throbber
PROCEEDINGS OF THE FIRST J_NTERNATIONAL
`SYMPOSIUM ON ULTRA LARGE SCALE INTEGRATION
`SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
`
`ULSI SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY/ 198~--
`
`Edited by'
`
`S. Broydo
`ZyMOS Corporation
`Sunnyvale, California
`
`C.M. Osburn
`MCNC
`Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
`
`Assistant Editors
`
`J.M. Andrews
`D.A. Anto nia dis
`W .M. Bullis
`G.K. Getter
`D.B. F rase r
`S . Goodwin-Jo hansson
`G .J . Hu
`Y. lida
`R.J. Jacco dine
`H .J . Levinste in
`E. Middlesworth
`
`Y . Nis hi
`L .C . Parrillo
`J.R . Pf iester
`A. Re isman
`G.C. Schwartz
`A . S inh a
`R.B. Swaro op
`J. V an d er Spiegel
`A .M . Voshchenkov
`D.N.K. W a ng
`
`ELECTRONICS AND DIELECTRICS AND INSULATION DIVISIONS
`
`Proceedings Volume 87- 11
`
`THE ELECTROCHEMICAL SOCIETY, INC., 10 South Main St., Pennington, NJ 08534-2891
`
`Case No. IPR2016-00782
`DSS.2008.001
`
`

`
`Copyright 1987
`by
`The Electrochemical Society, Incorporated
`
`Papers contained herein may not be
`reprinted and may not be digested by pub(cid:173)
`lications other than those of The Electrochemical
`Society in excess of 1/6 of the material presented.
`
`Library of Congress Catalog Number: 87-82381
`Printed in the United States of America
`
`Case No. IPR2016-00782
`DSS.2008.002
`
`

`
`SELF ALIGNED BITLINE CONTACT FOR 4 MBIT DRAM
`
`K.H.Kuesters, H.M.Muehlhoff, G. Enders, E.G.Mohr
`and W.Mueller
`
`Corporate Research and Technology,Techn .Center
`for Microe l ectronics,Siemens AG,Otto- Hahn-Ring 6,
`D-8000 Munich 83,
`Ge rma~y
`
`reduction in 4 Mbit dRAM cell ~ize is
`A 25 %
`achieved by a self aligned bitline contact, which
`is £ully overlapping gate and field oxide(FOBIC).
`No additional masks are
`required. The gate
`is
`encapsulated by oxide using an oxide spacer
`t echnique. A
`thin oxide/nitride/oxide dielectric
`allows
`a
`contact hole etch, which does not
`significantly affect
`t he oxide insulation of the
`gate and
`the field oxide. The nitride serves as
`an etch stop for top oxide etch, t he final etch
`step removes only a thin dielectric.
`A 0.9 pm contact between polycide (TaSi) bitline
`and n+ diffusion (Rc <SOQ), 0.2 ~m distance to
`gate is realized without deterioration of tran(cid:173)
`sistor properties . No yield
`reduction due
`to
`gate/bitline shorts
`occurs. No
`influence of
`nitride on device properties
`is observed
`for
`nitride thickness <SOnm.
`
`1. Introduction:
`
`4M DRAM concepts are based on 3 dimensional cell structures
`such as
`trench capacitor cell (1)
`and stacked capacitor
`cell. Their integration into the process flow and the reali(cid:173)
`zation of
`sub micron design rules set new demands
`tor
`process development. However to obtain a chip size of less
`than
`100
`mm 2
`further
`innovations
`are
`necessary.
`In this paper we
`report a
`tre nch capacitor cell with self
`aligned, fu lly overlapping bitline contact (FOBIC). The cell
`design allows
`the contact hole ~o overlap gate and field
`oxide; the contact area
`is
`independant of
`lithographic
`alignment tolerances. The registration tolerance for bitl ine
`contacts is eliminated {see fig. 1). Thus the cell area can
`be shrunk by 25 % compared
`to
`a
`conventional contact
`technique.
`The proposed process is different from previous concepts for
`self aligned contacts (2 -5 )
`in which
`t he thermal oxide of
`gate polysilicon
`is used as an interlevel insulator between
`
`640
`
`Case No. IPR2016-00782
`DSS.2008.003
`
`

`
`the
`to match
`interconnections. The process has
`gates and
`requirements of reliable submicron LDD transistors, wh ic h
`are deteriorated by a
`strong reoxidation of gate po l y(cid:173)
`silicon.
`recent self aligned contact technology
`In contrast with a
`(6) which uses nitride LDD spacers and gate encapsulation,
`an oxide spacer technique is used because of LDD transistor
`reliability.
`A new
`technique for etching the dielectric underneath the
`bitline is used to ensure a
`good insulation of bitline to
`polysilicon gates
`(wordline) and substrate for
`the over(cid:173)
`lapping contacts. The FOBIC contact process
`is integra ted
`i nto the 4 Mbit process flow without additional masks.
`
`2. Process flow
`
`is fabricated with a 0.9 pm twin well pro(cid:173)
`The 4 Mbit dRAM
`cess. After
`trench capacitor and LDD transistor formation a
`lew resis tivity polycide (poly Si/TaSi:;,) layer is used for
`bit l ines and
`local peripheral
`inte rconnects. The
`second
`interconnect level consists of Ti/TiN/AlSi metallization.
`For contacts connecting the polycide bitline to n+ diffusion
`transfer gates) the FOBIC process (fig. 2)
`(source/drain of
`is employed.
`
`2.1 Oxide encapsulation of the gate
`(0.3 ~
`After patterning
`a double
`layer of poly Si/oxide
`TEOS) an oxide spacer
`is formed by oxide deposition (TEOS)
`(0.2 pro)
`and RIE etching (CHF3/02). The spacer width
`~s
`determined by LDD transistor optimization. The poly gate is
`insulated by at least 0.15 ~m oxide. A vertical etch profile
`of poly Si/oxide which can be achieved by sequential oxide
`etch (CHF3/02)
`and poly Si etch
`(Cl2/He)
`is essential.
`The same
`technique for oxide encapsulation of the gate has
`also been applied to
`a polycide gate with an oxide spacer
`covering the sidewalls of
`a trip le layer of poly Si/TaSi:;,/
`oxide.
`
`2.2.1 Contact hole etch
`The dielectr~c under the bitli ne consists of a tri~le layer
`of thin oxide/nitride/oxide. For
`the top oxide
`a
`reflow
`technique (PH 3-diffusion and backetch of the doped oxide) is
`employed, with a final thickness of 0.2/um.
`The triple
`layer dielectric allows a
`contact hole etch,
`which does not significantly affect the field oxide and the
`oxide insulation of the gate (see fig. 2). After patterning
`the contact hole mask
`the top oxide is etched using
`the
`nitride as an etch stop. The oxide etch can be performed
`a) by dry etching, b) by wet etching, or a combination of
`ooth.
`
`641
`
`Case No. IPR2016-00782
`DSS.2008.004
`
`

`
`a CHF3 plasma with a selectivity of 4:1
`a) For dry etching
`with respect
`to the nitride is used (f i g. 3a). Duri ng
`overetch the nitride etch rate reduces due to an enhanced
`development of
`a C rich polymer film on the nitride. The
`(> 70 %) to remove
`overetch time has to be sufficient
`oxide spacers on the nitride. Therefore a nitride thick(cid:173)
`70 nm is required as an etch stop. After removing
`ness >
`the polymer
`film by Ar p l asma,
`the contact hole etch
`continues with etching the nitride (S F6 Plasma , fig. 3b)
`selecti-vely to
`the underlying oxide(= 50 nm). To avoid
`any nitri de spacers along
`the gates an overet~h of 70 %
`is necessary. The remaining
`t h in oxide
`is removed by a
`short dry etch s t ep (CHF3/02).
`b) If the top oxide i s wet etched (NH4F/HF), a nitride l ayer
`of >
`10nm is sufficient for
`the etch stop. The
`thin
`nitride and
`the thin oxide (= 50 nm) underneath are
`etched by
`the same CHF3/02 dry etch step
`(fig . 4a).
`The use of a rather th in nitride as an etch stop is also
`possible if combining
`a dry etch of
`the
`top oxide
`(without long overetch) and
`a wet etch to remove oxide
`spacers on
`the nitride. The use of a wet etch step seems
`also preferable because of a tapering of the contact hole
`edge. If any conventional contacts are patterned by the
`same mask and technique,
`the contact hole size
`is not
`affected by
`a wet etch step
`for the
`top oxide as the
`underlying nitride/oxide i s ~tched anisotropically.
`After completing
`the process
`(see fig.
`3c ,4b,4c) an oxide
`insulation of the gate > 120 nm is obtained, the field o xide
`thinning ~n the contact h ole is at most 50 nm. The contact
`area of the FOBIC contact is defined by gate and field oxide
`edges. The distance of
`the contact
`to the gate
`is only
`0.2 )..liD.
`2.2.2 Contact hole etch-alternative process
`The essential
`feature of
`the contact hole etch proposed in
`2.2.1 is
`the use of an etch stop layer for the top oxide.
`Only a
`t hin dielectric
`is l e f t
`for the final e~~h step .by
`which the oxide insulation of the gate and the fie ld oxide
`can be
`t h inned . Because
`in the case of a pure dry etch of
`top oxide
`the required nitride thickness
`is >
`70 nm,
`an
`alternative process allowing the use of
`a thinner nitride
`even for
`a pure dry etch process has been
`i nvestigated.
`Instead of nitride a double layer of nitride
`(20 nm) and
`poly-Si (30
`nm) is used. Poly Si is a ver y efficient etch
`stop for etching oxide
`in a CHF3/02 plasma (selectivity >
`20 :1). However,
`a continous
`layer of poly Si can cause
`shorts or problems when etching contact holes
`from
`the
`second metallization
`level to source/drain areas. Therefore
`-after top oxide etch, poly Si etch (wet or Cl2/He plasma),
`and resist stripping -
`the poly Si is changed into o~ide by
`wet oxidation
`(900°C,20 min). The poly Si can be oxidized
`although buried under the
`top oxide because the top oxide
`
`64 2
`
`Case No. IPR2016-00782
`DSS.2008.005
`
`

`
`than thermal oxide. During oxidation
`less dense
`(TEOS) is
`the nitride
`is protecting
`the active arcac. A
`final etch
`step (CHF3/02 plasma) removes
`the nitride and underlying
`thin oxide, leading to the result shown in fig. 5.
`
`2.3 Polycide interconnect level
`formed by TaSi2
`After contact hol e etch
`the bitline is
`(200nm) on top of poly Si (lOOnm). Poly S i is doped by As or
`P Implantation. As shown by SIMS analysis Phosphorous out(cid:173)
`diffusion during subseque~t annealing steps
`(BPSG
`reflow
`900oc, 40 min) is changi~g the vertical doping profile of
`the As doped source/drain areas. Therefore the effect on the
`lightly doped drain r e gions of th e transistors adjac ent to
`the self aligned contact has
`to be checked
`(see 4.2).
`The contact resi stance poly Si
`to n+-diffusion
`c an be
`influenced by
`a thin native oxide at this
`interface. To
`break this oxide ion mixing (7) is applied: Part of the P or
`As dose
`is implanted into the i nterface between the poly Si
`and n~-diffusion. Fig . 6
`shows the geometry dependence of
`contact resLstance with and without Lon mixLng
`for As
`implantation into poly Si. For an effective bitline contact
`width of 0.9 pro less than SO Q are obtained.
`
`3. Device characteri zation
`
`3.1 Isolation of bitline to transfer gate and substrate
`~ig. 7
`shows a wordline to bitline leakage current distri(cid:173)
`bution for DRAM cell arrays with and without FOBIC contact.
`No yield
`reduction due
`t8 FOBIC contacts is observed, and
`is caused by gate oxide failure. To
`isolation breakdown
`suppress the
`leakage current path across
`the gate oxide
`special
`test-structures
`on
`field oxide were evaluated
`(fig. 8). Below 20 V the leakage current is below d etec tion
`limit , breakdown of the oxide i nsulation occurs only at
`voltages higher than 60 V.
`t h e
`Another conce rn about the FOBIC contact process was
`influence of field oxide thinning (max. SOnm) in the contact
`hole on diode properties. Experiments with different over(cid:173)
`etch show no effect on p-n
`junctions as long as the field
`oxide thinning is less than 80nm.
`
`3.2 Transistor properties
`Current-voltage characteristics (fig. 9) of transistors with
`and without FOBIC contact show no difference. No effect of P
`doped poly Si(bitline) on transistor behaviour was observed,
`although lateral diffusion of P i nto LDD regions was one of
`the concerns. Short time DC stress results of transistors
`with and wi thout FOBIC contact also exhi bit no difference.
`Because of the higher gate stack the shadowing effect of the
`LDD Implantation (8,9) becomes more pronounced. However, the
`LDD implant
`shadowing effect
`is effectively ·reduced by
`
`643
`
`Case No. IPR2016-00782
`DSS.2008.006
`
`

`
`implantation (see 9). The L DD
`rotating the waf ers dur i n g
`dose is divided into 4 equal dose s, the waf er is rotated by
`90 degrees after each implanta tion.
`
`3.3 Nitride effect on device
`The introduction
`o f a
`n i tride layer, whi c h is n ot removed
`from the wa fer during
`t he process
`flow, ha s been investi(cid:173)
`ga ted very careful ly. For nitride th ickness of > 100nm an
`enhanced gated diode l eakage
`c urrent is observed for la rge
`transistor arrays
`(no ov erlapping contact) . As shown by TEM
`(fig. 10) a nd def ect analysis, ge neration of 6efects (dislo(cid:173)
`ca tions, point defect clus ter s) appears at t he edge o f the
`gate's oxide
`s pacer , whe re
`the nitride
`layer
`i s
`bend i ng
`upwards . At
`this pa rt icula r
`site the nitride can cause an
`enhanced stress. For n itride thickness of 50nm deteriorat ion
`of gated diode leakage
`curren t occurs
`for high
`reverse
`v oltage (9V) depending on ni t ride deposition parameters
`(enhanced leakage current is observed for l o wer deposition
`t emperatures
`(750 ° C )) . To avoi d
`any effect o n
`leakage
`current (for al l CVD nitride deposition parameters )
`the
`nitride thickness has to be reduc ed
`to
`JOnm
`favoring
`a
`contact h ole etch proce ss
`inc luding a wet etch
`step
`( see
`2.2 . 1) or t h e process outlined in 2 . 2.2.
`Investigation of hot electron degrada tion (fig . 1 1 ) shows a
`r educ~i on i n
`lifetime by
`a fa c tor of five
`for a nitride
`laye r thi ckn e ss of 130
`nm compared
`to devi ces without
`a
`.s 50
`nm ni tr ide
`n itride layer, whi le for
`no effect
`on
`lifetime is observed .
`
`Acknowledgement
`to B.Hasler, W. Meyberg, H .Benzin(cid:173)
`The authors are grateful
`ger, f or their collaboration in this work , to H.Oppol zer for
`TEM ana lysis,
`to H.Haude k, H . Demm f or SEM analysi s . This
`work was supported by the Federal Department of Res ea rch and
`Tec hnology (sign. NT 26 96) .
`REFERENCES
`IEOM Tech. Dig. 19 85, p.69 4
`( 1 ) H.Sunami ,
`(2) S .Muramot o, T . Hos o ya, S . Matsuo, IEDM Tech. Dig.
`197 8, p.185
`(3) Y . Tanigaki, S.Iwamatsu, K.Hirobe, J. Electroche m.
`soc . 19 7 8 , p . 4 7 1
`(4) M.Sakamoto, K.Hamano, IEDM Tech. Dig . 1980 , p.136
`(5)
`J . S.de Zaldivar, NTG-Fachberich te Bd. 77 (1981), p.22
`(6) A.Sh inohara, M.Fukumo to, G. Fuse, S.Odanaka,
`M.Sasago, T.Ohzone, T.Ishihar a, 17thSSDM Tokyo,
`Extended Abstrac ts, p .29
`(7) D.K.Brice, J.Appl.Phys. 46 (1 97 5), p.3385
`(8) T.Mizu no , Y.Matsumoto, S . Sawada, S.Shinozaki,
`O.Ozawa, IEDM Techn. Dig. 1985, p. 2 50
`(9) H.M.Mlihlhoff, P.Murkin, K.H.Klisters , M.Orlowski ,
`W.Mli ller, this confe rence
`
`Case No. IPR2016-00782
`DSS.2008.007
`
`

`
`dKG
`Fig.l: Layout pattern f or bitline contact a) wit hout and
`b) with FOBIC (dxG 1 dxL regi~tration tolerances)
`
`1) Poly Si-Gate With o~1de encapsulation
`
`Resist
`
`o~ide
`
`Nitride
`
`Fig .2:
`Process for FOBIC
`contact(wet etch of
`top oxide as des(cid:173)
`cibed in 2.2.1, b)
`
`cross section of
`bitline contact
`
`2) direct contact mask. oxide etch stopped by mtride layer
`
`3) Nitride/thin. oxide etch
`
`4) Poly Si depositioo Poly Si doping (As Implantation) TaSi sputtering
`
`645
`
`Case No. IPR2016-00782
`DSS.2008.008
`
`

`
`Fig.3: FOBIC process, using
`dry etch for top oxide
`
`3a:first step of contact
`hole etch: oxide is
`etched selectively to
`underlying nitride
`
`3b:after complete contact
`hole etch process
`
`3c:cross section of 4Mbit dRAM with fully overlapping
`bitline contact (dry etch of top oxide)
`
`646
`
`Case No. IPR2016-00782
`DSS.2008.009
`
`

`
`Fig.4a:
`After complete
`contact hole
`etch process
`(wet etch of
`top oxide)
`
`Fig.4b, c:
`cross sections of 4Mbit dRAM
`(wet etch of top oxide)
`
`Fig.S:
`Process using a thin poly Si (20 nm) on top of nitride
`(30 nm) as etch stop for etching the top oxide (see 2.2.2)
`Poly Si is changed into oxide by wet oxidation (o~
`a) after contact hole etch
`b) after complete process
`
`O.SJ.Im
`
`647
`
`Case No. IPR2016-00782
`DSS.2008.010
`
`

`
`As-*' . . . .. :
`~&-UJ--=~--+--~--+----+( 100 rwn Poly Si) --
`
`1
`Fi g.6:
`~~----~~-----4~--~~--~----~
`Geometry dependance
`o f cont act resistance
`n+- pol y/n+- d i ffus i on.
`Lower curve shows
`r ed uc t ion due t o ion
`mixing
`
`10
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`~\
`I I
`
`"' T ( a)
`
`: I "
`" t
`l .. ~
`" f ,, ~
`"'
`
`,. I
`
`H
`
`1E-9
`
`1E-12
`
`I [AI
`
`Fig . ?:
`(U=lOV) distri bution
`Wordline to bitl ine l e akage current
`for DRAM cell arrays with (a ) and without (b) FOBI C c ontact .
`
`I gate
`[A]
`
`Fig.8:
`Le akage curren t
`acros s wordline
`t o bitl i ne iso(cid:173)
`lation (FOBIC
`techno l ogy) for
`test structure
`on field oxi de
`
`~t~~·~r-t
`I ;-t2l .... L-+--<--+--+--+--~-· +--+---+--1---+---l
`
`- rea
`
`-a0
`
`-00
`
`- 40
`
`- 20
`
`0
`
`648
`
`2 0
`
`4!1
`
`Vgate (V]
`
`Case No. IPR2016-00782
`DSS.2008.011
`
`

`
`Fig.9:
`Current-Volta ge
`characte r i stics
`of cell transistor s
`wi th FOBIC c o ntact
`
`t s. r-~~~~~~
`ld
`[rnA]
`
`0
`
`3V
`
`Vd [V]
`
`F i g.lO:
`Defects at spacer edge (nit ride
`thicknes s 130 nm)
`(TEM result)
`
`Fig.l l : Shor t time DC stress results for wafers with 130 rum
`nitride 1 50 rum nitride 1 without nitride
`
`ill
`T
`
`649
`
`Case No. IPR2016-00782
`DSS.2008.012

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket