throbber
negative diagnosis in which the correct diagnosis was
`made at 20 weeks’ gestation.
`Nuchal anomalies appeared in 14 of 22 fetuses (59%)
`with atrioventricular septal defect. This finding is in
`accordance with the high incidence of nuchal anomalies
`in fetuses with cardiac anomalies.1 Allan4 reported 49
`fetuses with atrioventricular septal defect. Heterotaxia
`syndromes or isomerism of the atrial appendages was
`noted in 22 of these cases. In our series, there was only
`1 fetus with heterotaxia syndrome. We have no expla-
`nation for the difference between the 2 studies.
`The ability to diagnose atrioventricular septal defect
`relies on the skill of the observer. Gembruch et al9 and
`Achiron et al10 detected this anomaly in early pregnancy.
`Allan4 recently estimated that only 50% of cases are
`detected in utero. In our series, the diagnosis was con-
`firmed in 11 of 13 fetuses in which a postmortem exam-
`ination was performed. The higher detection rate in our
`series may be attributed to the fact that all examinations
`were performed by the same experienced observer.
`We are aware of 2 possible drawbacks in our study.
`(1) Because not all of our patients delivered in our
`hospital, we only had our own data on pregnancy out-
`come in 72% of patients. In the other cases we relied on
`information provided by patients or their obstetricians.
`We cannot exclude the possibility that we were not
`informed about a case of a false-negative diagnosis of
`atrioventricular septal defect. (2) Because of the destruc-
`tive nature of the termination of pregnancy, a reliable
`postmortem examination was not possible in all cases.
`
`In summary, the data show that accurate sono-
`graphic diagnosis of fetal complete atrioventricular
`septal defect is possible in the first and early second
`trimesters of pregnancy. Many of these fetuses
`have associated abnormal sonographic findings;
`the most frequent was nuchal translucency. About
`2/3 of the fetuses in whom chromosomal analysis
`was available had an abnormal karyotype.
`
`1. Berdahl LD, Wenstrom KD, Hanson JW. Web neck anomaly and its associ-
`ation with congenital heart disease. Am J Med Genet 1995;56:304 –307.
`2. Marino B. Pattern of congenital heart disease and associated cardiac anomalies
`in children with Down syndrome. In: Marino B. Pueschel SM, eds. Heart Disease
`in Persons with Down Syndrome. Baltimore: Brooks, 1996:133–140.
`3. Ferencz C, Loffredo CA, Correa-Villasenor A, Wilson PD, eds. Genetic and
`Environmental Risk Factors of Major Cardiovascular Malformations: The Balti-
`more-Washington Infant Study 1981–1989; Armonk, NY: Futura,1997:103–122.
`4. Allan LD. Atrioventricular septal defect in the fetus. Am J Obstet Gynecol
`1999;181:1250 –1253.
`5. Digilio MC, Marino B, Giannico S, Giannotti A, Dallapiccola B. Atrioven-
`tricular canal defect and hypoplastic left heart syndrome as discordant congenital
`heart defects in twins. Teratology 1999;60:206 –208.
`6. Allan L. Atrioventricular septal defect. In: Allan L, Hornberger LK, Sharland
`G, eds. Textbook of Fetal Cardiology. London: Greenwick Media, 2000:163–193.
`7. Pierpont MAM, Markwald RR, Lin AE. Genetic aspects of atrioventricular
`septal defect. Am J Med Genet 2000;97:289 –296.
`8. Bronshtein M, Coffler MS, Zimmer EZ. The cardiovascular system. In:
`Bronshtein M, Zimmer EZ, eds. Transvaginal Sonography of the Normal and
`Abnormal Fetus. New York: Parthenon, 2001:87–130.
`9. Gembruch U, Hansmann M, Redel DA, Bald R, Knopfle G. Fetal complete
`heart block: antenatal diagnosis, significance and management. Eur J Obstet
`Gynecol Reprod Biol 1989;31:9 –22.
`10. Achiron R, Rotstein Z, Lipitz S, Mashiach S. First trimester diagnosis of fetal
`congenital heart disease by transvaginal ultrasonography. Obstet Gynecol 1994;
`84:69 –72.
`
`Diagnostic and Therapeutic Uses of Inhaled Nitric
`Oxide in Neonatal Ebstein’s Anomaly
`Andrew M. Atz, MD, Ricardo A. Munoz, MD, Ian Adatia, MB, ChB, and
`David L. Wessel, MD
`Inhaled nitric oxide (NO) is a selective pulmonary
`
`vasodilator with few adverse effects using current
`delivery and monitoring techniques. Failure of the
`postoperative newborn with pulmonary hypertension
`to respond to NO has successfully discriminated ana-
`tomic obstruction to pulmonary blood flow from re-
`versible pulmonary vasoconstriction.1 Severe neonatal
`Ebstein’s anomaly is a rare lesion with high mortali-
`ty.2,3 However, occasionally survivors demonstrate
`spontaneous clinical improvement as pulmonary vas-
`cular resistance declines.4 The aim of this study was to
`determine whether a trial of NO could differentiate
`patients with functional pulmonary atresia5 from
`structural pulmonary atresia, and therefore quickly
`identify those who would require surgery. Further-
`
`From the Children’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mas-
`sachusetts. Dr. Atz’s address is: The Children’s Heart Center of South
`Carolina, Medical University of South Carolina, 165 Ashley Avenue,
`PO Box 250915, Charleston, South Carolina 29425. E-mail:
`atzam@musc.edu. Manuscript received September 18, 2002; re-
`vised manuscript received and accepted December 11, 2002.
`
`more, we speculated that NO might therapeutically
`improve oxygenation in patients with a patent pulmo-
`nary valve by decreasing afterload on the right ven-
`tricle, causing improved cardiac output and reduced
`intracardiac shunt.
`
`• • •
`We identified all neonates presenting to a cardiac
`intensive care unit with echocardiographically diagnosed
`Ebstein’s anomaly (Table 1). Patients with associated
`complex congenital heart disease were excluded. Four-
`teen (7 female and 7 male) patients had maximal arterial
`oxygen tension (PaO2) ⬍65 mm Hg and all received a
`trial of inhaled NO. Prostaglandin E infusions were dis-
`continued before NO testing in an effort to further en-
`courage anterograde flow across the pulmonary valve.
`Hemodynamic variables were measured at (1)
`baseline—a stage in which patients were normother-
`mic and hemodynamically stable (steady heart rate
`and blood pressure and no change in inotropic or
`ventilatory requirement), and (2) at the end of a 15-
`minute trial of inhaled NO at 80 ppm. Ventilation pa-
`
`906
`
`©2003 by Excerpta Medica, Inc. All rights reserved.
`The American Journal of Cardiology Vol. 91 April 1, 2003
`
`0002-9149/03/$–see front matter
`doi:10.1016/S0002-9149(03)00036-5
`
`Ex. 2023-0001
`
`

`
`TABLE 1 Patient Characteristics
`
`Patient
`Number
`1
`2
`3
`4
`
`Age
`(d)
`4
`1
`2
`1
`
`Weight
`(kg)
`1.7
`2.3
`2.5
`2.7
`
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`
`1
`1
`1
`2
`1
`1
`1
`1
`2
`4
`
`3.1
`3.0
`3.1
`3.2
`4.5
`2.4
`2.8
`3.6
`3.8
`4.0
`
`Celermajer
`Ratio
`(index)
`0.79 (2)
`2.50 (4)
`0.95 (2)
`2.57 (4)
`
`1.58 (4)
`1.68 (4)
`1.20 (3)
`0.61 (2)
`0.63 (2)
`0.67 (2)
`0.41 (1)
`0.50 (2)
`0.95 (2)
`0.53 (2)
`
`Operation
`
`B-T shunt
`0
`B-T shunt, TV closed, ASD created
`B-T shunt, PV opened, TV closed,
`ASD created
`B-T shunt, PV opened, ASD created
`0
`0
`0
`0
`TV closed
`RVOT patch, VSD closed, ASD closed
`0
`0
`0
`
`Pulmonic
`Atresia
`⫹
`⫹
`⫹
`⫹
`
`⫹
`Functional
`Functional
`Functional
`Functional
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`
`PaO2
`Arterial
`Saturation (%)
`(mm Hg)
`Base
`NO Base NO
`Outcome
`83
`84
`49
`51 Died (17 d)
`53
`51
`24
`22
`Died (1 d)
`81
`72
`41
`34 Died (4 mo)
`70
`77
`40
`39
`Died (5 d)
`
`86
`58
`31
`47
`84
`51
`82
`91
`90
`83
`
`78
`70
`77
`66
`90
`81
`79
`95
`95
`84
`
`34
`31
`20
`26
`33
`30
`49
`61
`42
`43
`
`Died (2 d)
`30
`Alive
`36
`Died (2 d)
`46
`Alive
`34
`Alive
`36
`Died (6 d)
`36
`45 Died (4 mo)
`130
`Alive
`46
`Alive
`45
`Alive
`
`ASD ⫽ atrial septal defect; Base ⫽ before nitric oxide; B-T ⫽ Blalock-Taussig; PaO2 ⫽ systemic arterial oxygen tension; PV ⫽ pulmonic valve; RVOT ⫽ right
`ventricular outflow tract; TV ⫽ tricuspid valve; VSD ⫽ ventricular septal defect.
`
`significant. Written informed consent was obtained
`from parents of all patients under approved protocols.
`After all data were collected, the patients were
`divided into 2 groups: those with structural pulmonary
`atresia and those with a patent pulmonary valve as
`defined by echocardiographic evidence of anterograde
`flow after inhaling NO for 15 minutes. The first group
`included 5 patients in whom anterograde flow was
`never demonstrated by echocardiography either before
`or during treatment with NO; in all, atresia was con-
`firmed at either catheterization or at operation. The
`second group included 5 patients in whom anterograde
`flow was detected by echocardiography at baseline
`and during NO inhalation, and 4 patients with func-
`tional pulmonary atresia who had evidence of antero-
`grade flow only after inhaling NO.
`There was no statistical difference seen in either
`group after 15 minutes of breathing inhaled NO with
`respect to heart rate, arterial blood pressure, arterial pH,
`or arterial carbon dioxide pressure. There was a signifi-
`cant increase in PaO2 from baseline in the group with a
`patent pulmonary valve (39 to 53 mm Hg; p ⬍0.05) and
`in arterial oxygen saturation (71% to 84%; p ⬍0.05)
`after inhalation of NO at 80 ppm for 15 minutes. In the
`group with structural pulmonary atresia, there was no
`comparative change in arterial PaO2 (41 to 39 mm Hg)
`or in arterial saturation (80% to 78%) (Figure 1).
`In 6 patients with improvement in oxygenation by
`ⱖ10% during the initial trial of NO at 80 ppm, NO
`was reintroduced at 5 to 20 ppm. Patient 11 was the
`only patient with a patent pulmonary valve who did
`not have improvement in oxygenation, and he was
`found to have subpulmonic stenosis, which resulted in
`fixed obstruction to pulmonary blood flow. Nitrogen
`dioxide measured continuously in all patients re-
`mained at ⬍2 ppm and methemoglobin concentration
`remained at ⱕ1.2%
`Six infants underwent surgery: four with structural
`pulmonary atresia, the patient with fixed subpulmonic
`stenosis, and patient 10, who underwent surgery for
`
`BRIEF REPORTS 907
`
`FIGURE 1. Patients with a patent pulmonary valve (no pulmonary
`atresia) had improvement in systemic saturation (Sat) and PaO2—a
`mean percentage increase of 36% and 31%, respectively, after 15
`minutes of NO. Those with structural pulmonary atresia had no im-
`provement in oxygenation with NO. No change in heart rate or
`systemic blood pressure (BP) was seen in either group.
`
`rameters were kept constant throughout the 15-minute
`trial. Nitrogen dioxide was continuously monitored and
`methemoglobin levels were measured by co-oximetry
`(CIBA-Corning model 2500, Medfield, Massachusetts).
`Heart rate, blood pressure, and blood gases were mea-
`sured in all patients. Patients underwent echocardiogra-
`phy at baseline and at the end of the trial of NO to assess
`the presence or absence of forward flow across the pul-
`monary valve. Initial diagnostic echocardiograms were
`reviewed by a single investigator blinded to the results to
`determine the index of severity of Ebstein’s anomaly as
`described by Celermajer et al2 (ratio of the combined
`right atrial and atrialized right ventricular area to the area
`of the functional right ventricle and left heart.)
`All patients acted as their own controls. A paired
`nonparametric test (Wilcoxon signed-rank test) was
`used to compare the difference between baseline he-
`modynamic variables and after 15 minutes of inhaled
`NO. A p value ⬍0.05 was considered statistically
`
`Ex. 2023-0002
`
`

`
`rapidly progressive heart failure within 6 hours of life
`despite improved oxygenation with NO. The types of
`surgical procedure varied and are listed in Table 1.
`Only 2 of 6 postoperative patients survived to hospital
`discharge and neither survived beyond 4 months.
`Eight patients did not undergo surgical procedures.
`Two patients were believed to be unsuitable candidates
`for surgery. One had pulmonary atresia and diminutive
`(1.5 mm) branch pulmonary arteries and died of severe
`hypoxia at 2 days despite reinitiating prostaglandin E.
`One with functional pulmonary atresia had severe neo-
`natal hydrops and despite a positive response to NO had
`progressive acidosis and rapid onset multiorgan system
`failure. The other 6 patients remain alive during an
`average of 4.4 years (range 2.9 to 8.6) of follow-up.
`In an effort to maximally encourage anterograde flow
`across the pulmonary valve, all patients in this study had
`prostaglandin discontinued before initiation of NO. The
`ductuses were patent in these patients at the time of
`testing but qualitatively were no larger than moderate in
`size. It is unclear whether our results would have been
`similar
`if performed during prostaglandin infusion.
`There has been a report of a neonate with Ebstein’s
`anomaly with documented anterograde flow across the
`pulmonary valve in whom maintenance of a ductus ar-
`teriosus with prostaglandin resulted in worsened hypox-
`emia, acidosis, and systemic hypotension due to a steal
`phenomenon. Prolonged NO and closure of the ductus
`was speculated to help long-term right ventricular com-
`pliance and function.6 Treatment with inhaled NO during
`prostaglandin infusion to maintain a widely patent ductus
`may theoretically have a deleterious effect on Ebstein’s
`patients with excessive pulmonary blood flow by in-
`creasing the pulmonary-to-systemic flow ratio and wors-
`ening hemodynamics. We did not see this in our study
`patients, who were profoundly cyanotic and had prosta-
`glandin discontinued. The present study confirms the
`
`safe and beneficial therapeutic aspect of NO in a series of
`cyanotic patients with Ebstein’s anomaly and illustrates
`the previously undescribed role of NO as a diagnostic
`tool for this disease. Use of this management strategy
`may have valuable utility in other scenarios where func-
`tional pulmonary atresia may be encountered, such as
`congenital tricuspid regurgitation7 and Uhl’s anomaly.8
`
`In conclusion, inhaled NO rapidly and effec-
`tively discriminated functional
`from structural
`pulmonary atresia shortly after birth in severely
`affected neonates with Ebstein’s anomaly. Inhaled
`NO after discontinuation of prostaglandin may
`play an important diagnostic and therapeutic role
`in neonates with Ebstein’s anomaly and may mod-
`ify currently accepted prognostic indicators.
`
`1. Adatia I, Atz AM, Jonas RA, Wessel DL. Diagnostic use of inhaled nitric oxide
`after neonatal cardiac operations. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1996;112:1403–
`1405.
`2. Celermajer DS, Cullem S, Sullivan ID, Speigelhalter DJ, Wyse RK, Deanfield
`JE. Outcome in neonates with Ebstein’s anomlay. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992;19:
`1041–1046.
`3. Yetman AT, Freedom RM, McCrindle BW. Outcome in cyanotic neonates
`with Ebstein’s anomaly. Am J Cardiol 1998;81:749 –754.
`4. Bush A, Busst CM, Haworth SG, Hislop AA, Knight WB, Corrin B, Shine-
`bourne EA. Correlations of lung morphology, pulmonary vascular resistance, and
`outcome in children with congenital heart disease. Br Heart J 1988;59:480 –485.
`5. Freedom RM, Culham JA, Moes CA, Olley PM, Rowe RD. Differentiation of
`functional and structural pulmonary atresia: role of angiography. Am J Cardiol
`1978;41:914 –920.
`6. Bruckheimer E, Bulbul Z, Pinter E, Gailani M, Kleinman, CS, Fahey JT.
`Inhaled nitric oxide therapy in a critically ill neonate with Ebstein’s anomaly.
`Pediatr Cardiol 1998;19:477–479.
`7. Andelfinger G, Shirali GS, Rauniker RA, Atz AM. Functional pulmonary
`atresia in neonatal Marfan’s syndrome: successful treatment with inhaled nitric
`oxide. Pediatr Cardiol 2001;22:525–526.
`8. Tumbarello R, Adatia I, Yetman A, Boutin C, Izukawa T, Freedom RM. From
`functional pulmonary atresia to right ventricular restriction. Long term follow up
`of Uhl’s anomaly. Int J Cardiol 1998;67:161–164.
`
`Early and Late Results of Thrombolytic Therapy Using
`Tissue-Type Plasminogen Activator to Restore Arterial
`Pulse After Cardiac Catheterization in Infants and
`Small Children
`Duraisamy Balaguru, MBBS, MRCP, Muhammad Dilawar, MD, Pamela Ruff, BS, RDCS, and
`Wolfgang A.K. Radtke, MD
`Pulse loss after cardiac catheterization has been
`
`reported to occur in 8% to 39% of infants weigh-
`ing ⬍14 kg1–3 despite prophylactic use of heparin,4
`notably after retrograde balloon angioplasty or valvu-
`loplasty.5 Impaired limb growth is a possible late com-
`plication6,7 and access is lost for future catheterization.
`
`From the Children’s Heart Center, Medical University of South Caro-
`lina, Charleston, South Carolina. Dr. Radtke’s address is: Pediatric
`Cardiology, Medical University of South Carolina, 165 Ashley Ave-
`nue, PO Box 250915, Charleston, South Carolina 29425. E-mail:
`radtkew@musc.edu. Manuscript received April 30, 2002; revised
`manuscript received and accepted November 27, 2002.
`
`Thrombolytic therapy using streptokinase5,8,9 and uroki-
`nase,10 and, recently, tissue-type plasminogen activator
`(t-PA)11–14 has been reported but without assessing long-
`term patency of the target vessel. The reports on t-
`PA11–14 were based on a variety of doses given ⬎24
`hours after catheterization and patient numbers were
`small. We report our experience using a uniform t-PA
`dosing protocol that began 4 to 6 hours after cardiac
`catheterization with regard to safety, efficacy, and long-
`term patency of the target vessel.
`• • •
`Medical records of patients who received throm-
`
`908
`
`©2003 by Excerpta Medica, Inc. All rights reserved.
`The American Journal of Cardiology Vol. 91 April 1, 2003
`
`0002-9149/03/$–see front matter
`doi:10.1016/S0002-9149(03)00037-7
`
`Ex. 2023-0003

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket