunk connector 110 including
`
`second plurality branches 168 joined to second trunk portion, and second
`electrically-connected light string (another light cluster 116). (Id., (Appendix
`
`B), at 162-167.)
`
`• Second tree portion is mechanically and electrically connectable to the first
`tree portion along a common vertical axis. (Id., (Appendix B), at 167-172.)
`
`• The electrical connections are coaxial electrical connectors connectable in
`
`any rotational orientation and enables the electrical connection being made
`
`independent of the rotational orientation of the first trunk portion relative the
`second trunk portion about the common vertical axis. (Id., (Appendix B),
`
`172-177; Ex. 1008, at 42 (Figs. 6-7 (220 & 222 connectable in any
`
`alignment)).)
`
`The subject matter of Chen being relied upon to invalidate the ‘416 has been
`
`carried through from the Chen Provisional. First, the Chen Provisional is
`incorporated by reference. See Ariosa v. Illumina, IPR2014-01093, Paper 69, 11
`
`(PTAB Jan. 7, 206). Additionally, the subject matter of the Chen Provisional
`
`discloses the same elements of Chen relied upon, each of which is identified below
`
`in Part (V)(A)(ix). Finally, as with Chen, Chen Provisional also suggests that a
`
`POSA may utilize contact terminals other than the ones specifically disclosed. (Ex.
`
`10
`
`Page 18
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`1008, at 24, ll. 6-12.) This provisional filing date renders Chen prior art under
`
`§102(e) as of Sept. 23, 2010.
`
`Chen is also prior art under §102(a) because it published before the filing
`
`date of the ‘416 nonprovisional application, and the ‘416 cannot receive the benefit
`of its provisional filing. (Ex. 1002, ¶¶23, 26, 28-52; supra Parts (III)(A);
`
`(IV(A)(ii)&(iv).)
`
`The ’186 relates to the field of pre-lit artificial holiday trees and discloses
`
`artificial trees with modular tree portions that are mechanically and electrically
`
`connectable. (Id., Abstract; 1:14–18.) Each trunk portion includes a trunk electrical
`connector housed within a trunk body of the trunk portion. (Id., 2:44-54.)
`
`Fig. 4 of the ’186 compared to Fig. 5 of the ‘416 shows the similarities of
`
`conductive components inside trunk portions:
`Fig. 4 ‘186 Patent (Ex. 1007)
`
`
`Fig. 5 ‘416 Patent (Ex. 1001)
`
`
`Like the ‘416, the ‘186 discloses electrical connectors are housed at least
`
`partially within the trunk body. (E.g., id., Figs. 14b, 15b, 16b (depicting connector
`
`11
`
`Page 19
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`within trunk body).) The connectors disclosed in the ‘186 are also connectors that
`
`allow an electrical connection to be made in a multitude of rotational alignments.
`
`(See id., 15:62-66; 15:45-50 (“[T]he coaxial nature of connectors 200 and 212
`
`permit the electrical connection of the connectors at any rotational orientation
`
`about a vertical axis. [Upon assembly], other than aligning the two portions along a
`
`vertical axis A, no rotational alignment is necessary.”).) The connectors include a
`
`male side with a central prong 262 and barrel connector 260 surrounding the prong
`
`on the male side (a central and channel prong) and a female side with a terminal
`
`308 disposed in a “central void” and a second contact 306 on the outside of a
`
`second barrel connector in a “channel void.” (Ex. 1002, ¶60.)
`
`Fig. 6 depicts an exploded view of the “male” end of a trunk connector. (Ex.
`
`1007.) Herein, this end is considered the “male” end,
`
`because it depicts and is described to have a male prong.
`(Id., Fig. 6 (depicting prong); 11:8-20 (“Second electrical
`
`contact 262 . . . may be located generally at a center
`portion of receptacle 264, extending upward and away
`
`from a closed end of receptacle 264.”); 15:34-44
`
`(explaining that 262 is inserted into female receptacle
`
`310).)
`
`The ‘416 describes the male side as the side with a
`
`central prong. (Ex. 1001, 2:49-50.) However, the parlance
`
`of male/female is interchangeable because electrical
`
`contacts are frequently nested contacts. (Ex. 1002, ¶62.)
`
`12
`
`Page 20
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`Thus, connector 200 is described as “a female trunk connector configured to
`
`receive a male counterpart [212] to form a coaxial-like electrical connection.” (Ex.
`
`1007, 9:9-11.) This is because though connector 200 has a male central prong, the
`
`contact set depicted nests such that female contact 260 of Figs. 8-10 extends
`axially externally to the connector plug. (See id., Fig. 8.) The terms female and
`
`male are relative and would not confuse a POSA. (Ex. 1002, ¶62.)
`
`As shown in Figure 6, electrical contact 262 may be a prong and electrical
`
`contact 260 may be a circular structure that provides a second electrical contact.
`
`(Ex. 1007, Fig. 6; 11:8-20; 15:34-44.) A POSA would understand that for contact
`
`set 250, first contact 260 may be what is shown below in the left image, and
`
`second contact 262 may be what is shown below in the right image, where when
`
`assembled, second contact 262 is disposed inside first contact 260, as indicated by
`
`the dotted line that represents element 262 in Figure 6. (Ex. 1002, ¶63.)
`
`
`
`This is further made clear by description defining 264 as a “receptacle” with
`
`an open and closed end. (Ex. 1007, 11:11-20.) Thus, when assembled, the prong is
`
`positioned inside the barrel structure for a first and second contact on the male end.
`(Ex. 1002, ¶64; accord, e.g., Ex. 1007, Fig. 7 (depicting contact 262 inside contact
`
`set 250).)
`
`13
`
`Page 21
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`As shown in Fig. 6 and described above, the two electrical contacts 260
`
`and/or 262 forming set 250 may include spring-activated contacts:
`
`However, it will be understood that contact set 250 may include
`other types of single-contact or multi-contact electrical
`connectors. Such embodiments include first electrical contact 260
`and second electrical contact 262 comprising a pair of electrical
`contacts of substantially the same structure, such as a pair of blade
`connectors, spade connectors, or other such electrical terminals or
`contacts as known to those skilled in the art.
`
`(Ex. 1007, 11:21-28; accord 12:30-37.) Thus, connector 262 may b

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket