throbber
QENTER F; LR DRIIQ EVALUATIQN AND RESEARLZH
`
`APPLIQATI1 LN NUMBER: NDA 20845
`
`FINAL PRINTED LAB ELLINQ
`
`i
`
`PRAXAIR ET AL. 1010
`
`i
`
`

`
`NO Labeling
`
`-
`
`Page 1 0f7
`
`INOmaxTM (nitric oxide) for inhalation
`
`100 and 800ppm (parts per million)
`
`DESCRIPTION
`
`INOmaxTM (nitric oxide gas) is a dmg administered by inhalation. Nitric oxide, the active substance in INOmax, is a
`pulmonary vasodilator. INOmax is a gaseous blend of nitric oxide (0.8%) and nitrogen (99.2%). INOmax is supplied in
`aluminum cylinders as a compressed gas under high pressure (2000 pounds per square inch gauge [psig]). _
`
`The structural fonnula of nitric oxide (NO) is shown below:
`
`In
`
`CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY
`
`Nitric oxide is a compound produced by many cells of the body. It relaxes vascular smooth muscle by binding to the heme
`moiety of cytosolic guanylate cyclase, activating guanylate cyelase and increasing intracellular levels of cyclic guanosine
`3’,5’-monophosphate, which then leads to vasodilation. When inhaled; nitric oxide produces pulmonary vasodilation.
`A
`
`INOmax appears to increase the partial pressure of arterial oxygen (PaO2) by dilating pulmonary vessels in better
`ventilated areas of the lung, redistributing pulmonary blood-‘flow away from lung regions with low ventilationjperfusion
`(V/Q) ratios toward regions with normal ratios.
`
`Effects on Pulmonary Vascular Tone in PPHN: Persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newbom (PPHN) occurs as a
`primary developmental defect or as a condition secondary to other diseases such as meconium aspiration syndrome
`(MAS), pneumonia,
`sepsis, hyaiine membrane disease, congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH), and pulmonary
`hypoplasia. In these states, pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) is high, which results in hypoxemia secondary to right-
`to— left shunting of blood through the patent ductus arteriosu_s and foramen ovale; In neonates with PPHN, INOmax
`improves oxygenation (as indicated by significant increases in PaO2).
`
`PHARMACOKINETICS
`
`The pharmacokinetics of nitric oxide has been studied in adults.
`
`Uptake and Distribution: Nitric oxide is absorbed systemically afier -inhalation. Most of it traverses the pulmonary
`capillary bed where it combines with hemoglobin that is 60% to 100% oxygen'- saturated. At
`this level of oxygen
`saturation, nitric oxide combines predominantly with oxyhemoglobin to produce methemoglobin and nitrate. At
`low
`oxygen saturation, nitric oxide can combine with deoxyhemoglobin to transiently form nitrosylhemoglobin, which is
`converted to nitrogen oxides and methemoglobin upon exposure to oxygen. Within the pulmonary system, nitric oxide
`can combine with oxygen and water to produce nitrogen dioxide and nitrite,
`respectively, which interact with
`oxyhemoglobin to produce methemoglobin and nitrate. Thus, the end products of nitric oxide that enter the systemic
`circulation are predominantly methemoglobin and nitrate.
`
`Metabolism: Methemoglobin disposition has been investigated as a function of time and nitric oxide exposure '
`concentration in neonates with respiratory failure. The methemoglobin (MetHb) concentration—time profiles during the
`first 12 hours of exposure to 0, 5, 20, and 80 ppm INOmax are shown in Figure 1.
`
`Methemoglobin Concentration- Time Profiles
`Neonates Inhaling 0, 5, 20 or 80 ppm INOmax
`
`http://www.fda.gov/cder/foi/label/1999/20845lb1.htm
`
`8/9/00 ‘
`
`001
`
`

`
`NO Labeling
`
`~
`
`Page 2 of 7
`
`Figure I
`
`Methemoglobin concentrations increased during the first 8 hours of nitric oxide exposure. The mean methemoglobin level
`remained below 1% in the placebo group ‘and in the 5 ppm and 20 ppm lNOmax groups, but reached approximately 5% in
`the 80 ppm 1NOmax group.Methemoglobin levels >7% were attained only in patients receiving 80 ppm, where they
`comprised 35% of the group. The average time to reach peak methemoglobin was 10 :1: 9 (SD) hours (median, 8 hours) in
`these 13 patients; but one patient did not exceed 7% until 40 hours.
`
`Elimination: Nitrate has been identified as the predominant nitric oxide metabolite excreted in the urine, accounting for
`>-70% of the nitric oxide dose inhaled. Nitrate is cleared from the plasma by the kidney at rates approaching the rate of
`glomerular filtration.
`
`CLINICAL TRIALS
`
`The efficacy of 1NOmax has been investigated in term and near-term newborns with hypoxic respiratory failure resulting
`from a variety of etiologies. Inhalation of INOmax reduces the oxygenation index (O1= mean airway pressure in cm H20
`x fraction of inspired oxygen concentration {FiO2] x l00 divided by systemic arterial concentration in mm Hg [PaO2]) and
`increases PaO2 (See CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY.)
`
`(i) NINOS study: The Neonatal Inhaled Nitric Oxide Study (NINOS) group conducted a double- blind, randomized,
`placebo-controlled, multicenter trial in 235 neonates with hypoxic respiratory failure. The objective of the study was to
`determine whether inhaled nitric oxide would reduce the occurrence of death and/or initiation of extracorporeal membrane
`oxygenation (ECMO) in a prospectively defined cohort of tenn or near-tenn neonates with hypoxic respiratory failure
`unresponsive to conventional therapy. Hypoxic respiratory failure was caused by meconium aspiration syndrome (MAS;
`49%), pneumonia/sepsis (21%), idiopathic primary pulmonary hypertension if the newborn (PPHN; 17%), or respiratory-
`distress syndrome (RDS; 11%). Infants S 14 days of age (mean, 1.7 days) with a mean PaO2 of 46 mm Hg and a mean
`oxygenation index (OI) of 43 cm H20 / mm Hg were initially randomized to receive 100% 02 with (n=l 14) or without
`(n=121) 20 ppm nitric oxide for up to 14 days. Response to study drug was defined as a change from baseline in PaO2 30
`minutes after starting treatment (full response = >20 mm Hg, partial = 10-20 mm Hg, no response = <10 mm Hg).
`Neonates with a less than full response were evaluated for a response to 80 ppm nitric oxide or control gas. The primary
`results from the NINOS study are presented in Table 1.
`
`http2//www.fda.gov/cder/foi/label/1999/2O8451b1.htm
`
`A
`
`.
`
`8/9/O0
`
`002
`
`

`
`NO Labeling
`
`‘
`
`Page 3 of 7
`
`Table 1
`
`Summary of Clinical Results from NINOS Study
`
`2 Control
`
`I NO
`
`1 Pvalue
`
`Q (n=l14)
`(n=i21)
`‘
`5
`"
`'
`l
`% 5“‘‘6‘’’°) T
`i
`,
`V
`.
`,
`.
`l *“”%> T
`'
`j
`l
`1
`* “<“°”°>
`l“‘”39%) W i
`
`a Extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation
`
`b Death or need for ECMO was the study’s primary end point.
`a
`
`Although the incidence of death by 120 days of age was similar in both groups (N0, 14%; control, 17%), significantly
`fewer infants in the nitric oxide group required ECMO compared with controls (39% vs. 55%, p = 0.014). The combined
`incidence of death and/or initiation of ECMO showed a significant advantage for the nitric oxide treated group (46% vs.
`64%, p 2 0.006). The nitric oxide group also had significantly greater increases in Pa02 and greater decreases in the O]
`and the alveolar-arterial oxygen gradient than the control group (p<0.001 for all parameters). Significantly more patients
`had at least a partial response to the initial administration of study drug in the nitric oxide group (66%) than the control
`group (26%, p<0.00l). Of the 125 infants who did not respond to 20 ppm nitric oxide or control, similar percentages of
`NO- treated (18%) and control (20%) patients had at least a partial response to 80 ppm nitric oxide for inhalation or
`control drug, suggesting a lack of additional benefit for the higher dose of nitric oxide.. No infant had study drug
`discontinued for toxicity. lnhalednitric oxide had no detectable effect on mortality.The adverse events collected in the
`NINOS trial occurred at similar incidence rates in both treatment groups. (See ADVERSE REACTIONS.) Follow-up
`exams were performedat 18-24 months for the infants enrolled in this trial. In the infants with available follow-up, the two
`treatment groups were similar with respect to theirmental, motor, audiologic, or neurologic evaluations.
`
`(ii) CINRGI study: This study was a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial of 186 term- and
`near-term neonates with pulmonary hypertension and hypoxic respiratory failure . The primary objective of the study was
`to detennine whether INOmax would reduce the receipt of ECMO in these patients. Hypoxic respiratory failure was
`caused by MAS (35%), idiopathic PPHN (30%), pneumonia/sepsis (24%), or RDS (8%). Patients with a mean Pa02 of 54
`mm Hg and a mean (01) of 44 cm H20 / mm Hg were randomly assigned to receive either 20 ppm INOrr_1ax (n=97) or
`nitrogen gas (placebo; n=89) in addition to their ventilatory support. Patients who exhibited a Pa02 >60 mm Hg and a pH
`< 7.55 were weaned to 5 ppm INOmax or placebo. The primary results from the CINRGI study are presented in Table 2.
`
`Table 2
`
`Summary of Clinical Results from CINRGI Study
`
`—“
`
`3°'97<3‘%> 5
`’*9<57%>
`4 W 7 3’”<3%) i
`
`a Extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation
`
`“ ECMO was the primary end point of this study.
`
`http://www.fda.gov/cder/foiflabell1999/20845lbl.htm
`
`8/9/00-
`
`003
`
`

`
`NO Labeling
`
`‘
`
`Page 4 Of 7
`
`Significantly fewer neonates in the INOmax group required ECMO compared to the control group (31% vs. 57%,
`p<0.00l). While the number of deaths were similar in both groups (INOmax, 3%; placebo, 6%), the combined incidence
`of death and/or receipt of ECMO was decreased in the INOmax group (33% vs. 58%, p<0.0Dl).
`
`In addition, the INOmax group had significantly improved oxygenation as measured by Pa02, 01, and alveolar-arterial
`gradient (p<0.00I for all parameters). Of the 97 patients treated with INOmax, 2 (2%) were withdrawn fi'om study drug
`due to methemoglobin levels >4%. The fiequency and number of adverse events reported were similar in the two study
`groups. (See ADVERSE REACTIONS.)
`
`INDICATIONS
`
`INOmax, in conjunction with ventilatory support and other appropriate agents, is indicated for the treatment of term and
`near-tenn (>34 weeks) neonates with hypoxic respiratory failure associated with clinical or echocardiographic evidence of
`pulmonary hypertension, where it improves oxygenation and reduces me need for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.
`
`CONTRAINDICATIONS
`
`INOmax should not be used inthe treatment of neonates known to be dependent on right-to-left shunting of blood.
`
`PRECAUTIONS
`
`Rebound
`
`-‘
`
`Abrupt discontinuation of INOmax may lead to worsening oxygenation and increasing pulmonary artery pressure.
`
`_ Methemoglobinemia
`
`Methemogloginemia increases with the close of nitric oxide. In the clinical trials, maximum methemoglobin levels usually
`were reached approximately 8 hours afier initiation of inhalation, although methemoglobin levels have peaked as late as
`40 hours following initiation of INOmax therapy. In one study._]3 of 37 (35%) of neonates treated with INOmax 80 ppm
`had methemoglobin levels exceeding 7%. Following discontinuation or reduction of nitric oxide the methemoglobin
`levels remmed to baseline over a period of hours.
`
`Elevated N02 Levels
`
`In one study, N02 levels were <0.5 ppm when neonates were treated with placebo, 5 ppm, and 20 ppm nitric oxideover
`the first 48 hours. The 80 ppm group had a mean peak N02 level of 2.6 ppm.
`'
`
`Drug Interactions
`
`No formal drug- interaction studies have been performed, and a clinically significant interaction with other medications
`_ used in the treatment of hypoxic respiratory failure cannot be excluded based on the available data. In particular, although
`there are no data to evaluate the possibility, nitric oxide donor compounds,
`including sodium nitroprusside and
`nitroglycerin, may have an additive effect with INOmax on the risk of developing methemoglobinemia. INOmax has been
`administered with tolazoline, dopamine, dobutamine, steroids, surfactant, and high-frequency ventilation.
`
`Carcinogenesis, Mutagenesis, Impairment of Fertility
`
`No long-tenn studies in animals to evaluatethe carcinogenic potential of nitric oxide have been perfonned. Nitric oxide
`has demonstrated genotoxicity in Salmonella (Ames Test), human lymphocytes, and after in vivo exposure in rats. There
`are no animal or human studies to evaluate nitric oxide for" effects on fertility or harm to the developing fetus.
`
`Pregnancy: Category C
`
`http://www.fda.gov/cder/foi/label/1999/20845lbl.htm
`
`'
`
`8/9/00
`
`004
`
`

`
`NO Labeling
`
`_
`
`I
`
`Page 5 of 7
`
`Animal reproduction studies have not been conducted with lNOmax. It is not known whether lNOmax can cause fetal
`harm when administered to a pregnant woman or can affect reproduction capacity. lNOmax is not intended for adults.
`
`' Pediatric Use
`
`Nitric oxide for inhalation has been studied in a neonatal population (up to 14 days of age). No information about its
`effectiveness in other age populations is available.
`
`Nursing Mothers
`
`Nitric oxide is not indicated for use in the adult population, including nursing mothers. It is not known whether nitric
`oxide is excreted in human milk.
`
`ADVERSE REACTIONS
`
`Controlled studies have included 325 patients on "lNOmax doses of 5 to 80 ppm and 251 patients on placebo. Total
`mortality in the pooled trials was 11% on placebo and 9% on iN0max, a result adequate to exclude lNOmax mortality
`being more than 40% worse than placebo.
`
`in both the NINOS and CINRGI studies, the duration of hospitalization was similar in INOmax- and placebo- treated
`groups.
`
`From all controlled studies,‘ at least 6 months of follow-up is available for 278 patients who received lNOmax and 212
`patients who received placebo. Among these patients, there was no evidence of an adverse effect of treatment on the need
`for rehospitalization, special medical services, pulmonary disease, or neurological sequelae.
`
`In the NINOS, treatment groups were similar with respect to the incidence and severity of intracranial hemorrhage; Grade
`IV hemorrhage, periventricular leukomalacia, cerebral infarction, seizures requiring anticonvulsant therapy, pulmonary
`hemorrhage, or gastrointestinal hemorrhage.
`
`The table below shows adverse events with an incidence of at least 5% on lNOmax in the CINRGI study, and that were
`more common on lNOmax than on placebo.
`
`ADVERSE EVENTS IN THE CINRGI TRIAL
`
`I Aerse Event
`
`-
`
`I
`
`Placebo (n=8)
`
`.
`
`Inhaled N0 (n=97)
`
`iI I
`
`i" 9 (9%)
`
`http'://www.fda.gov/cder/foi/label/1999/208451b].htm
`
`’
`
`8/9/00
`
`005
`
`

`
`NO Labeling
`
`A
`
`OVERDOSAGE
`
`36%)
`
`Page 6 of 7
`
`Overdosage with lNOmax will be manifest by elevations in methemoglobin and N02. Elevated N02 may cause acute lung
`injury. Elevations in rnethemoglobinemia reduce the oxygen delivery capacity of the circulation. In clinical studies, N02
`levels >3 ppm or methemoglobin levels >7% were treated by reducing the dose of or discontinuing INOrnax.
`
`Methemoglobinemia that does not resolve after reduction or discontinuation of therapy can be treated with intravenous
`vitamin C, intravenous methylene blue, or blood transfusion, based upon the clinical situation.
`
`DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION
`
`Dosage
`
`The recommended dose of INOmax is 20 ppm. Treatment should be maintained up to 14 days or until the underlying
`oxygen desaturation has resolved and the neonate is ready to be weaned from INOmax therapy.
`—
`
`An initial dose of 20 ppm was used in the NINOS and CINRGI trials. in CINRGI, patients whose oxygenation improved
`with 20 ppm were dose-reduced to 5 ppm as tolerated at the end of 4 hours of treatment. In the NINOS trial, patients who
`oxygenation failed to improve on 20 ppm could be increased to 80 ppm, but those patients did not then improve on the
`higher dose. As the risk of methemoglobinemia and elevated N02 levels increases significantly when lNOmax is
`administered at_,doses >20 ppm, doses above this level ordinarily should not be used.
`
`Administration
`
`Additional therapies should be used to maximize oxygen delivery. In patients with collapsed alveoli, additional therapies
`might includelsurfactant and high frequency oscillatory ventilation.
`
`The safety and effectiveness of inhaled nitric oxide have been established in a population receiving other therapies for
`hypoxic respiratory failure, including vasodilators, intravenous fluids, bicarbonate therapy, and mechanical ventilation.
`Different dose regimens for nitric oxide were used in the clinicalstudies (see CLINICAL STUDIES).
`
`INOmax should be administered with monitoring for PaO2, methemoglobin, and N02.
`
`The nitric oxide delivery systems used in the clinical trials provided operator-determined concentrations of nitric oxide in
`the breathing gas, and the concentration was constant throughout the respiratory cycle. INOmax must be delivered
`through a system with these characteristics and which does not cause generation of excessive inhaled nitrogen dioxide.
`The IN0ventTM system and other systems meeting these criteria were used in the clinical trials. In the ventilated neonate,
`precise monitoring of inspired nitric oxide and N02 should be instituted, using a properly calibrated analysis device with
`alarms. This system should be calibrated using a precisely defined calibration mixture of nitric oxide and nitrogen
`dioxide, such as INOcal"”'
`. Sample gas for analysis should be drawn before the Y-piece, proximal to the patient. Oxygen
`levels should also be measured.
`*
`
`In the event of a system failure or a wall-outlet power failure, a backup battery power supply and reserve nitric oxide i
`delivery system should be available.
`
`The lNOmax dose should not be discontinued abruptly as it may result in an increase in pulmonary artery pressure and/or
`worsening of blood oxygenation (PaO2). Deterioration in oxygenation and elevation in PAP may also occur in children
`with no apparent response to INOmax. Discontinue/wean cautiously.
`
`HOW SUPPLIED
`
`INOmaxT” (nitric oxide} is available in the following sizes:
`
`Size D Portable aluminum cylinders containing 353 liters at STP of nitric oxide gas in 800 ppm
`concentration in nitrogen (delivered volume 344 liters) (NDC 64693-002-D1)
`'
`
`Size D Portable aluminum cylinders containing 353 liters at STP of nitric oxide gas in 100 ppm
`
`http://www.fdagov/cder/foi/label/1999/20845lbl.htm
`
`8/9/00
`
`006
`
`

`
`NO Labeling
`
`I
`
`I
`
`Page 7 of '7
`
`concentration in nitrogen (delivered volume 344 liters) (NDC 64693-001-01)
`
`Size 88 Aluminum cylinders containing 1963 liters at STP of nitric oxide gas in 800 ppm concentration in
`nitrogen (delivered volume 1918 liters) (NDC 64693-002-02 )
`
`Size 88_Aluminum cylinders containing 1963 liters at STP of nitric oxide gas in I00 ppm concentration in
`nitrogen (delivered volume 1918 liters) (NDC 64693-001-02)
`
`Store at 25°C (77°F) with excursions permitted between 15-30°C (59-86°F). '[See USP Controlled Room Temperature}
`
`Occupational Exposure
`
`The exposure limit set by me Occupational Safety and-Health Administration (OSHA) for nitric oxide is 25 ppm and for
`N02 the limit is 5 ppm.
`-
`.
`
`CAUTION
`
`_
`
`Federal law prohibits dispensing without a prescription.
`
`[NO Therapeutics, Inc
`
`54 Old Highway 22
`
`Clinton, NJ 08_809 USA
`
`http://www.fda.gov/cder/foi/label/1 999/20845lb1.htm
`
`007

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket