throbber
Recent Advances in Paediatric Ventilation
`
`W. BUTT
`Paediatric Intensive Care Unit, Royal Children’s Hospital, VICTORIA
`
`
`
`ABSTRACT
` Background: To review the recent advances in ventilatory therapy for acute respiratory failure in
`children.
` Data sources: Recent published peer-review articles on mechanical ventilation for acute respiratory
`failure in children.
`
`Summary of review: Advances in conventional treatment for acute respiratory failure (e.g. mechanical
`ventilation) have not increased survival in children. However, recent therapies including high frequency
`ventilation, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, nitric oxide and liquid ventilation have reported
`improved outcomes. The rationale and use of each are presented.
` Conclusions: High frequency ventilation exists in three forms, although only high frequency oscillation
`appears to show any benefit in the management of acute respiratory failure refractory to conventional
`mechanical ventilation. Extracorporeal oxygenation has halved mortality in neonates with acute
`respiratory failure, and has been used successfully in non-neonate patients. Inhaled nitric oxide from 6 to
`20 parts per million improves oxygenation in paediatric patients with acute respiratory failure and
`congenital heart disease (particularly in the presence of pulmonary arterial hypertension). Liquid
`ventilation or perfluorocarbon-associated gas exchange has also been used to treat acute respiratory
`failure in paediatric patients, with partial liquid ventilation particularly appearing to show promise.
`(Critical Care and Resuscitation 1999; 1: 85-92)
`
` Key words: Paediatric ventilation, high frequency ventilation, ECMO, liquid ventilation
`
`
`
`organ failure. Secondly, most therapies fail to treat the
`underlying cause of ARDS and the abnormalities of the
`surfactant system with accompanying derangements in
`lung compliance, pulmonary arterial hypertension
`(PAH), and ventilation-perfusion (V/Q) mismatch.
`
`CONVENTIONAL MECHANICAL VENTILATION
`(CMV)
` All modes of positive pressure ventilation used in
`adult intensive care units are also used in children,
`although paralysis or spontaneous breathing with
`triggered breaths, pressure and volume limited modes
`are most widely used. Cuffed endotracheal tubes are
`uncommonly used because of the smaller size of the
`endotracheal tube (no cuff allows a tube with a larger
`internal diameter), and the lower bronchial perfusion
`pressure of children which makes bronchial mucosal
`injury more likely. Humidification is essential to
`
`
`
` Acute respiratory failure (ARF) continues to be a
`major problem in paediatric critical care. In a recent
`report from a large paediatric intensive care unit,1
`patients with ARF comprised nearly 3% of all
`admissions and 8% of total patient days. Mortality in
`this group was 62% and accounted for 33% of all deaths
`in the intensive care unit during the 24-month study
`period. Others report similar findings with mortalities
`ranging from 40% to 75%.2-5 Freund and Jorch reviewed
`four
`recent
`reports of acute
`respiratory distress
`syndrome (ARDS) in children, reporting an overall
`mortality of 52%.6
` Recent advances in conventional therapy for the
`treatment of ARF and ARDS have not had a major
`impact on survival. Firstly, the refinements of existing
`care have had complications, including volutrauma,
`barotrauma, oxygen toxicity, impairment of cardiac
`output and nosocomial infections with multiple system
`
`
` Correspondence to: Dr. W. Butt, Paediatric Intensive Care Unit, Royal Children’s Hospital, Victoria 3052
`
`
`
`
`85
`
`Ex. 2038-0001
`
`

`
`Critical Care and Resuscitation 1999; 1: 85-92
`
`ventilation (HFPPV), high frequency jet ventilation
`(HFJV), and high
`frequency oscillation
`(HFO).
`Important differences between the latter two modes of
`HFV
`are
`summarised
`in Table 1
`and
`are
`comprehensively reviewed by Froese and Bryan.7 Figure
`1 illustrates an HFO device. All types of HFV effect
`elimination of carbon dioxide by the delivery of a very
`cycled
`at
`supraphysiologic
`small
`tidal volume
`respiratory rates.
` HFPPV is similar to CMV and accomplishes gas
`exchange largely through bulk convection, although
`some bulk convection occurs with the other modes of
`HFV as well. The tidal volume generated with HFJV
`and HFV, however, is smaller than the anatomic dead-
`space volume itself, and thus, other mechanisms must be
`invoked to explain their effectiveness in ventilation.8
`These mechanisms
`include pendelluft, asymmetric
`velocity profiles, Taylor dispersion, and molecular
`diffusion.
`
`Pendelluft refers to peripheral mixing of gas between
`alveolar units with variable time constants. During HFV,
`the respiratory cycle is shorter than the shorter alveolar
`time constant, and ventilation is considerably augmented
`as units with longer and shorter time constants empty
`into one another. Lung diseases in which there is
`considerable
`inequality
`in
`time constants between
`alveolar units, such as ARDS, theoretically amplify this
`effect by 300%.
` Asymmetric velocity profiles refer to air flow that
`has, during inspiration, a parabolic velocity profile;
`whereas during expiration, it has a flat profile.
`
`
`
`
`Figure 1. Schematic of a high frequency oscillator.
` Piston
`displacement, a function of rate and amplitude, determine “tidal
`volume”. (From Wetzel RC, Gioia FR. High frequency ventilation.
`Pediatr Clin North Am 1987;34:15.)
`
`
`
`W. BUTT
`
`prevent endotracheal tube blockage with inspissated
`mucous.
` Diaphragmatic splinting by a distended
`stomach must be prevented
`in
`the spontaneously
`breathing child because of the dependence of the small
`child on diaphragmatic function.
`
`Objectives of Mechanical Ventilation
`Improve pulmonary gas exchange
`- Relieve acute respiratory acidosis or ventilatory failure
`- Reverse hypoxemia or hypoxemic respiratory failure
`Change pressure-volume relations in lung
`- Optimise pulmonary compliance
`- Prevent or reverse atelectasis
`Reduce or otherwise modulate work of breathing
`- Decrease oxygen cost of breathing
`- Reverse respiratory muscle fatigue
`- Use anaesthesia, sedation, or neuromuscular blockade
`Avoid complications
`- Decrease or prevent anoxic-hypoxic events
`- Prevent barotrauma, volutrauma, and oxygen toxicity
`Support lung and airway healing
`- Allow time for therapeutic intervention to succeed
`- Allow time for lung repair to evolve
`Promote independent breathing or independent lifestyle
`- Facilitate ventilatory independence
`- Provide partial, complete, ambulatory, permanent, or
`temporary assisted ventilation to support chronic
`debilitating illness or lung disease
`
`
`Direct Goals
` Oxygenation: Oxygen delivery (DO2) and oxygen
`uptake (VO2) are more important than arterial blood
`thus an arterial blood
`(PaO2),
`oxygen
`tension
`haemoglobin oxygen saturation (SaO2) of greater than
`80% (with no metabolic acidosis) is adequate. Mean
`airway pressure and inspired oxygen concentration
`to
`limit volutrauma,
`(FiO2) may be minimised
`barotrauma and oxygen toxicity.
` Ventilation: respiratory acidosis (in the absence of
`metabolic acidosis) is rarely lethal, thus pH not carbon
`dioxide is the goal of ventilation (> 7.15). If reactive
`pulmonary hypertension is present then it may be
`necessary to have a pH > 7.4.
`
`OTHER THERAPIES FOR ACUTE RESPIRATORY
`FAILURE
`
`High Frequency Ventilation
`a
`is
`(HFV)
` High
`frequency
`ventilation
`nonconventional mode of mechanical ventilation that
`has been used clinically for almost 15 years in the
`management of refractory ARF. There are three distinct
`types of HFV: High
`frequency positive-pressure
`
`
`86
`
`
`
`Ex. 2038-0002
`
`

`
`
`
`W. BUTT
`
`benefit from ECMO and effectively stopped the use of
`that therapy in ARF for a time. However, interest in
`ECMO
`resurfaced
`in
`the early 1980s,
`led by
`pediatricians and neonatologists in search of modality
`that would provide temporising support to premature
`infants with hyaline membrane disease and persistent
`pulmonary hypertension of the newborn (PPHN).
`
`
`
`Critical Care and Resuscitation 1998; 1: 7-14
`
`Table 1. Differences between high frequency jet ventilation (HFJV) and high frequency oscillation (HFO)
`
`HFJV
`HFO
`Rate (HZ)
`1.5-3.0
`3.0-15.0
`Expiration
`Passive
`Active
`Special ETT/reintubation
`Yes
`No
`Gas exchange
`
`
`++
`++
`↓ PaCO2
`+
`↑PaO2

`Cardiac output
`↑↓
`↓
`Tracheal injury
`++
`?
`
` Accordingly, net convective transport of gas occurs
`with each respiratory cycle. This mechanism of gas
`transport is particularly important at points of airway
`division, where velocity profiles are normally even more
`skewed.
` Taylor dispersion refers to the dispersion of gas
`within the airway that results from the interaction
`between the axial velocity profile of the breath and the
`forces of radial diffusion that act on bases in motion;
`this effect is enhanced by the turbulent flow encountered
`at airway branch points and by the high flow velocities
`seen with HFV. This mechanism
`contributes
`significantly to gas mixing during HFV.
`
`Finally, molecular diffusion is no less a factor in gas
`exchange with HFV than it is with CMV. Figure 2
`illustrates those locations within the lung where these
`various mechanisms of gas exchange are thought to
`predominate.
` HFO appears to be a therapy with great promise for
`the treatment of ARF refractory to management with
`CMV. It may also have a role in the prevention of
`iatrogenic lung injury and in the promotion of lung
`healing. A strategy that opens alveoli with a sustained
`inflation maneuver, maintains
`them open for gas
`exchange with sufficiently high airway pressure is most
`likely to achieve improved oxygenation and compliance,
`and decrease in lung injury.9
`frequent chest
`Proper monitoring of PaO2,
`
`radiographs, and serial determination of indices of
`pulmonary and cardiac function will decrease the
`potential for barotrauma and low cardiac output that is
`inherent with this therapy.
`
`Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO)
`
` During the early 1970s, numerous cases and small
`series were reported which led to a multi-institutional
`ECMO trial in 1975.10 This study, involving 9 centers
`over 2.5 years, randomised 90 adults patients with
`severe ARF to receive ECMO or CMV therapy.
`and
`Subsequently
`criticised
`for
`design
`
`methodological flaws, this study failed to demonstrate
`
`
`Figure 2. A representation of mechanisms of gas transport that
`predominate in given lung regions. 1 = bulk convection; 2 = Taylor
`dispersion; 3 = asymmetric velocity profiles; 4 = pendelluft; 5 =
`molecular diffusion. (From Wetzel RC, Gioia FR. High frequency
`ventilation. Pediatr Clin North Am 1987;34:15.)
`
`
`
`Indications for neonatal ECMO became more refined
`its complications became better understood
`as
`(particularly bleeding in the more premature patients). A
`prospective, randomised study was undertaken in 1985
`by O’Rourke et al in which neonates with ARF who fell
`into an 80% mortality group, as defined by
`historically derived predictor data, were randomised to
`therapy.11
`receive either ECMO or conventional
`Although the mortality in the control group was only
`half of that predicted, it was twice that in the ECMO
`
`
`
`88
`
`Ex. 2038-0003
`
`

`
`
`
`W. BUTT
`
`reached statistical
`that
`figure
`group, a survival
`significance and established ECMO as a standard
`therapy for selected groups of neonates, especially those
`with associated pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH).
` The success of ECMO in the neonatal population
`inspired renewed interest in applications of this therapy
`in the non-neonate, and once again, reports of successes
`in single cases and small series have begun to appear in
`the literature.12-15
`
`Technical aspects
` The advantages of veno-arterial compared with
`veno-venous ECMO include, maintaining a normal
`pulmonary blood flow, as an aid in lung healing,
`providing a better coronary blood pH and PaO2, and
`maintaining a pulsatile flow. Cerebral embolism is also
`less likely to occur as the normal pattern of cerebral
`arterial flow is maintained.
`
`Nitric oxide
` Multiple physical and chemical stimuli acting on
`receptors located on the endothelial cell membrane,
`activate the intracellular enzyme, nitric oxide synthetase,
`which catalyses the conversion of L-arginine to nitric
`oxide (NO). This reaction appears to be dependent on
`the
`presence
`of
`cofactors,
`including
`reduced
`nicotinamide
`adenine
`dinucleotide
`phosphate
`(NADPH)16 and sufficient substate17 and can be blocked
`by various arginine analogues.18 It may also involve
`active notrosothiol intermediates.19 The NO so formed
`diffuses easily and rapidly from the endothelial cells into
`subjacent vascular smooth muscle cells, where
`it
`stimulates
`guanylate
`cyclase
`to
`increase
`the
`concentration of cyclic guanosine monophosphate,
`which in turn causes smooth muscle relaxtion.20
` Nitrovasodilators currently
`in clinical use are
`thought to act via mechanisms that result in NO
`release.21 Any NO that reaches the vascular space is
`quickly inactivated by binding to the heme ring of
`haemoglobin, which ultimately
`is metabolised
`to
`methaemoglobin.22 Guanylate cyclase can also be
`inactivated by methylene blue,23 also limiting the effect
`of NO.
`
`Inhaled NO distributes to aerated lung only, where
`its localised vasodilating effect improves V/Q matching.
`Thereafter, any NO that diffuses into the vascular space
`is quickly inactivated by haemoglobin, so its systemic
`vasodilatory effects are minimal; thus inhaled NO acts
`as a selective pulmonary vasodilator.
` Laboratory studies prepared the way for trials of
`inhaled NO
`in a variety of disease processes
`characterised by PAH or severe V/Q mismatching.
`Roberts et al used inhaled NO at 80 parts per million
`(ppm) to treat six infants with PPHN, which increased
`
`88
`
`
`
`Critical Care and Resuscitation 1999; 1: 85-92
`
`preductal SaO2 in all six patients (88% to 97%) and
`postductal SaO2 in five of six patients (82% to 90%),
`without
`systemic
`hypotension
`or
`significant
`methaemoglobinaema.24 Little response was seen with a
`lower dose of NO and five of six patients manifested
`rebound PAH when the NO was discontinued after 30
`minutes. One patient continued to respond to NO for 23
`days.
` Kinsella et al, reported their experience treating nine
`neonates with PPHN using NO at 10 to 20 ppm.25
`Within 15 minutes of initiating NO at 10 ppm, the PaO2
`increased from 55 mmHg to 136 mmHg and the
`oxygenation index (i.e. mean airway pressure x FiO2 x
`100 ÷ PaO2) decreased from 60 to 26. No patient
`developed
`systemic
`hypotension
`or meth-
`aemoglobinaemia. Their first three of nine patients were
`treated with NO for less than 4 hours and, though they
`responded, they were referred for ECMO because the
`PAH persisted when the NO was discontinued. The last
`six of nine patients were treated for 24 hours with NO,
`the dose reduced progressively to 6 ppm; all continued
`to respond to NO administration, and none required
`ECMO.
`In a subsequent report, Kinsella et al, again noted a
`
`marked improvement in oxygenation with NO for
`neonates with PPHN.26 NO was initiated at 20 ppm for
`4 hours, then maintained at 6 ppm for 20 hours. Only 1
`out of 9 of these ECMO-eligible patients ultimately
`required ECMO; that patient received primarily left
`heart support for sepsis-induced low cardiac output and
`multiple organ system dysfunction. No patients had any
`haemodynamic compromise because of NO. The blood
`pressure was well maintained and heart rate fell,
`indicating a rising cardiac output, even in 2 of 3 of the
`patients with sepsis. Echocardiographic indices of PAH
`improved. Methaemoglobin levels peaked at 1.44 ±
`0.09% with the “loading dose” of NO but, at 24 hours,
`were no different than the pretreatment values.
`Finer et al studied 23 ECMO-eligible neonates
`
`treated with conventional medical
`therapy and
`surfactant, who continued to have an oxygenation index
`greater than 20.27 Fourteen of the 23 patients showed
`some improvement in oxygenation with NO at 5 to 80
`ppm, 1 in 14 responding hours later to NO having not
`responded initially, but 11 of 23 ultimately required
`ECMO. Eleven of 13 patients with echocardiographic
`signs of PAH responded to NO, whereas 7 of 10 with
`normal pulmonary artery pressures did not.
` Abman et al, reported a 28-week gestation neonate
`with PAH secondary to sepsis, who demonstrated
`improved oxygenation and decreased pulmonary artery
`pressure (PAP) when treated with low-dose NO.28 They
`speculated that NO might prove particularly helpful in
`the treatment of some preterm patients who were at great
`
`Ex. 2038-0004
`
`

`
`Critical Care and Resuscitation 1999; 1: 85-92
`
`
`
`W. BUTT
`
`patients for up to 53 days. Methaemoglobin levels
`remained less than 1.3%.
` Considerable potential exists with NO to reduce the
`short-term mortality and the long-term morbidity of
`severe cardiopulmonary failure in children. It appears
`that the long-sought selective pulmonary vasodilator
`may finally be here.
`
`Liquid ventilation
` The concept of liquid ventilation (LV) seems almost
`anti-evolutionary, yet, as a therapy for ARF, it offers
`several theoretic advantages compared with CMV for
`the safe, effective gas exchange in the surfactant-
`deficient lung.
`
`Forces
`that determine surface tension may be
`predicted by considering the Laplace equation;
`
`
`
`
`
`risk for injury with conventional therapy for ARF and
`PAH, but who were not ECMO-eligible, because of their
`age and size.
`
`Patients with PAH secondary to congenital heart
`disease may also benefit, both diagnostically and
`therapeutically, from NO. Roberts et al reported 10
`patients, aged from 3 months to 6.5 years, with
`structural congenital heart disease and PAH; 6 had
`septal defects with left-to-right shunts, and 5 had
`trisomy 21.29 Inhaled NO at 80 ppm was more effective
`at reducing pulmonary vascular resistance than oxygen
`at an FiO2 of 0.9. Pulmonary vascular resistance fell
`20% with oxygen, 26% with NO at 80 ppm, and 54%
`with a combination of the two. Patients with the highest
`pulmonary vascular resistance had the greatest response
`to NO. A decrease in the systemic vascular resistance
`did not occur. The authors suggested that, in addition to
`being a short-term treatment for patients with PAH, NO
`might be useful in the cardiac catheterisation laboratory
`to determine which patients have reactive rather than
`fixed pulmonary vascular disease.
` Wessel et al, determined
`to an
`the response
`acetylcholine infusion and NO in patients with structural
`congenital
`heart
`disease
`and PAH
`following
`cardiopulmonary bypass and repair.30 They noted that
`NO at 80 ppm was a potent and selective pulmonary
`vasodilator both before and after cardiopulmonary
`bypass, but
`that
`the vasodilatory
`response
`to
`acetylcholine was diminished (37% reduction versus a
`9% reduction) after cardiopulmonary bypass. They
`attributed
`this finding to cardiopulmonary bypass-
`induced pulmonary vascular endothelial dysfunction,
`with failure to release endogenous NO.
`
`Following relief of chronic mitral stenosis with PAH,
`Girard et al31 (in adults), and Atz et al32 (in children),
`showed a pulmonary vasodilatory response to NO
`without a decrease in systemic arterial pressure. Atz et
`al, speculated that in children, where mitral stenosis
`commonly coexists with
`important
`left ventricular
`outflow tract obstruction, NO might be of particular
`benefit because systemic diastolic pressure, and
`therefore coronary artery perfusion, might be better
`maintained using a selective pulmonary dilator without
`system vascular effects.
` A decrease in endothelium-dependent pulmonary
`vasodilation has been demonstrated with experimental
`syndrome,34
`shunts,33 Eisenmenger’s
`left-to-right
`idiopathic PAH,35 and COPD.36 Rossaint et al, treated
`10 adults with ARDS using NO at 18 ppm and observed
`a 19% decrease in mean PAP, a 14% decrease in
`intrapulmonary shunt, and a 31% increase in PaO2/FiO2,
`the cardiac output and mean arterial blood pressure
`remained unchanged.37 Inhaled NO remained effective
`even when administered continuously in one of these
`
`
`
`
`
`P = 2T/r
`
`
`Where,
`
`P = alveolar distending pressure
` T = surface tension
`
`r = radius of the alveolus
`
` This predicts that if surface tension is decreased,
`lung expansion can be accomplished more easily, and
`even small alveoli can be maintained open for gas
`exchange at low distending pressures. The risk of
`pressure-induced lung injury is also decreased.
`
`It has been reasoned that by using liquid functional
`residual capacity (FRC) and tidal gas breathing by
`CMV, oxygenation and carbon dioxide removal may be
`facilitated and one may improve pulmonary mechanics
`in the surfactant-deficient lung. Liquid-filled alveoli
`have a much diminished air-fluid interface, and thus, the
`surface tension forces that favor alveolar collapse are
`minimised. Other physical properties of fluid favor its
`more homogeneous distribution compared with gas, and
`therefore a more complete expansion of the lung.
`Oxygenation and ventilation will be directly enhanced if
`oxygen and carbon dioxide are highly soluble in the
`fluid used to inflate the alveoli, as the fluid itself will act
`as a gas exchange reservoir. Finally, the liquid can act
`mechanically
`to
`lavage particulate matter
`and
`inflammatory or infectious material from the lung, as
`well as delivering pharmacological agents to it.
`
`Theoretic advantages of liquid ventilation
`• Reduces lung distending pressures;
`• Facilitates homogeneous lung expansion;
`• Maintains functional residual capacity; and
`• Acts as a vehicle for pulmonary administration of
`drugs to the lung.
`
`
`
`89
`
`Ex. 2038-0005
`
`

`
`W. BUTT
`
` Two forms of LV are currently used: total (tidal)
`liquid ventilation (TLV), and partial liquid (PLV) or
`perfluorocarbon-associated gas exchange
`(PAGE).
`With TLV, a volume of perfluorocarbon equal to the
`lung’s functional residual capacity (FRC) is instilled via
`an endotracheal tube, and tidal volume (VT) aliquots of
`liquid are subsequently cycled to effect gas exchange,
`often utilising highly specialised apparatus. With PLV
`or PAGE, a volume of perfluorocarbon equal to the
`lung’s FRC is instilled into the trachea, but unlike TLV
`the subsequent tidal ventilation is performed with
`respiratory gas administered via a standard mechanical
`ventilator at conventional settings.
` An extensive
`experimental literature has accumulated over the last 25
`years for each form of LV, with animal studies
`documenting its efficacy and safety in mature and
`immature animals, both with and without a variety of
`respiratory disease processes. Succinct reviews of this
`topic have recently been published.38,39
` Liquid ventilation, especially the technically simpler
`PLV or PAGE, is a promising therapy, the applications
`for which are increasing in number. Studies to date have
`focused on its use to improve gas exchange and increase
`respiratory compliance in surfactant deficiency states,
`especially in immature animals. Experimental evidence
`reported by Fuhrman’s group supports its application in
`lung injury secondary to gastric aspiration40 and in oleic
`acid-induced ARDS.41 PAGE decreases protein loss into
`the alveoli if initiated prior to inducing ARDS with oleic
`acid.42 Perfluorocarbon will also decrease free radical
`in vitro,43
`production by alveolar macrophages
`supporting another lung-protective role. Hirschl et al,
`determined that a combination of TLV and PLV
`improves lung compliance and gas exchange in animals
`supported with ECMO following oleic-acid-induced
`lung injury, with LV decreasing the ECMO blood flow
`
`Table 2. Gas exchange and compliance in conventional mechanical ventilation versus perfluorocarbon-
`associated gas exchange
`
`
`
`Critical Care and Resuscitation 1999; 1: 85-92
`
`requirements.44 A recent report of gas exchange and
`compliance change in surfactant deficiency highlights
`the improvements in this group with PAGE and is
`summarised in Table 2.
`
`Investigations are also ongoing utilising LV
`techniques to improve delivery of a wide variety of
`medications to the lung, for example, antimicrobial
`agents, surfactants, and NO. “Dose-response” curves
`for various applications of LV need to be determined
`and new perfluorocarbons need to be developed, the
`physical properties of which will hopefully facilitate
`particular therapies.
`
`CONCLUSION
` CMV of patients with ARF has undergone many
`changes over the past quarter century, with ever more
`sophisticated strategies and technology being used.
`Despite these advances, mobidity and mortality have
`been improved only modestly, at best. Further advances
`with modification of conventional therapies are likely to
`be limited by their failure to address the underlying
`physiologic disturbances which lead to the clinical
`syndrome of ARF, and their poor success rate in
`minimising complications associated with the therapy.
` New approaches to treatment of ARF usually address
`some fundamental physiologic principle, for example,
`surface tension, heart-lung interaction,
`normalisation of lung function in the diseased state, or
`V/Q mismatch, in ways which minimise iatrogenic lung
`injury.
` A number of recently investigated novel therapies,
`including
`pressure-controlled
`ventilation
`with
`permissive hypercapnia, high-frequency ventilation,
`ECMO,
`inhaled nitric oxide
`therapy, and per-
`fluorocarbon liquid ventilation, show promise.
`
`
`
`Time (min)
`
`
`
`CMV
`-5
`
`-30
`
`5
`
`PAGE
`30
`
`60
`
`PaO2 (mm Hg)
`PaCO2 (mm Hg)
`pH
`CDyn (ml/cm H2O/kg)
`
`CMV = conventional mechanical ventilation; CDyn = dynamic compliance; PAGE = perfluorocarbon-associated gas exchange; PaCO2 = partial
`pressure of carbon dioxide, arterial; PaO2 = partial pressure of oxygen, arterial. From Leach CL, Fuhrman BP. Perfluorocarbon-associated gas
`exchange (PAGE) in surfactant deficiency. Am Rev Respir Dis 1992;145:A454.
`
`61 ± 6
`62 ± 6
`7.19 ± .05
`0.33 ± .03
`
`59 ± 6
`62 ± 4
`7.20 ± .04
`0.37 ± .04
`
`250 ± 28
`50 ± 4
`7.27 ± .03
`0.85 ± .09
`
`251 ± 18
`41 ± 3
`7.34 ± .04
`0.87 ± .08
`
`268 ± 38
`38 ± 3
`7.36 ± .04
`0.88 ± .10
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`90
`
`Ex. 2038-0006
`
`

`
`3.
`
`4.
`
`5.
`
`6.
`
`7.
`
`Received: 27 March 1998
`Accepted: 20 August 1998
`
`REFERENCES
`1. Davis SL, Furman DP, Costarino AT Jr. Adult
`respiratory distress syndrome in children: Associated
`disease, clinical course, and predictors of death. J
`Pediatr 1993;123:35-45.
`Lyrne RK, Truog WE. Adult respiratory distress
`syndrome in a pediatric intensive care unit: Predisposing
`conditions, clinical course, and outcome. Pediatrics
`1981;67:790-795.
`Rivera RA, Butt W, Shann F. Predictors of mortality in
`children with respiratory failure: Possible indications for
`ECMO. Anaesth Intensive Care 1990;18:385-389.
`Tamburro RF, Bugnitz MC, Stidham GL. Alveolar-
`arterial oxygen gradient as predictor of outcome in
`patients with non-neonatal pediatric respiratory failure. J
`Pediatr 1991;119:935-938
`Timmons OD, Dean JM, Vernon DD. Mortality rates
`and prognostic variables
`in children with adult
`respiratory distress syndrome. J Pediatr 1991;119:896-
`899.
`Freund A, Jorch G. Pediatric characteristics of adult
`respiratory distress syndrome: A meta-analysis. Klin
`Padiatr 1993;205:411-415.
`Froese AB, Bryan AC. High-frequency ventilation. Am
`Rev Respir Dis 1987;135:1363-1374.
`8. Wetzel RC, Gioia FR. High frequency ventilation.
`Pediatr Clin North Am 1987;34:15-38.
`9. Gerstmann DR, DeLemos RA, Clark RH. High-
`frequency ventilation: Issues of strategy. Clin Perinatol
`1991;18:563-580.
`10. Zapol WM, Snider MT, Hill JD, et al. Extracorporeal
`membrane oxygenation in severe acute respiratory
`failure. JAMA 1979;242:2193-2196.
`JP, et al.
`11. O'Rourke PP, Crone RK, Vacanti
`Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and conventional
`medical therapy in neonates with persistent pulmonary
`hypertension of the newborn: a prospective randomized
`study. Pediatrics 1989;84:957-963.
`12. Adolph V, Heaton J, Steiner R, Bonis S, Falterman K,
`Arensman R. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for
`non-neonatal
`respiratory
`failure.
`J Pediatr Surg
`1991;26:326-330.
`13. Butt W, Karl T, Horton A, Shann F, Mullaly R.
`Experience with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation
`in children more than one month old. Anaesth Intensive
`Care 1992;20:308-310.
`14. Steiner RB, Adolph VR, Heaton JF, Bonis SL,
`Falterman KW, Arensman RM. Pediatric extracorporeal
`membrane oxygenation in posttraumatic respiratory
`failure. J Pediatr Surg 1991;26:1011-1014.
`15. Weber TR, Tracy TF Jr, Connors R, Kountzman B,
`Pennington DG. Prolonged extracorporeal support for
`nonneonatal
`respiratory
`failure.
`J Pediatr Surg
`1992;27:1100-1104.
`16. Palmer RM, Moncada S. A novel citrulline-forming
`enzyme implicated in the formation of nitric oxide by
`
`Critical Care and Resuscitation 1999; 1: 85-92
`
`
`
`W. BUTT
`
`2.
`
`19.
`
`vascular endothelial cells. Biochem Biophys Res
`Commun 1989;158:348-352.
`17. Mitchell JA, Hecker M, Vane JR. The generation of L-
`arginine in endothelial cells is linked to the release of
`endothelim-derived relaxing factor. Eur J Pharmacol
`1990;176:253-254.
`18. Vargas HM, Cuevas JM, Ignarro LJ, Chaudhuri G.
`Comparison of the inhibitory potencies of N-methyl-, N-
`nitro and n-amino-L-arginine on EDRF function in the
`rat: Evidence for continuous basal EDRF release. J
`Pharmacol Exp Ther 1991;257:1208-1215.
`Ignarro LJ, Lippton H, Edwards JC, et al. Mechanism of
`vascular smooth muscle relaxation by organic nitrates,
`nitrites, nitroprusside, and nitric oxide: Evidence for the
`involvement of S-nitrosothiols as active intermediates. J
`Pharmacol Exp Ther 1981;218:739-749.
`20. Griffith TM, Edwards DH, Lewis MJ, Henderson AH.
`Evidence that cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP)
`mediates endothelium-dependent
`relaxation. Eur J
`Pharmacol 1985;112:195-202.
`21. Gruetter DY, Gruetter CA, Barry BK, et al. Activation
`of coronary artery guanylate cyclase by nitric oxide,
`nitroprusside, and nitrosoguanidine:
`Inhibition by
`calcium, lanthanum, and other cations; enhancement by
`thiols. Biochem Pharmacol 1980;29:2943-2950.
`22. Doyle MP, Hoekstra JW. Oxidation of nitrogen oxides
`by bound dioxygen in hemoproteins. J Inorg Biochem
`1981;14:351-358.
`23. Gruetter CA, Gruetter DY, Lyon JE, Kadowitz PJ,
`Ignarro LJ. Relationship between cyclic guanosine 3’-
`5’monophosphate formation and relaxation of coronary
`arterial
`smooth muscle
`by
`glyceryl
`trinitrate,
`nitroprusside, nitrite, and nitric oxide: effects of
`methylene blue and methemoglobin. J Pharmacol Exp
`Ther 1981;219:181-186.
`24. Roberts JD, Polaner DM, Lang P, Zapol WM. Inhaled
`nitric oxide in persistent pulmonary hypertension of the
`newborn. Lancet 1992;340:818-819.
`25. Kinsella JP, Neish SR, Shaffer E, Abman SH. Low-dose
`inhalational nitric oxide
`in persistent pulmonary
`hypertension of the newborn. Lancet 1992;340:819-820
`26. Kinsella JP, Neish SR, Ivy DD, Shaffer E, Abman SH.
`Clinical responses to prolonged treatment of persistent
`pulmonary hypertension of the newborn with low doses
`of inhaled nitric oxide. J Pediatr 1993;123:103-108.
`27. Finer NN, Etches PC, Kamstra B, Tierney AJ, Peliowski
`A, Ryan CA. Inhaled nitric oxide in infants referred for
`extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: dose response. J
`Pediatr 1994;124:302-308.
`28. Abman SH, Kinsella JP, Schaffer MS, Wilkening RB.
`Inhaled nitric oxide in the management of a premature
`newborn with severe respiratory distress and pulmonary
`hypertension. Pediatrics 1993;92:606-609.
`29. Roberts JD Jr, Lang P, Bigatello LM, Vlahakes GJ,
`Zapol WM. Inhaled nitric oxide in congenital heart
`disease. Circulation 1993;87:447-453.
`30. Wessel DL, Adatia I, Giglia TM, Thompson JE, Kulik
`TJ. Use of inhaled nitric oxide and acetylcholine in the
`evaluation of pulmonary hypertension and endothelial
`
`
`
`91
`
`Ex. 2038-0007
`
`

`
`W. BUTT
`
`
`
`
`Critical Care and Resuscitation 1999; 1: 85-92
`
`function after cardiopulmonary bypass. Circulation
`1993;88:2128-2138.
`31. Girard C, Lehot JJ, Pannetier JC, Filley S, Ffrench P,
`Estanove S. Inhaled nitric oxide after mitral valve
`replacement in patients with chronic pulmonary artery
`hypertension. Anesthesiology 1992;77:880-883.
`32. Atz AM, Adatia I, Jonas RA, Wessel DL. Inhaled nitric
`oxide in children with p

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket